Thursday, October 10, 2024

4574 - QUANTUM COMPUTER - on the Space Station?

 

-    4574 -  QUANTUM  COMPUTER  -  on the Space Station?   How a quantum sensor on the ISS could revolutionize space exploration.  This space-based atom interferometry will lead to exciting new discoveries and fantastic quantum technologies impacting everyday life, and will transport us into a quantum future.

-


------------------------------------  4574  -  QUANTUM  COMPUTER  -  on the Space Station?

-

-    Scientists onboard the International Space Station (ISS) have announced that, for the first time, they have successfully made high-precision measurements using a quantum sensor based on ultra-cold atoms of the element Rubidium.This is a significant achievement with wide-ranging applications, as these sensors could surpass traditional ones in sensitivity and accuracy, enabling advancements in fields like GPS technology and telecommunications.

-

-    These sensors would offer new opportunities for scientific discoveries through the study of quantum phenomena, testing the limits of fundamental physics.  Maybe even pushing beyond theories such as general relativity and the Standard Model of particle physics.

-

-    Researchers were able to measure the subtle vibrations of the ISS itself, using an instrument called an atom interferometer.  It's one of the most advanced technologies for making high-precision measurements.

-

-    The technique is based on the same principles as optical interferometry, where light is split into two beams that travel along different optical paths before getting combined to produce interference. Any differences between the beams' paths allows for extremely precise detection of changes in the environment.

-

-   Instead of light, however, atom interferometry uses atoms cooled to near absolute zero (-459 degrees Fahrenheit or -273 degrees Celsius), and relies on their ability to exist in multiple positions and motions at the same time due to quantum effects that become apparent at this ultra-cold temperature.

-

-   When atoms move through an interferometer, they create patterns called “fringes”, which contain information about forces like gravity or other environmental influences. And, because atoms move much slower than light, they are affected by these forces for a longer time, allowing for very precise measurements that are much more sensitive than their optical counterparts.

-

-    On Earth, atom interferometers have allowed scientists to achieve incredible feats, such as building absolute gravimeters and investigating changes in fundamental constants of nature with baffling accuracy. But physicists have been eager to apply atom interferometry in space, where microgravity helps eliminate interference and allows scientists to take even longer measurements that would actually improve the instrument's sensitivity altogether.

-

-    In the past maintaining coherence between the atom's has been challenging and required hands-on assistance in order to run experiments.   Yet, the scientists were able to run their measurements remotely from Earth.

-

-    They hope that, as the instrument further develops, it will become possible to make even more precise measurements of gravity that would allow us to investigate and understand our uiverse in greater detail than ever.   They could reveal the composition of planets and moons in our solar system, because different materials have different densities that create subtle variations in gravity.

-

-   This enhanced sensitivity could also enable scientists to finally detect dark matter, an elusive substance that has remained a cosmic mystery due to its weak interactions with particles and gravitational fields.

-

-   Atom interferometry could also be used to test Einstein's theory of general relativity in new ways.  This is the basic theory explaining the large-scale structure of our universe, and we know that there are aspects of the theory that we don’t understand correctly. This technology may help us fill in those gaps and give us a more complete picture of the reality.

-

-    Space-based atom interferometry will lead to exciting new discoveries and fantastic quantum technologies impacting everyday life, and will transport us into a quantum future.

-

-

October 10, 2024           QUANTUM  COMPUTER  -  on the Space Station?                 4562

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, October 10, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Wednesday, October 9, 2024

4573 - EXOPLANETS - and Pluto dwarf planet? -

 

-    4573 -    EXOPLANETS  -  and Pluto dwarf planet?   -    Astronomers have confirmed the existence of exoplanets with extremely small orbits around their stars. But what about exoplanets that get close enough to be devoured by their star, and what if it’s an Earth-sized exoplanet?


-----------------------------------  4573  -    EXOPLANETS  -  and Pluto dwarf planet?

-

-    Researchers investigated an Earth-sized exoplanet with an orbital period of only 5.7 hours, known as “ultra-short-period” (USP) exoplanets, that could eventually experience what’s known as tidal disruption, resulting in its devourment by its star.

-

-     Tidal disruption could be a potential fate of rocky planets.   About 10 percent of sun-like stars might have engulfed their rocky planets. This system “TOI-6255” is the best-known progenitor for those planet engulfment events.

-

-    TOI-6255 b, whose radius is ~1.08 and mass is ~1.44 of Earth’s and located just over 20.4 parsecs (65.2 light-years) from Earth. However, while being Earth-sized holds promise for life, TOI-6255 b’s 5.7-hour orbit not only make this exoplanet far too hot for life as we know it to exist, but this also means its orbit takes it dangerously close to what’s known as Roche limit. -

-

-   The Roche Limit is the distance a smaller object can orbit a larger object until the larger object’s gravity tears the smaller object to pieces, along with TOI-6255 b also experiencing the  tidal disruption, which is a common occurrence throughout the cosmos, including black holes.

-

-    This planet is doomed for tidal disruption in 400Myr which is short on cosmic scale (~13Gyr). The planet is also tidally distorted to be football like in shape (10 percent deviation from sphere), in comparison Earth’s tidal distortion due to the moon is only 1e-7 [0.0000001] level.

-

-   Orbital phase curve study of this planet could confirm that it is indeed tidally distorted. We know what the phase curve should look like for a spherical planet, tidally distorted planet has a strong deviation from that. We can also see if the surface of the planet is covered by lava pool as would be expected on a planet this hot.

-

-    “USPs” are exoplanets whose orbits are less than one day and whose masses are less than 2x the Earth.  Only about 100 USPs have been discovered with a 2014 study estimating approximately 0.5 percent exist around Sun-like stars and a 2019 study discussing their bulk composition (i.e., mass of its iron core and mantle).

-

-   Given their extremely short orbit, these worlds are likely too hot for life as we know it to exist, and along with USPs are the familiar “hot Jupiters” who orbit their stars in only a few days and astronomers estimate their population is in the hundreds.   These worlds are Jupiter-sized or larger gas planets and are also potentially far too hot for life as we know it to exist. But what is the significance of TOI-6255 b being an Earth-sized planet as opposed to a Jupiter-sized planet, or larger?

-

-      Planets similar to Earth in size are most likely rocky, mostly made of iron core and silicate mantle. They show us what terrestrial planets in other planetary systems are made of. Jupiter-sized planets are most certainly covered by thick hydrogen and helium atmospheres. Jupiter-sized planets are unlikely to harbor life.

-

-    While TOI-6255 b isn’t due for disassembly for another 400 million years, watching any exoplanet get ripped to shreds by its host star could provide important insights regarding the planet’s exterior and interior compositions, thus helping us better understand the similarities between exoplanets and planets within our own solar system.

-

-     These unique worlds and their extremely tight orbits have challenged our understanding of solar system architecture throughout our Milky Way Galaxy, as Mercury is the closest planet to our Sun, and it still takes 88 days to complete one orbit.

-

-    One similarity between our solar system and exoplanetary systems is the Roche limit. The study also focuses on tidal disruption that is physically distorting TOI-6255 b. Tidal disruption could be a potential fate of rocky planets.

-

-    Tidal disruption of planets is minimal in our solar system. However, the rings of Saturn are thought to originate from tidal disruption of satellites around Saturn. Tidal forces are strongly dependent on orbital separation, only objects with the shortest orbital period experience significant tides.

-

-   Discovered in 1930, Pluto was long considered our solar system's ninth planet. But after the discovery of similar worlds deeper in the Kuiper Belt, Pluto was reclassified as a “dwarf planet”.

-

-    A dwarf planet is an object in orbit around the Sun that is large enough to pull itself into a nearly round shape but has not been able to clear its orbit of debris.    Pluto falls into the dwarf planet category because it is located in a part of our solar system known as the Trans-Neptunian region (beyond Neptune) where other objects might cross Pluto's orbital path.

-

-   Pluto is only about 1,400 miles wide. At that small size, Pluto is only about half the width of the United States. It's about 3.6 billion miles away from the Sun, and it has a thin atmosphere composed mostly of nitrogen, methane, and carbon monoxide. On average, Pluto’s temperature is -387°F (-232°C), making it too cold to sustain life.

-

-   Pluto is orbited by five known moons, the largest of which is Charon. Charon is about half the size of Pluto itself, making it the largest satellite relative to the planet it orbits in our solar system. Pluto and Charon are often referred to as a "double planet."

-

-    The only spacecraft to explore Pluto up close was NASA's New Horizons. It flew by the dwarf planet and its moons in 2015.

-

-   In 1930, Venetia Burney of Oxford, England, suggested to her grandfather that the new discovery be named for the Roman god of the underworld. He forwarded the name to the Lowell Observatory and it was selected.

-

-    The surface of Pluto is extremely cold, so it's unlikely that life could exist there. At such cold temperatures, water, which is vital for life as we know it, is essentially rock-like. Pluto's interior is warmer, however, and some think there could even be an ocean deep inside.

-

-   Pluto has an equatorial diameter of about 1,477 miles (2,377 kilometers). Pluto is about 1/5th the width of Earth.   From an average distance of about 3.7 billion miles (5.9 billion kilometers), Pluto is about 39 times farther away than the Earth is from the Sun. From this distance, it takes sunlight 5.5 hours to travel from the Sun to Pluto.

-

-   If you were to stand on the surface of Pluto at noon, the Sun would be 1/900 the brightness it is here on Earth, or about 300 times as bright as our full moon. There is a moment each day near sunset here on Earth when the light is the same brightness as midday on Pluto.

