Friday, June 30, 2023

4071 - NEUTRINOS - discovered by IceCube Observatory

 

-    4071  -  NEUTRINOS  -  discovered by IceCube Observatory.     The first 'ghost particle' image of Milky Way galaxy are neutrinos detected by IceCube.    Our Milky Way galaxy is an awe-inspiring feature of the night sky, viewable with the naked eye as a horizon-to-horizon hazy band of stars. Now, for the first time, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has produced an image of the Milky Way using “neutrinos”, tiny, ghostlike astronomical messengers, but not photons.


-----------   4071   -     NEUTRINOS  -  discovered by IceCube Observatory

-   The high-energy neutrinos, with energies millions to billions of times higher than those produced by the fusion reactions that power stars, were detected by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory, a gigaton detector operating at the Amundsen-Scott South Pole Station.

-

-   This one-of-a-kind detector encompasses a cubic kilometer of deep Antarctic ice instrumented with over 5,000 light sensors. IceCube searches for signs of high-energy neutrinos originating from our galaxy and beyond, out to the farthest reaches of the universe.

-

-    Unlike the case for light of any wavelength, in neutrinos, the universe outshines the nearby sources in our own galaxy.   The capabilities provided by the highly sensitive IceCube detector, coupled with new data analysis tools, have given astronomers an entirely new view of our galaxy.

-

-   Interactions between cosmic rays, high-energy protons and heavier nuclei, also produced in our galaxy, and galactic gas and dust inevitably produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. Given the observation of gamma rays from the galactic plane, the Milky Way was expected to be a source of high-energy neutrinos.

-

-   The search focused on the southern sky, where the bulk of neutrino emission from the galactic plane is expected near the center of our galaxy. However, until now, the background of muons and neutrinos produced by cosmic-ray interactions with the Earth's atmosphere posed significant challenges.

-

-    To overcome these challenges, IceCube developed analyses that select for "cascade" events, or neutrino interactions in the ice that result in roughly spherical showers of light. Because the deposited energy from cascade events starts within the instrumented volume, contamination of atmospheric muons and neutrinos is reduced. Ultimately, the higher purity of the cascade events gave a better sensitivity to astrophysical neutrinos from the southern sky.

-

-   However, the final breakthrough came from the implementation of machine learning methods, developed by IceCube collaborators at TU Dortmund University, that improve the identification of cascades produced by neutrinos as well as their direction and energy reconstruction.

-

-    The improved methods allowed astronomers to retain over an order of magnitude more neutrino events with better angular reconstruction, resulting in an analysis that is three times more sensitive than the previous search.

-

-    The dataset used in the study included 60,000 neutrinos spanning 10 years of IceCube data, 30 times as many events as the selection used in a previous analysis of the galactic plane using cascade events. These neutrinos were compared to previously published prediction maps of locations in the sky where the galaxy was expected to shine in neutrinos.

-

-      The maps included one made from extrapolating Fermi Large Area Telescope gamma-ray observations of the Milky Way and two alternative maps identified as KRA-gamma by the group of theorists who produced them. The power of machine learning offers great future potential, bringing other observations closer within reach.

-

-    Observing our own galaxy for the first time using particles instead of light is a huge step.   As neutrino astronomy evolves, we will get a new lens with which to observe the universe.

-

June 29,  2023        NEUTRINOS  -  discovered by IceCube Observatory       4071

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, June 30, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4070 - EUCLID SPACE TELESCOPE

 

-    4070  -  EUCLID  SPACE  TELESCOPE  -  observing the expansion of the Universe.  5 billion years after the Big Bang, the dynamics of the universe changed: instead of slowing down further, the expansion of the universe is still accelerating today. This “dark energy” now dominates the expansion.

-


---------------------   4070   -    EUCLID  SPACE  TELESCOPE

-   

-   Tomorrow,1 July, 2023,  the Euclid space telescope will start its journey into outer space on an important mission to seek further clues about the origin of the universe.

