Thursday, October 17, 2024

4578 - JAMES WEBB - discoveries strange galaxies?

 

-  4578  -  JAMES  WEBB  -  discoveries strange galaxies?     James Webb Space Telescope results have revealed that there may not be a Hubble tension after all. But contradictions within the findings point to a deeper mystery.   For years, astronomers have found that the universe appears to be expanding at different speeds depending on where they look, a conundrum they call the “Hubble tension”.\


----------------------------------  4578  -   JAMES  WEBB  -  discoveries strange galaxies?

-

-   When JWST came online in 2022, one team of researchers used the space telescope's unprecedented accuracy to confirm the tension exists. But according to the new results from a different team of scientists, the Hubble tension may arise from measurement error and be an illusion after all. Yet even these results are not definitive.

-

-    Currently, there are two gold-standard methods for figuring out the Hubble constant, a value that describes the expansion rate of the universe. The first involves poring over tiny fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background.  The CMB is an ancient relic of the universe's first light produced just 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

-

-    After mapping out this microwave hiss using the European Space Agency's Planck satellite, cosmologists inferred a Hubble constant of roughly 46,200 mph per million light-years, or around 67 kilometers per second per megaparsec (km/s/Mpc). This, alongside other measurements of the early universe, aligned with theoretical predictions.

-

-    The second method operates at closer distances and in the universe's later life using pulsating stars called Cepheid variables. Cepheid stars are slowly dying, and their outer layers of helium gas grow and shrink as they absorb and release the star's radiation, making them periodically flicker like distant signal lamps.

-

-   As Cepheids get brighter, they pulsate more slowly, enabling astronomers to measure the stars' intrinsic brightness. By comparing this brightness to their observed brightness, astronomers can chain Cepheids into a "cosmic distance ladder" to peer ever deeper into the universe's past.

-

-   The Hubble constant measured using the Hubble Space Telescope and JWST found a puzzlingly high value of 73.2 km/s/Mpc. Hence the tension, a significant discrepancy between methods measuring the expansion rate in the early universe and those in the more modern one.

-

-  It was suggested that dust, gas and other stars could be throwing off the brightness measurements of the Cepheids, creating the appearance of a discrepancy where there isn‘t one at all.

-

-   In this study, to tease out a possible systematic error in Cepheid crowding, astronomer trained JWST on 11 nearby galaxies containing Type Ia supernovae, measuring their distances and anchoring them to three independent distance ladders with intrinsic brightnesses in similar regions of the sky: the Cepheids; and two other standard candle red giant stars known as "tip-of-the-red-giant-branch" (TRGB) stars and J-region asymptotic giant branch (JAGB) stars.

-

-    The TRGB and JAGB stars gave Hubble constant results of 69.85 km/s/Mpc and 67.96 km/s/Mpc, respectively. But the Cepheids returned 72.04 km/s/Mpc, replicating the Hubble tension.

-

-     JWST confirms the earliest galaxy in the universe is bursting with way more stars than we thought possible.    Named JADES-GS-z14-0, the galaxy formed at least 290 million years after the Big Bang, and contains stars that have been bursting into life since an estimated 200 million years after our universe began.

-

-   These mysterious origins and rapid development of the stars has opened up some fundamental questions about how our universe came to be.   The discovery by JWST of an abundance of luminous galaxies in the very early Universe suggests that galaxies developed rapidly, in apparent tension with many standard models.

-

-   Astronomers aren't certain when the very first globules of stars began to clump into the galaxies we see today, but cosmologists previously estimated that the process began slowly within the first few hundred million years after the Big Bang.

-

-    Current theories suggest that halos of dark matter (a mysterious and invisible substance believed to make up 85% of the total matter in the universe) combined with gas to form the first seedlings of galaxies. One billion to 2 billion years into the universe's life, these early protogalaxies reached adolescence, forming into dwarf galaxies that began devouring one another to grow into ones like our own.

-

-   In February 2023, a group of astronomers analyzing data from the telescope discovered a group of six gargantuan galaxies, aged between 500 to 700 million years after the Big Bang, that were so massive they were in tension with 99% of cosmological models.