-

-    Pluto's orbit around the Sun is unusual compared to the planets: it's both elliptical and tilted. Pluto's 248-year-long, oval-shaped orbit can take it as far as 49.3 astronomical units (AU) from the Sun, and as close as 30 AU. (One AU is the mean distance between Earth and the Sun: about 93 million miles or 150 million kilometers.) But on average, Pluto is 3.7 billion miles  away from the Sun, or 39 AU.

-

-   From 1979 to 1999, Pluto was near perihelion, when it is closest to the Sun. During this time, Pluto was actually closer to the Sun than Neptune.   One day on Pluto takes about 153 hours. Its axis of rotation is tilted 57 degrees with respect to the plane of its orbit around the Sun, so it spins almost on its side. Pluto also exhibits a retrograde rotation; spinning from east to west like Venus and Uranus.

-

-   Pluto has five known moons: Charon, Nix, Hydra, Kerberos, and Styx. This moon system might have formed by a collision between Pluto and another similar-sized body early in the history of the solar system.

-

-    Charon, the biggest of Pluto's moons, is about half the size of Pluto itself, making it the largest satellite relative to the planet it orbits in our solar system. It orbits Pluto at a distance of just 12,200 miles.  Our Moon is 20 times farther away from Earth. Pluto and Charon are often referred to as a double planet.

-

-    Charon's orbit around Pluto takes 153 hours – the same time it takes Pluto to complete one rotation. This means Charon neither rises nor sets, but hovers over the same spot on Pluto's surface. The same side of Charon always faces Pluto, a state called “tidal locking”.

-

-    Pluto's other four moons are much smaller, less than 100 miles wide. They're also irregularly shaped, not spherical like Charon. Unlike many other moons in the solar system, these moons are not tidally locked to Pluto. They all spin and don’t keep the same face towards Pluto.

-

-    Dwarf planet Pluto is a member of a group of objects that orbit in a disc-like zone beyond the orbit of Neptune called the Kuiper Belt. This distant realm is populated with thousands of miniature icy worlds, which formed early in the history of our solar system about 4.5 billion years ago. These icy, rocky bodies are called Kuiper Belt objects, transneptunian objects, or plutoids.

-

-    Pluto is about two-thirds the diameter of Earth's Moon and probably has a rocky core surrounded by a mantle of water ice. Interesting ices like methane and nitrogen frost coat the surface. Due to its lower density, Pluto's mass is about one-sixth that of Earth's Moon.

-

-   Pluto's surface has mountains, valleys, plains, and craters. The temperature on Pluto can be as cold as -375 to -400 degrees Fahrenheit .   Pluto's tallest mountains are 6,500 to 9,800 feet (2 to 3 kilometers) in height. The mountains are big blocks of water ice, sometimes with a coating of frozen gases like methane. Long troughs and valleys as long as 370 miles add to the interesting features of this faraway dwarf planet.

-

-   Craters as large as 162 miles (260 kilometers) in diameter dot some of the landscape on Pluto, with some showing signs of erosion and filling. This suggests tectonic forces are slowly resurfacing Pluto.  The most prominent plains observed on Pluto appear to be made of frozen nitrogen gas and show no craters. These plains do show structures suggesting convection (blobs of material circulating up and down).

-

-   Pluto has a thin, tenuous atmosphere that expands when it comes closer to the Sun and collapses as it moves farther away, similar to a comet. The main constituent is molecular nitrogen, though molecules of methane and carbon monoxide have also been detected.

-

-    When Pluto is close to the Sun, its surface ices sublimate (changing directly from solid to gas) and rise to temporarily form a thin atmosphere. Pluto's low gravity (about 6% of Earth's) causes the atmosphere to be much more extended in altitude than our planet's atmosphere. Pluto becomes much colder during the part of each year when it is traveling far away from the Sun. During this time, the bulk of the planet's atmosphere may freeze and fall as snow to the surface.

-

-    It isn't known whether Pluto has a magnetic field, but its small size and slow rotation suggest little or none.

-

-

October 9, 2024          PLANET  DISCOVERED  -  and Pluto renamed?                   4573

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, October 9, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Tuesday, October 8, 2024

4572 - EARLIEST GALAXIES - tell us the Universe formation?

 

-    4572 -  EARLIEST  GALAXIES  -  tell us the Universe formation?  The earliest galaxies formed amazingly fast after the Big Bang. Do they break the universe or change its age?  The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is the largest and most powerful space telescope built to date. Since it was launched in December 2021 it has provided groundbreaking insights.


-------------------------  4572  -  EARLIEST  GALAXIES  -  tell us the Universe formation?

-

-   JWST is discovering the earliest and most distant known galaxies, which existed just 300 million years after the Big Bang.    These distant objects are also very ancient because it takes a long time for the light from these objects to reach telescopes. JWST has now found a number of these very early galaxies. We're effectively looking back in time at these objects, seeing them as they looked shortly after the birth of the universe.

