Sunday, September 29, 2024

4568 - SUPERNOVAE EXPLOSIONS - how early in the Universe?

 

-    4568 -  SUPERNOVAE  EXPLOSIONS  -  how early in the Universe?     The first billion years of early Universe saw the explosive creation of stars and the growth of the first galaxies. It’s also a time when the earliest known black holes appeared to grow very massive quickly.


------------------------  4568  -  SUPERNOVAE  EXPLOSIONS  -  how early in the Universe?

-

-    Today we see supermassive black holes (SMBH) in galaxies that can have upwards of millions or billions of solar masses.   Astronomers naturally assumed that it took a long time for such monsters to build up. Like billions of years.

-

-    When JWST observed the most distant quasar “J1120+0641”, they expected to see an active galactic nucleus as it looked some 770 million years after the Big Bang. That is, they expected a still-growing central supermassive black hole. They were intrigued to find that it had a mass of at least a billion suns.

-

-   “ Infrared Deep Sky Survey” has the quasar appearing as a faint red dot close to the center. It’s the most distant yet found, seen as it was 770 million years after the Big Bang.   How could such an early SMBH get so big so fast? For something that young, having that much mass says something about its feeding mechanism.

-

-    Astronomers already know that SMBH existed early in cosmic time. These structures at the hearts of those distant quasars apparently already existed when the Universe was very young, about 5% of its current age.

-

-    How do these Supermassive Black Holes form?  The growth of SMBH in the early Universe is a hot topic these days. The standard idea for a long time was that they grew slowly through mergers and acquisitions during galaxy formation. Since those mergers take a long time—millions of years, at least, it seemed that the black holes would go along for the long, slow ride.

-

-    And, you can’t speed up black hole growth too much once one forms. As matter swirls into the black hole, it does so through the accretion disk that feeds it. The disk—the active galactic nucleus—is very bright due to the radiation emitted as the matter heats up through friction and magnetic field interactions. The light pressure pushes stuff away. That limits how quickly the black hole can eat.

-

-    Still, astronomers found these early SMBH sporting 10 billion solar masses when, by conventional wisdom, they should have been less massive.    For “J1120+0641”, astronomers considered different scenarios for its growth, including a so-called “ultra-effective feeding mode”. That implies early SMBH had some very efficient way of accreting gas and dust and other material.

-

-    Astronomers looked at these active galactic nuclei at the hearts of distant quasars in more detail using JWST. It has the MIRI spectrograph that looks at the light from those quasars in great detail. The MIRI spectra of J1120+0641 revealed the presence of a large dust torus (a donut-shaped ring) surrounding the accretion disk of the SMBH.

-

-    That disk is feeding the SMBH at a very “normal” rate similar to SMBH in the “modern” Universe. The quasar’s broad-line region, where clumps of gas orbit the black hole at speeds near the speed of light look normal, too.  By almost all the properties that can be deduced from the spectrum, J1120+0641 turns out to be feeding no differently than quasars at later times. So, what does that mean for theories of SMBH formation in the early Universe?

-

-    The observations rule out fast feeding and other explanations for why the SMBH is so massive.  Overall, the new observations only add to the mystery: early quasars were shockingly normal. No matter in which wavelengths we observe them, quasars are nearly identical at all epochs of the Universe.

-

-    If you extrapolate these observations to other ideas about early SMBH, it means the process of black hole growth was pretty much set early in cosmic history. They didn’t start as stellar-mass black holes that got big. Instead, they formed from the collapse of very massive early clouds of gas to become massive primordial seeds.

-

-    From there, not only did they feed from their accretion disks, but probably did grow even more massive through those mergers and acquisitions. Thanks to JWST, however, astronomers now know that the early feeding mechanisms were already in place very early in cosmic time. Now they just need to figure out when the primordial seeds of SMBH first appeared in the infant Universe.

 

-    If you extrapolate these observations to other ideas about early SMBH, it means the process of black hole growth was pretty much set early in cosmic history. They didn’t start as stellar-mass black holes that got big. Instead, they formed from the collapse of very massive early clouds of gas to become massive primordial seeds.

-

-

September 29, 2024     SUPERNOVAE -  how early in the Universe?                  4568

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Sunday, September 29, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Saturday, September 28, 2024

4567 - SUPERMASSIVE BLACKHOLES - formed in the early universe?

 

-    4567 -  SUPERMASSIVE  BLACKHOLES  -   formed in the early universe?  -   The early Universe is a puzzling and still-unknown place. The first billion years of cosmic history saw the explosive creation of stars and the growth of the first galaxies. It’s also a time when the earliest known black holes appeared to grow very massive quickly. Astronomers want to know how they grew and why they feed more like “normal” recent supermassive black holes (SMBH).