-

-   The light from JADES-GS-z14-0 is similarly puzzling.   The light detected by NIRSpec finds its origins in an enormous halo of young stars surrounding the galaxy's core, which have been burning for at least 90 million years before the point of its observation. The galaxy is also crammed with unusually high quantities of dust and oxygen, which suggests its history of star birth and death may be even longer.

-

-    This finding shows that ultra-bright galaxies in the early universe are not just the product of active black holes greedily gobbling up matter, as is often assumed to be the case. The new observations show that runaway star formation is also a viable explanation for the surprising brightness of these ancient galaxies.

-

-   So how did galaxies like JADES-GS-z14-0 produce so many stars, so quickly? Answers to this cosmic mystery remain elusive, but it's unlikely they will break our current understanding of cosmology. Instead, astronomers are toying with explanations that include the earlier-than-anticipated appearance of giant black holes; supernova feedback; or even dark energy to understand why these ancient stars were able to form so rapidly.

-

-

October 17, 2024             JAMES  WEBB  -  discoveries strange galaxies?                4578

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, October 17, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Tuesday, October 15, 2024

4576 - HUBBLE TENSION - how fast is Universe expanding?

 

-   4576  -   HUBBLE  TENSION  -  how fast is Universe expanding?    The “Hubble Tension' is the dilemma that the expansion rate for the Universe seems to be different depending on what direction you look or how you measure it.  The James Webb Space Telescope results have revealed that there may not be a Hubble tension after all. But contradictions within the findings point to a deeper mystery.


-

------------------=-=----------  4576  -   HUBBLE  TENSION  -  how fast is Universe expanding? 

-

-    New measurements taken with JWST have deepened the scientific controversy of the “Hubble tension”, suggesting it may not exist at all.   For years, astronomers have found that the universe appears to be expanding at different speeds depending on where they look, a conundrum they call the “Hubble tension”. Some of the measurements agree with our best current understanding of the universe, while others threaten to break it.

-

-   When JWST came online in 2022, one team of researchers used the space telescope's unprecedented accuracy to confirm the tension exists. But according to the new results from a different team of scientists, the Hubble tension may arise from measurement error and be an illusion after all. Yet even these results are not definitive.

-

-    Currently, there are two gold-standard methods for figuring out the “Hubble constant of Universe expansion rate” a value that describes this expansion rate. The first involves poring over tiny fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background which is an ancient relic of the universe's first light produced just 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

-

-   After mapping out this microwave hiss using the European Space Agency's Planck satellite, cosmologists inferred a Hubble constant of  “46,200 mph per million light-years”, or around “67 kilometers per second per megaparsec (km/s/Mpc)”. This, alongside other measurements of the early universe, aligned with many theoretical predictions.

-

-   The second method operates at closer distances and in the universe's later life using pulsating stars called “Cepheid variables”. Cepheid stars are slowly dying, and their outer layers of helium gas grow and shrink as they absorb and release the star's radiation, making them periodically flicker like distant signal lamps.

-

-  As Cepheids get brighter, they pulsate more slowly, enabling astronomers to measure the stars' intrinsic brightness. By comparing this brightness to their observed brightness, astronomers can chain Cepheids into a "cosmic distance ladder" to peer ever deeper into the universe's past.

-

-   Astronomer measured the Hubble constant using the Hubble Space Telescope and JWST, they found a puzzlingly high value of 73.2 km/s/Mpc. Hence the tension, a significant discrepancy between methods measuring the expansion rate in the early universe and those in the more modern one.

-

-   But some previously suggested that dust, gas and other stars could be throwing off the brightness measurements of the Cepheids, creating the appearance of a discrepancy where there isn‘t one at all.

-

-   In the new study, to tease out a possible systematic error in Cepheid crowding, they trained JWST on 11 nearby galaxies containing Type Ia supernovae, measuring their distances and anchoring them to three independent distance ladders with intrinsic brightnesses in similar regions of the sky: the Cepheids; and two other standard candle red giant stars known as "tip-of-the-red-giant-branch" (TRGB) stars and J-region asymptotic giant branch (JAGB) stars.

-

-    Their results were puzzling. The TRGB and JAGB stars gave Hubble constant results of 69.85 km/s/Mpc and 67.96 km/s/Mpc, respectively. But the Cepheids returned 72.04 km/s/Mpc, replicating the Hubble tension.