-

-    The visible matter known to researchers is actually only around 5% of the universe; 95% of the universe is a proverbial black box. Two invisible factors, dark matter and dark energy,  influence the arrangement of objects in space and the expansion of the universe.  Remember matter and energy are two forms of the same thing.

-

-   The Euclid space telescope is now prepared to shed light on the darkness.  It will start its mission to record, in a 3D map, the large-scale structure of galaxies up to 10 billion light years away from Earth. Researchers hope that this unique recording of the cosmic web will reveal more about the nature of dark matter and dark energy as well as the laws of gravity.

-

-   Dark matter is matter that does not emit, absorb or reflect light.   Because it is invisible, it's difficult for researchers to study it. But it seems clear that there must be something else there. The observed arrangement of galaxies cannot be explained by general relativity, unless there is more mass than we can see.

-

-    The only way for us to study dark matter is through its interaction with the gravitational force. On board “Euclid”  is an instrument called a VISible (VIS), which can image galaxies with tremendous precision. From the pictures, astronomers will measure how distorted the galaxies appear.

-

-    This distortion takes place because of an effect called “gravitational lensing”: mass that lies between the telescope and the observed galaxy deflects the light like a magnifying glass, making the galaxy behind it appear distorted.  This effect will give us information about how much dark matter lies between Euclid and the observed galaxy.

-

-   Since 1998, researchers have been working on another invisible phenomenon that cannot be explained by Einstein's theory of general relativity. Based on measurements of exploding, extremely bright stars (supernovae), two research groups have found that the expansion of the universe is not slowing down due to gravity, as previously assumed, but accelerating.  This acceleration started about 5 billion years ago.

-

-    The simplest description researchers currently have for dark energy causing this accelerstion is the “cosmological constant”: it states that the density of dark energy does not change over the entire evolution of the cosmos. As Euclid looks back to the beginnings of the universe 10 billion years ago by observing very distant galaxies, researchers can investigate whether dark energy has indeed not changed over time.

-

-   The near-infrared spectrometer and photometer (NISP), with which the researchers can evaluate a phenomenon called the “red shift”. Similar to the “Doppler effect” of light, galaxies moving away from us appear "redder" because the received wavelength gets stretched.  The farther a galaxy is away from us, the faster it is moving away from Earth.  From the red shift astronomers can deduce the distance to the galaxy and obtain information about the expansion of the universe.

-

-   Has the density of dark energy changed in the course of the evolution of the universe?

-

-   Euclid could also provide crucial clues about Einstein's theory of general relativity. The laws of gravity only work at huge scales if we introduce these “dark components" . But, it is also possible that on a cosmic scale, general relativity is not yet correct.  Researchers have developed many complex models of modified theories of gravity,

-

-     A simulation by the UZH computer maps all the galaxies that Euclid could potentially observe. Among other things, it is used to test how well the analysis tools deal with immense amounts of data. Astrophysics are running through different dark matter scenarios and investigating what effects they have on cosmological observations.

-

-     Currently, the best proven model for the origin of the universe is the “Big Bang theory”. It describes the development of the universe after the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago when matter, space and time came into being.  The Big Bang is not necessarily the beginning of the universe, but a point in time before which we cannot say anything scientifically because it is not accessible to our observation.

-

-    In the first phase after the Big Bang, the universe expanded rapidly. At this point, it consisted of an almost homogeneous plasma of elementary particles. Only when the universe cooled down more and more did the first atoms form and photons were able to split off. This was followed by the so-called "Dark Ages," in which there were still no galaxies and no visible light sources.

-

-   About 200 million years after the Big Bang, stars and galaxies began to form. Under the force of gravity, the individual galaxies increasingly formed a large-scale structure that resembles a network of nodes and connections, it is therefore also called the “cosmic web”. In between there are almost matterless regions, known as voids.

-

-    The phase when the cosmic web formed is called the “matter-dominated phase” of the universe, because it was driven by gravity and dark matter. However, 5 billion years after the Big Bang, the dynamics of the universe changed: instead of slowing down further, the expansion of the universe is still accelerating today. The researchers explain this by the fact that “dark energy” now dominates the expansion.

