Tuesday, August 8, 2023

4113 - NEUTRINOS - where do they come from?

 

-    4113  -  NEUTRINOS  -  where do they come from?     Pinpointing cosmic neutrino sources opens up the possibility of using the particles as a new probe of fundamental physics. Researchers have shown that the neutrinos can be used to open cracks in the reigning Standard Model of particle physics and even test quantum descriptions of gravity.


--------------  4113  -  NEUTRINOS  -  where do they come from?

-  

-    Physicists finally know where at least some of these high-energy particles come from, which helps make the neutrinos useful for exploring fundamental physics.  Since 2012, the “IceCube Neutrino Observatory” at the South Pole has detected a dozen or so cosmic neutrinos each year.

-

-   The Sun send us photons of light.  And photons are how we know and undersand our world.  But, the Sun and other parts of the universe sends us neutrinos too.  They are almost massless like photons.  They carry no electric charge, they are neutral, so do not interact with matter.

-  

-    Of the 100 trillion neutrinos that pass through you every second, most come from the sun or Earth’s atmosphere. But a smattering of the particles, those moving much faster than the rest, traveled here from powerful sources farther away.

-

-    For decades, astrophysicists have sought the origin of these “cosmic” neutrinos. Now, the IceCube Neutrino Observatory has finally collected enough of them to reveal telltale patterns in where they’re coming from.

-

-    The new map shows a diffuse haze of cosmic neutrinos emanating from throughout the Milky Way, but strangely, no individual sources stand out. “It’s a mystery” .

-

-     IceCube study from last fall was the first to connect “cosmic neutrinos” to an individual source. It showed that a large chunk of the cosmic neutrinos detected so far by the observatory have come from the heart of an “active” galaxy called NGC 1068. In the galaxy’s glowing core, matter spirals into a central supermassive black hole, somehow making cosmic neutrinos in the process.

-

-    Little is known about how the activity around some supermassive black holes generates these neutrinos, and so far the evidence points to multiple processes or circumstances.

-

-    Abundant as they are, neutrinos usually zip through Earth without leaving a trace; a  huge detector had to be built to detect enough of them to perceive patterns in the directions they arrive from. IceCube, built 12 years ago, consists of kilometer-long strings of detectors bored deep into the Antarctic ice.

-

-    Each year, IceCube detects a dozen or so cosmic neutrinos with such high energy that they clearly stand out against a haze of atmospheric and solar neutrinos. More sophisticated analyses can tease out additional candidate cosmic neutrinos from the rest of the data.

-

-    Astrophysicists know that such energetic neutrinos could only arise when fast-moving atomic nuclei, known as cosmic rays, collide with material somewhere in space. And very few places in the universe have magnetic fields strong enough to whip cosmic rays up to sufficient energies.

-

-    Gamma-ray bursts, ultrabright flashes of light that occur when some stars go supernova or when neutron stars spiral into each other, were long thought one of the most plausible options. The only real alternative was active galactic nuclei, or AGNs —galaxies whose central supermassive black holes spew out particles and radiation as matter falls in.

-

-    In 2016, IceCube began sending out alerts every time they detected a cosmic neutrino, prompting other astronomers to train telescopes in the direction it came from. They tentatively matched up a cosmic neutrino with an active galaxy called TXS 0506+056, or TXS for short, that was emitting flares of X-rays and gamma rays at the same time.

-

-    More and more cosmic neutrinos were collected, and another patch of sky began to stand out against the background of atmospheric neutrinos. In the middle of this patch is the nearby active galaxy NGC 1068. IceCube’s recent analysis shows that this correlation almost certainly equals causation.

-

-    There’s less than a 1-in-100,000 chance that the abundance of neutrinos coming from the direction of NGC 1068 is a random fluctuation.    These two AGNs appear to be the brightest neutrino sources in the sky, yet, puzzlingly, they’re very different. TXS is a type of AGN known as a blazar: It shoots a jet of high-energy radiation directly toward Earth.

-   

-     Yet we see no such jet pointing our way from NGC 1068. This suggests that different mechanisms in the heart of active galaxies could give rise to cosmic neutrinos.

Astronomers suspect there is some material surrounding the active core in NGC 1068 that blocks the emission of gamma rays as neutrinos are produced.  We know very little about the cores of active galaxies because they are too complicated.

-

-    The cosmic neutrinos originating in the Milky Way muddle things further. There are no obvious sources of such high-energy particles in our galaxy, in particular, no active galactic nucleus. Our galaxy’s core hasn’t been bustling for millions of years.

-

-   Astronomers speculate that these neutrinos come from cosmic rays produced in an earlier, active phase of our galaxy.  The accelerators that made these cosmic rays may have made them millions of years ago.

-

-    What stands out in the new image of the sky is the intense brightness of sources like NGC 1068 and TXS. The Milky Way, filled with nearby stars and hot gas, outshines all other galaxies when astronomers look with photons. But when it’s viewed in neutrinos, “the amazing thing is we can barely see our galaxy,” . “The sky is dominated by extragalactic sources.”

-

-     Neutrinos offer rare clues that a more complete theory of particles must supersede the 50-year-old set of equations known as the Standard Model. This model describes elementary particles and forces with near-perfect precision, but it errs when it comes to neutrinos: It predicts that the neutral particles are massless, but they aren’t, not quite.

-

-    Physicists discovered in 1998 that neutrinos can shape-shift between their three different types; an electron neutrino emitted by the sun can turn into a muon neutrino by the time it reaches Earth. And in order to shape-shift, neutrinos must have mass, the oscillations only make sense if each neutrino species is a quantum mixture of three different very tiny masses.

-

-   Dozens of experiments have allowed particle physicists to gradually build up a picture of the oscillation patterns of various neutrinos, solar, atmospheric, laboratory-made. But cosmic neutrinos originating from AGNs offer a look at the particles’ oscillatory behavior across vastly bigger distances and energies.

-

-   Cosmic neutrino sources are so far away that the neutrino oscillations should get blurred out  wherever astrophysicists look, they expect to see a constant fraction of each of the three neutrino types. Any fluctuation in these fractions would indicate that neutrino oscillation models need rethinking.

-

-   Another possibility is that cosmic neutrinos interact with dark matter as they travel, as predicted by many dark-sector models. These models propose that the universe’s invisible matter consists of multiple types of nonluminous particles. Interactions with these dark matter particles would scatter neutrinos with specific energies and create a gap in the spectrum of cosmic neutrinos that we see.

-

-   Or, the quantum structure of space-time itself can drag on the neutrinos, slowing them down. A group based in Italy recently argued in Nature Astronomy that IceCube data shows hints of this happening, but other physicists have been skeptical of these claims.

-

-    The exact fraction of each neutrino type depends on the source model, and the most popular models, by chance, predict that equal numbers of the three neutrino species will arrive on Earth. But cosmic neutrinos are still so poorly understood that any observed imbalance in the fractions of the three types could be misinterpreted. The result could be a consequence of quantum gravity, dark matter or a broken neutrino oscillation model, or just the still-blurry physics of cosmic neutrino production.

-

-   We need to detect many more cosmic neutrinos. IceCube is being upgraded and expanded to 10 cubic kilometers over the next few years, and in October, a neutrino detector under Lake Baikal in Siberia posted its first observation of cosmic neutrinos from TXS.

-

-    And deep in the Mediterranean, dozens of strings of neutrino detectors collectively called “KM3NeT” are being fastened on the seafloor by a robot submersible to offer a complementary view of the cosmic-neutrino sky.

-

-    What will we learn with these new eyes?

-

-

August 6,  2023                      4113

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, August 8, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4112 - MILKYWAY - new chemicals and ghost stars?

 

-    4112  -   MILKYWAY  -  new chemicals and ghost stars?       “Chemical cartography”, has unveiled new regions of our galaxy's stunning radial features populated by dense patches of young stars.   This could be crucial for astronomers seeking to understand our galaxy's evolution, shape and structure.


--------------  4112  -  MILKYWAY  -  new chemicals and ghost stars?

-    A mysterious alignment of stellar dead stars haunts the heart of the Milky Way.   These exist in the form of “planetary nebulas”, clouds of gas that are expelled by dying stars at the end of their lives.

-

-    These “nebulae” can resemble butterflies or hourglasses with the smoldering remains of the star at their heart. The sun, when it runs out of fuel for nuclear fusion at its core and after it has swelled out as a red giant and swallowed the inner planets in around 5 billion years, will leave similar gaseous remains around a white dwarf star.

-

-   Astronomers know a great deal about planetary nebulas, but an arrangement of such clouds in the galactic bulge at the center of our Milky Way galaxy has still been a puzzle since its discovery 10 years ago.

-

-    Studying 136 planetary nebulas in the thickest part of the Milky Way, the galactic bulge, with the “Very Large Telescope” (VLT), the team discovered that each is unrelated and comes from different stars, which died at different times and spent their lives in different locations.

-

-   The researchers also found that the shapes of these planetary nebulas line up in the sky in the same way. Not only this, but they are also aligned almost parallel to the plane of the Milky Way.

-

-   This alignment is only present in the planetary nebulas that have a close stellar companion. In these cases, the companion stars orbit the stellar remnant at the heart of the planetary nebulas at a distance closer than our solar system's innermost planet Mercury is to the sun.

-

-    The alignment is absent in planetary nebulas that lack such a companion star, and this implies that the alignment could be created as a result of the rapid orbital motion of the companion star, which may even end up orbiting inside the remains of the main star.

-

-     The formation of stars in the bulge of our galaxy is a complex process that involves various factors such as gravity, turbulence, and magnetic fields. Until now, we have had a lack of evidence for which of these mechanisms could be causing this process to happen and generating this alignment.

-

-   Chemical cartography shows the distribution of elements throughout the Milky Way  from lighter elements, such as hydrogen and helium, to heavier ones, such as carbon, nitrogen and oxygen. Astronomers refer to any elements heavier than helium as metals. This allows astronomers to locate stars according to their chemical compositions rather than merely the light they emit.

-

-    Over the course of their lives, stars fuse hydrogen to create helium, then fuse that helium to create other metals. This means metal levels associated with individual stars can give astronomers information about their ages.

-

-    We are now creating better and better maps of the Milky Way.   Chemical cartography isn't  a new process, but only recently did scientists manage to develop telescopes with enough observing power to get significant results using the technique.

-

-   For at least seven decades, astronomers have understood that our galaxy has spiral arms that extend out from the dense concentration of stars, gas, and dust which lie at its heart, known as the "central bulge."  However, the exact shape of this striking structure ,down to the number of arms our galaxy has, remains uncertain.

-

-   The difficulty in assessing the Milky Way's morphology comes from the fact that we live in it. We're basically analyzing it from the inside, with Earth sitting in the Orion Arm around two-thirds of the way from the central bulge.

-

-    We simply can't get far enough to observe our galaxy from an outsider's perspective.

One traditional way of mapping the Milky Way involves monitoring the concentrations of young stars that are created as the galaxy's very dense spiral arms rotate. As this rotation occurs, it compresses gas and dust to ultimately trigger star births.

-

-    Identifying an overabundance of young stars implies the location of a spiral arm.   Though young stars can be detected by tracking the bright blue light they emit, observations of this kind can be obscured by thick clouds of dust which present a challenge to even the most advanced telescopes. That means some regions of the Milky Way’s spiral arms go unobserved.

-

-    One way of working around this dust veil is by observing exactly how metal-rich the stars that lurk in hidden regions are.   This  “metalicity” serves as an age measurement because the early cosmos was filled with hydrogen and helium, but little in the way of metals. That means the oldest stars are also composed of mostly hydrogen and helium and are thus "low metalicity" or "metal-poor."

-

-    During their lives, these older stars forge heavier elements via nuclear fusion, but,  when they run out of such fuel, are ripped apart by supernova explosions that spread the metals throughout their cosmic environment. Therefore, when metal-enriched clouds of dust and gas collapse to birth stars, this next generation of stars is richer in metals than the last.

-

-    This stellar cycle of life and death has continued throughout the 13.8 billion-year history of the universe, with every subsequent generation of stars being more metal-rich than the last. Thus, young stars are expected to be "metal-rich" or hold a "high metalicity."

-

-    If the Milky Way's spiral arms trigger star births as predicted, then they should be marked by young stars, metal-rich stars. Conversely, spaces between the arms should be marked by metal-poor stars.  The spiral arms are indeed richer in metals. 

-

-   Since Gaia launched in 2013, the spacecraft has observed around 2 billion cosmic objects allowing astronomers to considerably widen their view of the universe. It dropped its latest and third data release in June 2022, which was especially important for chemical cartography because it offers the most precise and comprehensive survey of the Milky Way ever conducted.

-

-    The sheer volume of data available from Gaia allows us to do chemical cartography at a galactic scale now.   Data on both the positions for billions of stars and their chemical makeup wasn’t available until recently.

-

-   Gaia’s chemical data is still represent just around 1% of the Milky Way. Going forward, not only will Gaia continue to scour our galaxy collecting this data, but new telescopes are also coming online to collect data ripe for chemical cartography endeavors.

-

-    As telescope technology becomes more advanced, the power of chemical cartography will also increase, meaning astronomers stand to learn more about the structure of our galaxy and its previously obscured regions.

-

-

August 6,  2023       MILKYWAY  -  new chemicals and ghost stars?               4112

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, August 8, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Saturday, August 5, 2023

4111 - RING NEBUBLA - new studies using JWST?

 

-    4111  -   RING  NEBUBLA  -  new studies using JWST?    The James Webb Space Telescope has imaged the “Ring Nebula” as a glowing green and purple eye, presenting the familiar planetary nebula in an altogether new light.  The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) images show the Ring Nebula, known as Messier 57 (M57), located around 2,200 light-years away, in intricate detail that will surprise even astronomers who are familiar with the object.


--------------  4111  -  RING  NEBUBLA  -  new studies using JWST?

-    Located in the Lyra constellation, the Ring Nebula is a popular target for space enthusiasts as its donut-shaped ring of glowing gas and dust is visible even with small backyard telescopes throughout the summer.

-

-    The Ring Nebula is the glowing remains of a long-dead star, a class of astronomical object called a "planetary nebula," which somewhat confusingly has nothing to do with planets. At its heart is a white speck that represents a white dwarf star, what remains of that extinct stellar body's core.

-

-    M57, Ring Nebula, is particularly fascinating to astronomers because not only is it close enough to be viewed with even amateur telescopes, but from our vantage point in the solar system, the planetary nebula is tilted so that it is viewed face-on. That means that observing the Ring Nebula with space telescopes offers astronomers the opportunity to see what is going on within planetary nebula and shed light on the life and death of stars.

-

-     When stars of similar sizes to the sun exhaust their fuel for nuclear fusion, they can no longer support themselves against the inward force of their own gravity, ending the balancing act that kept the star stable for as long as billions of years.

-

-    As the core collapses, the outer layers of the star, where nuclear fusion still proceeds, are blasted outwards. This initially causes the star to swell out as a red giant, a phase which the sun will undergo in around 5 billion years when it will puff out to around the orbit of Mars, consuming the inner planets, including Earth.

-

-   This outer shell of material eventually cools and disperses to form a variety of different shapes, including wispy clouds, expanding bubbles or ring-shaped nebulas like M57. What shape a planetary nebula will take hinges on the complex physical processes occurring within it.

-

-    That means that observations of this system give us a glimpse of what the solar system could look like in billions of years. This is a preview of the sun's distant future,  and JWST's observations have opened a new window into understanding these awe-inspiring cosmic events.

-

-    Astronomers can also glean information about the chemical processes occurring in the planetary nebula by analyzing the colors their gas and dust emit as the stars in their centers blast it with radiation. 

-

-    The material in planetary nebulas like M57 is enriched with the heavy elements that are forged during the life of the dead star that created it. Eventually, much of this matter will be incorporated into huge clouds of gas and dust called interstellar clouds.

-

-    When dense patches of these clouds condense and collapse under their own gravity, they birth new stars that contain the material from stellar predecessors. That means objects like the Ring Nebula can weave a tale of stellar life and death.

-

-    By studying the Ring Nebula with JWST, we hope to gain a deeper understanding of the life cycles of stars and the elements they release into the universe?

-

-

August 4,  2023        RING  NEBUBLA  -  new studies using JWST?                  4111

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, August 5, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4110 - EINSTEIN CROSS - a new model for the Universe?

 

-    4110  -   EINSTEIN  CROSS  -   a new model for the Universe?     Astronomers have discovered a stunning, rare example of an "Einstein cross" splitting and magnifying light from the far depths of the universe.  One foreground elliptical galaxy, around 6 billion light-years from Earth, has warped and quadrisected a bright beam of light from a background galaxy about 11 billion light-years from our planet.