-

-   To make a measurement of Cepheid stars you get the star colors wrong, you get the dust correction wrong, you get the metallicity correction wrong. And, you get a different expansion rate.

-

-   Astronomers believe the answer is to make even more measurements, potentially some with an additional type of star. This work to be completed in the next two years.   JWST is a marvelous machine, and it's exactly what we need to get at some of these kinds of issues. It's a good time to be working on this.

-

-

October 15, 2024        HUBBLE  TENSION  -  how fast is Universe expanding?          4576

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, October 15, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4577 - OLDEST GALAXIES - too old to make sense?

 

-  4577  -   OLDEST  GALAXIES  -  too old to make sense?  -  The  James Webb Space Telescope found "tiny red dots" in the early universe representing overgrown supermassive black holes and stars that are impossibly old for the infant universe.


----------------------------  4577  -   OLDEST  GALAXIES  -  too old to make sense?

-

-    These “odd red bodies” hide stars that models suggest are "too old" to have lived during early cosmic times and black holes that measure up to thousands of times larger than the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way. Scientists believe these objects must have been born in a way unique to the early universe by a method that seems to have ceased after around 1 billion years of its existence.

-

-   The three little red dots are seen as they were when the universe was between 600 million and 800 million years old. Though that may seem like a tremendously long time after the Big Bang, the fact that the universe is 13.8 billion years old means it was no more than 5% of its current age when these objects existed.

-

-    This is very confusing.  You can make this uncomfortably fit in our current model of the universe, but only if we evoke some exotic, insanely rapid formation at the beginning of time.

The researchers studied the intensity of different wavelengths of light coming from the little red dots. This revealed signs that the stars are hundreds of millions of years old.  This is far older than is expected for stars at this early stage of the universe.

-

-   The researchers also saw traces of supermassive black holes within the little red dots' regions with masses equivalent to millions, sometimes even billions, of suns. These black holes are between 100 and 1,000 times as massive as Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way that sits just 26,000 light-years from Earth.

-

-   Both of these discoveries are not expected under current models of cosmic evolution, galaxy growth, or supermassive black hole formation. All of these theories suggest galaxies and supermassive black holes grow in lockstep, but this growth takes billions of years.

-

-    They have also confirmed that these galaxies appear to be packed with ancient stars, hundreds of millions of years old, in a universe that is only 600 million to 800 million years old.   These objects hold the record for the earliest signatures of old starlight.   It was totally unexpected to find old stars in a very young universe. These luminous objects do not quite fit comfortably into commology theories.

-

-   They first spotted the little red dots while using the JWST back in July, 2024. At the time, the researchers immediately suspected the objects were actually galaxies that existed roughly     13.5 billion years ago.  Deeper investigation of these objects' light spectra confirmed these as galaxies that lived during the very dawn of time and also revealed that "overgrown" supermassive black holes and impossibly "old" stars were powering the red dots' impressive light output.

-

-   They are not certain how much of the light from the little red dots comes from each of these sources. That means these galaxies are either unexpectedly old and more massive than the Milky Way, having formed far earlier than models predict, or have normal amounts of mass yet overly massive black holes somehow.  These are voids that are vastly more massive than a similar galaxy would have during the current epoch of the universe.

-

-    Distinguishing between light from material falling into a black hole and light emitted from stars in these tiny, distant objects is challenging.    That inability to tell the difference in the current dataset leaves ample room for interpretation of these intriguing object.

-

-  All black holes have light-trapping boundaries called "event horizons,", however much light they contribute to the little red dots,  must come from the material that surrounds them rather than from within.

-

-    The tremendous gravitational influence of the black holes generates turbulent conditions in this material, which also feeds the black hole over time, heating it and causing it to glow brightly. Regions powered by supermassive black holes in this way are called "quasars," and the regions of their galaxies they sit in are known as "active galactic nuclei (AGNs).

-

-   These newly found, "red dot" black hole regions could be different from other quasars, even those the JWST has already seen in the early universe.   The red dot black holes seem to produce far more ultraviolet light than expected. Still, the most shocking thing about these supermassive black holes remains just how massive they seem.