-

June 29,  2023          EUCLID  SPACE  TELESCOPE                 4070

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, June 30, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Tuesday, June 27, 2023

4069 - MYSTERIES IN ASTRONOMY?

 

-    4069  -    MYSTERIES  IN  ASTRONOMY?     ASTRONOMY  -  mysteries.  No physicist would dare assert that our physical knowledge of the universe is near completion. To the contrary, each new discovery seems to unlock a Pandora's box of even bigger, even deeper physics questions.  Here are some astronomical mysteries.

-


---------------------   4069   -     MYSTERIES  IN  ASTRONOMY?

-  These are big mysteries that astronomers and I am trying to solve.  In our family I tend to work on these big problems and my wife works on the rest.  She takes care of those lesser problems that we tend to encounter in our daily lives.  Here is the list I am working:

-

-   It all starts when in 1900, the British physicist Lord Kelvin is said to have pronounced: "There is nothing new to be discovered in physics now. All that remains is more and more precise measurement." Within three decades, quantum mechanics and Einstein's theory of relativity had revolutionized the field.   We still see new discoveries looming that lord Kelvin did not anticipate.

-

-  What is dark energy?  No matter how astrophysicists crunch the numbers, the universe simply doesn't add up. Even though gravity is pulling inward on space-time,  it keeps expanding outward faster and faster. To account for this, astrophysicists have proposed an invisible force that counteracts gravity by pushing space-time apart.

-

-   They call it “dark energy“. In the most widely accepted model of dark energy, it is a "cosmological constant", an inherent property of space itself, which has "negative pressure" driving space apart. As space expands, more space is created, and with it, more dark energy.

-

-  Based on the observed rate of expansion, scientists know that the sum of all the dark energy must make up more than 70 percent of the total contents of the universe. But no one knows how to look for it.

-

-  What is dark matter?  Evidently, about 84 percent of the matter in the universe does not absorb or emit light. "Dark matter," as it is called, cannot be seen directly, and it hasn't yet been detected by indirect means, either. Instead, dark matter's existence and properties are inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter, radiation and the structure of the universe.

-

-   This shadowy substance is thought to pervade the outskirts of galaxies, and may be composed of "weakly interacting massive particles," or WIMPs. Worldwide, there are several detectors on the lookout for WIMPs, but so far, not one has been found. One recent study suggests dark mater might form long, fine-grained streams throughout the universe, and that such streams might radiate out from Earth like hairs.  But, who knows?

-

-  Why is there an arrow of time?  The fact that you can't un-break an egg is a common example of the law of increasing “entropy“.  Time moves forward because a property of the universe called "entropy," roughly defined as the level of disorder, only increases, and so there is no way to reverse a rise in entropy after it has occurred.  You can’t unbreak an egg!

-

-  The fact that entropy increases is a matter of logic: There are more disordered arrangements of particles than there are ordered arrangements, and so as things change, they tend to fall into disarray. But the underlying question here is, why was entropy so low in the past? Why was the universe so ordered at its beginning, when a huge amount of energy was crammed together in a small amount of space?  The cosmos is expanding ever since.

-

-  Are there parallel multi-universes?  Astrophysical data suggests space-time might be "flat," rather than curved, and thus that it goes on forever. If so, then the region we can see is just one patch in an infinitely large "quilted multiverse."

-

-  At the same time, the laws of quantum mechanics dictate that there are only a finite number of possible particle configurations within each cosmic patch , which contains 10^10^122 distinct possibilities.

-

-  So, with an infinite number of cosmic patches, the particle arrangements within them are forced to repeat ,infinitely many times over.  This means there are infinitely many parallel universes: cosmic patches exactly the same as ours , as well as patches that differ by just one particle's position, patches that differ by two particles' positions, and so on down to patches that are totally different from ours.

-

-   Why is there more matter than antimatter?  The question of why there is so much more matter than its oppositely-charged and oppositely-spinning twin, antimatter, is actually a question of why anything exists at all. One assumes the universe would treat matter and antimatter symmetrically, and thus that, at the moment of the Big Bang, equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have been produced.

