- 3666 - JAMES WEBB - observes distant galaxies? Recent 2022 observations by the James Webb Space Telescope have not disproved the big bang theory. The latest Webb observations do reveal some strange and unexpected things about the universe that may adjust that theory.
--------------------- 3666 - JAMES WEBB - observes distant galaxies?
- Evidence for the Big Bang is centered around two facts: first, that more distant galaxies have a higher redshift than closer ones, and second, that the universe is filled with a cosmic background of microwave radiation.
-
- The first suggests that the universe is expanding in all directions, while the second suggests that it was once in a very hot and dense state. These are two of the Three Pillars of data supporting the big bang, the third being the relative abundance of elements in the early universe.
-
- The “LCDM model” for universe expansion states that it began with the big bang and is filled with matter, dark matter, and dark energy. Everything from the acceleration of cosmic expansion to the clustering of galaxies supports this model.
-
- JWST can see much deeper into space and time than Hubble. One of these secondary test compares the apparent brightness of a galaxy with its apparent size. The ratio of brightness to size is known as surface brightness. Generally, the bigger a galaxy, the brighter it should be, so the surface brightness of every galaxy should be roughly the same.
-
- More distant galaxies would appear dimmer, but they’d also have a smaller apparent size, so the surface brightness would still be the same. The test predicts that in a static, non-expanding universe the surface brightness of all galaxies should be about the same, regardless of distance.
-
- This isn’t what we see. What we observe is that more distant galaxies have a dimmer surface brightness than closer ones. The amount of dimming is proportional to the amount of redshift the galaxy has. You might think this proves that all those distant galaxies are speeding away from us, but it actually doesn’t.
-
- If those distant galaxies were speeding away, you’d have two dimming effects. The red shift and the ever-increasing distance. The test predicts that in a simple expanding universe the surface brightness of galaxies should diminish proportional to both redshift and distance. We only see the effects of redshift.
-
- This fact has led some to propose a static universe where light spontaneously loses energy over time. It’s the so-called “tired light hypothesis“, and it’s very popular among big bang opponents. If the universe is static and light is tired, then the test predicts exactly what we observe. Hence no big bang.
- The CMB disproves this “tired light theory“. It’s a common misconception that redshift proves that galaxies are speeding away from us. They aren’t. Distant galaxies aren’t speeding through space. Space itself is expanding, putting greater distance between us.
-
- It’s a subtle difference, but it means that galactic redshift is caused by “cosmic expansion“, not relative motion. It also means that distant galaxies appear a bit larger than they would in a static universe. They are distant and tiny, but the expansion of space gives the illusion of them being larger. As a result, the surface brightness of distant galaxies dims only proportional to redshift.
-
- We know tired light is wrong because of the cosmic microwave background. A static, tired-light universe wouldn’t have any remnant heat from a primordial fireball. Not to mention the fact that distant galaxies would appear blurred, and distant supernovae wouldn’t be time-dilated by cosmic expansion. The only model that supports all the evidence is the Big Bang Theory
-
- Still the James Webb Space Telescope has found some unusual things. Most significantly, it has found more galaxies and more distant galaxies than there should be, and that could lead to some revolutionary changes in our standard model.
-
- Our current understanding is that after the big bang the universe went through a period known as the “dark ages“. During this period the first light of the cosmos had faded, and the first stars and galaxies hadn’t yet formed.
-
- Webb is so sensitive it can see some of the youngest galaxies that formed just after the dark ages. We would expect those young galaxies to be less numerous and less developed than later galaxies. But the Webb observations have found very red shifted, very young galaxies that are both common and surprisingly mature.
-
- The Webb telescope tells us that while the big bang model isn’t wrong, some of our assumptions about it might be. We still have more ton learn, stay tuned!
-
August 28, 2022 JAMES WEBB - observes distant galaxies? 3666
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---
--- Some reviews are at: -------------- http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----
-- email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
--- to: ------ jamesdetrick@comcast.net ------ “Jim Detrick” -----------
--------------------- --- Monday, August 29, 2022 ---------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment