Saturday, August 5, 2023

4110 - EINSTEIN CROSS - a new model for the Universe?

 

-    4110  -   EINSTEIN  CROSS  -   a new model for the Universe?     Astronomers have discovered a stunning, rare example of an "Einstein cross" splitting and magnifying light from the far depths of the universe.  One foreground elliptical galaxy, around 6 billion light-years from Earth, has warped and quadrisected a bright beam of light from a background galaxy about 11 billion light-years from our planet.


--------------  4110 -  EINSTEIN  CROSS  -   a new model for the Universe?

-    The resulting pattern, first predicted by Albert Einstein in 1915, shows four smudges of blue light haloed around the orange of the foreground galaxy, a rare arrangement that astronomers will study to get a better understanding of the universe.

-

-    The background light likely comes from a quasar, a young galaxy whose supermassive black hole at its core gobbles up enormous amounts of matter and blasts out enough radiation to shine more than a trillion times more brightly than the brightest stars.

-

-    Einstein's theory of general relativity describes the way massive objects warp the fabric of the universe, called space-time. Gravity, Einstein discovered, isn't produced by an unseen force; rather, it's simply our experience of space-time curving and distorting in the presence of matter and energy.

-

-    This curved space sets the rules for how energy and matter move. Even though light travels in a straight line, light moving through a highly curved region of space-time, like the space around enormous galaxies, also travels in a curve, bending around the galaxy and splaying out into a halo.

-

-   What this halo looks like depends on the strength of the galaxy's gravity and the perspective of the observer. In this case, Earth, the lensing galaxy and the quasar have aligned to perfectly duplicate the quasar's light, arranging them along a so-called “Einstein ring”.

-

-   The lens was discovered in 2021 by the “Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument”, which is attached to the telescope at Kitt Peak National Observatory in Arizona.   After the lens's discovery, the astronomers performed follow-up analyses with the “Multi-Unit Spectroscopic Explorer” at the Very Large Telescope in Chile, and confirmed that they had discovered an Einstein cross.

-

-    Astronomers have identified hundreds of Einstein rings, and they're not sought after only for the pretty pictures they make. As the rings work to magnify the light they bend, reconstructing the light smears into their original, pre-bent forms can enhance the details astronomers can spot in very distant galaxies.

-

-     The extent to which light bends depends on the strength of the gravitational field of the object that bends it, Einstein rings can act as a cosmic scale for gauging the masses of galaxies and black holes. Studying the distant light warping around these rings can even help scientists glimpse objects that would otherwise be too dark to be seen on their own, such as black holes or wandering exoplanets.

-

-     Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity has been remarkably successful in describing the gravity of stars and planets, but it doesn’t seem to apply perfectly on all scales.  The James Webb Space Telescope has produced the deepest and sharpest infrared image of the distant universe to date.

-

-    Everything in the universe has gravity and feels it too. Yet this most common of all fundamental forces is also the one that presents the biggest challenges to physicists. Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity has been remarkably successful in describing the gravity of stars and planets, but it doesn’t seem to apply perfectly on all scales.

-

-    General relativity has passed many years of observational tests, from Eddington’s measurement of the deflection of starlight by the Sun in 1919 to the recent detection of gravitational waves. However, gaps in our understanding start to appear when we try to apply it to extremely small distances, where the laws of quantum mechanics operate, or when we try to describe the entire universe at large distances.

-

-    Quantum theory predicts that empty space, the vacuum, is packed with energy. We do not notice its presence because our devices can only measure changes in energy rather than its total amount.

-

-    However, according to Einstein, the vacuum energy has a repulsive gravity, it pushes the empty space apart. Interestingly, in 1998, it was discovered that the expansion of the universe is in fact accelerating.

-  

-     However, the amount of vacuum energy, or dark energy as it has been called, necessary to explain the acceleration is many orders of magnitude smaller than what quantum theory predicts.

-

-   Hence the big question, dubbed “the old cosmological constant problem”, is whether the vacuum energy actually gravitates, exerting a gravitational force and changing the expansion of the universe.

-

-    Then why is its gravity so much weaker than predicted? If the vacuum does not gravitate at all, what is causing the cosmic acceleration?

-

-    We don’t know what dark energy is, but we need to assume it exists in order to explain the universe’s expansion. Similarly, we also need to assume there is a type of invisible matter presence, dubbed dark matter, to explain how galaxies and clusters evolved to be the way we observe them today.

-

-    These assumptions are baked into scientists’ standard cosmological theory, called the “lambda cold dark matter” (LCDM) model, suggesting there is 70% dark energy, 25% dark matter and 5% ordinary matter in the cosmos. And this model has been remarkably successful in fitting all the data collected by cosmologists over the past 20 years.

-

-    But the fact that most of the universe is made up of dark forces and substances, taking odd values that don’t make sense, has prompted many physicists to wonder if Einstein’s theory of gravity needs modification to describe the entire universe.

-

-   A new twist appeared a few years ago when it became apparent that different ways of measuring the rate of cosmic expansion, dubbed the Hubble constant, give different answers, a problem known as the Hubble tension.

-

-   The disagreement, or tension, is between two values of the Hubble constant. One is the number predicted by the LCDM cosmological model, which has been developed to match the light left over from the Big Bang (the cosmic microwave background radiation). The other is the expansion rate measured by observing exploding stars known as supernovas in distant galaxies.

-

-    Many theoretical ideas have been proposed for ways of modifying LCDM to explain the Hubble tension. Among them are alternative gravity theories.

-

-   General relativity describes gravity as the curving or warping of space and time, bending the pathways along which light and matter travel. Importantly, it predicts that the trajectories of light rays and matter should be bent by gravity in the same way.

-

-    To find out whether general relativity is correct on large scales simultaneous investigations of three aspects of it. These were the expansion of the universe, the effects of gravity on light and the effects of gravity on matter.

-

-    Using a statistical method known as the “Bayesian inference”, they reconstructed the gravity of the universe through cosmic history in a computer model based on these three parameters. We could estimate the parameters using the cosmic microwave background data from the Planck satellite, supernova catalogues as well as observations of the shapes and distribution of distant galaxies by the SDSS and DES telescopes. We then compared our reconstruction to the prediction of the LCDM model (essentially Einstein’s model).

-

-   We found interesting hints of a possible mismatch with Einstein’s prediction, albeit with rather low statistical significance. This means that there is nevertheless a possibility that gravity works differently on large scales, and that the theory of general relativity may need to be tweaked.

-

-    This study also found that it is very difficult to solve the Hubble tension problem by only changing the theory of gravity. The full solution would probably require a new ingredient in the cosmological model, present before the time when protons and electrons first combined to form hydrogen just after the Big Bang, such as a special form of dark matter, an early type of dark energy or primordial magnetic fields.

-

-  This study has demonstrated that it is possible to test the validity of general relativity over cosmological distances using observational data. While we haven’t yet solved the Hubble problem, we will have a lot more data from new probes in a few years.

-

-    We should be able to use these statistical methods to continue tweaking general relativity, exploring the limits of modifications, to pave the way to resolving some of the open challenges in cosmology.

-

-

August 5,  2023       EINSTEIN  CROSS  -   a new model for the Universe?     4110

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, August 5, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment