Wednesday, November 30, 2022

3767 - STARDUST - what people are made of?

   -  3767  -  STARDUST  -  what people are made of?   Science has said humans are made of stardust, and now, a new survey of 150,000 stars shows just how true the old cliché is: Humans and their galaxy have about 97 percent of the same kind of atoms, and the elements of life appear to be more prevalent toward the galaxy's center.


---------------------  3767  -  STARDUST  -  what people are made of?  

-  The crucial elements for life on Earth, the building blocks of life, can be abbreviated as CHNOPS: carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, phosphorus and sulfur. For the first time, astronomers have cataloged the abundance of these elements in a huge sample of stars.

-

-  The astronomers evaluated each element's abundance through “spectroscopy“; each element emits distinct wavelengths of light from within a star, and they measured the depth of the dark and bright patches in each star's light spectrum to determine what it was made of.

-

-  They used stellar measurements from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey's (SDSS) Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE) spectrograph in New Mexico. APOGEE can peer through the dust in the Milky Way because it uses infrared wavelengths, which pass through dust.

-

-  This instrument collects light in the near-infrared part of the electromagnetic spectrum and disperses it, like a prism, to reveal signatures of different elements in the atmospheres of stars. 

-

-  A fraction of the almost 200,000 stars surveyed by APOGEE overlap with the sample of stars targeted by the NASA Kepler mission, which was designed to find potentially Earth-like planets. 

-

-  Although humans share most elements with the stars, the proportions of those elements differ between humans and stars.   Humans are about 65 percent oxygen by mass, whereas oxygen makes up less than 1 percent of all elements measured in space and in the spectra of stars. 

-

-  The six most common elements of life on Earth (including more than 97 percent of the mass of a human body) are carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, oxygen, sulphur and phosphorus. Those same elements are abundant at the center of our Milky Way galaxy.

-

-   The proportion of each element of life differed depending on the region of the galaxy in which it was found. For example, the sun resides on the outskirts of one of the Milky Way's spiral arms. Stars on the outskirts of the galaxy have fewer heavy elements required for life's building blocks, such as oxygen, than those in more central regions of the galaxy. 


-

-   In  January, 2006, a conical capsule carrying the first samples of a comet and the first pristine traces of interstellar dust ever collected landed in the Utah desert. The capsule had been dropped from NASA's Stardust spacecraft, which continued its voyage through space and became the first mission to visit two comets.

-

-  Launched in 1999, “Stardust” visited an asteroid before making a close brush with “Comet Wild 2“, then returned to Earth to deposit the samples. As part of its extended mission, the box-shaped craft visited “Comet Tempel 1“. When the mission ended, in March, 2011, the spacecraft had traveled nearly 5.7 billion miles over the course of nearly 12 years.

-

-  Although the mission has come to a close, researchers are still hunting down the dust particles embedded in material carried by the capsule that returned to Earth more than a decade ago.

-

-  The Stardust was a boxy craft that carried two solar arrays, along with a 101 pounds sample-return capsule that was dropped into Earth's atmosphere, carrying samples of comet and interstellar dust. The spaceship carried two dedicated science instruments and several engineering instruments required for spacecraft operation that also collected scientific data:

-

-  The aerogel dust collectors were two tennis-racket-shaped collectors capable of extending from and retracting into the spacecraft. The aerogel covering the collectors kept dust particles pristine as they slowed from high speeds to a dead stop. One side of a collector gathered material from Wild 2 while the other side sampled material encountered as Stardust traveled through space.

-

-  The Cometary and Interstellar Dust Analyzer (CIDA) determined the composition of individual dust grains that collided with a silver impact plate.

-

-  The Navigation Camera targeted the comet, collecting high-resolution images.

-

-  The Dust Flux Monitors monitored the flux and size distribution of particles in Stardust's environment.

-

-  After a three billion-mile journey to rendezvous with a comet, the Stardust return capsule joins the national collection of flight icons at the National Air and Space Museum.

-

-  The crown jewel of Stardust's instruments was the sample-gathering aerogel. The product is a silicon-based solid with a porous, sponge-like structure and consists mostly of empty space. Because the particles that Stardust aimed to sample were traveling at up to six times the speed of a rifle bullet, a high-speed capture in a conventional collector could alter the particles' shape and chemical composition. But when the high-speed particles hit aerogel, they were captured with minimal heating or chemical alteration. 

Capturing the particles in aerogel was a little bit like collecting BBs by shooting them into Styrofoam.

-

-  Each particle created a carrot-shaped track up to 200 times the particle's length in the aerogel, allowing scientists to trace the particles' paths through the mostly transparent material.

-

-  Stardust's primary science objectives included making a flyby of Wild 2 at a velocity low enough that samples could be collected for return and interstellar dust particles could be collected. This would also allow the return of as many high-resolution images as possible of the comet's nucleus and the surrounding shell of gas, or coma.

-

-  On its way to Wild 2, Stardust collected interstellar dust material older than the solar system. In 2003, the probe flew within 2,050 miles of the asteroid 5535 Annefrank. The mission team used the tiny asteroid as a preliminary run and an attempt to improve Stardust’s flyby accuracy while collecting images of Annefrank.

-

-  Stardust entered the coma of Wild 2 on December 31, 2003, and made its closest approach on January 2, 2004, passing within 155 miles of the comet. At that point, the spacecraft was 1.85 times the Earth-sun distance from the sun.

-

-   The sample collector was extended on December 24, and after collecting all the material possible, it was sealed in the sample vault of the re-entry capsule only 6 hours after the flyby. 

-

-  In January 2006, Stardust dropped its conical capsule into the Earth's atmosphere. The capsule landed at the U.S. Air Force Test and Training Range in the Utah desert. Within two days, the capsule was transferred to the Johnson Space Center in Houston, where researchers began the long hunt through aerogel for signs of the tiny particles.

-

-  Back in space, Stardust was placed into hibernation until it was funded for an extended mission called the New Exploration of Tempel 1 (NExT). A year earlier, in 2005, NASA's Deep Impact spacecraft observed Tempel 1 and crashed a probe into it. The Stardust-NExT mission returned to Tempel 1 to continue mapping the comet and examine how the impact crater had changed.