--------------  4110 -  EINSTEIN  CROSS  -   a new model for the Universe?

-    The resulting pattern, first predicted by Albert Einstein in 1915, shows four smudges of blue light haloed around the orange of the foreground galaxy, a rare arrangement that astronomers will study to get a better understanding of the universe.

-

-    The background light likely comes from a quasar, a young galaxy whose supermassive black hole at its core gobbles up enormous amounts of matter and blasts out enough radiation to shine more than a trillion times more brightly than the brightest stars.

-

-    Einstein's theory of general relativity describes the way massive objects warp the fabric of the universe, called space-time. Gravity, Einstein discovered, isn't produced by an unseen force; rather, it's simply our experience of space-time curving and distorting in the presence of matter and energy.

-

-    This curved space sets the rules for how energy and matter move. Even though light travels in a straight line, light moving through a highly curved region of space-time, like the space around enormous galaxies, also travels in a curve, bending around the galaxy and splaying out into a halo.

-

-   What this halo looks like depends on the strength of the galaxy's gravity and the perspective of the observer. In this case, Earth, the lensing galaxy and the quasar have aligned to perfectly duplicate the quasar's light, arranging them along a so-called “Einstein ring”.

-

-   The lens was discovered in 2021 by the “Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument”, which is attached to the telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona.   After the lens's discovery, the astronomers performed follow-up analyses with the “Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer” at the Very Large Telescope in Chile, and confirmed that they had discovered an Einstein cross.

-

-    Astronomers have identified hundreds of Einstein rings, and they're not sought after only for the pretty pictures they make. As the rings work to magnify the light they bend, reconstructing the light smears into their original, pre-bent forms can enhance the details astronomers can spot in very distant galaxies.

-

-     The extent to which light bends depends on the strength of the gravitational field of the object that bends it, Einstein rings can act as a cosmic scale for gauging the masses of galaxies and black holes. Studying the distant light warping around these rings can even help scientists glimpse objects that would otherwise be too dark to be seen on their own, such as black holes or wandering exoplanets.

-

-     Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity has been remarkably successful in describing the gravity of stars and planets, but it doesn’t seem to apply perfectly on all scales.  The James Webb Space Telescope has produced the deepest and sharpest infrared image of the distant universe to date.

-

-    Everything in the universe has gravity and feels it too. Yet this most common of all fundamental forces is also the one that presents the biggest challenges to physicists. Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity has been remarkably successful in describing the gravity of stars and planets, but it doesn’t seem to apply perfectly on all scales.

-

-    General relativity has passed many years of observational tests, from Eddington’s measurement of the deflection of starlight by the Sun in 1919 to the recent detection of gravitational waves. However, gaps in our understanding start to appear when we try to apply it to extremely small distances, where the laws of quantum mechanics operate, or when we try to describe the entire universe at large distances.

-

-    Quantum theory predicts that empty space, the vacuum, is packed with energy. We do not notice its presence because our devices can only measure changes in energy rather than its total amount.

-

-    However, according to Einstein, the vacuum energy has a repulsive gravity, it pushes the empty space apart. Interestingly, in 1998, it was discovered that the expansion of the universe is in fact accelerating.

-  

-     However, the amount of vacuum energy, or dark energy as it has been called, necessary to explain the acceleration is many orders of magnitude smaller than what quantum theory predicts.

-

-   Hence the big question, dubbed “the old cosmological constant problem”, is whether the vacuum energy actually gravitates, exerting a gravitational force and changing the expansion of the universe.

-

-    Then why is its gravity so much weaker than predicted? If the vacuum does not gravitate at all, what is causing the cosmic acceleration?

-

-    We don’t know what dark energy is, but we need to assume it exists in order to explain the universe’s expansion. Similarly, we also need to assume there is a type of invisible matter presence, dubbed dark matter, to explain how galaxies and clusters evolved to be the way we observe them today.

-

-    These assumptions are baked into scientists’ standard cosmological theory, called the “lambda cold dark matter” (LCDM) model, suggesting there is 70% dark energy, 25% dark matter and 5% ordinary matter in the cosmos. And this model has been remarkably successful in fitting all the data collected by cosmologists over the past 20 years.

-

-    But the fact that most of the universe is made up of dark forces and substances, taking odd values that don’t make sense, has prompted many physicists to wonder if Einstein’s theory of gravity needs modification to describe the entire universe.

-

-   A new twist appeared a few years ago when it became apparent that different ways of measuring the rate of cosmic expansion, dubbed the Hubble constant, give different answers, a problem known as the Hubble tension.

-

-   The disagreement, or tension, is between two values of the Hubble constant. One is the number predicted by the LCDM cosmological model, which has been developed to match the light left over from the Big Bang (the cosmic microwave background radiation). The other is the expansion rate measured by observing exploding stars known as supernovas in distant galaxies.

-

-    Many theoretical ideas have been proposed for ways of modifying LCDM to explain the Hubble tension. Among them are alternative gravity theories.

-

-   General relativity describes gravity as the curving or warping of space and time, bending the pathways along which light and matter travel. Importantly, it predicts that the trajectories of light rays and matter should be bent by gravity in the same way.

-

-    To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales simultaneous investigations of three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.

-

-    Using a statistical method known as the “Bayesian inference”, they reconstructed the gravity of the universe through cosmic history in a computer model based on these three parameters. We could estimate the parameters using the cosmic microwave background data from the Planck satellite, supernova catalogues as well as observations of the shapes and distribution of distant galaxies by the SDSS and DES telescopes. We then compared our reconstruction to the prediction of the LCDM model (essentially Einstein’s model).

-

-   We found interesting hints of a possible mismatch with Einstein’s prediction, albeit with rather low statistical significance. This means that there is nevertheless a possibility that gravity works differently on large scales, and that the theory of general relativity may need to be tweaked.

-

-    This study also found that it is very difficult to solve the Hubble tension problem by only changing the theory of gravity. The full solution would probably require a new ingredient in the cosmological model, present before the time when protons and electrons first combined to form hydrogen just after the Big Bang, such as a special form of dark matter, an early type of dark energy or primordial magnetic fields.

-

-  This study has demonstrated that it is possible to test the validity of general relativity over cosmological distances using observational data. While we haven’t yet solved the Hubble problem, we will have a lot more data from new probes in a few years.

-

-    We should be able to use these statistical methods to continue tweaking general relativity, exploring the limits of modifications, to pave the way to resolving some of the open challenges in cosmology.

-

-

August 5,  2023       EINSTEIN  CROSS  -   a new model for the Universe?     4110

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, August 5, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Friday, August 4, 2023

4109 - DARK MATTER and DARK ENERGY?

 

-    4109  -   DARK  MATTER  and  DARK  ENERGY ?    Dark energy and dark matter, constitute some of the biggest and most fascinating questions to exist in astronomy today. Neither phenomena can be seen by human eyes, yet still appear to be holding our universe together.


--------------  4109  -  DARK  MATTER  and  DARK  ENERGY?   

-    The European Space Agency's ambitious Euclid space telescope is on its way to decoding the secrets of dark matter and dark energy.   On July 3, 2023, the Euclid telescope sent its first images back to Earth. And while these seminal portraits are certainly mesmerizing, they also confirm that the space observatory's instruments are working in tip-top shape.

-

-   Euclid's purpose is to map out the dark side of our universe by analyzing billions of galaxies that reside up to about 10 billion light-years away.  This ambitious map will be in "3D," because it'll include the element of time to show how those realms evolved in tandem with a maturing universe.

-

-    The outstanding first images obtained using Euclid's visible and near-infrared instruments open a new era to observational cosmology and statistical astronomy.  They mark the beginning of the quest for the very nature of dark energy.

-

-     Euclid launched on July 1 from Cape Canaveral in Florida. Now floating about a million miles from Earth, it joined the James Webb Space Telescope on July 28 at what's known as the second Lagrange point.

-

-    Euclid's VIS captures the universe through the part of the electromagnetic spectrum that's visible to human eyes, wavelengths between 550 and 900 nanometers.   The range of the close-up to about one quarter the width and height of the full moon as seen from Earth.

-

-    Some highlights of VIS' portraits include cosmic rays shooting straight across the field, a wealth of unmissable glittering stars, and most importantly, a few fuzzy blobs. Those blobs are galaxies Euclid will investigate further while developing a highly detailed map of our universe, dark energy and all.

