Friday, December 31, 2021

3385 - PLANETARY NEBULAE - planet formation?

  -  3385  -  PLANETARY  NEBULAE  -  planet formation?   The NASA James Webb Space Telescope, to launch in January, 2020. It is specialized to observe in infrared wavelengths. The powerful observatory is expected to reveal more about the habitability of certain exoplanets' atmospheres.


---------------------  3385  -  PLANETARY  NEBULAE  -  planet formation?

-  Meteorites are remnants of the building blocks that formed Earth and the other planets orbiting our Sun.  Is this the geochemical evolution of our Solar System and our home planet?

-

-  In their youth, stars are surrounded by a rotating disk of gas and dust. Over time, these materials aggregate to form larger bodies, including planets. Some of these objects are broken up due to collisions in space, the remnants of which sometimes hurtle through Earth's atmosphere as meteorites.

-

-  By studying a meteorite's chemistry and mineralogy we can reveal details about the conditions these materials were exposed to during the Solar System's early years.

-

-   Why are volatile elements more depleted on Earth and in meteoritic samples than the average Solar System, represented by the Sun's composition?  

-

-  It's long been theorized that periods of heating and cooling resulted in the evaporation of volatiles from meteorites. By studying a particularly primitive class of meteorites called carbonaceous chondrites that contain crystalline droplets, called chondrules, which were part of the original disk of materials surrounding the young Sun. Because of their ancient origins, these beads are an excellent laboratory for uncovering the Solar System's geochemical history.

-

-  Understanding the conditions under which these volatile elements are stripped from the chondrules can help us work backward to learn the conditions they were exposed to in the Solar System's youth and all the years since.

-

-  Scientists were probing the isotopic variability of potassium and rubidium, two moderately volatile elements.  Each element contains a unique number of protons, but its isotopes have varying numbers of neutrons. 

-

-  This means that each isotope has a slightly different mass than the others. As a result, chemical reactions discriminate between the isotopes, which, in turn, affects the proportion of that isotope in the reaction's end products.

-

-  This means that the different kinds of chemical processing that the chondrules experienced will be evident in their isotopic composition, which is something we can probe using precision instruments.

-

-   How and when in their lifespans did the chondrules lose their volatiles? The isotopic record  indicates that the volatiles were stripped as a result of massive shockwaves passing through the material circling the young Sun that likely drove melting of the dust to form the chondrules. These types of events can be generated by gravitational instability or by larger baby planets moving through the nebular gas.

-

-    Once a planet gets as big as ours, its gravity is sufficient that losing most volatile elements becomes very difficult. Knowing that moderately volatile elements were stripped from the planetary building blocks themselves answers fundamental questions about Earth's geochemical evolution.

-

-  We are not alone in planet formation.  Exoplanets are planets beyond our own solar system. Thousands have been discovered in the past two decades, mostly with NASA's Kepler Space Telescope. 

-

-  These exoplanets come in a huge variety of sizes and orbits. Some are gigantic planets hugging close to their parent stars; others are icy, some rocky. NASA is looking for a special kind of planet: one that's the same size as Earth, orbiting a sun-like star in the habitable zone.

-

-  The habitable zone is the range of distances from a star where a planet's temperature allows liquid water oceans, critical for life on Earth. The earliest definition of the zone was based on simple thermal equilibrium, but current calculations of the habitable zone include many other factors, including the greenhouse effect of a planet's atmosphere. This makes the boundaries of a habitable zone "fuzzy."  

-

-  Astronomers announced in August 2016 that they might have found such a planet orbiting Proxima Centauri. The newfound world, known as “Proxima b“, is about 1.3 times more massive than Earth, which suggests that the exoplanet is a rocky world.

-

-   The planet is also in the star's habitable zone, just 4.7 million miles from its host star. It completes one orbit every 11.2 Earth-days. As a result, it's likely that the exoplanet is tidally locked, meaning it always shows the same face to its host star, just as the moon shows only one face (the near side) to Earth.

-

-  Most exoplanets have been discovered by the Kepler Space Telescope, an observatory that began work in 2009 and is expected to finish its mission in 2018, once it runs out of fuel. As of mid-March 2018, Kepler has discovered 2,342 confirmed exoplanets and revealed the existence of perhaps 2,245 others. The total number of planets discovered by all observatories is 3,706.

-

-  Astronomers have an origin story for our solar system. Simply put, a spinning cloud of gas and dust (called the protosolar nebula) collapsed under its own gravity and formed the sun and planets. As the cloud collapsed, conservation of angular momentum meant the soon-to-be-sun should have spun faster and faster. 

-

- But, while the sun contains 99.8 percent of the solar system's mass, the planets have 96 percent of the angular momentum. Astronomers asked themselves why the sun rotates so slowly.

-

-  The young sun would have had a very strong magnetic field, whose lines of force reached out into the disk of swirling gas from which the planets would form. These field lines connected with the charged particles in the gas, and acted like anchors, slowing down the spin of the forming sun and spinning up the gas that would eventually turn into the planets. 

-

-  Most stars like the sun rotate slowly, so astronomers inferred that the same "magnetic braking" occurred for them, meaning that planet formation must have occurred for them. The implication: Planets must be common around sun-like stars.

-

-  For this reason and others, astronomers at first restricted their search for exoplanets to stars similar to the sun, but the first two discoveries were around a pulsar, a rapidly spinning corpse of a star that died as a supernova. 

-

-  The first confirmed discovery of a world orbiting a sun-like star, in 1995, was “51 Pegasi b“,  a Jupiter-mass planet 20 times closer to its sun than we are to ours. 

-

-  A Canadian team discovered a Jupiter-size planet around Gamma Cephei in 1988, but because its orbit was much smaller than Jupiter's, the scientists did not claim a definitive planet detection.

-

-  Most of the first exoplanet discoveries were huge Jupiter-size (or larger) gas giants orbiting close to their parent stars. That's because astronomers were relying on the radial velocity technique, which measures how much a star "wobbles" when a planet or planets orbit it. These large planets close in produce a correspondingly big effect on their parent star, causing an easier-to-detect wobble.

-

-  Before the era of exoplanet discoveries, instruments could only measure stellar motions down to a kilometer per second, too imprecise to detect a wobble due to a planet. Now, some instruments can measure velocities as low as a centimeter per second. 

-

-  Kepler launched in 2009 on a mission to observe a region in the Cygnus constellation. Kepler performed that mission for four years until most of its reaction wheels (pointing devices) failed. 