-

-   Normally, supermassive black holes are paired with galaxies.   They grow up together and go through all their major life experiences together. But here, we have a fully formed adult black hole living inside of what should be a baby galaxy.

-

-    That doesn't really make sense because these things should grow together, or at least that’s what we thought.  The red dot galaxies themselves are also surprising. They seem to be much smaller than other galaxies despite having almost as many stars. That means the red dot galaxies seem to consist of between 10 billion and 1 trillion stars crammed into a galaxy a few hundred light-years across with a volume 1,000 times smaller than the Milky Way.

-

-   If the Milky Way were reduced to the size of one of these red dot galaxies, then the closest star to the sun (Proxima Centauri, which is 4.2 light-years away) would be within the solar system. Additionally, the distance between the Earth and the Milky Way's supermassive black hole, Sgr A*, would be reduced from 26,000 light-years to just 26 light-years. That would see it and its surroundings appearing in the night sky over Earth.

-

-   These early galaxies would be so dense with stars.  These stars that must have formed in a way we've never seen, under conditions we would never expect during a period in which we’d never expect to see them.    The universe stopped making objects like these after just a couple of billion years. They are unique to the early universe.

-

-   Astronomers will be obtaining deeper spectra by pointing the JWST at the red objects for prolonged periods of time to obtain emission spectra of light associated with various elements. This could help unravel the contributions of ancient stars and supermassive black holes in the galaxies.

-

-

October 15, 2024          OLDEST  GALAXIES  -  too old to make sense?                   4577

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, October 15, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Sunday, October 13, 2024

4575 - FARTHEST GALAXIES - earliest galaxies?

 

-  4575  -  FARTHEST GALAXIES  -  earliest galaxies?  -   James Webb Space Telescope found "tiny red dots" in the early universe representing overgrown supermassive black holes and stars that are impossibly old for the infant universe.  These odd red bodies hide stars that models suggest are "too old" to have lived during early cosmic times and black holes that measure up to thousands of times larger than the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way.

-


----------------------------------------------  4575  -    FARTHEST GALAXIES  -  earliest galaxies?

-

-    Scientists believe these “tiny red dots” must have been born in a way unique to the early universe by a method that seems to have ceased after around 1 billion years of its existence.  The three little red dots are seen as they were when the universe was between 600 million and 800 million years old.

-

-    Though that may seem like a tremendously long time after the Big Bang, the fact that the universe is 13.8 billion years old means it was no more than 5% of its current age when these objects existed.

-

-  Scientists from Penn State University saw these mysterious crimson cosmic oddities when investigating the early universe with the JWST's Near Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec) instrument as part of the RUBIES survey. 

-

-   What's behind the dots?  The researchers studied the intensity of different wavelengths of light coming from the little red dots. This revealed signs that the stars are hundreds of millions of years old.  This is far older than is expected for stars at this early stage of the universe.

-

-   The researchers also saw traces of supermassive black holes within the little red dots' regions with masses equivalent to millions, sometimes even billions, of suns. These black holes are between 100 and 1,000 times as massive as Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), the supermassive black hole at the heart of the Milky Way that sits just 26,000 light-years from Earth.

-

-    Both of these discoveries are not expected under current models of cosmic evolution, galaxy growth, or supermassive black hole formation. All of these theories suggest galaxies and supermassive black holes grow in lockstep, but,  this growth takes billions of years, not millions of years.  That's a difference of a 1000 times???

-

-   These regions appear to be packed with ancient stars, hundreds of millions of years old, in a universe that is only 600 million to 800 million years old. Remarkably, these objects hold the record for the earliest signatures of old starlight.  It was totally unexpected to find old stars in a very young universe.

-

-    They first spotted the little red dots while using the JWST back in July. At the time, the researchers immediately suspected the objects were actually galaxies that existed roughly 13.5 billion years ago.

-

-    Deeper investigation of these objects' light spectra confirmed these as galaxies that lived during the very dawn of time and also revealed that "overgrown" supermassive black holes and impossibly "old" stars were powering the red dots' impressive light output.

-

-    These galaxies are either unexpectedly old and more massive than the Milky Way, having formed far earlier than models predict, or have normal amounts of mass yet overly massive black holes somehow.