-

-  But if that had happened, there would have been a total annihilation of both: Protons would have canceled with antiprotons, electrons with anti-electrons (positrons), neutrons with antineutrons, and so on, leaving behind a dull sea of photons in a matter less expanse.

-

-  For some reason, there was excess matter that didn't get annihilated, and here we are. For this, there is no accepted explanation. The most detailed test to date of the differences between matter and antimatter confirm they are mirror images of each other, providing exactly zero new paths toward understanding the mystery of why matter is far more common.  Thank God it turned out that way.

-

-    What is the fate of the universe?    The fate of the universe strongly depends on a factor of unknown value: Ω, Omega, a measure of the density of matter and energy throughout the cosmos. If Ω, Omega, is greater than 1, then space-time would be "closed" like the surface of an enormous sphere.

-

-    If there is no dark energy, such a universe would eventually stop expanding and would instead start contracting, eventually collapsing in on itself in an event dubbed the "Big Crunch." If the universe is closed but there is dark energy, the spherical universe would expand forever.

-

-  If Ω, Omega,  is less than 1, then the geometry of space would be "open" like the surface of a saddle. In this case, its ultimate fate is the "Big Freeze" followed by the "Big Rip": first, the universe's outward acceleration would tear galaxies and stars apart, leaving all matter frigid and alone. Next, the acceleration would grow so strong that it would overwhelm the effects of the forces that hold atoms together, and everything would be wrenched apart.

-

- If Omega, Ω = 1, the universe would be “flat“, extending like an infinite plane in all directions. If there is no dark energy, such a planar universe would expand forever but at a continually decelerating rate, approaching a standstill. If there is dark energy, the flat universe ultimately would experience runaway expansion leading to the Big Rip. Regardless how it plays out, the universe is dying.  Happy New Year you do not have much to look forward to.

-

-  How do measurements collapse quantum wave functions?  In the strange realm of electrons, photons and the other fundamental particles, quantum mechanics is the law. Particles don't behave like tiny balls, but rather like waves that are spread over a large area. Each particle is described by a "wave function," or “probability distribution“, which tells what its location, velocity, and other properties are more likely to be, but not what those properties are.

-

-   The particle actually has a range of values for all the properties, until you experimentally measure one of them, its location, for example,  at which point the particle's wave function "collapses" and it adopts just one location.

-

-  How and why does measuring a particle make its wave function collapse, producing the concrete reality that we perceive to exist? The issue, known as the “measurement problem“, may seem esoteric, but our understanding of what reality is, or if it exists at all, hinges upon the answer.

-

-  Is string theory correct?  When physicists assume all the elementary particles are actually one-dimensional loops, or "strings," each of which vibrates at a different frequency, physics gets much easier.

-

-  String theory allows physicists to reconcile the laws governing particles, called quantum mechanics, with the laws governing space-time, called general relativity, and to unify the four fundamental forces of nature into a single framework.

-

-  But the problem is, string theory can only work in a universe with 10 or 11 dimensions: three large spatial ones, six or seven compacted spatial ones, and a time dimension. The compacted spatial dimensions, as well as the vibrating strings themselves, are about a billionth of a trillionth of the size of an atomic nucleus. There's no conceivable way to detect anything that small, and so there's no known way to experimentally validate or invalidate string theory.

-

-  Is there order in chaos?  For example: Physicists can't exactly solve the set of equations that describes the behavior of fluids, from water to air to all other liquids and gases. In fact, it isn't known whether a general solution of the so-called Navier-Stokes equations even exists, or, if there is a solution, whether it describes fluids everywhere, or contains inherently unknowable points called “singularities“.

-

-   As a consequence, the nature of chaos is not well understood. Physicists and mathematicians wonder, is the weather merely difficult to predict, or inherently unpredictable? Does turbulence transcend mathematical description, or does it all make sense when you tackle it with the right math?  It all comes down to the math.  Was math invented or discovered in the first place?

-

-  Do the universe's forces merge into one?  The universe experiences four fundamental forces: electromagnetism, the strong nuclear force, the weak interaction (also known as the weak nuclear force) and gravity.

-

-   To date, physicists know that if you turn up the energy enough, for example, inside a particle accelerator , three of those forces "unify" and become a single force. Physicists have run particle accelerators and unified the electromagnetic force and weak interactions, and at higher energies, the same thing should happen with the strong nuclear force and, eventually, gravity.

-

-  Even though theories say that should happen, nature doesn't always oblige. So far, no particle accelerator has reached energies high enough to unify the strong force with electromagnetism and the weak interaction. Including gravity would mean yet more energy.

-

-   It isn't clear whether scientists could even build one that powerful; the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), near Geneva, can send particles crashing into each other with energies in the trillions of electron volts (about 14 tera-electron volts, or TeV). To reach grand unification energies, particles would need at least a trillion times as much, so physicists are left to hunt for indirect evidence of such theories.

-

-  Besides the issue of energies, the Grand Unified Theories (GUTs) still have some problems because they predict other observations that so far haven't panned out. There are several GUTs that say protons, over immense spans of time (on the order of 10^36 years), should turn into other particles.

-

-  This has never been observed, so either protons last much longer than anyone thought or they really are stable forever. Another prediction of some types of GUT is the existence of magnetic monopoles, isolated "north" and "south" poles of a magnet , and nobody has seen one of those, either. It's possible we just don't have a powerful enough particle accelerator. Or, physicists could be wrong about how the universe works

-

-  I will continue to work on these problems.  If you have any breakthroughs please let me know.  I have to stop right now my wife wants me to carry out the garbage.                              

-

-

June 27,  2023        MYSTERIES  IN  ASTRONOMY?         2548     4063

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, June 27, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

EARTH'S ORBIT - and salty seas?

 

-    4068  -   EARTH'S  ORBIT  -  and salty seas?   Nearly 10,000 years ago, Earth came out of its most recent ice age. Vast, icy swaths of land around the poles thawed, melting the glaciers that had covered them for nearly 100,000 years.   Why, after such a long period of cold, did the ice age finally come to an end?


------------------   4068  -     EARTH'S  ORBIT  -  and salty seas?

-   The traditional explanation for why ice ages begin and end is a series of eccentricities and wobbles in the planet's orbit known as the “Milankovitch cycles”. Named after Serbian scientist Milutin Milankovitch, these cycles describe patterns in Earth's orbit and axial tilt. Over time, our planet's orbit around the sun alternates from being more circular to more egg-shaped. At the same time, our planet's axis tends to both tilt and wobble.

-

-  Milankovitch found that these factors combine at regular intervals to cause land at 65 degrees north latitude (a parallel that runs through Canada, Alaska and parts of Eurasia) to become warmer than normal and theorized that this warming and then subsequent cooling of the Northern Hemisphere explained the planet's cycle of ice ages , or glacials, and warmer periods, or interglacials.

-

-    However, while there is evidence that Milankovitch cycles drive the ebb and flow of ice ages, many modern glaciologists don't think the cycles' reported ties to ice ages completely checks out. One issue is that when the glaciers in the Northern Hemisphere melted, glaciers in the Southern Hemisphere melted too.

-

-    But with the traditional explanation, it's unclear how warming in one hemisphere would melt glaciers in the other,  when the Milankovich-driven changes in sunlight intensity that would produce warmer temperatures in the north would cause temperature drops in the south, counterbalancing any net warming.

-

-   Glaciologists have attempted to fill in the gaps between what we know about Milankovitch cycles and Earth's ice ages. The missing link needs to explain how these cycles cool and warm the entire planet at once, not just one hemisphere at a time. 

-

-     One possible explanation is that when the Northern Hemisphere began to warm around 13,000 years ago, meltwater and icebergs flooded the North Atlantic Ocean, causing a temporary cooling of the Northern Hemisphere known as the Younger Dryas period (12,900 to 11,700 years ago).

-  

-    There is some evidence that the Younger Dryas affected ocean currents in a way that caused the Southern Atlantic to warm up, stirring up the ocean in the process and releasing tons of stored carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, which in turn caused glaciers in the Southern Hemisphere to melt over the next 1,500 years. The end result was likely a more carbon-rich atmosphere that continued to warm both hemispheres, lifting the planet out of the glacial period.

-

-    Another hypothesis, published in 2021, suggests that the length and intensity of the Southern Hemisphere's winters could dictate when ice ages end. On the surface, it sounds like the polar opposite of the Milankovitch theory, which suggests that Northern Hemispheric summers drive the climatic changes.

-

-    However, long winters in the Southern Hemisphere alter wind patterns near the tropics, which can create frequent storms over an area of the Pacific Ocean known as the Tropical Warm Pool, region of ocean that stores and releases great amounts of heat. Altered winds can create storms in this area, which in turn releases massive amounts of water vapor that can act as a greenhouse gas.

-

-    Another idea is that salty water pouring from the Indian Ocean into the Atlantic Ocean helped end the last ice age. The Indian Ocean had become super salty because a drop in sea level had cut off a critical current that flows from the Pacific to the Indian Ocean; normally, this current diluted the Indian's very salty tropical waters.

-

-   A change in wind patterns and currents in the Indian Ocean could have caused the Indian Ocean to dump tons of dense, salty water into the Atlantic Ocean, altering its currents and temperatures in both the Northern and Southern hemispheres.

-

-   More evidence is needed to know for sure if any of these hypotheses can actually explain why the last ice age ended. But glaciologists are continuing to look into this cold case.   

-

-    Nearly 10,000 years ago vast, icy swaths of land around the poles thawed, melting the glaciers that had covered them for nearly 100,000 years.  Why, after such a long period of cold, did the ice age finally come to an end?

-

-    Another hypothesis, published in 2021, suggests that the length and intensity of the Southern Hemisphere's winters could dictate when ice ages end.  It sounds like the polar opposite of the Milankovitch theory, which suggests that Northern Hemispheric summers drive the climatic changes.

-    However, long winters in the Southern Hemisphere alter wind patterns near the tropics, which can create frequent storms over an area of the Pacific Ocean known as the “Tropical Warm Pool”, a region of ocean that stores and releases great amounts of heat. Altered winds can create storms in this area, which in turn releases massive amounts of water vapor that can act as a greenhouse gas.

-

-    Another idea is that salty water pouring from the Indian Ocean into the Atlantic Ocean helped end the last ice age. The Indian Ocean had become super salty because a drop in sea level had cut off a critical current that flows from the Pacific to the Indian Ocean; normally, this current diluted the Indian's very salty tropical waters.

-

-    A change in wind patterns and currents in the Indian Ocean could have caused the Indian Ocean to dump tons of dense, salty water into the Atlantic Ocean, altering its currents and temperatures in both the Northern and Southern hemispheres.

-

-    More evidence is needed to know for sure if any of these hypotheses can actually explain why the last ice age ended. But glaciologists are continuing to look into this cold case.

-

-

June 26,  2023            EARTH'S  ORBIT  -  and salty seas?              4068

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, June 27, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Monday, June 26, 2023

4067 - GAMMA RAY BURSTS - how to explain them?

 

-    4067  -  GAMMA  RAY  BURSTS  -   how to explain them?    Fifty years ago, on June 1, 1973, astronomers around the world were introduced to a powerful and perplexing new phenomenon called GRBs (gamma-ray bursts). Today sensors on orbiting satellites like NASA's Swift and Fermi missions detect a GRB somewhere in the sky about once a day on average. Astronomers think the bursts arise from catastrophic occurrences involving stars in distant galaxies, events thought to produce new black holes.


------------   4067   -  GAMMA  RAY  BURSTS  -   how to explain them?  