-

-  NASA then put Kepler on a new mission called K2, in which Kepler uses the pressure of the solar wind to maintain position in space. The observatory periodically switches its field of view to avoid the sun's glare. 

-

-  Kepler's pace of planetary discovery slowed after switching to K2, but it is still found hundreds of exoplanets using the new method. Its latest data release, in February 2018, contained 95 new planets.

-

-  Besides gas giants and terrestrial planets, Kepler has helped define a whole new class known as "super-Earths": planets that are between the size of Earth and Neptune. Some of these are in the habitable zones of their stars, but astrobiologists are going back to the drawing board to consider how life might develop on such worlds. 

-

-  Kepler's observations showed that super-Earths are abundant in our universe. 

-

-  Kepler's primary method of searching for planets is the "transit" method. Kepler monitors a star's light. If the light dims at regular and predictable intervals, that suggests a planet is passing across the face of the star.

-

-   In 2014, Kepler astronomers unveiled a new "verification by multiplicity" method that increased the rate at which astronomers promote candidate planets to confirmed planets. The technique is based on orbital stability, many transits of a star occurring with short periods can only be due to planets in small orbits, since multiply eclipsing stars that might mimic would gravitationally eject each other from the system in just a few million years.

-

-  As new observatory called the ‘Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite’ (TESS) is to launch in spring 2018. TESS will orbit the Earth every 13.7 days and will perform an all-sky survey over two years. It will survey the Southern Hemisphere in its first year, and the Northern Hemisphere in its second. The observatory is expected to reveal many more exoplanets, including at least 50 that are around the size of Earth. 

-

-  The HARPS spectograph on the “European Southern Observatory's La Silla “ 3.6-meter telescope in Chile, whose first light was in 2003. The instrument is designed to look at the wobbles that a planet induces in a star's rotation. HARPS has found well over 100 exoplanets itself, and is regularly used to confirm observations from Kepler and other observatories.

-

-  The Canadian Microvariability and Oscillations of STars (MOST) telescope, which started observations in 2003. MOST is designed to observe a star's astroseismology, or starquakes. But it also has participated in exoplanet discoveries, such as finding the exoplanet “55 Cancri e“.

-

-  The French Space Agency's CoRoT (COnvection ROtation and planetary Transits), which operated between 2006 and 2012. It found a few dozen confirmed planets, including COROT-7b, the first exoplanet that had a predominantly rock or metal composition.

-

-   The NASA/European Space Agency Hubble and NASA Spitzer space telescopes, which periodically observe planets in visible or infrared wavelengths, respectively.  More information about a planet's atmosphere is available in infrared.

-

-  The European CHaracterising ExOPlanets Satellite (CHEOPS), which is expected to be ready for launch in 2018. The mission is designed to calculate the diameters of planets accurately, particularly those planets that fall between super-Earth and Neptune masses.

-

-  The NASA James Webb Space Telescope, to launch in January, 2020. It is specialized to observe in infrared wavelengths. The powerful observatory is expected to reveal more about the habitability of certain exoplanets' atmospheres.

-

-  The European Space Agency's PLAnetary Transits and Oscillations of stars (PLATO) telescope, which is expected to launch in 2024. It is designed to learn how planets form and which conditions, if any, could be favorable for life.

-

-  The ESA ARIEL (Atmospheric Remote-sensing Infrared Exoplanet Large-survey) mission, which will launch in mid-2028. It is expected to observe 1,000 exoplanets and also do a survey of the chemical compositions of their atmospheres.

-

-   With thousands to choose from, it's hard to narrow down a few. Small solid planets in the habitable zone are automatically standouts.    Five other exoplanets that have expanded our perspective on how planets form and evolve:

-

-------------------  51 Pegasi b: As mentioned earlier, this was the first planet to be confirmed around a sun-like star. Half the mass of Jupiter, it orbits around its sun at roughly the distance of Mercury from our Sun. 51 Pegasi b is so close to its parent star that it is likely tidally locked, meaning one side always faces the star.

-

---------------------  HD 209458 b: This was the first planet found (in 1999) to transit its star (although it was discovered by the Doppler wobble technique) and in subsequent years more discoveries piled up. It was the first planet outside the solar system for which we could determine aspects of its atmosphere, including temperature profile and the lack of clouds. (Matthews participated in some of the observations using MOST.)

-

----------------------  55 Cancri e: This super-Earth orbits a star that is bright enough to see by eye, meaning astronomers can study the system in more detail than almost any other. Its "year" is only 17 hours and 41 minutes long (recognized when MOST gazed at the system for two weeks in 2011). Theorists speculate that the planet may be carbon-rich, with a diamond core.

-

----------------------  HD 80606 b: At the time of its discovery in 2001, it held the record as the most eccentric exoplanet ever discovered. It is possible that its odd orbit (which is similar to Halley's Comet around the sun) may be due to the influence of another star. Its extreme orbit would make the planet's environment extremely variable.

-

----------------------  WASP-33b: This planet was discovered in 2011 and has a sort of "sunscreen" layer — a stratosphere — that absorbs some of the visible and ultraviolet light from its parent star. Not only does this planet orbit its star "backward," but it also triggers vibrations in the star, seen by the MOST satellite. 

-

-   Astronomers have discovered dozens of new "rogue" planets, roughly doubling the known number of these mysterious free-roaming worlds.  They have found a collection of at least 70 exoplanets without parent stars in a patch of space about 420 light-years from Earth.

-

-  Most exoplanets are found via observations of their host stars. Astronomers notice slight stellar motions induced by the gravitational tug of an orbiting planet, or ,spot tiny brightness dips caused when a world "transits" its parent star's face.

-

-  Such strategies cannot work for rogue planets, so these worlds are considerably harder to find. Astronomers have generally relied upon a technique called gravitational microlensing, which involves watching foreground objects move in front of background stars. During such passages, the foreground body can act as a gravitational lens, bending the distant star's light in ways that can reveal the closer object's mass and other features.

-

-  Astronomers have analyzed 20 years' worth of imagery and other data collected by a variety of telescopes on the ground and in space, including the European Southern Observatory's Very Large Telescope in Chile, Japan's Subaru Telescope in Hawaii, the European Space Agency's Gaia spacecraft and the Dark Energy Camera, an instrument mounted on the 4-meter Victor M. Blanco Telescope at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile.

-

-  They measured the tiny motions, the colors and luminosities of tens of millions of sources in a large area of the sky. These measurements allowed astronomers to securely identify the faintest objects in this region, the rogue planets.

-

-  The researchers saw infrared energy emitted by 70 to 170 gas-giant rogue planets.  Objects at least 13 times more massive than Jupiter are likely to be "failed stars" known as brown dwarfs rather than planets. 

-

-  The new results bolster the idea that rogue planets are common throughout the Milky Way galaxy, perhaps even outnumbering "normal" worlds that orbit parent stars. 

-

-   Do most of them form solo, condensing from a cloud of material too small to produce a star? Or are rogues usually born in "normal" solar systems but booted into the vast dark void by dramatic gravitational interactions?

-

December 23, 2021      PLANETARY  NEBULAE  -  planet formation     3382                                                                                                                                                

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, December 31, 2021  ---------------------------






3386 - PLANETS - free floating planets?

  -  3386  -  PLANETS  -  free floating planets?    Astronomers have discovered at least 70 new free-floating planets (FFPs), planets that wander through space without a parent star to orbit, in the Upper Scorpius OB stellar association, which is the nearest region of star formation to our Sun. 


---------------------  3386  -  PLANETS  -  free floating planets?

- This is the largest sample of such planets found in a single group and it nearly doubles the number known over the entire sky.  Identifying FFPs within a star cluster is a major challenge, like trying to find a needle in a haystack. 

-

-  First, one needs eyes sensitive enough to detect the “needles”. While stars are relatively bright and easy to spot, planetary-mass members are several thousand times fainter and can only be detected with large aperture telescopes and sensitive detectors. 

-

-  Second, one must identify the rare planetary-mass members (the “needles”, typically a few hundreds) within the overwhelming multitude of field stars and background galaxies (the “haystack").

-

-  To solve this challenge, the astronomers combined proper motions ( motion across the plane of the sky) with multi-wavelength photometry. Proper motions are an extremely effective method to identify members of an association since all the members were born from the same molecular cloud complex and have similar motions to the parent cloud. 

-

-  Unrelated field stars have almost random proper motions, and background galaxies have no measurable proper motions. Photometric luminosities and colors are useful to refine the selection and reject the few remaining interlopers.

-

-  The astronomers also combined the vast number of images available in public astronomical archives with the new deep wide-field observations obtained with the best infrared and optical telescopes on the ground and in space. 

-

-  Using over 80,000 wide-field images adding up to around 100 terabytes and spanning 20 years, they identified at least 70, and up to as many as 170 of these Jupiter-sized planets, as members of the Upper Scorpius association among the background stars and galaxies. This is by far the largest sample of FFPs in a single association, and almost doubles the number of FFPs known to date over the entire sky.

-

-   The nature and origin of FFPs remains unknown: do they form like stars through the gravitational collapse of small clouds of gas? Or,  do they form like planets around stars and are then dynamically ejected or stripped off? 

-

-  The number of FFPs discovered in the Upper Scorpius association exceeds the number of FFPs expected if they only form like stars from the collapse of a small molecular cloud, indicating that other mechanisms must be at play.

-

-  These observations suggest that giant-planet systems must form and become dynamically unstable within the observed lifetime (3-10 million years) of the region to contribute to the population of FFPs. Current studies suggest that dynamical instability among the giant planets in our Solar System may also have occurred at early times, although it was much less violent than the instability needed to eject planets as massive as the ones we have found.

-

-  FFPs, lurking far away from any star illuminating them, would normally be impossible to image. However, the astronomers took advantage of the fact that, in the few million years after their formation, these planets are still hot enough to glow, making them directly detectable by sensitive cameras on large telescopes.

-

-   The FFPs will be essential to study planetary atmospheres in the absence of a blinding host star, making the observation far easier and more detailed. The comparison with atmospheres of planets orbiting stars will provide key details about their formation and properties.  Studying the presence of gas and dust around these objects, what we call 'circumplanetary discs’, will shed more light on their formation process.

-

-  There could be several billions of Jupiters roaming the Milky Way without a host star. This number would be even greater for Earth-mass planets since they are known to be more common than massive planets.

-

-  Using observations and archival data from several of NSF's NOIRLab's observatories, together with observations from telescopes around the world and in orbit, astronomers have discovered at least 70 new free-floating planets, planets that wander through space without a parent star, in a nearby region of the Milky Way.

-

-  Aastronomers, used observations and archival data from a number of large observatories, including facilities from NSF's NOIRLab, telescopes of the European Southern Observatory, the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope, and the Subaru Telescope, amounting to 80,000 wide-field images over 20 years of observations.



The data include 247 images from the NEWFIRM extremely wide-field infrared imager at Kitt Peak National Observatory (KPNO) in Arizona.

-

-   1348 images from the same NEWFIRM instrument after it was relocated to the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) in Chile.

-

-   2214 images from the Infrared Side Port Imager that was previously operating on the VĂ­ctor M. Blanco 4-meter Telescope at CTIO.

-

-   3744 images from the Dark Energy Camera.

-

-  The free-floating planets lie in the Upper Scorpius OB association, which is 420 light-years away from Earth. This region contains a number of the most famous nebulae, including the Rho Ophiuchi cloud, the Pipe Nebula, Barnard 68, and the Coalsack.

-

-  Free-floating planets have mostly been discovered via microlensing surveys, in which astronomers watch for a brief chance alignment between an exoplanet and a background star. However, microlensing events only happen once, meaning follow-up observations are impossible.

-

-  These new planets were discovered using a different method. These planets, lurking far away from any star illuminating them, would normally be impossible to image. However, in the few million years after their formation, these planets are still hot enough to glow, making them directly detectable by sensitive cameras on large telescopes. 

-

-  The team used the 80,000 observations to measure the light of all the members of the association across a wide range of optical and near-infrared wavelengths and combined them with measurements of how they appear to move across the sky.

-

-  They measured the tiny motions, the colors and luminosities of tens of millions of sources in a large area of the sky, allowing astronomers to securely identify the faintest objects in this region.

-

-  This discovery also sheds light on the origin of free-floating planets. Some scientists believe these planets can form from the collapse of a gas cloud that is too small to lead to the formation of a star, or that they could have been kicked out from their parent system. 

-

-  The ejection model suggests that there could be even greater numbers of free-floating planets that are Earth-sized.  The free-floating Jupiter-mass planets are the most difficult to eject, meaning that there might even be more free-floating Earth-mass planets.

-

-  The range in the number of free-floating planets occurs because the mass of the objects is not measured directly in this study. Objects larger than 13 Jupiter masses are not likely to be planets. 

-

-  An upper limit on the mass of the objects was inferred from their brightness, which is dependent on their age. Since the age of the stellar association in which these planets reside is only known to a given certainty, the exact number of planets is also uncertain.

-

-  December 29, 2021          PLANETS  -  free floating planets?      3386                                                                                                                                               

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, December 31, 2021  ---------------------------






Monday, December 27, 2021

3384 - ELECTRIC CARS - some early specs.

   -  3384  -  ELECTRIC  CARS  -  some early specs. Electric cars work by plugging into a charge point and taking electricity from the grid. They store the electricity in rechargeable batteries that power an electric motor, which turns the wheels. Electric cars accelerate faster than vehicles with traditional fuel engines.



---------------------  3384  -  ELECTRIC  CARS  -  some early specs.

-  You charge an electric vehicle by plugging it into a public charging station or into a home charger. There are plenty of charging stations around to stay fully charged while you're in town.

-

-  How far you can travel on a full charge depends on the vehicle. Each model has a different range, battery size and efficiency. The perfect electric car for you will be the one you can use for your normal journeys without having to stop and charge up halfway through.

-

-  There are a few different types of electric vehicle (EV). Some run purely on electricity, these are called pure electric vehicles. And some can also be run on gas or diesel, these are called hybrid electric vehicles.

-

-  “Plug-in electric”  means the car runs purely on electricity and gets all its power when it's plugged in to charge. 

-

-  Plug-in hybrid cars mainly run on electricity but also have a traditional fuel engine so you can use petrol or diesel too if they run out of charge. When running on fuel, these cars will produce emissions but when they're running on electricity, they won't. Plug-in hybrids can be plugged into an electricity source to recharge their battery.

-

-  Hybrid-electric run mainly on fuel like gas or diesel but also have an electric battery too, which is recharged through regenerative braking. These let you switch between using your fuel engine and using 'EV' mode at the touch of a button. These cars cannot be plugged into an electricity source and rely on petrol or diesel for energy.

 -

- Electric cars have 90% fewer moving parts than an Internal Combustion Engine car. 

-  

-  Here's a breakdown of the EV parts:

-

--------------------------     Electric Engine/Motor - Provides power to rotate the wheels. It can be DC/AC type, however, AC motors are more common.

-

--------------------------     Inverter - Converts the electric current in the form of Direct Current (DC) into Alternating Current (AC)

-

--------------------------     Drivetrain - EVs have a single-speed transmission which sends power from the motor to the wheels.

-

--------------------------     Batteries - Store the electricity required to run an EV. The higher the kW of the battery, the higher the range.

-

--------------------------     Charging - Plug into an outlet or EV charging point to charge your battery.

-

-  EV batteries - capacity and kWh explained: Kilowatts (kW) is a unit of power (how much energy a device needs to work). A kilowatt-hour(kWh) is a unit of energy (it shows how much energy has been used), e.g. a 100 watt lightbulb uses 0.1 kilowatts each hour. An average home consumes 3,100 kWh of energy a year. An electric car consumes an average of 2,000 kWh of energy a year.  That is 65% that of a house.

-

-  You can charge an electric vehicle either by plugging it into a socket or by plugging into a charging unit. There are three types of chargers:

-

-  Three pin plug for electric car charging Three-pin plug - a standard three-pin plug that you can connect to any 13 amp socket.

 -

- Socketed electric car charger Socketed - a charge point where you can connect either a Type 1 or Type 2 cable.

 -

-  Tethered electric car charger Tethered - a charge point with a cable attached with either a Type 1 or Type 2 connector.

-

-  There are also three EV charging speeds:

-

--------------------------     Slow - typically rated up to 3kW. Often used to charge overnight or at the workplace. Charging time: 8-10 hours.

-

--------------------------     Fast - typically rated at either 7Kw or 22kW. Tend to be installed in car parks, supermarkets, leisure centres and houses with off-street parking. Charging time: 3-4 hours.

-

--------------------------     Rapid - typically rated from 43 kW. Only compatible with EVs that have rapid charging capability. Charging time: 30-60 minutes.

 -

-  How long to charge EV. Slow 8-10 hours, fast 3-4 hours, rapid 30-60 minutes.

 -

-  The weather affects how much energy your electric car consumes. You have a larger range in summer and smaller range in winter.

-

-  An EVs range is dependent on the battery size (kWh). The higher the EV battery kWh, more power, the further you travel. Here are examples of how far some electric cars charge will go:

-

--------------------------  Volkswagen e-Golf - range: 125 miles 

-

--------------------------  Hyundai Kona Electric - range: 250 miles.

-

-------------------------   Jaguar I-Pace - range: 220 miles 

-

-  Electric cars vary in price, just like gas cars.  EV leasing offers can get your EV home charger plus lowest off-peak rate for cheaper charging overnight.

-

-  December 23, 2021    ELECTRIC  CARS  -  some early specs.       3384                                                                                                                                                

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, December 27, 2021  ---------------------------






Sunday, December 26, 2021

2198 - Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle

 -  2198  - Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle .  Since 1927 we have had to live with the fact that a particles position and velocity cannot be determined simultaneously.  Delta position and delta velocity creates a little teeter totter of inexactitude in measurements of the velocity the particle is moving or where it is at the time of measurement.


----------------------------- 2198  -   Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle          

-  Heisenberg was a German physicist who reasoned that an atomic particle could not be defined as to position and momentum simultaneously.  It became known a the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.   It is not certain because it is in-determinant.

-

-  Heisenberg developed the concise math expressions in 1927 defining:

-

--------------  delta position  *  delta momentum   =  >   Planck’s Constant

-

-  Where delta position is the uncertainty of the position ,and,  delta momentum is the uncertainty of the momentum.  Planck’s Constant is a very small number.

-

-----------------   h   =    6.625  *  10^-31   gram * m^2/sec

-

-  When Heisenberg announced this Einstein made his famous statement , “ I can not believe that God would chose to play dice with the world.”

-

-  The uncertainty is so small it would not be seen with any object above the atomic scale.  On the other hand at the atomic scale and below this uncertainty is part of an every day reality.  It forces physicists to work through complex math and deal with probabilities of where a product will be with certainty.  

-

-  The theory of Quantum Mechanics would suggest that the whole Universe would work the same way.  Or, maybe not and maybe the theory of Quantum Mechanics is incomplete?

-

-  In either case,  since 1927 we have had to live with the fact that a particles position and velocity cannot be determined simultaneously.  Delta position and delta velocity creates a little teeter totter of inexactitude in measurements of the velocity the particle is moving or where it is at the time of measurement.

-

-  If you start getting a position more and more accurate, you start measuring velocity with less and less accuracy.  And vice versa.  When one goes up the other goes down.

-

-  The cosmological constant is another enigma  that is hard to comprehend.   This constant is not “constant” over time as it tries to explain the apparent accelerating expansion of the Universe.  Today the constant for space expansion is:

-

---------------     49,30 6 miles per hour for every million lightyear distance.

-

-  This constant expansion is believed to be due to Dark Energy,  a type of anti-gravity that permeates all of the vacuum of space.

-

-  We can create a vacuum in the lab.  After removing all the air and other particles and we remove all the heat down to absolute zero temperature that vacuum still contains measurable energy  

-

-  How can energy still exist in an absolute vacuum that is at absolute zero temperature?

-

-  This residual energy , this dark energy in a vacuum, helps explain why helium will not freeze by cooling alone.  Pressure must be applied to overcome the residual energy and that can never take it to zero.  

-

-  This residual energy is also what causes the random noise in electronic circuits.  It is sometimes called “thermal noise” that gets amplified in radio receivers as a hiss.  

-

-  The vacuum contains randomly fluctuating electromagnetic fields with an estimated energy density of 10^114 ergs per cubic centimeter.  If this number can be believed then one cubic centimeter of vacuum contains the total energy expended by all the stars in the Milky Way Galaxy shining for a million years.  

-

-  How can a normal human even comprehend this number?

-

-   At a large scale, a vacuum in space is smooth ad featureless.  At the atomic scale the vacuum is seething in a sea of activity.  The size of the atom is 10^-8 centimeters.  An electron is 10^-13 centimeters.  At the smallest scale the Planck length is 1.616 * 10^-33 centimeters.

-

-  It is at the Planck scale that space looses its smoothness and assumes a granular structure.  It is assumed that this granular structure is in fact particles with a diameter in Planck lengths and with a mass in Planck mass at 2.17 * 10^-5 grams .  Planck particles have a diameter that is equal to their wavelength in the wave-particle duality of matter.  This makes them transparent to longer wavelengths.  

-

-  A vacuum is made up of a sea of Planck particles whose density is 3.6 * 10^93 grams per cubic centimeter.  How can atomic particles move in such a dense medium?  Because the heavier the particle the shorter the wavelength and the lighter the particle the longer the wavelength  

-

-  All the known elementary particles have wavelengths much longer than the Planck length.  The vacuum then becomes transparent to these elementary particles that have longer wavelengths.  This is much like how infrared light can travel through a thick dust cloud or how ordinary light can pass through dense glass.

-

-  The high energy density in a vacuum can be temporarily converted into mass according to E=mc^2.  

-

-----  Energy  =  89,900,000,000,000,000  *  mass    kilograms * meters^2 / seconds^2

-

-  In other words you can get a whole lot of energy out of a little bit of mass.  The bomb over Hiroshima converted less than one half pound  of mass into energy.  That energy leveled the Hiroshima city and the surrounding country side. The nuclear flash could be seen by an observer on the planet Jupiter.  

-

-  In this energy vacuum particles and antiparticles are winking in and out of existence continuously.  The exact relationship between the energy of these particles , 10^-13 centimeters in diameter, and the brief time of their existence is the source of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle.

-

-  The “uncertainty of time” multiplied by the “uncertainty of energy” is equal to Planck’s Constant  /  2*pi  =  1.055 * 10^-31  grams * meters^2 / second.

-

-  These particles and anti-particles can only exist for an extraordinary short period of time,  10^-23 seconds.  An electron n this environment is continually absorbing and emitting these virtual particles from the vacuum.  The electron is in constant motion of jitter even in a vacuum at absolute zero temperature.  It is in a center of constant activity interacting with these virtual particles causing a cloud of virtual particles.  

-

-  The further you penetrate this cloud of virtual particles the more “point like” the electron becomes.  The further you penetrate the cloud the more pronounced the electric charge becomes.  This cloud of virtual particles is screening the full electronic charge of the electron thus causing its unpredictability.  

-

-  The jitter and the particle - wave indeterminacy are what cause the Heisenberg Uncertainty.  Because we are observing clouds of activity and jitter we must deal with these uncertainties as probabilities of position and movement.  This is true even in a vacuum and at temperatures at Absolute Zero degrees.

-

-  You can say that an electron 99% probability of being in this specific location, but there is still a 1% probability of it being somewhere else.  Mass and energy are constantly being exchanged and particles and antiparticles are constantly annihilating each other in his sea of uncertainty.  

-

-  Infinite precision is just not a possible condition in this Universe.  We have to learn o live with fuzziness and the probabilities and uncertainties it brings all of us.  It is a wonder we even got here.  Thank God we made it this far.

-

----------------------

- Footnote:  Werner Heisenberg was a genius but pretty much a jerk from what I have  read.  He was one of the world’s greatest physicists after Albert Einstein.  At the time he was 24 years old he was working in Quantum Mechanics when he developed the Uncertainty Principle.  

-

-  During World War II he was a Nazi working on the German atomic bomb.  He was only allowed to use E=mc^2 as long as he disavowed Einstein himself, who was a disavowed Jew.

-

-  Heisenberg became a member of the German army weapons bureau in 1939.  In February 1940 he published a paper on how to build an atomic bomb.  He almost had the bomb working but he needed heavy water (deuterium)  to slow the neutrons down enough to be absorbed by the uranium 235 nuclei.

-

-  He had a shipment coming from Norsk hydro plant in  Vemork, Norway.  But, fortunately, the allies and the Norwegian s sabotaged the ferry that was to take it to Germany.  Heisenberg was without the heavy water he needed to make the nuclear reaction work.  

-

-  At the same time,  Robert Oppenheimer was full steam ahead on the Manhattan Project.

-

-  After the war Oppenheimer was tormented and be leagued  by the military intelligence and became an unhappy man.  Heisenberg , on the other hand was welcomed as a hero in Germany after his release in 1946.   At he time he claimed he could have easily had the bomb built but dilly-dallied so the Nazi’s would never get to use it.