-

-  When Stardust flew by its second target, on February 14, 2011, the probe became the first spacecraft to visit two comets, while Comet Tempel 1 became the first comet visited by two space probes. Stardust's images revealed that much of the material blown out of the nucleus by Deep Impact had fallen back into the crater, suggesting that the heart of the comet wasn’t as tightly held together as previously believed.

-

-  On March 25, 2011, Stardust's extended mission ended. The spacecraft continues to orbit the sun, and NASA predicts that the probe will never get closer than 1.7 million miles to Earth's orbit.

-

-  Like most comets, Wild 2 is a fossil of planetary formation. For most of its life, it orbited between Jupiter and Uranus, but a brush with Jupiter in 1974 moved the comet to an orbit closer to the sun. By the time Stardust visited the comet, Wild 2 had made only five close encounters with the sun, which meant that the comet was in roughly the same condition as when it was formed with the solar system, some 4.5 billion years ago.

-

-   Stardust's samples helped researchers discover a new class of organics, captured by the dust particles, that was more primitive than those spotted in meteorites. Scientists also found irregular particles known as calcium-aluminum-rich inclusions (CAIs). CAIs are the oldest solar system materials and are composed of exotic compounds that form at very high temperatures.

-

-  The team also discovered a handful of interstellar particles, the first ever collected in space and returned to Earth for study. These particles drifted into the solar system from the region between stars and were likely formed before the sun was made. Finding them involves combing through millions of images of interstellar material captured by Stardust. Citizen scientists continue to help hunt for the particles by searching through millions of images

-

-  Your stardust has evolved into excellent reading and comprehension material.  Learning where you came from.   But, not why, not how,  ………..

-

 November 30, 2022            STARDUST  -  what people are made of?               3767                                                                                                                                  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, November 30, 2022  ---------------------------






Tuesday, November 29, 2022

3765 - ENTROPY - fate of the Universe?

  -  3765 -  ENTROPY  -   fate of the Universe?   We are convinced that the Universe is expanding at an accelerating rate.  But,  within the system there are fluctuations in this expansion.  These uneven fluctuations are what created the structure we observe today.  


---------------------  3765  -  ENTROPY  -   fate of the Universe? 

-  How “ Entropy” controls the fate of the Universe?   Entropy always increases, it never decreases in a system.  Can science speculate scenarios for the future of the Universe and still hold to this law in physics?

-

-  See Review  1914 and  1915 to learn more about “ Entropy”

-

-  This Review 3765 tells what happens to the Universe because entropy controls our fate. 

-

-  The Universe we observe today is full of stars, galaxies, Blackholes, Dark Matter, Dark Energy, and radiation.   It has clumps, clusters, and giant voids.  It is expanding and cooling.

-

-  Due to the constant and finite speed of light when we look into the distant Universe we are looking into the past and we observe a Universe that is smoother, hotter, denser, less clumpy, more energetic and more uniform.

-

-  So, what we see today would indicate that the future Universe will be clumpier, frozen, sparser, less energetic, and emptier.

-

-  To wrap our heads around this evolution of the Universe as we understand it we adopt the concept of “ Entropy”.  Entropy is a mathematical concept employing statistics of large numbers.  We can even calculate the Entropy for the entire Universe:

-

--------------------------  Entropy  =  10^104  *  BK

-

-------------------------  BK  is Boltzmann’s Constant

-

-------------------------  BK  =  1.38  * 10^-23  Joules  /  degrees Kelvin

-

-  (  See Review  1915 to learn about Boltzmann’s Constant )

-

-  The Entropy of the Blackhole at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy is 10^91 *BK .  Most of the Entropy in the Universe is due to many, many Blackholes.

-

-  When the Universe was very young the Entropy was much lower.  Not many Blackholes had formed yet.  In the far future the Entropy will be much higher, When Blackholes decay due to Hawking Radiation, Blackholes eventually evaporate causing Entropy to increase even further.

-

-  When the early Universe was dominated by radiation the Entropy was :

-

---------------------------  E  =  10^88  *  BK

-

-  This is less than the single Blackhole at the center of our Galaxy.  Entropy was much less 13.8 billion years ago.

-

-  In the far future, after all the Blackholes evaporate the entropy will be:

-

--------------------------   E  =  10^123  *  BK

-

-  Could the Universe expand forever, continue to accelerate until it rips entirely apart?

-

-  Could the Universe reverse and re-collapse, moving backwards until it becomes a single point, a “ Singularity”.

-

-  Could the Universe have originality stated out as a Singularity?  None of the math tells us what could have happened before 10^-33 seconds closer to the beginning of  time and space.  Math calculations become infinities with no answers.

-

-  If an Inflationary State existed before the hot Big Bang the Entropy could have been:

-

--------------------------  E  =   10^15  *  BK

-

--------------------------  E  =  10^15  *  1.38 * 10^-23

-

--------------------------  E  =  1.38  * 10^-8  Joules per Kelvin

-

-  But the temperature could have been billions of degrees Kelvin.  So, we can not calculate the Entropy at the beginning.  It could be zero.

-

-  The math in the theory of General Relativity takes us to a Singularity.  If we introduce some other theories, quantum theories of gravity, then other scenarios can be calculated.

-

-  Using the math  in “ Loop Quantum Gravity”, String Theory,  Brane Cosmology, we can derive 4 other possibilities that are not a Singularity.

-

-  The Universe could go through a cycle, a stringy bounce.  The Universe expands, reaches some maximum size, contracts, and re-collapses while the Entropy is increasing the entire time.

-

-  Another possibility is that gravity changes.  gravity could get turned off for a period of time and cosmology could go into hibernation.

-

-  Another possibility assumes that space-time pre-exists in a variety of locations and properties.  There could be multi-universes and we just happen to be in one of them.

-

-  One of the challenges astronomers have is to create one of these scenarios where by Entropy is continuously increasing.  Most hold on to this fact the  2nd law of Thermodynamics can never be violated.  Of the 4 scenarios presented the “ multi-verse”, or  “reproducing cosmology” scenario easily avoids the increasing Entropy problem,  the other scenarios do not adhere to the 2nd law of Thermodynamics.

-

-  This “Inflation” of space, creating more and more space at an exponential rate, must continue with overall Entropy of the entire system never decreasing.  The multi-verse scenario is the only one to avoid this problem, so far

-

-  Stay tuned, an announcement will be made shortly.  Request the following reviews if interested to learn more.

-

-    1914  -  Entropy is the arrow of time.  The entropy of this room is 546 Joules per Kelvin.

-

-   2421  -  Too much information.  A cubic centimeter of water contains 100,000 billion, billion atoms.  Each atom can contain a bit of information.  4,000,000,000 years ago organisms learned of cull useful bits out of the cosmic noise.

-

-   2321 -  Entropy and Evolution.  Good mutations win out in evolution because they are the ones that survive.  Things naturally and eventually always get worse.  When you get to the last heartbeat you’re done.


 November 29, 2022          ENTROPY  -   fate of the Universe?              3765                                                                                                                                  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, November 29, 2022  ---------------------------






3762 - The Quest for Reality

 -  3762  -  The Quest for Reality.   Everyone thought they had discovered reality when Isaac Newton was able to explain all observed motion on Earth and in the Solar System with only 3 simple mathematical laws. Albert Einstein came along and changed our reality by claiming that Newton’s laws were not accurate at high velocities.  Space and time have to be adjusted so that the velocity of light remains the same for all observers.


----------------------------- 3762   -  The Quest for Reality

-  The quest is the search for what is truth not merely what is apparent, or observed.  Everyone thought they had discovered reality when Isaac Newton was able to explain all observed motion on Earth and in the Solar System with only 3 simple mathematical laws.

-

-  Then Albert Einstein came along and changed our reality by claiming that Newton’s laws were not accurate at high velocities.  In Einstein’s reality the measurement of space and time are dependent on the observer’s velocity.  Space and time have to be adjusted so that the velocity of light remains the same for all observers.

-

-  There is no reality in the absence of observation, and, there is no physical means by which one can observe absolute motion through space.  Motion must be measured against something else.  It is always “relative” to another object.

-

-  Our reality changed again when Max Planck and Werner Heisenberg came up with the quantum, describing how energy comes to us in discrete packages, it is not really continuous like it appears. 

-

-   These energy packages are both waves and particles at the same time.  And, the waves exist only as statistical probabilities.  They can not be measured without disturbing them.  If you measure the velocity you do not know its position.  If you measure its position you do not know its velocity.  The same is true with time and energy.  You can only measure one in a trade-off of knowing the other.

-

-  Measurements are really an interaction between the attributes of the measurer and the measured.  They do not belong to either.  Only when we can show that the measurer is many times more accurate than the measured can we say that the measured attribute is accurate within reasonable limits. 

-

-  To  illustrate, if we use a thermometer to measure body temperature, the thermometer is cold and heats up by the amount of heat it absorbs until the two are equal.  But the body has cooled down by the amount absorbed by the thermometer.  Only if this interaction is small enough can it be ignored for practical purposes.  It would not make sense to use a big, cold thermometer to measure temperature of a small body.

-

-  We can not know a quantum entity for what it is because we must inevitably disturb whatever we observe in trying to measure it.  Electromagnetic energy is the transmitter of information, so by getting the information we changed what we were measuring.  At the quantum level, light is too big a thermometer.

-

-  Even a light beam carries momentum and energy.  Light comes in bundles, called photons, and the energy of each bundle is equal to Planck’s Constant * the Frequency of the Wave.

-

-   Light is both a particle and a wave.  It is a particle because you can count the number of photons.  It is a wave because it can go around corners and it can form an interference pattern.  Frequency is another name for color.  So, a light’s energy depends on its color and not its intensity.  Blue light has more energy than red light.

-

--------------------------    E = h*f 

-

--------------------------   Energy  =   Planck’s Constant * Frequency

-

--------------------------  Momentum = h / Wavelength

-

--------------------------  Momentum   =  Planck’s Constant / Wavelength.

-

-------------------------- Momentum = h * f / c 

-

--------------------------  Momentum =  Planck’s Constant * Frequency / Speed of Light.

-

-  Using a light wave to measure the position of an electron will change its velocity.  And if we use a light wave to measure its velocity we will change its position.  Momentum is mass * velocity.  The change in momentum * the change in position must always be greater than Planck’s Constant, h.

-

------------------------  Delta Momentum * Delta Position >  “h”

-

- ----------------------   h    =      6.626 *-34 kg*m^2/sec

-

-  Planck’s Constant is an “Action” about equivalent to the blink of an eye, a very small number.  It is a Constant of Action.  Action is Force * Distance.  Force = Mass * Acceleration.  Acceleration is the rate of change of Velocity.  Velocity is the rate of change of Distance with Time.

-

------------- Planck’s Constant = h = 10^-27 erg*seconds = 

-

------------- Planck’s Constant =  6.625*10^-34 joule*seconds =

-

--------------Planck’s Constant   =  6.625*10^-34 kg *meters^2/second  = 

-

- -------------Planck’s Constant   =    4.136*10^-15 electron volts*seconds.

-

-  It all boils down to “h” being a Constant that relates Energy, Space, and Time.

-

-  All particles may become waves at their smallest dimensions.  At the quantum level waves are oscillations of “possibilities“.  A wave vibrates in both time and space.  If we freeze time we can measure a wave’s spatial picture.  If we freeze space we can measure a wave’s temporal picture.  

-

-  We can also measure a wave’s intensity by measuring its amplitude.  The intensity of a wave is its amplitude squared.  And, amplitude squared is a measure of “probability“.  

-

-  Probability = (amplitude)^2  =  (possibilities)^2.  When equal waves meet the amplitudes add.  The wave interference can vary from zero (total cancellation) to twice the amplitude, and twice the possibilities.

-

-  We are used to waves in gases and liquids which support back and forth vibrations.  Solids support back and forth as well as sideways vibrations. Earthquakes vibrate in all three directions.   Light, and all electromagnetic waves, vibrate only sideways.

-

-  The amplitude of a wave is its possibilities.  The square of its possibilities is its probability.  And, Probability is the relative number of ways a particular event can happen.  That is the essence of Heisenberg’s Uncertainty Principle that occurs at the quantum level.  This was a reality that Einstein could not accept, he said, “ God does not play dice.”

-

-  An atom is 1,000 times smaller then the wavelength of green light, 0.6 nanometers versus 600 nanometers.  The nucleus of an atom is 10,000 time smaller than the atom, .00006 nanometers versus .6 nanometers.  

-

-  If electrons have any size at all it is smaller than our ability to measure it.  We know it is smaller than 10^-18 meters, .000000001 nanometers.  The diameter of an electron, and the other elementary particles, may be zero.  All particles may become quantum waves at their smallest dimensions. 

-

-   Light travels one nanofoot per second, 10^-9 feet/second, which is the length of 1,000,000,000 atoms.

-

-  Light is photons and photons carry the electromagnetic force.  When we observe electric charges interact or magnets interact we see action at a distance that appears instantaneous.  However, in reality these actions are occurring at light speed.  The electromagnetic forces are caused by photons which always travel at light speed.

-

-  The force of gravity is caused by gravitons and they too travel at light speed.

-

-  In reality Gravity Waves are ripples in the curvature of space-time.  When huge masses accelerate (example: Black Holes) Gravity Waves are generated.  When a Gravity Wave passes through a mass it squeezes it in one direction and stretches it in the orthogonal direction.  Everything we see is pulsing in and out due to gravity waves. 

-

-   However, our world is primarily made of electromagnetic waves carried by photons which are 10^36 times stronger, 100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 times stronger than gravitons.  Gravity is so weak by comparison the deformation due to passing Gravity Waves goes undetected.

-

-  The electric and magnetic forces, like gravity, are the same everywhere and are always equal to a natural constant times the value of the charges times the inverse of the square of the distance between them.  

-

-  The natural constant is the “Fine Structure Constant” and it is equal to the velocity of the electron in its circular path around the nucleus divided by the speed of light.  The Fine Structure Constant represents the strength of the electromagnetic force that holds atoms together.  It is a unit-less number:

-

----------------   Fine Structure Constant = 0.007197352568  =  1 / 137.03599976

-

-  The Fine Structure Constant, known as 1/137, sets the energy levels for the electrons that orbit the nucleus of every atom.  An atom will absorb or emit an electron according to the interaction between orbital angular momentum and spin angular momentum. 

-

-   A moving electric charge creates a magnetic field and emits photons of electromagnetic energy.  The Fine Structure Constant is the constant that links the Speed of Light, Planck’s Constant of Action, and Electric Charge, c, h, and e. 

-------------- Fine Structure Constant  =  e^2 / h * c 

-

-------------- Fine Structure Constant  =  e^2 / 2*pi*h 

-

-------------- where c = 2*pi, one wavelength of an electron in a circular path around the nucleus at the speed of light.

-

-  Planck’s Constant, h, is a unit of “ action” and represents the smallest change that can be observed in nature.  It is one wavelength of energy.

-

---------------Planck’s Constant  = Energy / Frequency

-

---------------Planck’s Constant  = Energy / Wavelength / Speed of Light

-

---------------  h = E * w / c

-

-  (3)  Number of electrons in the Observable Universe  =  the number of protons

-

-------  Number of electrons   =  c * time / Gravitational Constant * mass of a proton / c^2 

-

-----------------   Number of electrons in the Observable Universe  = 10^80

-

-  (4)  The size of the Observable Universe = c * time = c * 13.7*10^9 years 

-

---------  The size of the Observable Universe   =  1.3 *10^26 meters.  That is the radius.  

-

-------------    The volume is 4.3 * pi radius^3  =  10^80.

-

-  If you spread the protons out in the Observable Universe then there is only one atom / cubic meter.  The best vacuum we can produce on Earth is 1,000,000,000,000 atoms in a cubic meter.

-

-  With so little matter in the Universe in order to accumulate an Earth sized mass it would be one in every 10 cubic lightyears of space (The nearest star is 4 lightyears away). 

-

-   In order to accumulate a star, it would be one in 1,000 cubic lightyears of a space.  In order to accumulate a galaxy we need 10,000,000 lightyears of space. 

-

-  In order to accumulate another Universe we would have one in every 10,000,000,000 light years of space.  And, the Universe is only 13,700,000,000 years old with a diameter of 27.4 lightyears.  There is room for two Universes, where is the other one?  We only have enough matter for the one we have.

-

-  Life requires the higher level elements, heavier than hydrogen and helium.  Higher level elements, like carbon and iron, come from exploding stars, supernova.  So, life had to come after the hydrogen burning lifetime of a main sequence star.  This time scale is controlled by the fundamental constants of nature:

-

-----------------  Life of a star = ( h/Mp*c^2) / (G*Mp^2/h*c)

-

------------------  Life of a star   =  10^40 * 10^-23/ 10^-40  = 2.14 * 10^17 seconds 

-

------------------  Life of a star  = 7 billion years. 

-

-  So in order for life to exist it must be at least 7 billion years old and with 2 generations of star explosions 14 billion years, therefore, for life to happen it takes about 14 billion years.  We could not live in a smaller Universe.  The night sky is dark because the Universe must be old, cold, and dark in order for us to be here to observe it.

-

-  It is a strange world this reality and we will be lucky if we get out of it alive.  While we are here we can think about these things, questing as it were, with a brain of only 10^27 atoms in size. 

-

-   However, the complexity of the brain allowed by all the possible ways we can wire up these neurons is 10^70,000,000,000,000,  that is 1 followed by 70 trillion zeros.

-

-  I will bet you did not know your brain was that big and that it could be wired up that many ways.  Food for thought.