-

-    GRBs occur so far beyond our galaxy that even the closest-known burst exploded more than 100 million light-years away. Each burst produces an initial pulse of gamma rays, the highest-energy form of light, that typically lasts from milliseconds to minutes. This emission comes from a jet of particles moving close to the speed of light launched in our direction, and the closer we are to looking straight down the barrel, the brighter it appears.

-

-     Following this prompt emission is a fading afterglow of gamma rays, X-rays, ultraviolet, visible, infrared, and radio light that astronomers may be able to track for hours to months.

-

-   Even half a century on, GRBs offer up surprises. One recent burst was so bright it temporarily blinded most of the gamma-ray detectors in space. Nicknamed the BOAT (for brightest of all time), the 7-minute blast may have been the brightest GRB in the past 10,000 years. It also showed that scientists' most promising models of these events are nowhere near complete.

-

-    While theorists proposed 100 models in an effort to explain GRBs, most involving neutron stars in our own galaxy, observational progress was slow despite the growing number of detections by different spacecraft. Gamma rays can't be focused like visible light or X-rays, making precise localizations quite difficult. Without them, it was impossible to search for GRB counterparts in other wavelengths using larger telescopes in space or on the ground.

-

-  In 1991, NASA launched the Compton Gamma Ray Observatory, which included an instrument named BATSE (Burst and Transient Science Experiment) dedicated to exploring GRBs.   BATSE was about 10 times more sensitive than previous GRB detectors. Over Compton's nine-year mission, BATSE detected 2,704 bursts, which gave astronomers a rich set of observations made with the same instrument.

-

-    In its first year, BATSE data showed that bursts were distributed all over the sky instead of in a pattern that reflected the structure of our Milky Way galaxy.  This suggested that they were coming from distant galaxies, and that meant they were more energetic than most scientists thought possible.

-

-   Burst durations clustered into two broad groups,one lasting less than two seconds, the other lasting longer than two seconds, and that short bursts produced higher-energy gamma rays than long ones.

-

-    So both temporal and spectral properties agreed in identifying two separate groups of GRBs: short and long.  Theorists associated long GRBs with the collapse of massive stars and short ones with binary neutron star mergers.

-

-    When a burst occurred in the field of view X-ray cameras, the spacecraft could locate it well enough over a couple of hours that additional instruments could be brought to bear. Whenever BeppoSAX turned to a GRB's position, its instruments found a rapidly fading and previously unknown high-energy source,the X-ray afterglow theorists had predicted.

-

-    These positions enabled large ground-based observatories to discover long GRB afterglows in visible light and radio waves, and also permitted the first distance measurements, confirming that GRBs were truly far-away events.

-

-    Although most GRBs originate from exploding massive stars or neutron-star mergers, the researchers concluded that “GRB 191019A” instead came from the collision of stars or stellar remnants in the jam-packed environment surrounding a supermassive black hole at the core of an ancient galaxy.

-

-   This study will be published June 22, 2023, in the journal Nature Astronomy. This remarkable discovery grants astronomers a tantalizing glimpse into the intricate dynamics at work within these cosmic environments, establishing them as factories of events that would otherwise be deemed impossible.

-

-   Most stars die, according to their mass, in one of three predictable ways. When relatively low-mass stars like our sun reach old age, they shed their outer layers, eventually fading to become white dwarf stars. More massive stars, on the other hand, burn brighter and explode faster in cataclysmic supernovae explosions, creating ultra-dense objects like neutron stars and black holes. The third scenario occurs when two such stellar remnants form a binary system and eventually collide.

-

-    But the new study finds there might be a fourth option.  Stars can meet their demise in some of the densest regions of the universe, where they can be driven to collide. Long past their star-forming prime, ancient galaxies have few, if any, remaining massive stars. Their cores, however, teem with stars and a menagerie of ultra-dense stellar remnants, such as white dwarfs, neutron stars and black holes.

-

-    Astronomers have long suspected that in the turbulent beehive of activity surrounding a supermassive black hole, it only would be a matter of time before two stellar objects collided to produce a GRB. But evidence for that type of merger has remained elusive.