- 


--------------------  4567  -   SUPERMASSIVE  BLACKHOLES  -   formed in the early universe?

-

-   Today we see SMBH in galaxies that can have upwards of millions or billions of solar masses sequestered away. Astronomers naturally assumed that it took a long time for such monsters to build up. Like billions of years. So, when JWST observed the most distant :”quasar J1120+0641”, they expected to see an active galactic nucleus as it looked some 770 million years after the Big Bang. They expected a still-growing central supermassive black hole. They were intrigued to find that it had a mass of at least a billion suns.

-

-    This ULAS J1120+0641 is a very distant “quasar” powered by a black hole.  The quasar appears as a faint red dot close to the center. This quasar is the most distant yet found and is seen as it was just 770 million years after the Big Bang.

-

-    That raised a question: how could such an early SMBH get so big so fast? For something that young, having that much mass says something about its feeding mechanism. Astronomers already know that SMBH existed early in cosmic time. These structures at the hearts of those distant quasars apparently already existed when the Universe was very young, about 5% of its current age.

-

-    The growth of SMBH in the early Universe is a hot topic these days. The standard idea for a long time was that they grew slowly through mergers and acquisitions during galaxy formation. Since those mergers take a long time, millions of years.   It seemed that the black holes would go along for the long, slow ride.

-

-    And, you can’t speed up black hole growth too much once one forms. As matter swirls into the black hole, it does so through the accretion disk that feeds it. The disk—the active galactic nucleus—is very bright due to the radiation emitted as the matter heats up through friction and magnetic field interactions. The light pressure pushes stuff away. That limits how quickly the black hole can eat.

-

-    Still, astronomers found these early SMBH sporting 10 billion solar masses when, by conventional wisdom, they should have been less massive.  For J1120+0641, astronomers considered different scenarios for its growth, including a so-called “ultra-effective feeding mode”.

-

-    That implies early SMBH had some very efficient way of accreting gas and dust and other material. So, astronomers looked at these active galactic nuclei at the hearts of distant quasars in more detail using JWST. It has the MIRI spectrograph that looks at the light from those quasars in great detail.

-

-    The MIRI spectra of “J1120+0641” revealed the presence of a large dust torus (a donut-shaped ring) surrounding the accretion disk of the SMBH. That disk is feeding the SMBH at a very “normal” rate similar to SMBH in the “modern” Universe. The quasar’s broad-line region, where clumps of gas orbit the black hole at speeds near the speed of light look normal, too.

-

-    By almost all the properties that can be deduced from the spectrum, J1120+0641 turns out to be feeding no differently than quasars at later times. So, what does that mean for theories of SMBH formation in the early Universe?   The observations rule out fast feeding and other explanations for why the SMBH is so massive.

-

-    Overall, the new observations only add to the mystery: early quasars were shockingly normal. No matter in which wavelengths we observe them, quasars are nearly identical at all epochs of the Universe.

-

-    If you extrapolate these observations to other ideas about early SMBH, it means the process of black hole growth was pretty much set early in cosmic history. They didn’t start as stellar-mass black holes that got big. Instead, they formed from the collapse of very massive early clouds of gas to become massive primordial seeds.

-

-    From there, not only did they feed from their accretion disks, but probably did grow even more massive through those mergers and acquisitions. Thanks to JWST, however, astronomers now know that the early feeding mechanisms were already in place very early in cosmic time. Now they just need to figure out when the primordial seeds of SMBH first appeared in the infant Universe.

-

-

September 28, 2024    SUPERMASSIVE  BLACKHOLES  -  in the early universe?       4567

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, September 28, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4566 - BLACKHOLES - newest ones found? -

 

-    4566 -  BLACKHOLES  -  newest ones found?  -    Using the Hubble Space Telescope, astronomers have discovered the closest massive black hole to Earth ever seen, a cosmic titan "frozen in time."    This "intermediate-mass black hole," could serve as a missing link in understanding the connection between stellar mass and supermassive blackholes.

-


---------------------------------------  4566  -  BLACKHOLES  -  newest ones found?

-

-     The black hole appears to have a mass of around 8,200 suns, which makes it considerably more massive than stellar-mass black holes with masses between 5 and 100 times that of the sun, and much less massive than aptly named supermassive black holes, which have mass millions to billions that of the sun. The closest stellar-mass black hole scientists have found is called “Gaia-BH1”, and it sits only 1,560 light-years away from us.

-

-   The newly found intermediate-mass black hole dwells in a spectacular collection of about   ten million stars called Omega Centauri, which sits around 18,000 light-years from Earth.   The fact that the "frozen" black hole appears to have stunted its growth supports the idea that Omega Centauri is the remains of an ancient galaxy cannibalized by our own galaxy.

