Wednesday, April 10, 2024

4427- MILKYWAY GALAXY - how big is it?

 

-    4427  -  MILKYWAY GALAXY   -  how big is it?   -    Exactly how massive is the Milky Way?  How do you weigh a galaxy? It's an astronomical challenge, particularly if it's the galaxy you call home. It turns out there are several ways to get a handle on the mass of the Milky Way.


-------------------------  4427    -     MILKYWAY GALAXY   -  how big is it?

-    One method is to look at the motion of stars in the galaxy. Most Milky Way stars follow a roughly circular path around the galactic center. Just as planets orbit the Sun, stars orbit the galaxy. Since gravity is the force holding stars in their orbit, you can use a star's speed and distance from the center to determine the mass within its orbit.

-

-    Not all stars have circular orbits, but they do on average. So you can plot the speed vs. distance from the center for known stars, and get what is known as the rotation curve. Measurements of this curve in the Milky Way and other galaxies were the first evidence that galaxies had much more mass than could be accounted for by visible stars, leading to the idea of dark matter.

-

-    One of the problems with the “rotation curve method” is that we can only measure stars to a certain distance. We now know that most of our galaxy's mass isn't concentrated at the center, but rather extends outward into a galactic halo. We can estimate the mass of the halo from the rotation curve, but we can also look at the motion of globular clusters.

-

-    Globular clusters are bright dense clusters of stars. Since stars within a globular cluster are gravitationally bound, these clusters move around the galaxy like a single object. They are found in a sphere surrounding the Milky Way, so measuring their motion helps us measure the mass of the galactic halo.

-

-   To measure the outer region of the galactic halo, we can look at the motion of satellite galaxies such as the Magellanic Clouds. There are about 60 small galaxies within about 1.4 million light-years of the Milky Way. Not all of them are in orbit around our galaxy, but many of them are. Since they lay outside our galactic halo, their orbital motions are determined by all of our galaxy's mass. The only downside of this approach is that with only a few dozen orbiting galaxies, the result isn't particularly accurate.

-

-   All of these approaches calculate the mass of the Milky Way from orbital motion. There are a few methods that don't rely on the orbital motion. One of these is to look at the tidal plumes of dwarf galaxies. In the history of our galaxy, there are some globular clusters and dwarf galaxies that strayed too close to the central region of the Milky Way and were ripped apart by tidal forces. The remnants of these galaxies form a stream of stars, such as the Sagittarius stream. By calculating the motion of these streams we can estimate galactic mass.

-

-   Another approach is to look at stars leaving our galaxy. Occasionally a star will have a near miss with another star and gain enough velocity to escape our galaxy. Since the escape velocity depends on galactic mass, a statistical measure of escaping stars gives a mass for the galaxy.

-

-   We can look at the local group of galaxies. This includes the Andromeda galaxy and its satellite galaxies. Our local group is gravitationally isolated from more distant galaxy clusters, so looking at the equilibrium state of the local group gives us a handle on its overall mass and the mass of the Milky Way.

-

-   Each of these approaches has its own advantages and levels of accuracy. None of them are the final say on their own. In this latest work, the team took a statistical average of various methods and derived what we might call the best value for the mass of our galaxy. The value they determined was a “trillion solar masses”, give or take a few hundred billion solar masses.

- 

-

April 10, 2023          MILKYWAY GALAXY   -  how big is it?           4427

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, April 10, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4425 - MARS - craters filled with water?

 

-    4425  -  MARS  -  craters filled with water?  -    New research shows that the Gale Crater, the landing spot for NASA’s “MSL Curiosity”, held water for a longer time than scientists thought.   Life needs water, and it needs stability. So, if Gale Crater held water for a long time, it strengthens the idea that Mars could’ve supported life.



-------------------------  4425    -   MARS  -  craters filled with water?

-    Mars’ Gale Crater was filled with water for much longer than anyone thought.   We know that Mars was once warm and wet, a conclusion that was less certain a couple of decades ago.

-

-    The Gale Crater is an ancient paleolake, and research suggests that the region could’ve been exposed to water for a longer duration than thought. But was it liquid water?  The research is titled “Ice? Salt? Pressure?

-

-    Sediment deformation structures are evidence of late-stage shallow groundwater in Gale crater.   We know that water played a role in shaping the Martian surface. Multiple rovers and orbiters have given us ample evidence of that. Orbital images show clear examples of ancient deltas. We also have many images of sedimentary rock, with its tell-tale layered structure, laid down in the presence of water.