-

-   These observations from JWST agree with our current understanding of cosmology and of galaxy formation. But they also reveal aspects we didn't expect. Many of these early galaxies shine much more brightly than we would expect given that they existed just a short time after the Big Bang.

-

-    Brighter galaxies are thought to have more stars and more mass. It was thought that much more time was needed for this level of star formation to take place. These galaxies also have actively growing black holes at their centers.  This is a sign that these objects matured quickly after the Big Bang.

-

-   Scientists have been able to study these early galaxies by combining JWST's detailed images with its powerful capabilities for spectroscopy. Spectroscopy is a method for interpreting the electromagnetic radiation that's emitted or absorbed by objects in space.

-

-   Our understanding of cosmology and galaxy formation rests on a few fundamental ideas. One of these is the cosmological principle, which states that, on a large scale, the universe is homogeneous (the same everywhere) and isotropic (the same in all directions). Combined with Einstein's theory of general relativity, this principle allows us to connect the evolution of the universe to its energy and mass content.

-

-   The standard cosmological model, known as the "Hot Big Bang" theory, includes three main components.  One is the ordinary matter that we can see with our eyes in galaxies, stars and planets. A second ingredient is cold dark matter (CDM), slow-moving matter particles that do not emit, absorb or reflect light.

-

-  The third component is what's known the “cosmological constant” (Λ, or lambda). This is linked to something called dark energy and is a way of explaining the fact that the expansion of the universe is accelerating. Together, these components form what is called the ΛCDM model of cosmology.

-

-   Dark energy makes up about 68% of the total energy content of today's universe.  Despite not being directly observable with scientific instruments, dark matter is thought to make up most of the matter in the cosmos and comprises about 27% of the universe's total mass and energy content.

-

-   While dark matter and dark energy remain mysterious, the ΛCDM model of cosmology is supported by a wide range of detailed observations. These include the measurement of the universe's expansion, the cosmic microwave background, or CMB (the "afterglow" of the Big Bang) and the development of galaxies and their large-scale distribution, the way that galaxies cluster together.

-

-   The ΛCDM model lays the groundwork for our understanding of how galaxies form and evolve.  The CMB, which was emitted about 380,000 years after the Big Bang, provides a snapshot of early fluctuations in density that occurred in the early universe. These fluctuations, particularly in dark matter, eventually developed into the structures we observe today, such as galaxies and stars.

-

-   Galaxy formation consists of complex processes influenced by numerous different physical phenomena. Some of these mechanisms are not fully understood, such as what processes govern how gas in galaxies cools and condenses to form stars.

-

-   The effects of supernovae, stellar winds and black holes that emit significant amounts of energy  (active galactic nuclei, or AGN) can all heat or expel gas from galaxies. This in turn can boost or curtail star formation and therefore influence the growth of galaxies.

-

-   The efficiency and scale of these "feedback processes," as well as their cumulative impact over time, are poorly understood. They are a significant source of uncertainty in mathematical models, or simulations, of galaxy formation.

-

-   One of the simpler models of galaxy formation assumes that the rate at which stars form in a galaxy is directly tied to gas flowing into those galaxies. This model also proposes that the star formation rate in a galaxy is proportional to the rate at which dark matter halos grow. It assumes a fixed efficiency at converting gas into stars, regardless of cosmic time.

-

-    This "constant star formation efficiency" model is consistent with star formation increasing dramatically in the first billion years after the Big Bang. The rapid growth of dark matter halos during this period would have provided the necessary conditions for galaxies to form stars efficiently. Despite its simplicity, this model has successfully predicted a wide range of real observations, including the overall rate of star formation across cosmic time.

-

-    JWST has ushered in a new era of discovery. With its advanced instruments, the space telescope can capture both detailed images and high resolution spectra charts showing the intensity of electromagnetic radiation emitted or absorbed by objects in the sky. For JWST, these spectra are in the near infrared region of the electromagnetic spectrum.

-

-     Studying this region is crucial for observing early galaxies whose optical light has turned into near infrared (or "redshifted") as the universe has expanded.   Redshift describes how the wavelengths of light from galaxies become stretched as they travel. The more distant a galaxy is, the greater its redshift.

-

-   Over the past two years, JWST has identified and characterized galaxies at redshifts with values of between ten and 15. These galaxies, which formed around 200–500 million years after the Big Bang, are relatively small for galaxies (about 100 parsecs, or 3 quadrillion kilometers, across). They each consist of around 100 million stars, and form new stars at a rate of about one sun-like star per year.

-

-   While this does not sound very impressive, it implies that these systems double their content of stars within only 100 million years. For comparison, our own Milky Way galaxy takes about 25 billion years to double its stellar mass.