-

-    Distinguishing between light from material falling into a black hole and light emitted from stars in these tiny, distant objects is challenging.    Of course, all black holes have light-trapping boundaries called "event horizons," meaning that, however much light they contribute to the little red dots, it must come from the material that surrounds them rather than from within.

-

-    The tremendous gravitational influence of the black holes generates turbulent conditions in this material, which also feeds the black hole over time, heating it and causing it to glow brightly. Regions powered by supermassive black holes in this way are called "quasars," and the regions of their galaxies they sit in are known as "active galactic nuclei (AGNs)."

-

-   These newly found, "red dot" black hole regions could be different from other quasars, even those the JWST has already seen in the early universe.   The red dot black holes seem to produce far more ultraviolet light than expected. Still, the most shocking thing about these supermassive black holes remains just how massive they seem.

-

-    The ultraviolet light has the highest energy.  By the time that light reasches us it lost energy and is in the red end of the light spectrum.

-

-   Normally, supermassive black holes are paired with galaxies.    They grow up together and go through all their major life experiences together. But here, are fully formed adult black hole living inside of what should be a baby galaxy.   That doesn't really make sense because these things should grow together, or at least that’s what we thought.

-

-    Using both the Gemini North telescope and the Subaru Telescope, a team of astronomers have discovered a pair of merging quasars seen only 900 million years after the Big Bang. Not only is this the most distant pair of merging quasars ever found, but also the first confirmed pair found in the period of the universe known as “cosmic dawn”.

-

-    The red dot galaxies themselves are also surprising. They seem to be much smaller than other galaxies despite having almost as many stars. That means the red dot galaxies seem to consist of between 10 billion and 1 trillion stars crammed into a galaxy a few hundred light-years across with a volume 1,000 times smaller than the Milky Way.

-

-   To put that into context, if the Milky Way were reduced to the size of one of these red dot galaxies, then the closest star to the sun (Proxima Centauri, which is 4.2 light-years away) would be within the solar system. Additionally, the distance between the Earth and the Milky Way's supermassive black hole, Sgr A*, would be reduced from 26,000 light-years to just 26 light-years. That would see it and its surroundings appearing in the night sky over Earth.

-

-    These early galaxies would be dense with stars.   Stars must have formed in a way we've never seen, under conditions we would never expect during a period in which we’d never expect to see them.   And, the universe stopped making objects like these after just a couple of billion years. They are unique to the early universe.

-

-    The team intends to follow up on its findings with more observations of these confusing little red dots to understand the dots' mysteries better. This will include obtaining deeper spectra by pointing the JWST at the red objects for prolonged periods of time to obtain emission spectra of light associated with various elements. This could help unravel the contributions of ancient stars and supermassive black holes in the galaxies.

-

-    There's another way that we could have a breakthrough, and that's just having the right idea. We have all these puzzle pieces, and they only fit if we ignore the fact that some of them are breaking. This problem is amenable to a stroke of genius that has so far eluded us, all of our collaborators, and the entire scientific community.

-

-

October 12, 2024           FARTHEST GALAXIES  -  earliest galaxies?                 4575

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Sunday, October 13, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Thursday, October 10, 2024

4574 - QUANTUM COMPUTER - on the Space Station?

 

-    4574 -  QUANTUM  COMPUTER  -  on the Space Station?   How a quantum sensor on the ISS could revolutionize space exploration.  This space-based atom interferometry will lead to exciting new discoveries and fantastic quantum technologies impacting everyday life, and will transport us into a quantum future.

-


------------------------------------  4574  -  QUANTUM  COMPUTER  -  on the Space Station?

-

-    Scientists onboard the International Space Station (ISS) have announced that, for the first time, they have successfully made high-precision measurements using a quantum sensor based on ultra-cold atoms of the element Rubidium.This is a significant achievement with wide-ranging applications, as these sensors could surpass traditional ones in sensitivity and accuracy, enabling advancements in fields like GPS technology and telecommunications.

-

-    These sensors would offer new opportunities for scientific discoveries through the study of quantum phenomena, testing the limits of fundamental physics.  Maybe even pushing beyond theories such as general relativity and the Standard Model of particle physics.

-

-    Researchers were able to measure the subtle vibrations of the ISS itself, using an instrument called an atom interferometer.  It's one of the most advanced technologies for making high-precision measurements.

-

-    The technique is based on the same principles as optical interferometry, where light is split into two beams that travel along different optical paths before getting combined to produce interference. Any differences between the beams' paths allows for extremely precise detection of changes in the environment.

-

-   Instead of light, however, atom interferometry uses atoms cooled to near absolute zero (-459 degrees Fahrenheit or -273 degrees Celsius), and relies on their ability to exist in multiple positions and motions at the same time due to quantum effects that become apparent at this ultra-cold temperature.

-

-   When atoms move through an interferometer, they create patterns called “fringes”, which contain information about forces like gravity or other environmental influences. And, because atoms move much slower than light, they are affected by these forces for a longer time, allowing for very precise measurements that are much more sensitive than their optical counterparts.

-

-    On Earth, atom interferometers have allowed scientists to achieve incredible feats, such as building absolute gravimeters and investigating changes in fundamental constants of nature with baffling accuracy. But physicists have been eager to apply atom interferometry in space, where microgravity helps eliminate interference and allows scientists to take even longer measurements that would actually improve the instrument's sensitivity altogether.

-

-    In the past maintaining coherence between the atom's has been challenging and required hands-on assistance in order to run experiments.   Yet, the scientists were able to run their measurements remotely from Earth.

-

-    They hope that, as the instrument further develops, it will become possible to make even more precise measurements of gravity that would allow us to investigate and understand our uiverse in greater detail than ever.   They could reveal the composition of planets and moons in our solar system, because different materials have different densities that create subtle variations in gravity.

-

-   This enhanced sensitivity could also enable scientists to finally detect dark matter, an elusive substance that has remained a cosmic mystery due to its weak interactions with particles and gravitational fields.

-

-   Atom interferometry could also be used to test Einstein's theory of general relativity in new ways.  This is the basic theory explaining the large-scale structure of our universe, and we know that there are aspects of the theory that we don’t understand correctly. This technology may help us fill in those gaps and give us a more complete picture of the reality.

-

-    Space-based atom interferometry will lead to exciting new discoveries and fantastic quantum technologies impacting everyday life, and will transport us into a quantum future.

-

-

October 10, 2024           QUANTUM  COMPUTER  -  on the Space Station?                 4562

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, October 10, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Wednesday, October 9, 2024

4573 - EXOPLANETS - and Pluto dwarf planet? -

 

-    4573 -    EXOPLANETS  -  and Pluto dwarf planet?   -    Astronomers have confirmed the existence of exoplanets with extremely small orbits around their stars. But what about exoplanets that get close enough to be devoured by their star, and what if it’s an Earth-sized exoplanet?


-----------------------------------  4573  -    EXOPLANETS  -  and Pluto dwarf planet?

-

-    Researchers investigated an Earth-sized exoplanet with an orbital period of only 5.7 hours, known as “ultra-short-period” (USP) exoplanets, that could eventually experience what’s known as tidal disruption, resulting in its devourment by its star.

-

-     Tidal disruption could be a potential fate of rocky planets.   About 10 percent of sun-like stars might have engulfed their rocky planets. This system “TOI-6255” is the best-known progenitor for those planet engulfment events.

-

-    TOI-6255 b, whose radius is ~1.08 and mass is ~1.44 of Earth’s and located just over 20.4 parsecs (65.2 light-years) from Earth. However, while being Earth-sized holds promise for life, TOI-6255 b’s 5.7-hour orbit not only make this exoplanet far too hot for life as we know it to exist, but this also means its orbit takes it dangerously close to what’s known as Roche limit. -

-

-   The Roche Limit is the distance a smaller object can orbit a larger object until the larger object’s gravity tears the smaller object to pieces, along with TOI-6255 b also experiencing the  tidal disruption, which is a common occurrence throughout the cosmos, including black holes.

-

-    This planet is doomed for tidal disruption in 400Myr which is short on cosmic scale (~13Gyr). The planet is also tidally distorted to be football like in shape (10 percent deviation from sphere), in comparison Earth’s tidal distortion due to the moon is only 1e-7 [0.0000001] level.

-

-   Orbital phase curve study of this planet could confirm that it is indeed tidally distorted. We know what the phase curve should look like for a spherical planet, tidally distorted planet has a strong deviation from that. We can also see if the surface of the planet is covered by lava pool as would be expected on a planet this hot.

-

-    “USPs” are exoplanets whose orbits are less than one day and whose masses are less than 2x the Earth.  Only about 100 USPs have been discovered with a 2014 study estimating approximately 0.5 percent exist around Sun-like stars and a 2019 study discussing their bulk composition (i.e., mass of its iron core and mantle).

-

-   Given their extremely short orbit, these worlds are likely too hot for life as we know it to exist, and along with USPs are the familiar “hot Jupiters” who orbit their stars in only a few days and astronomers estimate their population is in the hundreds.   These worlds are Jupiter-sized or larger gas planets and are also potentially far too hot for life as we know it to exist. But what is the significance of TOI-6255 b being an Earth-sized planet as opposed to a Jupiter-sized planet, or larger?

-

-      Planets similar to Earth in size are most likely rocky, mostly made of iron core and silicate mantle. They show us what terrestrial planets in other planetary systems are made of. Jupiter-sized planets are most certainly covered by thick hydrogen and helium atmospheres. Jupiter-sized planets are unlikely to harbor life.

-

-    While TOI-6255 b isn’t due for disassembly for another 400 million years, watching any exoplanet get ripped to shreds by its host star could provide important insights regarding the planet’s exterior and interior compositions, thus helping us better understand the similarities between exoplanets and planets within our own solar system.

-

-     These unique worlds and their extremely tight orbits have challenged our understanding of solar system architecture throughout our Milky Way Galaxy, as Mercury is the closest planet to our Sun, and it still takes 88 days to complete one orbit.

-

-    One similarity between our solar system and exoplanetary systems is the Roche limit. The study also focuses on tidal disruption that is physically distorting TOI-6255 b. Tidal disruption could be a potential fate of rocky planets.

-

-    Tidal disruption of planets is minimal in our solar system. However, the rings of Saturn are thought to originate from tidal disruption of satellites around Saturn. Tidal forces are strongly dependent on orbital separation, only objects with the shortest orbital period experience significant tides.

-

-   Discovered in 1930, Pluto was long considered our solar system's ninth planet. But after the discovery of similar worlds deeper in the Kuiper Belt, Pluto was reclassified as a “dwarf planet”.

-

-    A dwarf planet is an object in orbit around the Sun that is large enough to pull itself into a nearly round shape but has not been able to clear its orbit of debris.    Pluto falls into the dwarf planet category because it is located in a part of our solar system known as the Trans-Neptunian region (beyond Neptune) where other objects might cross Pluto's orbital path.

-

-   Pluto is only about 1,400 miles wide. At that small size, Pluto is only about half the width of the United States. It's about 3.6 billion miles away from the Sun, and it has a thin atmosphere composed mostly of nitrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide. On average, Pluto’s temperature is -387°F (-232°C), making it too cold to sustain life.

-

-   Pluto is orbited by five known moons, the largest of which is Charon. Charon is about half the size of Pluto itself, making it the largest satellite relative to the planet it orbits in our solar system. Pluto and Charon are often referred to as a "double planet."

-

-    The only spacecraft to explore Pluto up close was NASA's New Horizons. It flew by the dwarf planet and its moons in 2015.

-

-   In 1930, Venetia Burney of Oxford, England, suggested to her grandfather that the new discovery be named for the Roman god of the underworld. He forwarded the name to the Lowell Observatory and it was selected.

-

-    The surface of Pluto is extremely cold, so it's unlikely that life could exist there. At such cold temperatures, water, which is vital for life as we know it, is essentially rock-like. Pluto's interior is warmer, however, and some think there could even be an ocean deep inside.

-

-   Pluto has an equatorial diameter of about 1,477 miles (2,377 kilometers). Pluto is about 1/5th the width of Earth.   From an average distance of about 3.7 billion miles (5.9 billion kilometers), Pluto is about 39 times farther away than the Earth is from the Sun. From this distance, it takes sunlight 5.5 hours to travel from the Sun to Pluto.

-

-   If you were to stand on the surface of Pluto at noon, the Sun would be 1/900 the brightness it is here on Earth, or about 300 times as bright as our full moon. There is a moment each day near sunset here on Earth when the light is the same brightness as midday on Pluto.

-

-    Pluto's orbit around the Sun is unusual compared to the planets: it's both elliptical and tilted. Pluto's 248-year-long, oval-shaped orbit can take it as far as 49.3 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, and as close as 30 AU. (One AU is the mean distance between Earth and the Sun: about 93 million miles or 150 million kilometers.) But on average, Pluto is 3.7 billion miles  away from the Sun, or 39 AU.

-

-   From 1979 to 1999, Pluto was near perihelion, when it is closest to the Sun. During this time, Pluto was actually closer to the Sun than Neptune.   One day on Pluto takes about 153 hours. Its axis of rotation is tilted 57 degrees with respect to the plane of its orbit around the Sun, so it spins almost on its side. Pluto also exhibits a retrograde rotation; spinning from east to west like Venus and Uranus.

-

-   Pluto has five known moons: Charon, Nix, Hydra, Kerberos, and Styx. This moon system might have formed by a collision between Pluto and another similar-sized body early in the history of the solar system.

-

-    Charon, the biggest of Pluto's moons, is about half the size of Pluto itself, making it the largest satellite relative to the planet it orbits in our solar system. It orbits Pluto at a distance of just 12,200 miles.  Our Moon is 20 times farther away from Earth. Pluto and Charon are often referred to as a double planet.

-

-    Charon's orbit around Pluto takes 153 hours – the same time it takes Pluto to complete one rotation. This means Charon neither rises nor sets, but hovers over the same spot on Pluto's surface. The same side of Charon always faces Pluto, a state called “tidal locking”.

-

-    Pluto's other four moons are much smaller, less than 100 miles wide. They're also irregularly shaped, not spherical like Charon. Unlike many other moons in the solar system, these moons are not tidally locked to Pluto. They all spin and don’t keep the same face towards Pluto.

-

-    Dwarf planet Pluto is a member of a group of objects that orbit in a disc-like zone beyond the orbit of Neptune called the Kuiper Belt. This distant realm is populated with thousands of miniature icy worlds, which formed early in the history of our solar system about 4.5 billion years ago. These icy, rocky bodies are called Kuiper Belt objects, transneptunian objects, or plutoids.

-

-    Pluto is about two-thirds the diameter of Earth's Moon and probably has a rocky core surrounded by a mantle of water ice. Interesting ices like methane and nitrogen frost coat the surface. Due to its lower density, Pluto's mass is about one-sixth that of Earth's Moon.

-

-   Pluto's surface has mountains, valleys, plains, and craters. The temperature on Pluto can be as cold as -375 to -400 degrees Fahrenheit .   Pluto's tallest mountains are 6,500 to 9,800 feet (2 to 3 kilometers) in height. The mountains are big blocks of water ice, sometimes with a coating of frozen gases like methane. Long troughs and valleys as long as 370 miles add to the interesting features of this faraway dwarf planet.

-

-   Craters as large as 162 miles (260 kilometers) in diameter dot some of the landscape on Pluto, with some showing signs of erosion and filling. This suggests tectonic forces are slowly resurfacing Pluto.  The most prominent plains observed on Pluto appear to be made of frozen nitrogen gas and show no craters. These plains do show structures suggesting convection (blobs of material circulating up and down).

-

-   Pluto has a thin, tenuous atmosphere that expands when it comes closer to the Sun and collapses as it moves farther away, similar to a comet. The main constituent is molecular nitrogen, though molecules of methane and carbon monoxide have also been detected.

-

-    When Pluto is close to the Sun, its surface ices sublimate (changing directly from solid to gas) and rise to temporarily form a thin atmosphere. Pluto's low gravity (about 6% of Earth's) causes the atmosphere to be much more extended in altitude than our planet's atmosphere. Pluto becomes much colder during the part of each year when it is traveling far away from the Sun. During this time, the bulk of the planet's atmosphere may freeze and fall as snow to the surface.

-

-    It isn't known whether Pluto has a magnetic field, but its small size and slow rotation suggest little or none.

-

-

October 9, 2024          PLANET  DISCOVERED  -  and Pluto renamed?                   4573

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, October 9, 2024  ---------------------------------