-

-    The Gale Crater and the landforms within it,  Mount Sharp,  is the dominant feature in the crater and rises 18,000 feet. It’s made up of sedimentary layers that have been eroded over time. But it has substructures that show its detailed history.

-

-    Wind-deposited layers were contorted into strange shapes, which suggests the sand had been deformed shortly after being laid down. These structures point to the presence of water just below the surface.

-

-    cientisSts found something odd in the overlying windborne sandstone: deformed layers that could only have been formed in the presence of water. The sandstone revealed that water was probably abundant more recently, and for longer, than previously thought.

-

-   This water might have been pressurized liquid, forced into and deforming the sediment; frozen, with the repeat freezing and thawing process causing the deformation; or briny, and subject to large temperature swings.

-

-    By the middle of Mars’ “Hesperian Period”, the planet lost its water. The Hesperian’s boundaries in time are uncertain, but it’s generally thought of as the transition from the heavy bombardment period to the dry Mars we know today. The Hesperian could’ve ended between 3.2 and 2.0 billion years ago. The “Noachian” preceded it, and the “Amazonian” followed it.

-

-    This suggests that Mars had abundant subsurface water toward the end of the Hesperian. The evidence is in MSL Curiosity’s images of different sedimentary rocks on Gale Crater’s Mt. Sharp.  When sediments are moved by flowing water in rivers, or by the wind blowing, they leave characteristic structures which can act like fingerprints of the ancient processes that formed them.

-

-   “MSL Curiosity” slowly worked its way up Mt. Sharp, studying the rocks at different elevations as it ascended. As expected, it found younger rocks the higher it went. Eventually, it reached the Stimson formation. The “Stimson formation” is the remnant of an ancient windborne desert dune field.

-

-   Usually, the wind deposits sediment in a very regular, predictable way.  Surprisingly, they found that these wind-deposited layers were contorted into strange shapes, which suggests the sand had been deformed shortly after being laid down. These structures point to the presence of water just below the surface.

-

-    In the “Brackenberry outcrop feature”, the sedimentary rocks show evidence of deformation by water. There are laminations in various states of deformity, becoming more pronounced in the feature geologists call the cusp core. In the “cusp core”, wind-ripple laminations bend toward the vertical and become incoherent.

-

-    There are three mechanisms that can explain the deformed features, and they all involve water. They’re also not mutually exclusive.  High-pressure water could’ve overcome the strength of the rock and deformed it. Large ice deposits on top of the structure could’ve caused deformation, as could freeze/thaw cycles of water inside the rock. The third explanation involves sediment rock weakly bound together by evaporites. Thermal expansion and contraction of the evaporites can deform the rock.

-

-    The layers of sediment in the crater reveal a shift from a wet environment to a drier one over time reflecting Mars’ transition from humid and habitable environment to inhospitable desert world.  But these water-formed structures in the desert sandstone show that water persisted on Mars much later than previously thought.

-

-   These finding extends the timeline of water persisting in the region surrounding Gale crater, and so the whole region could have been habitable for longer than previously thought.    Mars is an instructive example. If it remained habitable for longer than we thought, it was likely only marginally inhabitable.

-

-    There are a bewildering number of variables that go into making Earth the living oasis that it is. We’re much more likely to stumble on other planets like Mars, which were once habitable and maybe even harbored simple life. If Earth’s long-lived habitability is the outlier, and Mars’ marginal, interrupted habitability is more likely, we can expect to find many planets like it that were once alive but are now long dead.

- 

-    How lucky we are to be alive!

-

- 

April 9, 2023          MARS  -  craters filled with water?         4425

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, April 10, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Monday, April 8, 2024

4424 - SOLAR ECLIPSE SPEED - only the shadow knows ? -

 

-    4424  -  SOLAR  ECLIPSE  SPEED  -   only the shadow knows ?  -    April's total solar eclipse will travel at speeds ranging from 10 million miles an hour, half the speed of the fastest supernova explosion ever detected, to as slow as 1,565 mph, about twice the speed of a supersonic aircraft.


-------------------------  4424    -   SOLAR  ECLIPSE  SPEED  -   only the shadow knows ?

-   How fast will April's total solar eclipse travel?   During the total solar eclipse on April 8, the moon's shadow will slow down and then speed up again.  When the moon's shadow races across Earth on April 8 during the total solar eclipse, it will travel faster than the speed of sound.

-

-   It will sweep across Earth at more than 1,500 mileS per hour on April 8.

-

-    However, exactly how fast it will move will depend on where you are viewing it from.   A solar eclipse occurs on Earth when a new moon blocks at least part of the sun, as seen from Earth. All solar eclipses project a large fuzzy shadow onto Earth called the “penumbra”. From within it, observers see a partial solar eclipse, watching the moon gradually block some of the sun before gradually moving away.

-

-    Only during a total solar eclipse, when the moon blocks all of the sun, does a smaller, darker conical shadow called the umbra project onto Earth. This is the path of totality, and from within it, observers see partial phases on either side of a total solar eclipse.

-

-    As millions of people across the United States experienced a total eclipse as the umbra, or moon’s shadow passed over them, only six people witnessed the umbra from space. Viewing the eclipse from orbit the space station crossed the path of the eclipse three times as it orbited above the continental United States at an altitude of 250 miles.

-

-   The width of the umbra (the path of totality) and the penumbra (the partial eclipse zone) depend on the moon's distance from Earth during the eclipse. This also affects the speed at which the shadow moves, as does the rotational speed of the moon and the Earth. The moon is orbiting Earth from west to east, the same way Earth rotates, but the moon moves more quickly.

-

-    The penumbral and umbral shadows of the moon are projected as a path because Earth rotates under the faster-moving shadow of the moon. So, although the moon's shadow moves across Earth very quickly during an eclipse, it's counteracted by the Earth's rotational speed.

-

-    Although the moon's shadow would move even more quickly across the planet if it weren't rotating, on April 8, that shadow will still move exceptionally fast. However, it won't travel at a consistent speed.

-

-    The moon's shadow will travel slowest at the point of greatest eclipse near the town of Nazas, Mexico, where the duration is longest and also where the shadow speed is the lowest.  As the shadow progresses across North America, the shadow speed increases because the oblique angle of the shadow on a curved Earth results in a higher ground speed.

-

-    For example, at 11:37 UT on April 8, the event will begin as an eclipsed sunrise in the Pacific Ocean, during which the moon's shadow will be traveling at a whopping 10,439,792 mph.   As it ends as an eclipsed sunset in the Atlantic, it will be traveling at 5,535,176 mph. However, close to Nazas, Mexico, the point of the greatest eclipse where the centers of the sun, moon, and Earth are in perfect synergy (alignment), it will be moving at 1,565 mph.

-

-     The shadow will slow down to that point and speed up after, so as the moon's shadow enters the U.S. in Texas, it will speed up slightly to 1,597 mph. It will then pick up the pace across the U.S. and, as it leaves Newfoundland in Canada for the Atlantic, it will be moving at 4,727 mph.

-

- 

April 7, 2023        SOLAR  ECLIPSE  SPEED  -   only the shadow knows ?          4423

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, April 8, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4423 - PARKER SOLAR PROBE?

 

-    4423  -   PARKER  SOLAR  PROBE?   -    Parker Solar Probe was blasted by Coronal Mass Ejections 28 times in 4 years.  PSP was launched on August 12, 2018, with the goal of becoming the first spacecraft to touch the Sun while teaching us more about our host star than any spacecraft or solar instrument in human history.



-------------------------  4423    -   PARKER  SOLAR  PROBE?

-    Incredible data the PARKER  SOLAR  PROBE  has collected on coronal mass ejections (CMEs) over this four-year period.    There have been numerous case studies of coronal mass ejections (CMEs) using PSP observations that provided new insights into the evolution of CMEs as the structures propagate farther from the Sun. We are in the sixth year of the PSP mission which provided us with a reasonable number of CME events to perform a statistical investigation.

-

-    PSP collected direct measurements of 32 interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) between October 2018 and August 2022 and distances from the Sun ranging between 0.23 and 0.83 astronomical units (AU), with 1 AU being the distance between the Earth and the Sun, or approximately 93 million miles.

-

-    Of the 32 measurements, four were discarded due to gaps in the data, leaving 28 CMEs successfully measured. The study’s objectives were to identify various aspects of CMEs, specifically pertaining to how they change as they travel farther from the Sun, also known as radial distance.

-

-    Astronomers observed that the internal CME magnetic structure to become more complex with radial distance. We found the CME magnetic field strength to decrease at a lower rate than previous studies. We also saw that the expansion of the CME is important in the formation of the compression region ahead of it and the internal magnetic field has an influence on the short-scale fluctuations we find within the compression region.