-

-    The surprising findings from JWST of bright galaxies at high redshifts, or distances, could imply that these galaxies matured faster than expected after the Big Bang. This is important because it would challenge existing models of galaxy formation. The constant star-formation efficiency model described above, while effective at explaining much of what we see, struggles to account for the large number of bright and distant galaxies observed with a redshift of more than ten with a redshift of more than ten.

-

-  To address this, scientists are exploring various possibilities. These include changes to their theories of how efficiently gas is converted into stars over time. They are also reconsidering the relative importance of the feedback processes and how phenomena such as supernovae and black holes also help regulate star formation.

-

-    Some theories suggest that star formation in the early universe may have been more intense or "bursty" than previously thought, leading to the rapid growth of these early galaxies and their apparent brightness.

-

-    Others propose that different factors, such as lower amounts of galactic dust, a top-heavy distribution of star masses, or contributions from phenomena such as active black holes, could be responsible for the unexpected brightness of these early galaxies.

-

-   These explanations invoke changes to galaxy formation physics in order to explain JWST's findings. But scientists have also been considering modifications to broad cosmological theories. For example, the abundance of early, bright galaxies could be partly explained by a change to something called the “matter power spectrum”. This is a way to describe density differences in the universe.

-

-   One possible mechanism for achieving this change in the “matter power spectrum” is a theoretical phenomenon called "early dark energy". This is the idea that a new cosmological energy source with similarities to dark energy may have existed at early times, at a redshift of 3,000. This is before the CMB was emitted and just 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

-

-   This early dark energy would have decayed rapidly after the stage of the universe's evolution known as “recombination”. Intriguingly, early dark energy could also alleviate the Hubble tension which is a discrepancy between different estimates of the universe's age.

-

-   The galaxy findings from JWST required scientists to stretch the age of the universe by several billion years.   However, other phenomena could account for the bright galaxies.

-

-    The current record holder for the most distant galaxy is called “JADES-GS-z14-0”. The data gathered so far indicate that these galaxies have a large diversity of different properties.   Some galaxies show signs of hosting black holes that are emitting energy, while others seem to be consistent with hosting young, dust-free populations of stars.

-

-    Because these galaxies are faint and observing them is expensive (it takes exposure times of many hours), only 20 galaxies for which the redshift is more than ten have been observed with spectroscopy to date, and it will take years to build a statistical sample.

-

-   A different angle of attack could be observations of galaxies at later cosmic times, when the universe was 1 billion to 2 billion years old (redshifts of between three and nine).

-

-   In the first year of JWST's operation, it was claimed that some of the earliest galaxies had extremely high stellar masses (the masses of stars contained within them) and a change in cosmology was needed to accommodate bright galaxies that existed in the very early universe.

-

-     Soon after, it was clear that these galaxies do not break the universe, but their properties can be explained by a range of different phenomena. Better observational data showed that the distances to some of the objects were overestimated which led to an overestimation of their stellar masses.

-

-   The emission of light from these galaxies can be powered by sources other than stars, such as accreting black holes. Assumptions in models or simulations can also lead to biases in the total mass of stars in these galaxies.

-

-   As JWST continues its mission, it will help scientists refine their models and answer some of the most fundamental questions about our cosmic origins. It should unlock even more secrets about the universe's earliest days, including the puzzle of these bright, distant galaxies.

-

-

October 9, 2024          EARLIEST  GALAXIES  -  tell us the Universe formation?       4572

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, October 8, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Saturday, October 5, 2024

4571 - WEBB TELESCOPE MYSTERIES

 

-    4571 -  WEBB  TELESCOPE  MYSTERIES? -   James Webb Space Telescope results have revealed that there may not be a “Hubble tension” after all. But contradictions within the findings point to a deeper mystery.  New measurements taken with JWST have deepened the scientific controversy of the Hubble tension, suggesting it may not exist at all.


------------------------------  4571  -  WEBB  TELESCOPE  MYSTERIES

-

-    Astronomers have found that the universe appears to be expanding at different speeds depending on where they look, a conundrum they call the “Hubble tension”. Some of the measurements agree with our best current understanding of the universe, while others threaten to break it.

-

-   JWST  results are consistent with the standard model.   There are two gold-standard methods for figuring out the “Hubble constant”, a value that describes the expansion rate of the universe. The first involves poring over tiny fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background, an ancient relic of the universe's first light produced just 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

-

-   After mapping out this microwave hiss using the European Space Agency's Planck satellite, cosmologists inferred a Hubble constant of roughly 46,200 mph per million light-years, or around 67 kilometers per second per megaparsec ( 67 km/s/Mpc). This, alongside other measurements of the early universe, aligned with theoretical predictions.

-

-    The second method operates at closer distances and in the universe's later life using pulsating stars called “Cepheid variables”. Cepheid stars are slowly dying, and their outer layers of helium gas grow and shrink as they absorb and release the star's radiation, making them periodically flicker like distant signal lamps.