-

-   This would suggest Omega Centauri is actually the core of a small, separate galaxy whose evolution was cut short when the Milky Way swallowed it. If this event had never happened, this intermediate black hole may have possibly grown to supermassive status like the Milky Way's own supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), which has a mass 4.3 million times that of the sun and is located is 27,000 light-years from Earth.

-

-   Scientists have known for some time that not all black holes are created equally. While stellar-mass black holes are known to form via the collapse of stars with at least eight times the mass of the sun, supermassive black holes must have a different origin. That's because no star is massive enough to collapse and leave a remnant millions of times as massive as the sun.

-

-    Therefore, scientists propose that supermassive black holes are born and grow due to merger chains of progressively larger and larger black holes. This has been evidenced by the detection of ripples in spacetime, called gravitational waves, emanating from black hole mergers.

-

-   This process of black hole mergers and growth, combined with the vast gap in mass between stellar-mass black holes and supermassive black holes, means there should be a population of mid-size black holes.

-

-   Yet, these intermediate-mass black holes with masses between a few hundred and a few thousand times that of the sun have, for the most part, seem to have avoided detection. That's because, like all black holes, these mid-sized cosmic titans are marked by outer boundaries called “event horizons”.

-

-    The “event horizon” is the point at which the gravitational influence of a black hole becomes so immense that not even light is fast enough to escape it. Thus, black holes are only visible in light if they are either surrounded by matter to feed on, which glows while heating up, or rip apart and feed on an unfortunate star in a so-called "Tidal Disruption Event" (TDE).

 

-

-    Intermediate black holes, like the one in Omega Centauri, aren't surrounded by a lot of matter and feeding.  That means astronomers have to be a little bit cunning when hunting for such black holes. They use the gravitational effects these voids have on matter, like stars that orbit them or on light passing through them.

-

-   The hunt for this intermediate black hole began in 2019.  The researchers wanted to find rapidly moving stars in Omega Centauri that would prove the star cluster has a massive, dense or compact "central engine" black hole. A similar method was used to determine the mass and size of Sgr A* using a fast-moving population of stars at the heart of the Milky Way.

-

-  Using over 500 Hubble images of this star cluster built a vast database of the motions of stars in Omega Centauri, measuring the speeds of about 1.4 million stars. This ever-repeating view of Omega Centauri, which Hubble conducted not out of scientific interest but rather to calibrate its instruments, was the ideal data set for the team's mission.

-

-    Looking for high-speed stars and documenting their motion was the proverbial search for a needle in a haystack".   The team ultimately found not one but seven "needle-in-haystack stars," all moving at rapid velocities in a small region at the heart of Omega Centauri.

-

-   The rapid speed of these stars is caused by a concentrated mass nearby. If the team had only found one rapid star, it would have been impossible to determine whether its speed was the result of a large and close central mass or if that star is a runaway moving at a rapid pace in a straight path — absent of any central mass.

-

-   Spotting and measuring the different velocities and directions of seven stars allowed this determination to be made. The measurements revealed a centralized mass equivalent to 8,200 suns, while visual inspections of the region revealed no objects that resemble stars. That is exactly what would be expected if a black hole was located in this region, determined to be "light-months" wide.

-

-   The fact that our galaxy has matured enough to have grown a supermassive black hole at its heart means it has probably outgrown the stage of possessing many intermediate-mass black holes of its own. This one exists in the Milky Way because the cannibalization of its original galaxy happened to curtail its growth processes.

-

-   We now have confirmation that Omega Centauri contains an intermediate-mass black hole.  At a distance of about 18,000 light-years, this is the closest known example of a massive black hole.

-

-   That doesn't really change the status of Sgr A* as the closest supermassive black hole to Earth, or Gaia BH1's status of the closest stellar-mass black hole to Earth — but it provides some reassurance that scientists are on the right track when considering how our central black hole became such a cosmic titan in the first place.

-

-

September 28, 2024              BLACKHOLES  -  newest ones found?               4566

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, September 28, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4565 - FIRST GALAXIES - at dawn of time?

 

-    4565 -  FIRST  GALAXIES  -  at dawn of time?  -     Astronomers using the James Webb Space Telescope have spotted a rare galaxy at the dawn of time that may be a "missing link" between the oldest generation of stars and the ones we see near Earth.

-


-------------------------------------  4565  -  FIRST  GALAXIES  -  at dawn of time?

-

-    JWST has found a bizarre galaxy in the early universe whose gas outshines its stars, marking  it out as a possible missing link in galactic evolution.

-

-   The galaxy, “GS-NDG-9422 (9422)”, was spotted just one billion years after the Big Bang and is filled with massive stars burning nearly twice as hot as those typically found in the local universe.

-

-    These exotic stars are bombarding the gas clouds that surround them with enormous quantities of light particles (photons) , heating the clouds up and causing them to outshine the stars they enshroud. This is a rare trait hypothesized to exist in galaxies that contain the oldest generations of stars.

-

-   Astronomers aren't certain when the very first globules of stars began to clump into the galaxies we see today, but cosmologists previously estimated that the process began slowly during the first few hundred million years after the Big Bang.

-

-    Astronomers also aren't certain of the types of stars that formed in the early universe, or the time they took to ignite. Yet, as the only material emitted by the Big Bang was hydrogen and helium, the original, primordial stars (Population III stars) are thought to have been extremely large, very bright and incredibly hot.

-

-   But because the first and most massive cosmic furnaces blazed so intensely, they also burned out quickly: exploding in supernovae that scattered heavier elements forged through nuclear fusion in their hearts, thus laying the foundations for planets and later generations of stars.

-

-    To search for evidence of the earliest stars, the researchers pointed the JWST at an extremely distant region of the sky. Light travels at a fixed speed through the vacuum of space; this means that the deeper we look into the universe, the further back in time we see as we detect light coming from ever more remote sources.

-

-   This fact enabled the astronomers to spot “galaxy 9422”. The galaxy's stars are burning at temperatures of 140,000 degrees Fahrenheit, almost twice as hot as the 70,000 to 90,000 degrees F found in our local universe. Despite this, the ultra-hot stars are likely not part of the oldest generation of stars in the universe, as the researchers spotted elements beyond just hydrogen and helium.

-

-    We know that this galaxy does not have Population III stars, because the Webb data shows too much chemical complexity.   However, its stars are different than what we are familiar with.  The exotic stars in this galaxy could be a guide for understanding how galaxies transitioned from primordial stars to the types of galaxies we already know.

-

-    It's a very exciting time, to be able to use the Webb telescope to explore this time in the universe that was once inaccessible.  We are just at the beginning of new discoveries and understanding.

-

-

September 27, 2024               FIRST  GALAXIES  -  at dawn of time?             4565

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, September 28, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Thursday, September 26, 2024

4564 - DARK ENERGY - you could discover it

 

-    4564 -   DARK ENERGY  -  you could discover it?  -    New model reveals what the color of a galaxy tells about its distance.  It will be used for measuring cosmic structures.  Our universe is around 13.8 billion years old. Over the vastness of this time, the tiniest of initial asymmetries have grown into the large-scale structures we can see through our telescopes in the night sky: galaxies like our own Milky Way, clusters of galaxies, and even larger aggregations of matter or filaments of gas and dust.


------------------------------------  4564  -   DARK ENERGY  -  you could discover it

-

-    How quickly this growth takes place depends on a wrestling match between natural forces: Can dark matter, which holds everything together through its gravity and attracts additional matter, hold its own against dark energy, which pushes the universe ever further apart?

-

-    This is where telescopic observation projects come in, capturing large swaths of the sky very precisely in images. For example, there is the Dark Energy Survey with the Blanco telescope in Chile and the recently commissioned Euclid satellite. LMU scientists have been involved in both projects, including in leadership roles, for years.

-

-   Although precisely determining the distances of individual structures and galaxies from us is not always easy, it is vitally important. After all, the further away a galaxy is, the longer its light has been traveling to us, so the snapshot of the universe revealed by its observation is therefore older. An important source of information is the observed color of a galaxy, which is measured by ground-based telescopes like Blanco or satellites like Euclid.

-

-    The distance of a galaxy can be precisely determined by means of spectroscopy. This involves measuring the spectral lines of distant galaxies. As the universe as a whole is expanding, these appear to have a longer wavelength, the further away from us a galaxy is located. This is because the lightwaves of distant galaxies are stretched out on the long journey to us.

-

-   This effect, known as “redshift”, also changes the apparent colors that the instruments measure in the image of the galaxy. They appear redder than they are in reality. This is similar to the Doppler effect we hear in the apparent pitch of an ambulance's siren as it passes us and moves away.

-

-     The combined spectroscopic data from DESI of a total of 230,000 galaxies with the colors of these galaxies in the KiDS-VIKING survey and used this information to determine the relationship between the distance of a galaxy from us and its observed color and brightness. No two galaxies in the universe are the same, but for each class of similar galaxies, there is a special relationship between observed color and redshift.

-

-   If we can combine distance information with measurements of the shape of galaxies, we can infer large-scale structures from the light distortions.

-

-   To be able to observe the course of structure formation over time, you do not need to wait billions of years; it is enough to measure the structure at various distances from the Earth. With images alone, this is almost impossible, as you cannot just tell the distance of a galaxy to ours from its appearance in an image.

-

-    Using a model for what the apparent "color" of a galaxy tells us about its distance from us.  The major goal of this precise observation and distribution of galaxies at various distances is to derive insights into the great wrestling match between the natural forces of dark matter and dark energy.

-

-   Dark energy is poised to catch up and potentially arrest the formation of larger accumulations of mass in the universe altogether.

-

-   Some 13.8 billion years ago, the universe began with a rapid expansion we call the big bang. After this initial expansion, which lasted a fraction of a second, gravity started to slow the universe down. But the cosmos wouldn’t stay this way. Nine billion years after the universe began, its expansion started to speed up, driven by an unknown force that scientists have named “dark energy”.

-

 

-   We don't know what Dark energy is.   But, we do know that it exists, it’s making the universe expand at an accelerating rate, and approximately 68.3 to 70% of the universe is dark energy.

-

-   Dark energy wasn't discovered until the late 1990s. But its origin in scientific study stretches all the way back to 1912 when American astronomer Henrietta Swan Leavitt made an important discovery using Cepheid variables, a class of stars whose brightness fluctuates with a regularity that depends on the star's brightness.

-

-    All Cepheid stars with a certain period (a Cepheid’s period is the time it takes to go from bright, to dim, and bright again) have the same absolute magnitude, or luminosity – the amount of light they put out. Leavitt measured these stars and proved that there is a relationship between their regular period of brightness and luminosity.

-

-    Leavitt’s findings made it possible for astronomers to use a star’s period and luminosity to measure the distances between us and Cepheid stars in far-off galaxies (and our own Milky Way).

-

-   Around this same time in history, astronomer Vesto Slipher observed spiral galaxies using his telescope’s spectrograph, a device that splits light into the colors that make it up, much like the way a prism splits light into a rainbow. He used the spectrograph, a relatively recent invention at the time, to see the different wavelengths of light coming from the galaxies in different spectral lines.

-

-    With his observations, Silpher was the first astronomer to observe how quickly the galaxy was moving away from us, called redshift, in distant galaxies. These observations would prove to be critical for many future scientific breakthroughs, including the discovery of dark energy.

-

-    The discovery of galactic redshift, the period-luminosity relation of Cepheid variables, and a newfound ability to gauge a star or galaxy’s distance eventually played a role in astronomers observing that galaxies were getting farther away from us over time, which showed how the universe was expanding.

-

-   In 1922, Russian scientist and mathematician Alexander Friedmann published a paper detailing multiple possibilities for the history of the universe. The paper, which was based on Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity published in 1917, included the possibility that the universe is expanding.

-

-   In 1927, Belgian astronomer Georges Lemaître, who is said to have been unaware of Friedmann’s work, published a paper also factoring in Einstein’s theory of general relativity. And, while Einstein stated in his theory that the universe was static, Lemaître showed how the equations in Einstein’s theory actually support the idea that the universe is not static but, in fact, is actually expanding.

-

-    Astronomer Edwin Hubble confirmed that the universe was expanding in 1929 using observations made by his associate, astronomer Milton Humason. Humason measured the redshift of spiral galaxies. Hubble and Humason then studied Cepheid stars in those galaxies, using the stars to determine the distance of their galaxies (or nebulae, as they called them).

-

-    They compared the distances of these galaxies to their redshift and tracked how the farther away an object is, the bigger its redshift and the faster it is moving away from us. The pair found that objects like galaxies are moving away from Earth faster the farther away they are, at upwards of hundreds of thousands of miles per second.  This is now known as “Hubble’s Law”, or the “Hubble-Lemaître law”. The universe, they confirmed, is really expanding.

-

-    Scientists previously thought that the universe's expansion would likely be slowed down by gravity over time, an expectation backed by Einstein's theory of general relativity. But in 1998, everything changed when two different teams of astronomers observing far-off supernovae noticed that (at a certain redshift) the stellar explosions were dimmer than expected.

-

-   While dim supernovae might not seem like a major find, these astronomers were looking at “Type 1a supernovae”, which are known to have a certain level of luminosity. So they knew that there must be another factor making these objects appear dimmer. Scientists can determine distance (and speed) using an objects' brightness, and dimmer objects are typically farther away (though surrounding dust and other factors can cause an object to dim).

-

-     Using the objects’ brightness, the researchers determined the distance of these supernovae. And using the spectrum, they were able to figure out the objects’ redshift and, therefore, how fast they were moving away from us. They found that the supernovae were not as close as expected, meaning they had traveled farther away from us faster than ancitipated. These observations led scientists to ultimately conclude that the universe itself must be expanding faster over time.

-

-    But, as scientists built up a case for cosmic acceleration.  Why? What could be driving the universe to stretch out faster over time.   “Dark energy” is just the name that astronomers gave to the mysterious "something" that is causing the universe to expand at an accelerated rate.

-

-   Dark energy has been described by some as having the effect of a negative pressure that is pushing space outward. However, we don't know if dark energy has the effect of any type of force at all. There are many ideas floating around about what dark energy could possibly be. Here are four leading explanations for dark energy. Keep in mind that it's possible it's something else entirely.

-

---------------------  Vacuum Energy:

Some scientists think that dark energy is a fundamental, ever-present background energy in space known as vacuum energy, which could be equal to the cosmological constant, a mathematical term in the equations of Einstein's theory of general relativity.

-

-   Originally, the constant existed to counterbalance gravity, resulting in a static universe. But when Hubble confirmed that the universe was actually expanding, Einstein removed the constant, calling it “my biggest blunder,” .

-

-   But when it was later discovered that the universe’s expansion was actually accelerating, some scientists suggested that there might actually be a non-zero value to the previously-discredited “cosmological constant”. They suggested that this additional force would be necessary to accelerate the expansion of the universe. This theorized that this mystery component could be attributed to something called “vacuum energy,” which is a theoretical background energy permeating all of space.

-

-   Space is never exactly empty. According to quantum field theory, there are virtual particles, or pairs of particles and antiparticles. It's thought that these virtual particles cancel each other out almost as soon as they crop up in the universe, and that this act of popping in and out of existence could be made possible by “vacuum energy” that fills the cosmos and pushes space outward.

-

-    While this theory has been a popular topic of discussion, scientists investigating this option have calculated how much vacuum energy there should theoretically be in space. They showed that there should either be so much vacuum energy that, at the very beginning, the universe would have expanded outwards so quickly and with so much force that no stars or galaxies could have formed, or… there should be absolutely none.

-

-    This means that the amount of vacuum energy in the universe must be much smaller than it is in these predictions. However, this discrepancy has yet to be solved and has even earned the moniker "the cosmological constant problem."

-

-------------------  Quintessence:

-    Some scientists think that dark energy could be a type of energy fluid or field that fills space, behaves in an opposite way to normal matter, and can vary in its amount and distribution throughout both time and space. This hypothesized version of dark energy has been nicknamed “quintessence” after the theoretical fifth element discussed by ancient Greek philosophers.

-

-    It's even been suggested by some scientists that quintessence could be some combination of dark energy and dark matter, though the two are currently considered completely separate from one another. While the two are both major mysteries to scientists, dark matter is thought to make up about 85% of all matter in the universe.

-

----------------------  Space Wrinkles:

-    Some scientists think that dark energy could be a sort of defect in the fabric of the universe itself; defects like cosmic strings, which are hypothetical one-dimensional "wrinkles" thought to have formed in the early universe.

-

-----------------------   A Flaw in General Relativity:

-    Some scientists think that dark energy isn't something physical that we can discover. Rather, they think there could be an issue with general relativity and Einstein's theory of gravity and how it works on the scale of the observable universe. Within this explanation, scientists think that it's possible to modify our understanding of gravity in a way that explains observations of the universe made without the need for dark energy.

-

-    Einstein actually proposed such an idea in 1919 called “unimodular gravity”, a modified version of general relativity that scientists today think wouldn't require dark energy to make sense of the universe.

-

-     Dark energy is one of the great mysteries of the universe. For decades, scientists have theorized about our expanding universe. Now, for the first time ever, we have tools powerful enough to put these theories to the test and really investigate the big question: “what is dark energy?”

-

-    NASA plays a critical role in the ESA (European Space Agency) mission Euclid (launched in 2023), which will make a 3D map of the universe to see how matter has been pulled apart by dark energy over time. This map will include observations of billions of galaxies found up to 10 billion light-years from Earth.

-

-    NASA's Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope, set to launch by May 2027, is designed to investigate dark energy, among many other science topics, and will also create a 3D dark matter map. Roman's resolution will be as sharp as NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope's, but with a field of view 100 times larger, allowing it to capture more expansive images of the universe.

-

-    This will allow scientists to map how matter is structured and spread across the universe and explore how dark energy behaves and has changed over time. “Roman” will also conduct an additional survey to detect Type Ia supernovae

-

-   In addition to NASA’s missions and efforts, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, supported by a large collaboration that includes the U.S. National Science Foundation, which is currently under construction in Chile, is also poised to support our growing understanding of dark energy. The ground-based observatory is expected to be operational in 2025.

-

-    The combined efforts of Euclid, Roman, and Rubin will usher in a new “golden age” of cosmology, in which scientists will collect more detailed information than ever about the great mysteries of dark energy.

-

-     NASA's James Webb Space Telescope (launched in 2021), the world’s most powerful and largest space telescope, aims to make contributions to several areas of research, and will contribute to studies of dark energy.

-

-   NASA's SPHEREx (the Spectro-Photometer for the History of the Universe, Epoch of Reionization, and Ices Explorer) mission, scheduled to launch no later than April 2025, aims to investigate the origins of the universe. Scientists expect that the data collected with SPHEREx, which will survey the entire sky in near-infrared light, including over 450 million galaxies, could help to further our understanding of dark energy.

-

-   NASA also supports a citizen science project called “Dark Energy Explorers”, which enables anyone in the world, even those who have no scientific training, to help in the search for dark energy answers.  I have signed up our Coffee Club.  You dont need a telescope, you can use your computer to log into available telescopes that create a TV image.  You could be famous!!!

-

-

September 25, 2024               DARK  ENERGY     -  you could discover it?          4564

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, September 26, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4563 - HUBBLE TENSION - The universe is expanding?

 

-    4563 -  HUBBLE  TENSION  -  The universe is expanding?  -   Astronomers have used the James Webb and Hubble space telescopes to confirm one of the most troubling conundrums in all of physics.  The universe appears to be expanding at bafflingly different speeds depending on where we look.

-


--------------------------------  4563  -   HUBBLE  TENSION  -  The universe is expanding?

-

-   This problem, known as the “Hubble Tension”, has the potential to alter or even upend cosmology altogether. In 2019, measurements by the Hubble Space Telescope confirmed the puzzle was real; in 2023, even more precise measurements from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) repeated the discrepancy.

-

-   Now, a triple-check by both telescopes working together appears to have put the possibility of any measurement error to bed for good. There may be something seriously wrong with our understanding of the universe.

-

-    With measurement errors negated, what remains is the real and exciting possibility we have misunderstood the universe.   Currently, there are two "gold-standard" methods for figuring out the Hubble constant, a value that describes the expansion rate of the universe.

-

-    The first involves poring over tiny fluctuations in the cosmic microwave background (CMB).  Tne CMB is an ancient relic of the universe's first light produced just 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

-

-    Between 2009 and 2013, astronomers mapped out this microwave fuzz using the European Space Agency's Planck satellite to infer a Hubble constant of roughly 46,200 mph per million light-years, or roughly 67 kilometers per second per megaparsec (km/s/Mpc).

-

-   The second method uses pulsating stars called Cepheid variables. Cepheid stars are dying, and their outer layers of helium gas grow and shrink as they absorb and release the star's radiation, making them periodically flicker like distant signal lamps.

-

-    As Cepheids get brighter, they pulsate more slowly, giving astronomers a means to measure their absolute brightness. By comparing this brightness to their observed brightness, astronomers can chain Cepheids into a "cosmic distance ladder" to peer ever deeper into the universe's past. With this ladder in place, astronomers can find a precise number for its expansion from how the Cepheids' light has been stretched out, or “red-shifted”.

-

-   But, this is where the mystery begins. According to Cepheid variable measurements the universe's expansion rate is around 74 km/s/Mpc: an impossibly high value when compared to Planck's measurements.

-

-    Some scientists thought that the disparity could be a result of a measurement error caused by the blending of Cepheids with other stars in Hubble's aperture. But in 2023, the researchers used the more accurate JWST to confirm that, for the first few "rungs" of the cosmic ladder, their Hubble measurements were right.

-

-    Astronomers built on their previous measurements, observing 1,000 more Cepheid stars in five host galaxies as remote as 130 million light-years from Earth. After comparing their data to Hubble's, the astronomers confirmed their past measurements of the Hubble constant.

-

-    They can rule out a measurement error as the cause of the Hubble Tension with very high confidence.   Combining Webb and Hubble gives us the best of both worlds. We find that the Hubble measurements remain reliable as we climb farther along the cosmic distance ladder.

 

-    In other words: the tension at the heart of cosmology is here to stay

-

-

September 24, 2024         HUBBLE  TENSION  -  The universe is expanding?            4563

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, September 26, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Monday, September 23, 2024

4562 - BLACKHOLE - closest ever found? -

 

-    4562 -  BLACKHOLE  -  closest ever found?     Astronomers have discovered the closest massive black hole to Earth ever seen, a cosmic titan "frozen in time."    It is an elusive "intermediate-mass black hole," that could serve as a missing link in understanding the connection between stellar mass and supermassive black holes.

-


-----------------------------------  4562  - BLACKHOLE  -  closest ever found?