-

-     Scientists classify CMEs as part of space weather, which studies the activity on the Sun’s surface and how it affects the surrounding environment. Space weather can wreak havoc on electronics, specifically communication satellites and power stations on Earth, with one of the most notable space weather events occurring in September 1859 known as the Carrington Event, which was caused by a massive solar storm that wreaked havoc on worldwide electrical grids and created spectacular auroras across the globe, as well, with the latter traditionally only being visible in the northern and southern latitudes.

-

-    Understanding the evolution of CMEs is of paramount importance for space weather operations.   After having its first solar encounter in October 2018, PSP has continued to smash records regarding its distance from our Sun. This includes achieving its closest distance of 4.51 million miles on September 27, 2023, which is slated to be surpassed after its last flyby of Venus in November 2024.

-

-     Science objectives for PSP include determining the solar corona processes responsible for producing the solar wind, gaining insight into the solar plasma and magnetic field properties, and learning more about additional energy particles emitted by the Sun.

-

-    The PSP can travel close to our Sun because its state-of-the-art solar shield comprised of a 11.43-centimeter-thick carbon-composite shield capable of withstanding scorching temperatures up to 1,377 degrees Celsius.

-

-    PSP is slated to come within 3.83 million miles during its mission, which is planned to last a total of seven years.   The questions of interest for space weather are will a CME impact Earth and whether it will have a southward field component to interact with the northward magnetic field of Earth. Our modeling frameworks depend on an initial characterization of the CME closer to the Sun (within 20 solar radii) based on which the models project the CME parameters when it impacts Earth.

-

-   What PSP is doing is providing direct measurements of CMEs in the initial phases of propagation. Adding to this are the widespread radial observations of PSP to make our statistical approximations more robust.

-

-   CMEs have been observed for thousands of years in the form of auroras when the solar wind interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field near the planet’s surface. They are produced from the Sun’s corona in the form of massive discharges when solar plasma interacts with the Sun’s massive magnetic field and their velocities can range from 155 miles per second to almost 1,864 miles per second.

-

-   CMEs are monitored by the Space Weather Prediction Center with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration using a combination of ground- and space-based solar observatories.    Space weather is constantly monitored to determine how much damage can be caused to Earth surface power grids and satellite communications.

-

-    CMEs are crucial for the existence of our Sun.  CMEs appear as a valve that releases the built-up magnetic field from the Sun without which the Sun will rip itself apart. But the investigation of CME science also has important societal relevance. CMEs drive the strongest solar storms that can wreak havoc through impacting power grids and telecommunication networks.

-

-    CMEs can also damage orbiting satellites and technological infrastructure. CMEs are now counted among the major natural hazards as well. A more in-depth understanding of CMEs from initiation to propagation to evolution along the Sun-Earth line is required to improve the current status quo of space weather operations.

-

-    What new discoveries will researchers make about coronal mass ejections in the coming years and decades? Only time will tell, and this is why we science!

-

-

April 7, 2023                     PARKER  SOLAR  PROBE?                       4423

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, April 8, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Sunday, April 7, 2024

4422 - STARS - from birth to death?

 

-    4422  -   STARS  -   from birth to death?  -    Hubble Telescope witnesses a new star being born in a stunning cosmic light show.  The infant star FS Tau B is blasting out a powerful jet of matter that is slamming into sounding material.


-------------------------  4422  -   STARS  -   from birth to death?

-    The Space Telescope has imaged this powerful jet erupting from a natal envelope of gas and dust that represents a newly born star announcing itself to the universe.   Hubble spotted the infant star slicing its way out of the nebula that birthed it when it zoomed in on the youthful multi-star system FS Tau.

-

-    Located 450 light years from Earth, “FS Tau” is part of the Taurus-Auriga region. This region of space houses a stellar nursery of dark clouds of gas and dust, or "molecular clouds," that are home to numerous newly forming protostars and young stars.

-

-   Astronomers had previously discovered binary infant stars in this 2.8 million-year-old nebula, and now a second infant star, designated “FS Tau B”.   Both FS Tau B and the previously discovered infant stars in the FS Tau stellar nursery, a binary named FS Tau A (Haro 6-5A), are shrouded in illuminated gas and dust. This represents what is left of the matter in which overdense patches formed and collapsed to birth these stars.