-

-   As Cepheids get brighter, they pulsate more slowly, enabling astronomers to measure the stars' intrinsic brightness. By comparing this brightness to their observed brightness, astronomers can chain Cepheids into a "cosmic distance ladder" to peer ever deeper into the universe's past.

-

-  They measured the Hubble constant using the Hubble Space Telescope and JWST, they found a puzzlingly high value of 73.2 km/s/Mpc. Hence the tension, a significant discrepancy between methods measuring the expansion rate in the early universe and those in the more modern one.

-

-    Astronomers suggested that dust, gas and other stars could be throwing off the brightness measurements of the Cepheids, creating the appearance of a discrepancy where there isn‘t one at all.

-

-    In the new study, to tease out a possible systematic error in Cepheid crowding, astronomers trained JWST on 11 nearby galaxies containing Type Ia supernovae, measuring their distances and anchoring them to three independent distance ladders with intrinsic brightnesses in similar regions of the sky: the Cepheids; and two other standard candle red giant stars known as "tip-of-the-red-giant-branch" (TRGB) stars and J-region asymptotic giant branch (JAGB) stars.

-

-    Their results were puzzling. The TRGB and JAGB stars gave Hubble constant results of 69.85 km/s/Mpc and 67.96 km/s/Mpc, respectively. But the Cepheids returned 72.04 km/s/Mpc, replicating the Hubble tension.

-

-    The answer is to make even more measurements, potentially some with an additional type of star.  This work to be completed in the next two years. Yet whether additional measurements will resolve the problem or add to it is debated.   JWST is a marvelous machine, and it's exactly what we need to get at some of these kinds of issues. It's a good time to be working on this.

-

-

October 4, 2024         WEBB  TELESCOPE  MYSTERIES                   4571

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, October 5, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Friday, October 4, 2024

4570 - DARK MATTER ALTERNATIVES

 

-    4570  - DARK  MATTER  ALTERNATIVES -   Dark matter is thought to account for 85% of mass in the Universe, but because it barely interacts with ordinary matter and doesn’t interact at all with light, it is notoriously difficult to observe directly. Several research teams have tried to catch a glimpse of the elusive substance, but only the DAMA/LIBRA experiment has claimed to have seen it for real.

-


-------------------------------------  4570  -    DARK  MATTER  ALTERNATIVES

-

-   It’s a mystery that has had physicists scratching their heads for more than 20 years. The DAMA/LIBRA experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS) near L’Aquila, Italy, has been recording an annual fluctuation of light flashes in its detector that appears to be a sign of dark matter. But no one has been able to definitively replicate the findings.

-

-    DAMA/LIBRA’s observations of the distinct annual pattern is consistent with what physicists would expect with Earth’s relative position in the galaxy throughout the year. As the Earth orbits the Sun, the Sun orbits the black hole at the center of the Milky Way.

-

-    In June, the Earth hurtles through the Milky Way in the same direction as the Sun, increasing its relative speed through the haze of dark matter. But in December, the Earth travels with the flow of dark matter as it moves in the opposite direction to the Sun. As expected, the number of signals recorded by DAMA/LIBRA’s detector are highest in June and lowest in December.

-

-    A handful of groups have attempted to reproduce DAMA/LIBRA’s results using similar methods and materials in their detectors, including the same type of sodium iodide crystals that emit tiny flashes of light when they are hit with subatomic particles. Among them is COSINE-100, which has been running since 2016 at Yemilab’s predecessor, the Yangyang Underground Laboratory (Y2L) in South Korea.

-

-     But none have produced results that match those of the original experiment, raising questions about whether the yearly swing in signals is because of something else, such as the detector itself or from errors in the analysis methods used.  This is a puzzle that’s still there after 20 years.

-

-    Although the COSINE-100 detector uses the same type of sodium iodide crystals, they contain up to three times more radiation than the ones used in DAMA/LIBRA, which can muddy the faint signals of potential dark-matter particles and make it difficult to produce definitive results.

-

-    The upgraded experiment will use the same crystals as those used in the earlier COSINE-100 experiment, but with some extra enhancements to boost their sensitivity. The team are also developing a set of sodium iodide crystals that will be even more radiopure than DAMA/LIBRA’s for the next phase of the experiment, COSINE-200.

-

-     “COSINE-100” will be housed in the brand new 3,000-square-metre Yemilab. The $23 million facility lies around 1 kilometer underground and surpasses Y2L in both depth and volume. Since September 2023, researchers have been moving all Y2L experiments to Yemilab, where they will begin their next phase by the end of this year.

-

-     Yemilab also offers a better-shielded environment for detecting elusive particles besides dark matter. The facility will also hunt for neutrinos, chargeless particles that barely have mass.

-

-    The second phase of an experiment called “AMoRE” will search for signs of two neutrons decaying into protons and electrons without emitting a neutrino. This hypothesized process is called “neutrinoless double β decay” and if observed, it will demonstrate that neutrinos are their own antiparticle.