-

-  (1)  The Quantum Reality, Nick Herbert, 1985

-

-  (2)  The Constants of Nature, John D. Barrow, 2002.

-

-  (3)  Number of photons  =   c^3 * time / G* Mp 

-

 -         Number of photons  =   (26.9*10^24 m^3/sec^3 * 4.32*10^17 sec)   /  

-                                             (6.67*10^-11 m^3/kg*sec^2 * 1.167 * 10^-27 kg)  

-

-           Number of photons  = 1.49 * 10^80

 -

-  (4)  Radius =   3*10^8 m/sec * 3.16 * 10*17 sec

-

-         Radius = 1.3 * 10^26 meters.  

-

-         Volume =   4/3 * pi * 2.19 * 10^78 = 9.2 * 10^78

-

-           Volume  =  10^79

-

-  (5)  Life of a star = ( h/Mp*c^2) / (G*Mp^2/h*c)  

-

-        Life of a star  =  (6.625*10^-34 kg*m^2/sec / 1.167 *10^-23 kg /9*10^16 m^2

-

-        Life of a star  = .63*10^-23 sec) * (6.625 *10^-34 kg * m^2/sec * 3*10^8 m/sec / 6.67*10^-11 m^3/kg*sec^2 * (1.167*10^-17 kg) 

-

-        Life of a star = .63*10^-23 *3.4*10^40 * = 2.14 * 10^17 seconds /3.16 * 10^7sec/year

-

-        Life of a star  = 6.8 * 10^9 years 

-

-        Life of a star = 7 billion years.  

-

-  (6) A rainbow is a virtual image.  Every persons sees a different rainbow.

-

-  November 29, 2022       REALITY  -  it ain’t what it used to be?     658   2050    3762

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

-  to:   -------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com

 --------------------------   Tuesday, November 29, 2022  --------------------------


3763 - DARK MATTER - by comparing distant stars?

  -  3763 -  DARK  MATTER  -  by comparing distant stars?  -  Like alpha, the fine structure constant, we know precious little about dark matter, and some theoretical physicists suggest the inner parts of our galaxy might be just the dark corner we should search for connections between these two "damn mysteries of physics."  If we can observe these much more distant suns with the largest optical telescopes, maybe we'll find the keys to the universe.


---------------------  3763  -  DARK  MATTER  -  by comparing distant stars?

- How to explain electromagnetism, the law of how atoms and light interact, which explains everything from why you don't fall through the floor to why the sky is blue.

-

-  Our theory of electromagnetism is arguably the best physical theory humans have ever made, but,  it has no answer for why electromagnetism is as strong as it is. Only experiments can tell you electromagnetism's strength, which is measured by a number called α ( alpha is the fine-structure constant).

-

-  The American physicist Richard Feynman, who helped come up with the theory, called this "one of the greatest damn mysteries of physics" and urged physicists to "put this number up on their wall and worry about it."

-

-  Astronomers tried to test whether alpha is the same in different places within our galaxy by studying stars that are almost identical twins of our sun. If alpha is different in different places, it might help us find the ultimate theory, not just of electromagnetism, but of all nature's laws together, the "theory of everything."

-

-  Physicists really want one thing: a situation where our current understanding of physics breaks down. New physics. A signal that cannot be explained by current theories. A sign-post for the theory of everything.

-

-  To find the Theory of Everything they might wait deep underground in a gold mine for particles of dark matter to collide with a special crystal. Or,  they might carefully tend the world's best atomic clocks for years to see if they tell slightly different time. Or, smash protons together at nearly the speed of light in the 27-kilometer ring of the Large Hadron Collider.


-  Astronomers were looking beyond Earth, beyond our solar system, to see if stars which are nearly identical twins of our sun produce the same rainbow of colors. Atoms in the atmospheres of stars absorb some of the light struggling outwards from the nuclear furnaces in their cores.

-

-  Only certain colors are absorbed, leaving dark lines in the rainbow. Those absorbed colors are determined by alpha.

-

-  The problem is, the atmospheres of stars are moving, boiling, spinning, looping, burping, and this shifts the lines. The shifts spoil any comparison with the same lines in laboratories on Earth, and hence any chance of measuring alpha. Stars, it seems, are terrible places to test electromagnetism.

-

-  If you find stars that are very similar maybe their dark, absorbed colors are similar as well. So instead of comparing stars to laboratories on Earth, we compared twins of our sun to each other.

-

-  A new test with solar twins astronomers measured the spacing between pairs of absorption lines in our sun and 16 "solar twins" stars almost indistinguishable from our sun.  The rainbows from these stars were observed on the 3.6-meter European Southern Observatory (ESO) telescope in Chile. 

-

-  While not the largest telescope in the world, the light it collects is fed into probably the best-controlled, best-understood spectrograph: HARPS. This separates the light into its colors, revealing the detailed pattern of dark lines.

-

-  The ESO 3.6-meter telescope in Chile spends much of its time observing Sun-like stars to search for planets using its extremely precise spectrograph, HARPS.   From these exquisite spectra, we have shown that α was the same in the 17 solar twins to an astonishing precision: just 50 parts per billion. That's like comparing your height to the circumference of Earth. It's the most precise astronomical test of α ever performed.

-

-  Astronomers identified new solar twins much further away, about half way to the center of our Milky Way galaxy.  In this region, there should be a much higher concentration of dark matter, an elusive substance astronomers believe lurks throughout the galaxy and beyond. 

-

 November 28, 2022          DARK  MATTER  -  by comparing distant stars?        3763                                                                                                                                  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, November 29, 2022  ---------------------------






3764 - PROTONS - the nuclei of atoms?

  -  3764  -  PROTONS  -  the nuclei of atoms?    Protons are tiny subatomic particles that, along with neutrons, form the nucleus of an atom.   The heavier the atom, the more protons (and neutrons) it contains. Hydrogen, which is the lightest element, has a nucleus made from a single proton. The heaviest element in the Periodic Table, which is Oganesson, has 118 protons.