-

-    NISP, Euclid's Near-Infrared Spectrometer and Photometer has two roles. First, it can image galaxies in infrared light, or light invisible to human eyes that falls between about 950 and 2020 nanometers on the electromagnetic spectrum. The James Webb Space Telescope also taps into such infrared wavelengths, which is why scientists often say it's unveiling an invisible universe. It quite literally is.

-

-   Second, NISP can measure precisely how much light each galaxy emits to tell us how far away those galaxies are.    Before reaching the NISP detector, deep space light captured by Euclid also passes through some filters. These filters can do things like measure brightness at a specific infrared wavelength, which helps with NISP's galactic distance measurements.

-

-    Euclid has a device known as a "grism" that can basically split cosmic light into a full spectrum of wavelengths before sending the data to NISP.   With this process, scientists can determine how far away a certain galaxy is, as well as what the galaxy is chemically made of.

-

-    Space is constantly expanding outward in every direction like an unpoppable balloon. But the weird thing is, this ballooning seems to be happening at speeds scientists can't quite account for with all the visible stuff in our universe. Thus, something else must be acting to accelerate the cosmic expansion, "something" dark energy.

-

-    Also within the expanding universe, there seems to be some sort of glue making sure galaxies are held in place and dictating the way they're arranged. For example, scientists calculate that intergalactic gas and stars often move around as though there's extra gravity pulling on them.

-

-     Presumably, this is because some sort of invisible material surrounds the galaxies these objects live in (perhaps like a halo) and therefore exerts gravitational forces on them. That unseeable "glue" is known as dark matter.

-

-    Dark matter and dark energy aren't necessarily made up of one, or even two, things. They could be made up of a bunch of different components. Scientists just use these as bulk terms to describe gaps in our understanding.

-

-   As dark matter and energy interact with things in space, laying out the distribution and evolution of those things can tell us where the dark universe fits into the story.  Using Euclid to reveal so much about the 95% of the universe that we currently know so little about.

-

-    The fully calibrated Euclid will ultimately observe billions of galaxies to create the biggest-ever 3D map of the sky.  Maybe we can learn more about our dark universe?

-

-

August 1,  2023           DARK  MATTER  and  DARK  ENERGY?             4109

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, August 4, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4108 - PLANETARY NEBULAE - the future for our sun?

 

-    4108  -   PLANETARY  NEBULAE  -  the future for our sun?      Planetary nebulas are clouds of gas that are expelled by dying stars at the end of their lives. These can resemble butterflies or hourglasses with the smoldering remains of the star at their heart.


--------------  4108  -   PLANETARY  NEBULAE  -  the future for our sun?

-    The Sun, when it runs out of fuel for nuclear fusion at its core and after it has swelled out as a red giant and swallowed the inner planets in around 5 billion years, will leave similar gaseous remains around a white dwarf star. Our Sun will become a planetary nebula.

-

-   Astronomers know a great deal about planetary nebulas, but an arrangement of such clouds in the galactic bulge at the center of our Milky Way galaxy has still been a puzzle since its discovery in 2013.

-

-    Studying 136 planetary nebulas in the thickest part of the Milky Way, the galactic bulge, with the Very Large Telescope (VLT), each is unrelated and comes from different stars, which died at different times and spent their lives in different locations.

-

-   The researchers found that the shapes of these planetary nebulas line up in the sky in the same way. They are also aligned almost parallel to the plane of the Milky Way.

-

-    What wasn't known until now was the fact that this alignment is only present in the planetary nebulas that have a close stellar companion. In these cases, the companion stars orbit the stellar remnant at the heart of the planetary nebulas at a distance closer than our solar system's innermost planet Mercury is to the sun.

-

-    The alignment is absent in planetary nebulas that lack such a companion star, and this implies that the alignment could be created as a result of the rapid orbital motion of the companion star, which may even end up orbiting inside the remains of the main star.

-

-    The formation of stars in the bulge of our galaxy is a complex process that involves various factors such as gravity, turbulence, and magnetic fields. Until now, we have had a lack of evidence for which of these mechanisms could be causing this process to happen and generating this alignment.

-

-

July 31,  2023                      4108

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Friday, August 4, 2023  ---------------------------------