-

-    This could offer clues about their mass and explain why there is more matter than antimatter in the Universe.  The upgraded neutrino detector will use around 160 kilograms of crystals embedded with molybdenum-100, a naturally occurring radioisotope. When AMoRE-II starts running at the end of this year, it will be 100 times more sensitive than the previous version of the experiment.

-

-    Whether the two experiments succeed or fail at detecting the rare events they are looking for, they are nevertheless set to raise more questions.  If both will deliver only null results, we should seriously start rethinking the Universe.

-

-    We need to consider alternatives to dark matter that better explain cosmological observations.  Do constants of nature—the numbers that determine how things behave, like the speed of light—change over time as the universe expands? Does light get a little tired traveling vast cosmic distances?

-

-     It was believed that dark matter and dark energy explained these cosmological phenomena, but recent research indicates that our universe has been expanding without dark matter or dark energy.   Doing away with dark matter and dark energy resolves the "impossible early galaxy problem," that arises when trying to account for galaxies that do not adhere to expectations regarding to size and age. Finding an alternative to dark matter and energy that complies with existing cosmological observations, including galaxy distribution, is possible.

-

-    Dark matter is a hypothetical form of matter that does not interact with ordinary matter in any way except through gravity. It was proposed as a theoretical way to explain our astrophysical and cosmological observations. Ordinary matter can travel through the dark matter without any resistance and vice versa.

-

-   In space, gravitational pull determines the speed at which an object orbits. A higher speed than expected from surrounding orbiting objects is attributed to the existence and gravitational pull of dark matter.

-

-    The gravitational pull of dark matter can also bend light rays, causing a gravitational lensing effect just like normal matter. This allows for the measurement of dark matter in the object causing the bending, such as in galaxies and clusters of galaxies.

-

-   The most robust support for the existence of dark matter comes from the tiny variations observed in the cosmic microwave background radiation (remnant radiation from the big bang), measured with increasingly high precision.

-

-   Another argument for the existence of dark matter is that large-scale structures of the universe, such as galaxies, would not be able to form without the dark matter within the limited age of the universe.

-

-    There are alternatives to dark matter that account for many astrophysical observations. The oldest and most popular theory is “modified Newtonian dynamic” (MoND), which suggests that the Newtonian inverse square law of gravitational attraction force is a simplified version of a complete force that becomes perceptible only at very large distances when Newtonian force becomes negligible.

-

-   Another alternative is a version of MoND that includes Einstein's relativistic effects and explains observations where MoND is limited, such as cosmic microwave background radiation. Then there is the proposed theory of “retarded gravity” that also claims to comply with such observations.

-

-   Astronomers are surprised to learn that many observations show a complete absence of dark matter or dark matter-deficient structures. This leads one to question its existence.  One then has to find an explanation of what might have created the problem, such as tidal forces exerted by the passing of nearby galaxies stripping away dark matter. Even the mass of the Milky Way has recently been determined to be much smaller than expected from cosmology.

-

-    Recent discoveries create doubt around the existence of dark matter. Despite extensive research and billions of dollars in investment, there has been no direct detection of any dark matter.  The dark energy theory negates the gravitational pull of matter, causing the universe to expand faster with time, as observed.

-

-    The interrelated variation of constants of nature, dubbed “covarying coupling constants” (CCC), achieve the same effect by weakening the gravitational pull and other forces of nature with time, eliminating the need for dark energy.

-

-   Combined with the “tired light” (TL) effect which posits that light slows down as a result of energy loss, such a cosmological model has no room for dark matter. The CCC approach could also replace the dark energy-like constant considered responsible for the extremely rapid expansion of the universe following the Big Bang, called “inflation”.

-

-   The age of the universe is determined from the historical expansion rate of the universe, and can vary depending on the model used for the expansion. Measuring the redshift of exploding stars, called supernovae type 1a, and their observed brightness can determine the expansion rate of the Universe.

-

-   Redshift is the lowering of spectral line frequencies depending on the recessional speed of the emitting object, similar to the frequency of a receding ambulance siren. By allowing the redshift due to the tired light effect to coexist with the expansion redshift, the universe's expansion rate is reduced, and age of the universe increases.

-

-   This new model predicts the universe is older than we think it is, 26.7 billion years in the CCC cosmology compared to 13.8 in the standard cosmology, and allows galaxies and their clusters to form without dark matter. The increase in the age of the universe in early times when structures started forming was up to 100 times larger in the new model.

-

-   The absence of dark matter that reduces the gravitational force and increases the time for collapsing the matter to form structures is greatly overcompensated by increased age in the CCC model.

-

-   The expansion of the universe causes time to appear slowed down when observing distant galaxies. The CCC+TL model complies with observations showing a time dilation effect that appears to slow down the clock in distant objects.

-

-     The standard cosmology model requires dark matter to fit observations, such as accounting for redshift when measuring the brightness of supernovae. Dark matter is also used to explain physical processes such as galaxy rotation curves, galaxy clusters or gravitational lensing. Using CCC+TL cosmology means that we must seriously consider alternative physical processes to account for observations that had previously been attributed to dark matter.

-

-

October 3, 2024           DARK  MATTER  ALTERNATIVES                 4570

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, October 4, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4569 - DARK MATTER - discoveries in new experiment?

 

-    4569 - DARK MATTER  -  discoveries in new experiment? -   Dark matter is thought to account for 85% of mass in the Universe, but because it barely interacts with ordinary matter and doesn’t interact at all with light, it is notoriously difficult to observe directly. Several research teams have tried to catch a glimpse of the elusive substance, but only the DAMA/LIBRA experiment has claimed to have seen it for real.


----------------------------------  4569  -  DARK MATTER  -  discoveries in new experiment?

-

-  It’s a mystery that has had physicists scratching their heads for more than 20 years. The DAMA/LIBRA experiment at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory (LNGS) near L’Aquila, Italy, has been recording an annual fluctuation of light flashes in its detector that appears to be a sign of dark matter. But no one has been able to definitively replicate the findings.

-

-    Beneath a mountain in Jeongseon, South Korea, researchers are scaling up an experiment that could finally lay the controversial dark-matter claim to rest. In June, researchers will finish installing a revamped detector in a brand-new facility called “Yemilab”. If all goes to plan, the upgraded COSINE-100 experiment will be running by August, 2024.

- 

-    DAMA/LIBRA’s observations of the distinct annual pattern is consistent with what physicists would expect with Earth’s relative position in the galaxy throughout the year. As the Earth orbits the Sun, the Sun orbits the black hole at the center of the Milky Way. In June, the Earth hurtles through the Milky Way in the same direction as the Sun, increasing its relative speed through the haze of dark matter.

-

-    But in December, the Earth travels with the flow of dark matter as it moves in the opposite direction to the Sun. As expected, the number of signals recorded by DAMA/LIBRA’s detector are highest in June and lowest in December.

-

-    To reproduce DAMA/LIBRA’s results scientists were using similar methods and materials in their detectors, including the same type of sodium iodide crystals that emit tiny flashes of light when they are hit with subatomic particles. Among them is “COSINE-100”, which has been running since 2016 at Yemilab’s predecessor, the Yangyang Underground Laboratory (Y2L) in South Korea.

-

-    But none have produced results that match those of the original experiment, raising questions about whether the yearly swing in signals is because of something else, such as the detector itself or from errors in the analysis methods used. This is a puzzle that’s still there after 20 years.

-

-    To confirm or rule out DAMA/LIBRA’s claims for good, experiments need to match the original as much as possible.   Although the COSINE-100 detector uses the same type of sodium iodide crystals, they contain up to three times more radiation than the ones used in DAMA/LIBRA, which can muddy the faint signals of potential dark-matter particles and make it difficult to produce definitive results.

-

-    The upgraded experiment will use the same crystals as those used in the earlier COSINE-100 experiment, but with some extra enhancements to boost their sensitivity. The team are also developing a set of sodium iodide crystals that will be even more radiopure than DAMA/LIBRA’s for the next phase of the experiment, COSINE-200. With even lower radioactivity levels, the hope is to generate enough data over a shorter period of time to reach a more solid conclusion about DAMA/LIBRA’s results, and also search for low-mass dark matter. 

-

-    “COSINE-100” will be housed in the brand new 3,000-square-metre Yemilab. The $23 million facility lies around 1 kilometer underground and surpasses “Y2L” in both depth and volume. Since September 2023, researchers have been moving all Y2L experiments to Yemilab, where they will begin their next phase by the end of this year.

-

-    Yemilab also offers a better-shielded environment for detecting elusive particles besides dark matter. The facility will also hunt for neutrinos, chargeless particles that barely have mass. The second phase of an experiment called “AMoRE” will search for signs of two neutrons decaying into protons and electrons without emitting a neutrino.

-

-    This hypothesized process is called “neutrinoless double β decay” and if observed, it will demonstrate that neutrinos are their own antiparticle. This could offer clues about their mass and explain why there is more matter than antimatter in the Universe.

-

-     The upgraded neutrino detector will use around 160 kilograms of crystals embedded with molybdenum-100, a naturally occurring radioisotope. When AMoRE-II starts running at the end of this year, 2024, it will be 100 times more sensitive than the previous version of the experiment.

-

-    Whether the two experiments succeed or fail at detecting the rare events they are looking for, they are nevertheless set to raise more questions.   If both will deliver only null results, we should seriously start rethinking the Universe.

-

0

October 3, 2024          DARK MATTER  -  discoveries in new experiment?              4569

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, October 4, 2024  ---------------------------------