-

-   As the Hubble image shows FS Tau B is partially obscured by a dark, vertical lane of dust. This is believed to be the edge of a pancake-shaped gathering of gas, and dust called a protoplanetary disk that surrounds the infant star.   This material left over from the formation of FS Tau B will eventually coalesce to form planets.

-

-     FS Tau B isn't a fully-fledged star just yet. This protostar is currently gathering material from its surroundings. Once it has accumulated enough mass, the pressure at the heart of FS Tau B will be so great that hydrogen begins to undergo nuclear fusion to create helium in its stellar core. That is the nuclear process that defines the main sequence lifetime of a star.

-

-    FS Tau B and similar protostars shine not because of nuclear fusion but because of the heat generated by the collapse of the dust cloud that birthed them and from the accretion of more material.

-

-   Protostars are known to erupt with fast-moving columns of highly energetic particles called jets, and FS Tau B is a prime example of this phenomenon. This particular jet is also remarkable as it is double-sided yet is also unusually asymmetrical. Seen as a bright blue streak, the jet's asymmetry could be the result of the star expelling mass at different rates across its body.

-

-   As well as being a protostar, FS Tau B is classed as a “Herbig-Haro” object. This is a celestial body that is created when jets ejected from a young star slam into nearby clouds of gas and dust at high speeds. These impacts result in glowing patches in and around the nebulas that house protostars.

-

-    Once FS Tau B leaves the protostar phase, it will become a “T Tauri star”, a stellar object on the road to main sequence status like our 4.6 billion-year-old middle-aged star, the sun.

-

-   Exploding stars are rare but emit torrents of radiation—one close enough to Earth could threaten life on the planet.    Stars like the sun are remarkably constant. They vary in brightness by only 0.1% over years and decades, thanks to the fusion of hydrogen into helium that powers them. This process will keep the sun shining steadily for about 5 billion more years, but when stars exhaust their nuclear fuel, their deaths can lead to pyrotechnics.

-

-    The sun will eventually die by growing large and then condensing into a type of star called a “white dwarf”. But, stars more than eight times more massive than the sun die violently in an explosion called a “supernova”.

-

-   Supernovae happen across the Milky Way only a few times a century, and these violent explosions are usually remote enough that people here on Earth don't notice. For a dying star to have any effect on life on our planet, it would have to go supernova within 100 light years from Earth.

-

-    Very few stars are massive enough to die in a supernova. But when one does, it briefly rivals the brightness of billions of stars. At one supernova per 50 years, and with 100 billion galaxies in the universe, somewhere in the universe a supernova explodes every hundredth of a second.

-

-    The dying star emits high energy radiation as gamma rays. Gamma rays are a form of electromagnetic radiation with wavelengths much shorter than light waves.  They're invisible to the human eye. The dying star also releases a torrent of high-energy particles in the form of “cosmic rays” which are subatomic particles moving at close to the speed of light.

-

-   Supernovae in the Milky Way are rare, but a few have been close enough to Earth that historical records discuss them. In 185 A.D., a star appeared in a place where no star had previously been seen. It was probably a supernova.

-

-    Observers around the world saw a bright star suddenly appear in 1006 A.D.    Astronomers later matched it to a supernova 7,200 light years away. Then, in 1054 A.D., Chinese astronomers recorded a star visible in the daytime sky that astronomers subsequently identified as a supernova 6,500 light years away.

-

-   Johannes Kepler observed the last supernova in the Milky Way in 1604, so in a statistical sense, the next one is overdue.

-

-    At 600 light years away, the red supergiant Betelgeuse in the constellation of Orion is the nearest massive star getting close to the end of its life. When it goes supernova, it will shine as bright as the full moon for those watching from Earth, without causing any damage to life on our planet.

-

-    If a star goes supernova close enough to Earth, the gamma-ray radiation could damage some of the planetary protection that allows life to thrive on Earth. There's a time delay due to the finite speed of light. If a supernova goes off 100 light years away, it takes 100 years for us to see it.

-

-   Astronomers have found evidence of a supernova 300 light years away that exploded          2.5 million years ago. Radioactive atoms trapped in seafloor sediments are the telltale signs of this event. Radiation from gamma rays eroded the ozone layer, which protects life on Earth from the sun's harmful radiation. This event would have cooled the climate, leading to the extinction of some ancient species.

-

-   Safety from a supernova comes with greater distance. Gamma rays and cosmic rays spread out in all directions once emitted from a supernova, so the fraction that reach the Earth decreases with greater distance. For example, imagine two identical supernovae, with one 10 times closer to Earth than the other. Earth would receive radiation that's about a hundred times stronger from the closer event.

-

-   A supernova within 30 light years would be catastrophic, severely depleting the ozone layer, disrupting the marine food chain and likely causing mass extinction. Some astronomers guess that nearby supernovae triggered a series of mass extinctions 360 to 375 million years ago. These events happen within 30 light years only every few hundred million years.

-

-    But supernovae aren't the only events that emit gamma rays. Neutron star collisions cause high-energy phenomena ranging from gamma rays to gravitational waves.   Left behind after a supernova explosion, neutron stars are city-size balls of matter with the density of an atomic nucleus, so 300 trillion times denser than the sun.

-

-     These collisions created many of the gold and precious metals on Earth. The intense pressure caused by two ultradense objects colliding forces neutrons into atomic nuclei, which creates heavier elements such as gold and platinum.

-

-    A neutron star collision generates an intense burst of gamma rays. These gamma rays are concentrated into a narrow jet of radiation that packs a big punch.   If the Earth were in the line of fire of a gamma-ray burst within 10,000 light years, or 10% of the diameter of the galaxy, the burst would severely damage the ozone layer. It would also damage the DNA inside organisms' cells, at a level that would kill many simple life forms like bacteria.

-

-   That sounds ominous, but neutron stars do not typically form in pairs, so there is only one collision in the Milky Way about every 10,000 years. They are 100 times rarer than supernova explosions. Across the entire universe, there is a neutron star collision every few minutes.

-

-   Gamma-ray bursts may not hold an imminent threat to life on Earth, but over very long time scales, bursts will inevitably hit the Earth. The odds of a gamma-ray burst triggering a mass extinction are 50% in the past 500 million years and 90% in the 4 billion years since there has been life on Earth.

-

-   By that math, it's quite likely that a gamma-ray burst caused one of the five mass extinctions in the past 500 million years. Astronomers have argued that a gamma-ray burst caused the first mass extinction 440 million years ago, when 60% of all marine creatures disappeared.

-

-    The most extreme astrophysical events have a long reach. Astronomers were reminded of this in October, 2022, when a pulse of radiation swept through the solar system and overloaded all of the gamma-ray telescopes in space.

-

-    It was the brightest gamma-ray burst to occur since human civilization began. The radiation caused a sudden disturbance to the Earth's ionosphere, even though the source was an explosion nearly 2 billion light years away. Life on Earth was unaffected, but the fact that it altered the ionosphere is sobering.  A similar burst in the Milky Way would be a million times brighter.

-

-   An international team of astronomers and astrophysicists has found evidence that the bright gamma-ray burst “GRB 230307A” observed last year was caused by two neutron stars merging, not from a collapsing massive star.

-

-   Prior research has shown that the strongest occasional flashes of light in the night sky are made by gamma-ray bursts. There are two basic kinds of GRBs: those that last longer than two seconds and those that are shorter. Study of these bursts has shown that the shorter bursts are typically the result of merging neutron stars. Longer bursts, on the other hand, were believed to occur when a massive star collapses.

-

-   Neutron stars are created when massive supergiant stars collapse during a supernova. Once created, they can wander aimlessly alone through space. Sometimes, they travel close to another neutron star, forming a neutron binary system. As they orbit one another, they release gravitational waves, which can be measured here on Earth.

-

-   As they spiral, they are also pulled more tightly to one another until they eventually merge, emitting a massive burst of gamma rays, which on Earth looks like a bright burst of light—such bursts are called kilonovae. In studying GRB 230307A, researchers found that not only had it had been the source of the second-largest gamma-ray burst ever recorded, but it was also due to a kilonova, confounding theories regarding how GRBs are created.

-

-   The team studied the events leading up to the merger, the merger itself, and the material left after the collision—the first study of its kind. In focusing on the atomic nuclei left behind after the collision, the researchers found evidence of the creation of several heavy elements, including gold and silver. Further study of how such elements were formed, they suggest, could help to better understand how the universe as a whole was formed.

-

-

April 7, 2023             STARS  -   from birth to death?                           4422

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Sunday, April 7, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4421 - DARK ENERGY SURVEY - to explain the universe?

 

-    4421  -   DARK  ENERGY  SURVEY  -  to explain the universe?  -    By the time DESI has completed its five-year run, it will have mapped over three million quasars and 37 million galaxies. That massive trove of data should help scientists understand if dark energy is changing.   Whatever the eventual answer, the question is vital to understanding the Universe.


-------------------------  4421    -   DARK  ENERGY  SURVEY  -  to explain the universe?

-    At the Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona, an instrument with 5,000 tiny robotic eyes scans the night sky. Every 20 minutes, the instrument and the telescope it’s attached to observe a new set of 5,000 galaxies. The instrument is called DESI—Dark Energy Survey Instrument—and once it’s completed its five-year mission, it’ll create the largest 3D map of the Universe ever created.

-

-   But scientists are getting access to DESI’s first data release and it suggests that dark energy may be evolving.   DESI is the most powerful multi-object survey spectrograph in the world. It’s gathering the spectra for tens of millions of galaxies and quasars. The goal is a 3D map of the Universe that extends out to 11 billion light-years. That map will help explain how dark energy has driven the Universe’s expansion.

-

-   DESI began in 2021 and is a five-year mission. The first year of data has been released, and scientists with the project say that DESI has successfully measured the expansion of the Universe over the last 11 billion years with extreme precision.

-

-    DESI collects light from 5,000 objects at once with its 5,000 robotic eyes. It observes a new set of 5,000 objects every 20 minutes, which means it observes 100,000 objects—galaxies and quasars—each night, given the right observing conditions.

-

-    We don’t know what dark energy is, but we know some force is causing the Universe’s expansion to accelerate.   DESI measures dark energy by relying on baryonic acoustic oscillations (BAO.)   Baryonic matter is “normal” matter: atoms and everything made of atoms. The acoustic oscillations are density fluctuations in normal matter that date back to the Universe’s beginnings. BAO are the imprint of those fluctuations, or pressure waves, that moved through the Universe when it was all hot, dense plasma.

-

-   As the Universe cooled and expanded, the density waves froze their ripples in place, and where density was high, galaxies eventually formed. The ripple pattern of the BAO is visible in the DESI leading image. It shows strands of galaxies, or galaxy filaments, clustered together. They’re separated by voids where density is much lower.

-

-   The deeper DESI looks, the fainter the galaxies are. They don’t provide enough light to detect the BAO. That’s where quasars come in. Quasars are extremely bright galaxy cores, and the light from distant quasars creates a shadow of the BAO pattern. As the light travels through space, it interacts with and gets absorbed by clouds of matter. That lets astronomers map dense pockets of matter, but it took over 450,000 quasars. That’s the most quasars ever observed in a survey like this.

-

-    Because the BAO pattern is gathered in such detail and across such vast distances, it can act as a cosmic ruler. By combining the measurements of nearby galaxies and distant quasars, astronomers can measure the ripples across different periods of the Universe’s history. That allows them to see how dark energy has stretched the scale over time.

-

-   It’s all aimed at understanding the expansion of the Universe.  In the Universe’s first three billion years, radiation dominated it. The Cosmic Microwave Background is evidence of that. For the next several billion years, matter dominated the Universe. It was still expanding, but the expansion was slowing because of the gravitational force from matter. But since then, the expansion has accelerated again, and we give the name dark energy to the force behind that acceleration.

-

-    The “Lambda Cold Dark Matter” (Lambda CDM) is the standard model of “Big Bang Cosmology”. Lambda CDM includes cold dark matter—a weakly interacting type of matter—and dark energy. They both shape how the Universe expands but in opposite ways. Dark energy accelerates the expansion, and regular matter and dark matter slow it down.

-

-    DESI's  five-year run will have mapped over three million quasars and 37 million galaxies. This should help scientists understand if dark energy is changing.  The question is vital to understanding the Universe.

-

-    DESI isn’t the only effort to understand dark energy. The “ESA’s Euclid spacecraft” is already taking its own measurements to help cosmologists answer their dark energy questions.

The “Vera Rubin Observatory” and “Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope” will both contribute to our understanding of the elusive dark energy. They’ll perform surveys of their own, and by combining data from all three, cosmologists are poised to generate some long-sought answers.

-

-

April 4, 2023             DARK  ENERGY  SURVEY  -  to explain the universe?            4421

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Sunday, April 7, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Friday, April 5, 2024

4420 - UNIVERSE EXPANSION RATE? - how fast is it, really?

 

-    4420  -  UNIVERSE  EXPANSION  RATE?  -   how fast is it,  really?  -   The notion of the absolute speed limit comes from special relativity, but who ever said that special relativity should apply to things on the other side of the universe? That's the domain of a more general theory. A theory called “general relativity”.