---------------------  3764  -  PROTONS  -  the nuclei of atoms?

-  Protons are tiny particles just a femtometer across, but without them, atoms wouldn't exist.  Femto is 10^-15 meters, which is 0.000,000,000,000,000,1 meters.

-

-  Protons are not elementary particles; they're actually made up of even smaller particles called “quarks“. Like neutrons, protons contain three quarks (two "up" quarks and one "down" quark) that are held together inside a proton by the Strong Force.

-

-   Particles made of three quarks are referred to as "baryons". When physicists refer to "baryonic matter" they are specifically referring to matter made from protons and neutrons that make up atoms that then build all the people, planets, stars, galaxies and everything else that we can visibly see in the universe around us. 

-

- Throughout most of the 19th century, it was thought that atoms were the smallest and most basic building block of all matter, but as that century neared its end, the evidence that atoms are actually made of smaller particles began to grow. Scientists began to experiment with anode and cathode rays, which are positively and negatively charged beams produced by gas discharge tubes. 

-

-  In 1897 J. J. Thomson discovered that cathode rays are streams of electrically-negative subatomic particles called electrons, which were being liberated from the atoms in the discharge tube.   Anode rays must be streams of ions, which are positively charged atoms. Hydrogen ions were recognized in anode rays in 1898 by the German physicist Wilhelm Wien. 

-

-  The first hypothesis of the structure of atoms had negatively charged electrons spread through an amorphously distributed mass of positive charge. It was called the plum pudding model, with the electrons being made analogous to plums embedded in dough. 

-

-  The British physicist Ernest Rutherford between 1909 and 1911 fired what were called alpha particles, know today as helium nuclei, at a leaf of gold foil. In the plum pudding model, the alpha particles should have just passed straight through the gold atoms, or been deflected a little bit. 

-

-   Instead, they found in their experiment that sometimes the alpha particles were deflected at large angles, or even bounced straight back. That could only happen if there were a knot of electric charge at the center of an atom, rather than being spread out as in the plum pudding model. This convinced Rutherford that atoms actually consisted of a tiny, tight nucleus surrounded by empty space with electrons orbiting around the nucleus at a distance. 

-

-  In the gold leaf experiment, the deflected alpha particles were encountering this nucleus. But what was the nucleus made of?  Various experiments, including some performed by Rutherford, showed that hydrogen nuclei could come out of other elements, and by 1920 Rutherford had figured that hydrogen nuclei must be the basic building block of all atomic nuclei since hydrogen is the lightest element. 

-

-  Rutherford called the hydrogen nucleus a proton, meaning "first" in Greek because Rutherford saw it as the first building block for all atoms. Today we know that protons (and neutrons) are formed from even smaller particles, “quarks“, and that the nucleus of an atom is made from protons and neutrons.

-

-  A proton has what is called an "elementary charge", or "e" in shorthand. It is the basic unit of charge against which all other charges are measured. Only quarks have a smaller charge, being a third or two-thirds of the elementary charge.

-

-  The elementary charge of the proton is 1.602192 x 10^–19 coulombs. 

-

-  This is the exact equal and opposite of the charge of an electron, 

                                                    which is 1.602192 x 10^-19 coulombs. 

-

-  Because their charges are equal, and because the other co-inhabitant of the atomic nucleus, the neutron, is neutral, then so long as the number of protons and electrons are equal then their charges cancel out and atoms are electrically neutral.

-

-   Remove an electron from around an atom, however, and this upsets the balance between the cumulative charges of the electrons and the protons, and the atom becomes positively charged, which is called  an ion.

-

-  Given that protons are subatomic particles at the very heart of an atom, they are therefore extremely small, measuring just hundreds of trillionths of a meter (10^–15 meters). 

-

------------------------  Particle         Mass (kg) Radius (m)      Charge ( C)

-

-----------------------  Proton 1.673 x 10^–27 0.83 x 10^–15       1.6021 x 10^–19

-

-----------------------  Neutron 1.674 x 10^–27 0.84 x 10^–15            No charge

-

-----------------------  Electron 9.109 x 10^–31 10^–18-10^–22    –1.6021 x 10^–19

-

-   We can compare the scale of a femtometer to the width of a human hair, which is in the region of a hundred millionths, or 10^–8, of a meter, or the radius of an entire atom about ten billionths, or 10^–10, of a meter. 

-

-  Given their tiny size, they also have a tiny mass, just 1.673 x 10^–27 kilograms.  For comparisons, it's 1,836 times more massive than an electron (9.1 x 10^–31 kilograms).

-

-   It's also just slightly less massive than a neutron (1.674 x 10^–27 kilograms, or 1.008 times more massive than a proton). 

-

-  Star-forming nebulae filled with hydrogen gas in deep space are often referred to as

 H-II regions. This notation means that the hydrogen has been ionized by the ultraviolet light from young stars around it (H-I is neutral atomic hydrogen; H-II is ionized); the energy of the ultraviolet photon that the hydrogen absorbs is enough to kick out the electron. Since a hydrogen atom consists of just a single proton and a single electron, losing the electron leaves just the proton.

-

-   When a proton in the nebula recaptures an electron, it emits a photon of light at a characteristic wavelength of 656.3 nanometers, known as H-II emission.

-

-  Protons are also vital in the core of the sun, where the energy that manifests as the light and heat of the sun is generated via a mechanism known as the proton-proton chain. In the core of the sun, the temperature reaches 27 million degrees Fahrenheit, sufficient for nuclear fusion. In these high temperatures, all atoms are ionized, and since the sun is mainly hydrogen, then this means that the core of the sun is filled with protons. 

-

-  In the proton-proton chain, two protons coming together in these conditions at the center of the sun can fuse, in the process giving off a neutrino and a positively charged positron, which is the antimatter equivalent of an electron. 

-

-  Losing the positive charge turns one of the protons into a neutral neutron, and together the proton and neutron form deuterium (an isotope of hydrogen). This deuterium nucleus can then fuse with another proton, forming helium-3 (made of two protons and a neutron) and emitting energy in the process that eventually winds its way to the surface of the sun as radiation, which we see as light and feel as heat. 

-

-  Meanwhile, the helium-3 nucleus can then fuse with another helium-3 nucleus formed through the same process, creating helium-4 (2 protons, 2 neutrons) and emitting two other protons. These other protons can then go on to form more helium-3 and so on in a chain reaction, releasing more energy in the process. The sun contains enough hydrogen nuclei to continue doing this for another 5 billion years.

-

-  The solar wind, which is a flow of charged particles streaming away from the sun's atmosphere, includes protons besides electrons and various atomic nuclei. When the solar wind collides with a planetary atmosphere such as that of Earth, the protons and electrons ride magnetic-field lines down towards the poles of the planet, interacting and ionizing atoms and molecules in the atmosphere. These atoms and molecules then glow, producing the auroral displays of the Northern and Southern Lights.

-

-  Sometimes, the sun will erupt in a solar flare, often resulting in the release of a coronal mass ejection. These violent solar eruptions can accelerate protons to high energies. Such "solar energetic particles" are pushed up to almost the speed of light as they race away from the sun, and are a radiation hazard to astronauts and passengers in high-altitude airliners.

-

-  There are also high-energy protons (and alpha particles) coming from beyond our solar system. These "cosmic rays" pack a punch, traveling a smidgen below the speed of light, but their origin remains a perplexing mystery.  They are accelerated by powerful magnetic fields, and prime suspects include active galactic nuclei and the black hole environments they contain.

-

-  Alternatively, supernova remnants and dense star-forming regions have also been proposed as origin points for these particle bullets sent our way.

-

 November 29, 2022          PROTONS  -  the nuclei of atoms?                   3764                                                                                                                                  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, November 29, 2022  ---------------------------






3761 - QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT - beyond comprehension?

  -  3761  -  QUANTUM  ENTANGLEMENT  - beyond comprehension?  Quantum entanglement is known as spooky action at a distance.  A distant and instantaneous action that requires communications faster than the speed of light. Quantum entanglement will affect the entire world of communications.  The notions of realism and locality have been broken and the weirdness that comes out will be proven useful to everyone.


-------  3761  -  QUANTUM  ENTANGLEMENT  -   beyond comprehension?

-  I need your help. I can not comprehend it all by myself, when I start considering “everything“.  I am stuck between astronomy and physics. We all exist on the scale of 10^0 , or 2 *10^0 ,  which is two meters tall. (  10^0 power is equal to 1 ).  

-

-  Astronomy takes me to a billion, billion stars to study in the Observable Universe that is 10^80 meters in all directions. If you add up all the atoms, and even particles you can count there are 10^80 particles in this vast Observable Universe that is 10^80 meters radius. That is a 1 followed by 80 zeros.  I can not comprehend that vastness.

-

-  This same scale works in the other direction as well.  It goes to 10^-35 meters in the micro-world and 10^0 is still caught in the middle. So are you. These atoms that you are made of are made of even smaller sub-atomic particles. And if you divide all of space down to the smallest dimensions possible you get to the Planck Length which is 10^-35 meters, where you and I are still stuck in the middle of this scale at 10^0 meters.

-

-  When we look in both directions into the macro world of astronomy and the micro world of physics, both worlds get stranger and stranger. The macro world takes us all the way to blackholes.  Blackholes are another subject for another time, but I will warn you we end up at the same place, the sub-atomic world, the micro-world.

-

-   This Review takes us into this micro world.   These sub atomic particles  behave as particles and waves at the same time.  At the sub-atomic , micro world it gets really fuzzy.

-

-  It is not just my understanding that gets fuzzy.  The “reality” at the micro- atomic level gets fuzzy.  Atoms, electrons, photons act differently at the micro level than they do at the level of our every day macro lives.  

-

-  Atomic particles exist in “uncertain” states.  The are partially waves and partially particles at the same time.  They can maintain states that are truly random and at the same time be entangled such that one state is determined by another entangled particle’s state that is a distance away. 

-

-   If one entangled particle changes state the other does as well,  instantaneously.  This response between particles occurs regardless of the distance of separation and regardless of the fact that communication between them must be faster than the speed of light.  

-

-  This phenomena is known to have quantum uncertainties that are governed only by probabilities, never certainties. The math invented to describe these quantum uncertainties was discovered in 1964 by a physicist named John Bell.  His theories were the birth of Quantum Mechanics

-

-  Fifty years later and Bell’s proposed inequalities and probabilities of quantum states remain precisely accurate. The math always works. All experiments recorded to date verify their accuracy.  

-

-  Weirder still is that entangled particles can have their joint values precisely known while their individual values remain uncertain.  It is as if you rolled dice and the individual values were random but the total always added to the number seven.  

-

-  This theory has been demonstrated many times with entangled electrons that communicate with one having “spin up” and  the other having “spin down” regardless of distance of separation.  They always  remain quantum entangled operating as a linked pair. 

-

-  This theory has remained unchallenged for 50 years .  Every experiment to date reaffirms its validity. 

-

-   Albert Einstein originally objected to its validity on two fronts, realism and locality.  Realism is the conclusion that all objects have predetermined properties.  A property can not be indeterminant.   Locality is the conclusion that objects can only be influenced by their surroundings and those influences can not travel faster than the speed of light.

-

-  In contrast Quantum Mechanics theories allow a particle to be in two states at the same time.  Their state is indeterminant until it is measured.  Entangled particles can share these states such that they are always in these opposite states.  One has spin up and the other has spin down.  If one changes spin the other changes to the opposite spin instantly. Regardless of distance of separation.  

-

-  In 2015 an entanglement experiment was conducted with two diamonds.   Using two electrons embedded in the two diamonds that were separated by 1,280 meters, scientists could measure this switch of states and prove that it occurred faster than the speed of light.  

-

-  The scientists used lasers to excite electrons which in turn emit photons entangled with the spin of the electrons.  The photons traveled the distance of 1,280 meters to other photon detectors.  When the photons met again they became entangled .  Their distant electrons inside the diamonds became entangled as well.  