-

-    On Oct. 19, 2019, astronomers glimpsed the first hints of such an event when NASA’s Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory detected a bright flash of gamma rays that lasted a little over one minute. Any GRB lasting longer than two seconds is considered “long.” Such bursts typically come from the collapse of stars at least 10 times the mass of our sun.

-

-   Making long-term observations of the GRB’s fading afterglow enabled the astronomers to pinpoint the location of the GRB to a region less than 100 light-years from the nucleus of an ancient galaxy, very near the galaxy’s supermassive black hole.

-

-    The lack of a supernova accompanying the long GRB 191019A tells us that this burst is not a typical massive star collapse.  The location of GRB 191019A, embedded in the nucleus of the host galaxy, teases a predicted but not yet evidenced theory for how gravitational-wave emitting sources might form.

-

-    In typical galactic environments, the production of long GRBs from colliding stellar remnants, such as neutron stars and black holes, is incredibly rare. The cores of ancient galaxies, however, are anything but typical, and there may be a million or more stars crammed into a region just a few light-years across.

-

-    Such extreme population density may be great enough that occasional stellar collisions can occur, especially under the titanic gravitational influence of a supermassive black hole, which would perturb the motions of stars and send them careening in random directions. Eventually, these wayward stars would intersect and merge, triggering a titanic explosion that could be observed from vast cosmic distances.

-

-    It is possible that such events occur routinely in similarly crowded regions across the universe but have gone unnoticed until this point. A possible reason for their obscurity is that galactic centers are brimming with dust and gas, which could obscure both the initial flash of the GRB and the resulting afterglow. GRB 191019A may be a rare exception, allowing astronomers to detect the burst and study its aftereffects.

-

-   While this event is the first of its kind to be discovered, it’s possible there are more out there that are hidden by the large amounts of dust close to their galaxies.  If this long-duration event came from merging compact objects, it contributes to the growing population of GRBs that defies our traditional classifications.

-

-    In 2000, NASA launched HETE 2, a small satellite designed to detect and localize GRBs. It was the first mission to compute accurate positions onboard and quickly—in tens of seconds—communicate them to the ground so other observatories could study early afterglow phases. The burst it discovered on March 29, 2003, also exhibited definitive supernova characteristics, confirming a suspected relationship between the two phenomena.

-

-    In May 2005, Swift was able to pinpoint the first afterglow of a short GRB, showing that these blasts occur in regions with little star formation. This bolstered the model of short bursts as mergers of neutron stars, which can travel far from their birth place over the many millions of years it takes for them to crash together.

-

-   In 2008, NASA's Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope joined Swift in hunting GRBs and has observed about 3,500 to date. Its GBM (Gamma-ray Burst Monitor) and Large Area Telescope allow the detection and follow-up of bursts from X-rays to the highest-energy gamma rays detected in space, an energy span of 100 million times. This has enabled the discovery of afterglow gamma rays with billions of times the energy of visible light.

-

-    In 2017, Fermi and the European INTEGRAL satellite linked a short GRB to a source of gravitational waves, ripples in space-time produced as orbiting neutron stars spiraled inward and merged. This was an important first that connected two different cosmic "messengers," gravity and light. While astronomers haven't seen another "gravity and light" burst since, they hope more will turn up in current and future observing runs of gravitational wave observatories.

-

-   “StarBurst” is a small satellite designed to explore GRBs from neutron star mergers. Other missions include “Glowbug”.   “BurstCube” slated for launch in early 2024; “MoonBEAM”, which would orbit between Earth and the Moon and “LEAP”, designed to study GRB jets from the space station.

-

-    What will completely revolutionize our understanding of GRBs will be the ability to track them back to when the universe was most intensely forming stars, around 10 billion years ago.

-   

-    This part of the universe will be probed by the next generation of gravitational wave detectors—10 times more sensitive than what we currently have—and by future gamma-ray missions that can ensure continuity with the fantastic science Swift and Fermi have enabled.

-

June 25,  2023       GAMMA  RAY  BURSTS  -   how to explain them?             4067

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, June 26, 2023  ---------------------------------