-

-  Judging by he way Heisenberg treated his Nazi compatriots during and after the war ,he only looked after himself and no one else.  That is my definition of a jerk.

-

-  December 3, 2018     HEISENBERG  UNCERTAINTY  PRINCIPLE  ?        18

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

-  to:   -------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com

 --------------------------   Sunday, December 26, 2021  --------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


2178 - Light’s Mysteries

 -  2178 - Light’s Mysteries.  The electromagnetic radiation that surrounds us not only allows us to see it is what makes us see.  The energy bundled into each photon strikes the back of the eye and causes a chemical reaction which in turn sends an electrical nerve signal to the brain.  The brain uses these detected signals to create an image and match it with one we have in memory


---------------------------------  2178  -  Light’s Mysteries

-  Half of the human brain and most of its brain power is used in visualization.  The electromagnetic radiation that surrounds us not only allows us to see it is what makes us see.  The energy bundled into each photon strikes the back of the eye and causes a chemical reaction which in turn sends an electrical nerve signal to the brain.  The brain uses these detected signals to create an image and match it with one we have in memory.  We see things.

-

-   For the last 400 years science has debated the structure and nature of light.  In the early 1900’s light was first defined as consisting of inter-dependent , mutually perpendicular, transverse oscillations of an electric and magnetic wave.  Light was defined as electromagnetic radiation.  

-

-  Visible light is but a very narrow section of the entire electromagnetic spectrum.  Visible light has wavelengths from 390 nanometers (violet colors) to 740 nanometers (red colors).  

-

-  The electromagnetic spectrums stretches from power line frequencies of a few cycles per second and 100,000,000 meters wavelength to Gamma Rays that are 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 cycles per second and 0.000,000,000,000,000,1 meters wavelength.

-

-  Each photon of light is an energy bundle.  The amount of energy depends on the frequency of the oscillations.  A constant “unit of action” for each photon, known as Planck’s Constant, times the frequency is the energy that each photon possesses. 

-

-   Planck’s Constant unit of Action is 4.136*10^-15 electron volts.  Or, in the metric system, this unit of Action is 6.625*10^-14 kilogram*meters^2 / second.  Both are very small numbers.

-

-  Quantum Physics holds that matter, as well as light , exhibit the behaviors of both waves and particles.  It all started in the 1600’s when Christiaan Huygen proposed a wave theory for light.  However, at the same time Isaac Newton proposed the “ corpuscular” or particle theory of light.  

-

-  In the 1900’s light diffraction was observed and needed the wave theory to explain it.  Also, Thomas Young’s double-slit experiment with light and the resulting interference patterns needed the wave theory to explain it.

-

-  Generally, waves are thought to propagate through some medium.  Huygens called it “aluminiferous aether”.  When James Clerk Maxwell quantified a set of equations for electromagnetic radiation he used “ ether” as the medium for wave propagation.

-

-    For 200 years no one could discover what the ether was.  In the 1800’s the Michelson - Morley experiment using a light interferometer failed to detect the ether, and science decided there was none.  

-

-  In 1905 Albert Einstein used the particle theory of light to explain the photoelectric effect.  He concluded that light traveled in discrete bundles of energy, called photons.  The energy in photons depended on their frequency of oscillation.

-

-  In 1929 de Broglie won the Nobel Prize for his hypothesis that all matter , as well as light, has a wavelength related to its momentum.  Massive particles with much momentum have such small wavelengths as to be undetectable.  But, small objects can have observable wavelengths.  Photons, electron, protons, atoms and even bacteria have been observed to have wavelengths.

-

-  Science needed a way to study these wavelengths and developed the mathematics using differential equations to represent the wave-particle duality of light and matter.  Remember, light is energy and energy and matter are the same thing separated by the speed of light squared, E=mc^2.    The Wave Function equation is called the Schrodinger equation.  See note (1) for some description but the math is way over my head.

-

-  The Wave Function represents the probability of finding a given particle at a given point.  The probability equations can then be used to describe diffraction, interference and other wave-like properties.  Particles end up distributed according to these probability laws.  The probability of a particle being in any location is a “wave“.  The actual physical appearance of that particle is not a wave.

-

-  Back up to the second paragraph where light was defined as a “ transverse wave”.  Waves are a disturbance in a medium around an equilibrium state.  The energy of this disturbance is what causes the wave motion.  A transverse wave has displacements of the medium that are perpendicular ( transverse ) to the direction of the traveling wave.  Ocean waves and vibrating strings are transverse waves.

-

-  A longitudinal wave has displacements of the medium that are back and forth along the same direction of the traveling wave.  Sound waves are longitudinal waves.

-

-  The math works for waves in a medium.  Electromagnetic radiation travels through empty space with no medium (that we know of).  However, the math for these waves is still the same.  Waves transport energy, but not matter.  The medium itself does not travel.  The individual particles undergo back-and-forth, up-and-down, side-to-side motion around an equilibrium position, but the particles do not travel in the direction that the wave propagates.

-

-  To describe wave motion we need to describe the position of a particle in the medium at any point in time.  Mathematically this description is the Wave Function.

-

----------------  v  =   the velocity of the wave’s propagation

-

----------------  A  =  The maximum amplitude or magnitude of the displacement from equilibrium.

-

----------------  T  =  The time for one cycle, the Period, in seconds per cycle.

-

-----------------  f  -  the frequency in cycles per second.  The frequency is the reciprocal of the Period.  f  = 1 / T   ,or, T  = 1 / f.

-

---------------  2*pi*f  =  angular frequency in radiant per second.  The are 2*pi radians in one cycle.

-

----------------  w  =  wavelength is the distance between corresponding points on a successive, repetitive wave.

-

--------------  2*pi / w  =  the wave number or propagation constant in radians per meter.

-

---------------  v  = f * w  =  velocity = frequency * wavelength.

-

---------------  v  =  w / T  =  velocity =  wavelength / Period.

-

-  The vertical position of a point on the wave is “y” and the horizontal position is “x”.  The time is “t”.  The mathematical function for the position of a particle is:

-

--------------  y  =  A*sin 2*pi*f ( t - x / v)

-

--------------  y  =  A*sin 2*pi( t / T - x / v)

-

--------------  y  =  A*sin (2*pi*f  t - 2*pi*x / w)

-

-  The first derivative of these functions is the rate of change of the particles position with time.  The second derivative of this function is the rate of change of the rate of change.  The second derivative is the Wave Function : 

-

-------------  d^2y / dx^2  =  d^2y / v^2  *  dt^2

-

-  This equation says that the second derivative of “y” with respect to “x”  =  the second derivative of “y” with respect to “t”, time, divided by the wave velocity squared.  If a function “y” acts as a wave with a velocity, ”v” ,then, it can be described mathematically as a Wave Function. 

-

-   These derivatives are not that foreign to us.  The first derivative of distance with respect to time, that is, the rate of change of distance with respect to time is velocity.  The second derivative of distance with respect to time is the rate of change of velocity, or the rate of change of the rate of change of distance with respect to time which is acceleration.  On difference is that this is position in one dimension and the Wave Function is position in 3 dimensions.

-

-  That gets us to Schrodinger’s Wave Equation which is much too complicated for me to explain.  It describes the behavior of a particle in a field of force, like the behavior of an electron inside an atom.  Here is Schrodinger’s Wave Equation:

-

--------  (Laplace Operation)^2 * Wave Function - 4*pi*mass / (-1)^.5 * Planck’s Constant * (Derivative of the Wave Function with time)  -  8*pi^2 * mass * Potential Energy / (Planck’s Constant)^2 * Wave Function  = 0


--------  where:  the (Laplace Operation )   =  di/dx + dj/dy + dk/dz

-

---------  where : “ijk” are unit vectors along the “xyz” axes respectively.  And, these are partial derivatives because they have more than one variable.  To solve them you hold some variables constant and do a “partial derivative” on one variable at a time.

-

-  These Wave Equations are usually too difficult to be solved directly.  The math is too hard.  Instead, mathematicians solve an easier equation that is close then use Perturbation Theory to approximate the answer.  Perturbation makes small changes to the easy equation and then characterizes the changes to get to the more difficult equation‘s solution.

-

-  How can a simple thing as light get so complex?  

-

-  Entropy always increases and minimum entropy is maximum complexity.  So, if entropy always increase the fate of the Universe must be darkness.  Light is radiation, or energy.  Light and matter must be the same thing according to E=mc^2. -

-

-   So, your body and soul are made up of a very low energy form of light.  We call it matter. Matter too is very complex.  If entropy always increases the fate of the Universe must also be no matter.  No matter.  That is all I got to say on the subject.

-

-   November 21, 2018                   Light’s Mysteries        934       2178

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---- 

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

-  to:   -------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com

 --------------------------   Sunday, December 26, 2021  --------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Saturday, December 25, 2021

3379 - ELECTRIC CARS - were the future in 1907!

  -  3379  -  ELECTRIC  CARS  -   were the future in 1907!  Today’s electric cars have their origins in the luxurious, top-dollar designs of the early 20th century.  Electric cars might once again be mainstream, but it’s been a long road to get here.  Grandpa Detrick worked on electric Trolley Cars.  He was taking correspondence courses for an Electrical Engineering degree.


---------------------  3379  -   ELECTRIC  CARS  -   were the future in 1907!

-

-  An electric car buzzes along the road of a downtown street, with pedestrians and fellow drivers alike stopping to stare at the wealthy owners inside. The car costs roughly 7 times more than a normal Ford, and its reputation and design has helped to fuel long wait lists and pent-up demand.

-

-  For a brief period in the early 20th century in the United States, the electric car was high society’s hottest commodity, sought after by socialites and businessmen alike.  Electric cars might seem like the vehicles of the future, but they are actually a status symbol of the past.

-

-  During the early years of the “Automotive Age,”—from about 1896 to 1930—as many as 1,800 different car manufacturers functioned in the U.S. While innovators in Europe had been working on battery-powered vehicles since the 1830s, the first successful electric car in the U.S. made its debut in 1890 thanks to a chemist from Iowa. His six-passenger was basically an electrified wagon that hit a top speed of 14 mph.

-

-  By 1900, electric cars were so popular that New York City had a fleet of electric taxis, and electric cars accounted for a third of all vehicles on the road. People liked them because in many ways early electric cars outperformed their gas competitors.

-

-   Electric cars didn’t have the smell, noise, or vibration found in steam or gasoline cars. They were easier to operate, lacked a manual crank to start, and didn’t require the same difficult-to-change gear system as gas cars.

-

-  Electric cars became extremely popular in cities, especially with upper-class women who disliked the noisy and smelly attributes of gasoline-powered cars.

-

-   A New York Times article from 1911 reported, “The designers of electric passenger car-carrying vehicles have made great advances in the past few years, and these machines have retained all their early popularity and are steadily growing in favor with both men and women.”

-

-  Even the “best known and most prominent makers of gasoline cars in this country use electrics for driving between their homes and their offices.”

-

-   One of the challenges for early electric car owners was where to charge them. But by 1910 owners could install their own charging stations on their property, and an increasing number of car-repair shops popped up that allowed electric cars to charge overnight.

-

-  One of the most eccentric and interesting manufacturers of early electric cars was Oliver P. Fritchle, a chemist and electrical engineer who began as an auto repairman until he realized he could build a better electric car himself. Fritchle sold his first vehicle in 1906 and set up a production plant in Denver, Colorado, in 1908.

-

-  Fritchle made one of the best car batteries in the business, which he claimed could travel 100 miles on a single charge. He challenged other manufacturers to match his range, and set out on a publicity stunt in 1908 from Lincoln, Nebraska, to New York City in a two-seat Fritchle Victoria model that sold for $2,000.

-

-  The trip took him 20 days of driving and Fritchle drove the 1,800 mile journey over rough and nonexistent roads with only one flat tire, charging at electric central stations or electric garages as night. After the nationally publicized trip, he and his car returned to Denver by train, triumphant.

-

-  Fritchle marketed his cars as the “100-mile Fritchle,” and promised delivery 10 days after an order was placed. In Denver and the American West, his high-ceilinged cars reigned supreme with celebrities like Molly Brown driving around town in Fritchles. He was so successful that Fritchle even opened a sales office on Fifth Avenue in New York City, catering to the city’s affluent.

-

-  The production of electric cars peaked in 1912. Fritchle built about 198 vehicles per year between 1909 and 1914. And while at the turn of the century electric cars had made up a good proportion of the market, advances in gasoline-powered vehicles meant that electric cars owned a smaller and smaller market share as time went on.

-

-  When Henry Ford introduced the mass-produced and gas-powered Model T in 1908, it symbolized a death blow to the electric car. Grandpa was born in 1907.  By 1912, a gasoline car cost only $650 while the average electric roadster sold for $1,750. 

-

-  In 1912 Charles Kettering also invented the first electric automobile starter. Effectively eliminating the hand crank, Kettering’s invention made the gas-powered auto even more attractive to the same drivers who had preferred electric cars.

-

-  Despite Fritchle’s impressive trek across the country in his electric car, most people in the early twentieth century were not so adventurous. As the U.S. developed a better system of roads after the First World War, drivers wanted longer-range vehicles that could go the distance.

-

-   The discovery of Texas crude oil also reduced the price of gasoline, making both car ownership and car maintenance more affordable to the average consumer.  By 1935, electric cars had all but disappeared from the road. I was born in 1941.

-

-  It would take decades, and the persistent oil crises of the 1970s, before interest in electric cars once again fueled new technologies. In 1976, Congress passed the Electric and Hybrid Vehicle Research, Development, and Demonstration Act to support research and development in electric and hybrid vehicles.

-

-   But even the electric cars of the 1970s still lagged behind their predecessors; many topped out at 45 miles per hour and some could only drive 40 miles—60 miles less than the 100-mile Fritchle—before needing to be recharged.

-

-  Today, it’s normal to see a Prius pull up at a signal, and the biggest electric car companies are once again household names. Whether Tesla is debuting game-changing solar roof tiles, expanding the production capacity of its electric cars, or doubling its charging network with the rollout of the Model 3, electric cars are big business.

-

-  In our rush to embrace this new wave of electric vehicles, it’s easy to forget that today’s cars have their origins in the luxurious, top-dollar designs of the early 20th century. Electric cars might once again be mainstream, but it’s been a long road to get here.

-

December 15, 2021    -    ELECTRIC  CARS  -   were the future in 1907!      3378                                                                                                                                                

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, December 25, 2021  ---------------------------






Thursday, December 23, 2021

3382 - LIFE - our guide to evolution?

  -  3382  -  LIFE  -  our guide to evolution?   Does humanity exist to serve some ultimate, transcendent purpose? Conventional scientific wisdom says no.   Our evolution on this planet is just a “cosmic accident”. If you believe otherwise, many would accuse you of suffering from some kind of religious delusion.


---------------------  3382  -  LIFE  -  our guide to evolution?

-  If your worldview is entirely naturalistic it doesn’t rely on invoking any supernatural powers. And, does agree with conventional scientific wisdom.  In biological natural selection, genes’ ability to replicate themselves depends on how well they can encode traits that permit organisms to out-reproduce other members of their own species.

-

-  Such traits, for example, camouflage to avoid predators or eyes to enable vision, are adaptations to the environment, as opposed to traits that are just byproducts of adaptations or random genetic noise. The purpose of these adaptations is to solve difficult problems like seeing, digesting or thinking.

-

-  Because organisms are bundles of complex adaptations, they are the most improbably complex things in the universe. And improbable complexity is, in fact, the hallmark of natural selection.  The fundamental way in which we recognize that a trait actually is an adaptation. 

-

-  This makes them improbably low in “entropy”, which is the degree of disorder in a physical system. A basic law of physics is that entropy tends to always be increasing so that systems become more disordered.  This is known as the “second law of thermodynamics”.

-

-   It’s because of this law that you can crack an egg and mix it all together to make an omelet (making it more disordered), but you can’t turn the omelet neatly back into an egg with shell, white and yolk (making it more ordered).

-

-  Because natural selection is the process that “designs” organisms, incrementally organizing random, disordered matter into complex, functional organs. it is the most powerful anti-entropic process that we know of. Without the incremental changes that natural selection allows, the only way a complex adaptation like a mammalian eye could come into existence would be as the result of random chance. And the likelihood of that is extremely low.

-

-  Biological natural selection explains how adaptations have purpose to facilitate survival and reproduction, and why organisms behave purposefully. It does not explain how life in general could have any transcendent purpose.

-

- Cosmologist Lee Smolin’s theory of cosmological natural selection founded his theory on the view that our universe exists in an innumerably vast population of replicating universes, called a multiverse. 

-

-  Smolin reasoned that in a multiverse, universes that were better at reproducing would become more common. He proposed that they could be created from existing blackholes. And if blackholes are how universes reproduce, then cosmological natural selection would favor universes that contained more blackholes.

-

-  In this theory, life is simply the accidental byproduct of processes “designed” by selection to produce blackholes.

-

-  Smolin’s theory has considerable intuitive appeal. It seems analogous to Darwin’s selection theory. And blackholes do seem to be likely candidates to give birth to new universes. 

-

-  A blackhole is an infinitely small concentration of “spacetime“, “matter and energy“, a singularity. And it’s exactly this type of phenomenon we believe the Big Bang started from.

-

-  In one glaring aspect Smolin’s theory falls short of being analogous to Darwin’s. It does not predict that the most improbably complex feature of our universe will be the one most likely to be an adaptation produced by cosmological natural selection. Because that least entropic feature is “life” rather than “blackholes“.

-

-   Smolin does identify life as the least entropic known thing. His theory does not make the connection between entropy and selection. That is, it doesn’t acknowledge that just as improbably low entropy is the hallmark of selection operating at the biological level, this is likely to be true at the cosmological level as well.

-

-  If life is the universe’s reproductive system, the implication is that sufficiently evolved intelligence could acquire the ability to create new cosmic environments. In order to be habitable, these baby universes would need to replicate the physical laws of the lifeform’s native universe.

-

-  Cosmologists expect that in billions of years, our universe will cease being habitable. By that point, however, life could conceivably have become intelligent enough to produce new life-supporting universes, perhaps by civilizations “building” something similar to blackholes.

-

-  Human technological progress is likely to continue into the vastly distant future. If cosmological selection “designed” life to use its technology for universe reproduction, then it seems reasonable to expect that life will succeed in this regard, just as you’d expect an eye produced by biological selection to actually succeed in seeing.

-

-  That doesn’t mean that unceasing technological progress is guaranteed.  We could use our technology to destroy ourselves. Nevertheless we can reasonably expect humanity to be sticking around for a long, long time.

-

-  It’s not a new idea to propose in general terms that life might constitute a mechanism for cosmological evolution. 

-

-   Life, as the least entropic known thing in the universe, is more likely than blackholes  to be a mechanism of universe reproduction.  I have run out of entropy, sorry.

-

-  December 20, 2021      LIFE  -  our guide to evolution?              3382                                                                                                                                                

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, December 23, 2021  ---------------------------