-

-  The scientists ran 245 trials in each pair of electrons separated by the 1,280 meters and they always remained entangled.  In every case the electrons and photons remained entangled.  The experiment has been repeated and the conclusions are always the same , the Universe is weirder than we can imagine.   

-

-  Ok,  now that this is entanglement is a scientific fact how can we us it in technology?  

-

-  One invention that will now be possible would be a random number generator that would be truly random.  It could be used in cryptography transmitting messages that would be totally secure.  It would be impossible for someone to hack into this type secure communications.  Any disturbance would destroy the entanglement and we would know that the message had been attempted to be compromised, or intercepted. 

-

-  If we could incorporate this random number generator into a beacon that the internet could use then the internet could be made totally secure.  We could create a quantum internet, clock synchronization, quantum sensors and even quantum computers. The projections for the future would have a quantum internet being operational by 2020.  

-

-  John Bell started something that will affect the entire world of communications.  The notions of realism and locality have been broken and the weirdness that comes out will be proven useful to everyone.  We may be using it before we understand it.  Like life itself.

-

-  For more on Quantum Entanglement see Review 2208 and 1957 and 1950 and 1838 and 1828 that also lists 7 more reviews on the subject.

-

 November 27, 2022    QUANTUM  ENTANGLEMENT  -  ?            2211        3761                                                                                                                                  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, November 29, 2022  ---------------------------






Monday, November 28, 2022

3760 - - MILKY WAY - and galaxies beyond?

  -  3760  -  MILKY WAY  -  and galaxies beyond?   We used to think the Milky Way Galaxy was our entire universe. Then we discovered some other galaxies further away.   The Milky Way has a halo of stars.   Today this stellar halo is giving astronomers some new food for thought. It turns out everyone thought the halo was spherical. But, it’s not. 


---------------------  3760  -  -  MILKY WAY  -  and galaxies beyond?

-   According to a new measurement done by a team at Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, it has a tilted, oblong football shape. This new shape tells astronomers an interesting tale about our galaxy’s ancient history.

-

-  The shape of the stellar halo is a very fundamental parameter that we’ve just measured to greater accuracy than was possible before (2022).  There are a lot of important implications of the stellar halo not being spherical but instead shaped like a football, rugby ball, or zeppelin.

-

-  So, is it a big deal if it’s not like a beach ball, as astronomers predicted for so many years?    It turns out the odd shape is an important clue to Milky Way’s early history.  The tilt and distribution of stars in the stellar halo provide dramatic confirmation that our galaxy collided with another smaller galaxy 7-10 billion years ago.

-

-   The evolutionary history of the halo around the Milky Way involves some interesting characters. First, there’s a strange, lonely dwarf galaxy that astronomers dubbed “Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus” or GSE.  

-

-  Billions of years ago GSE galaxy collided with the Milky Way. Collisions are a natural way to build big galaxies out of small ones, and our galaxy formed that way. That mash up tore GSE to shreds and scattered stars from both galaxies into a dispersed halo surrounding the galaxy. The interactions between the two also caused pileups of stars in the halo. That changed the shape of the halo significantly. And, since GSE came in at an angle, the collision also tilted it. The shape is still odd and offset today.

-

-   Gaia-Enceladus merged with our Milky Way galaxy during its early formation stages, nearly 10,000,000,000 years ago. Its debris can now be found throughout the galaxy and in the stellar halo.  You would think that after billions of years, the halo would have “sphericized” itself. Yet, the stars remain in this weird triaxially shaped “cloud”. 

-

-  Something else, which turns out to be dark matter, is at play.  The tilted stellar halo strongly suggests that the underlying dark matter halo is also tilted.  A tilt in the dark matter halo could have significant ramifications for our ability to detect dark matter particles in laboratories on Earth.

-

-  That’s interesting to scientists searching for dark matter. If there really is a tilt in the dark matter halo, there could be areas where this mysterious stuff is more concentrated. Finding those regions could give astronomers a chance to detect interactions with dark matter. 

-

-  The Milky Way isn’t alone in having a halo. Every galaxy has one dominated by dark matter. While we don’t see dark matter, it provides a framework for the distribution of ordinary, visible matter. That includes stars, clusters, and nebulae in the body of the galaxy, plus stars in the halo.

-

-   The astronomers studied two major astronomy data sets that allowed them to make a computer model of what happened. One came from the GAIA spacecraft, which measures the positions, motions, and distances of millions of Milky Way and halo stars. The other data set came from a ground-based survey called H3 (short for Hectochelle in the Halo at High Resolution). The combined results showed the weirdly tilted football shape that emerged.

-

-  Astronomers have long theorized that a nucleus of stars almost certainly exists at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, but until now, they have been unable to find proof. In this new effort, the researchers took up the challenge by sifting through data from the Gaia space telescope.

-

-  Theory has also suggested that if there is a nucleus of stars at the center of the galaxy, they very likely contain much less metal than other stars because they would have been formed before such metals were scattered across the area where the Milky Way formed  12.5 billion years ago.

-

-  Thus, they would likely be made up mostly of helium and hydrogen. Looking only for stars that fit into this category narrowed things down somewhat, and, so did theories that have long suggested that if there is a nucleus of stars at the center of the galaxy, it would most likely be located in the constellation Sagittarius, as it is situated at what appears to be the center of the disk that makes up the galaxy. 

-

- That still left the team sifting through approximately 2 million stars, a daunting task.   Astronomers  were looking for, a cluster of approximately 18,000 stars at the center of the Milky Way galaxy. The stars in the cluster have less than 3% of the metal concentration of stars farther away.

-

-    Astronomers pinpointed the location of what should be the center of the galactic disk. They accounted for stars blocked by dust or other objects. Convinced that they had found the heart of the Milky Way, they took measurements and found the cluster makes up just 0.2% of the mass of the galaxy.  So now the Milky Way has a center to its oblong shape.

-

 November 27, 2022                         3760                                                                                                                                  

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, November 28, 2022  ---------------------------