-

-     The black hole appears to have a mass of around 8,200 suns, which makes it considerably more massive than stellar-mass black holes with masses between 5 and 100 times that of the sun, and much less massive than aptly named supermassive black holes, which have mass millions to billions that of the sun. The closest stellar-mass black hole scientists have found is called “Gaia-BH1”, and it sits only 1,560 light-years away from us.

-

-   The newly found intermediate-mass black hole dwells in a spectacular collection of about ten million stars called Omega Centauri, which sits around 18,000 light-years from Earth.  The fact that the "frozen" black hole appears to have stunted its growth supports the idea that Omega Centauri is the remains of an ancient galaxy cannibalized by our own galaxy.

-

-    This would suggest Omega Centauri is actually the core of a small, separate galaxy whose evolution was cut short when the Milky Way swallowed it. If this event had never happened, this intermediate black hole may have possibly grown to supermassive status like the Milky Way's own supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), which has a mass 4.3 million times that of the sun and is located is 27,000 light-years from Earth.

-

-    Stellar-mass black holes are known to form via the collapse of stars with at least eight times the mass of the sun, supermassive black holes must have a different origin. That's because no star is massive enough to collapse and leave a remnant millions of times as massive as the sun.

-

-   Scientists propose that supermassive black holes are born and grow due to merger chains of progressively larger and larger black holes. This has been evidenced by the detection of ripples in spacetime, called “gravitational waves”, emanating from black hole mergers.

-

-   This process of black hole mergers and growth, combined with the vast gap in mass between stellar-mass black holes and supermassive black holes, means there should be a population of mid-size black holes.   Yet, these intermediate-mass black holes with masses between a few hundred and a few thousand times that of the sun have seem to have avoided detection. That's because, like all black holes, these mid-sized cosmic titans are marked by outer boundaries called “event horizons”.

-

-   The event horizon is the point at which the gravitational influence of a black hole becomes so immense that not even light is fast enough to escape it. Thus, black holes are only visible in light if they are either surrounded by matter to feed on, which glows while heating up, or rip apart and feed on an unfortunate star in a so-called "Tidal Disruption Event" (TDE).

-

-    Intermediate black holes, like the one in Omega Centauri, aren't surrounded by a lot of matter and feeding.   That means astronomers have to be a little bit cunning when hunting for such black holes. They use the gravitational effects these voids have on matter, like stars that orbit them or on light passing through them.

-

-    The researchers wanted to find rapidly moving stars in Omega Centauri that would prove the star cluster has a massive, dense or compact "central engine" black hole. A similar method was used to determine the mass and size of Sgr A* using a fast-moving population of stars at the heart of the Milky Way.

-

-    They used over 500 Hubble images of this star cluster to build a vast database of the motions of stars in Omega Centauri, measuring the speeds of about 1.4 million stars. This ever-repeating view of Omega Centauri, which Hubble conducted not out of scientific interest but rather to calibrate its instruments, was the ideal data set for the team's mission.

-

-   Looking for high-speed stars and documenting their motion was the proverbial search for a needle in a haystack.   The team ultimately found not one but seven "needle-in-haystack stars," all moving at rapid velocities in a small region at the heart of Omega Centauri.

-

-   The rapid speed of these stars is caused by a concentrated mass nearby. If the team had only found one rapid star, it would have been impossible to determine whether its speed was the result of a large and close central mass or if that star is a runaway moving at a rapid pace in a straight path absent of any central mass.

-

-   Spotting and measuring the different velocities and directions of seven stars allowed this determination to be made. The measurements revealed a centralized mass equivalent to 8,200 suns, while visual inspections of the region revealed no objects that resemble stars. That is exactly what would be expected if a black hole was located in this region, which the team determined to be "light-months" wide.

-

-   The fact that our galaxy has matured enough to have grown a supermassive black hole at its heart means it has probably outgrown the stage of possessing many intermediate-mass black holes of its own. This one exists in the Milky Way because the cannibalization of its original galaxy happened to curtail its growth processes.

-

-   Previous studies had prompted critical questions of 'So where are the high-speed stars?' We now have an answer to that and the confirmation that Omega Centauri contains an intermediate-mass black hole.   At a distance of about 18,000 light-years, this is the closest known example of a massive black hole.

-

-   Of course, that doesn't really change the status of Sgr A* as the closest supermassive black hole to Earth, or Gaia BH1's status of the closest stellar-mass black hole to Earth,  but it provides some reassurance that scientists are on the right track when considering how our central black hole became such a cosmic titan in the first place.

-

-

September 23, 2024            BLACKHOLE  -  closest ever found?                    4562

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, September 23, 2024  ---------------------------------