-------------  4420    -    UNIVERSE  EXPANSION  RATE?  -   how fast is it,  really?

-    One of the great unsolved mysteries of cosmology is known as the “Hubble tension”. It stems from our inability to pin down the precise rate of the universe expansion. There are several ways to calculate this expansion, from observing distant supernovae to measuring the Doppler shift of maser light near supermassive black holes, and they all give slightly different results.

-

-    Maybe we don’t fully understand the structure of the Universe, or maybe our view of the heavens is biased given that we are located deep within a galactic supercluster.  The bias problem is even worse than we thought.

-

-    If we were floating deep in space, far away from any galaxies, then our view of cosmic expansion would be free of gravitational influences and we could better see how distant galaxies move away from us. Since we are part of a local cluster of galaxies, we have a bit of bias in our data. This is why many local galaxies are “blue-shifted”.

-

-     The Universe isn’t contracting near us, we’re just in a galactic gravitational well. We can easily account for this bias, so it isn’t a problem. However, given the Hubble tension, a team recently looked for gravitational biases beyond the local group, hoping it would solve the issue.

-

-   They looked at the largest gravitational structure we’re a part of, known as the “Laniakea Supercluster”. It is a massive cluster of galaxies more than 520 million light-years across, containing more than 100,000 galaxies, including the Milky Way. Our local group is being pulled toward the heart of Laniakea, and thus our motion through the Universe could skew our observations of cosmic expansion.

-

-   When the team measured the gravitational influence of the supercluster as a whole, they found it does bias our observations by about 2% – 3%. But it’s biased in the wrong direction. In other words, by not taking the effect of Laniakea into account, the Hubble tension seemed smaller than it actually is. These new results show that the tension is 2% – 3% greater than we thought.

-

-   Removing subtle biases from our cosmological data is challenging, so it is possible that further observations may swing the results back in the right direction. But we can’t rely on bias alone to solve this mystery. Clearly, something subtle and strange is going on, and the solution isn’t obvious. It will take a great deal more study to understand “Hubble’s tension”.

-

-     How can the universe expand faster than light travels?  It seems like it should be illegal, doesn’t it? Over and over (and over and over) we're told the supreme iron law of the universe: Nothing — absolutely nothing — can go faster than the speed of light.

-

-   Some galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light.   It's important to note that we live in an expanding universe. Every day the galaxies get farther apart from each other, on average. There are slight motions on top of that general expansion, leading to instances such as the Andromeda Galaxy heading on a collision course for the Milky Way. But in general, in the biggest of pictures, the galaxies are getting farther away from each other.

-

-   A key feature of this expansion is how uniform it is.   The objects close to you appear to move away with some speed, but the farther objects would appear to move faster. Even though they are moving at a constant speed, the apparent speed changes with distance.

-

-    The modern value is 68 kilometers per second per megaparsec, plus or minus a couple.  One megaparsec is 1 million parsec, which is 3.26 million light-years.

-

-    A galaxy 1 megaparsec away will appear to be receding away from us at 68 kilopmeters / second. If you look at a galaxy 2 megaparsec away, it recedes at 136 km/s. Three megaparsec away? You got it! 204 km/s. And on and on: for every megaparsec, you can add 68 km/s to the velocity of the far-away galaxy.

-

-   At some point, at some obscene distance, the speed tips over the scales and exceeds the speed of light, all from the natural, regular expansion of space.

-

-    It's true that in “special relativity”, nothing can move faster than light. But special relativity is a local law of physics. Or in other words, it's a law of local physics. That means that you will never, ever watch a rocket ship blast by your face faster than the speed of light. Local motion, local laws.

-

-    But a galaxy on the far side of the universe? That's the domain of general relativity, and general relativity says that a galaxy can have any speed it wants.   It goes deeper than this. Concepts like a well-defined "velocity" make sense only in local regions of space. You can only measure something's velocity and actually call it a "velocity" when it's nearby and when the rules of special relativity apply.

-

-   Stuff super-duper far away, like the galaxies we're talking about it? If it's not close, it doesn't count as a “velocity” in the way that special relativity cares about.  Special relativity doesn't care about the speed, superluminal or otherwise

-

-

April 4, 2023         UNIVERSE  EXPANSION  RATE?  -   how fast is it,  really?         4420

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, April 5, 2024  ---------------------------------