Saturday, May 25, 2024

4481 - EINSTEIN'S - theory of relativity?

 

-  4481   -   EINSTEIN'S  -  theory of relativity?  -    Albert Einstein's famous theory of relativity has been borne out in the real world, measured in eclipses, distorted galaxies and even the universe's structure.  General Relativity (GR), is the “theory of gravity” first cooked up by Albert Einstein in a feat that took him seven years to complete.  It provided amazing insights into how the world works.

-


----------------------------------------  4481    -    EINSTEIN'S  -  theory of relativity?

-

-   It's easy enough to state the essence of the theory in a simple statements: "Matter and energy tell space-time how to bend, and the bending of space-time tells matter how to move." But the actual mechanics take 10 equations to describe, with each one very difficult and highly interconnected with the others.

-

-   Out of all the features of his new theory, Einstein was proudest of its ability to explain the details of the orbit of Mercury. That innermost planet has a slightly elliptical orbit, and that ellipse ever-so-slowly rotates around the sun. In other words, the place where Mercury is farthest from the sun slowly changes with time.

-

-    mIf you apply simple Newtonian gravity to the sun-Mercury system, this change over time, called “precession”, doesn't show up.  Isaac Newton's view is incomplete. Once you add in the gentle gravitational nudging and tweaking due to the other planets, almost all of the precession can be explained, but not all.

-

-    By the early 1900s, it was a well-known problem in solar system dynamics, but not one that caused much controversy. Most folks just added it to the ever-growing list of "slightly weird things we can't explain about the universe" and assumed that we would find a mundane solution some day.

-

-    But Einstein thought Mercury was giving him a clue. When, after years of attempts, he was able to flex his general relativistic muscles and explain precisely the orbital oddities of Mercury, he knew he had finally cracked the gravitational code.

-

-   Before Einstein put the finishing touches on the big General Relativity, he came to some startling realizations about the nature of gravity. If you're isolated on a rocket ship that accelerates at a smooth and constant 1g — providing the same acceleration as Earth's gravity does — everything in your laboratory will behave exactly as it would on the planet's surface, Einstein reasoned. Objects will fall to the ground at the same speed as on Earth; your feet will stay firmly planted on the floor, etc.

-

-   This equivalence between gravity (as experienced on Earth) and acceleration (as experienced in the rocket) propelled Einstein forward to develop his theory. But hidden in that scenario is a surprising insight. Imagine a beam of light entering a window on the left side of the spaceship. By the time the light crosses the spaceship to exit, where will it be?

-

-    From the perspective of an outside observer, the answer is obvious. The light travels in a perfectly straight line, perpendicular to the path of the rocket. During the time the light was passing through, the rocket pushed itself forward. The light will then enter the rocket at one window, say, near the tip, and exit near the bottom, close to the engines.

-

-    From the inside the spacecraft, though, things seem strange. In order for the light to enter a window near the tip and exit near the engines, the beam's path has to be curved. Indeed, that's exactly what you see.  And, since gravity is exactly the same as acceleration, light must follow curved paths around massive objects.

-

-   It's difficult to observe this one experimentally, because you need a lot of mass and some light that passes close to the surface to get a detectable effect. But the 1919 solar eclipse proved just the right opportunity, and an expedition led by Sir Arthur Eddington found the exact shifting of distant starlight that Einstein's nascent theory had predicted.

-

-   Another interesting result pops out of creative thought experiments surrounding general relativity. This conclusion relies on the good old-fashioned Doppler effect, but it's applied to an unfamiliar scenario.

-

-    If something is moving away from you, the sound it produces will get stretched out, shifting down to lower frequencies, the “Doppler effect”. The same is true of light: A car moving away from you appears ever-so-slightly redder than it would be if the vehicle were stationary. (The redder light, the lower the frequency.)

-

-   So, if movement shifts light's wavelength, then acceleration can too: A bit of light traveling from the bottom to the top of an accelerating rocket will experience a redshift. And under General Relativity, what goes for acceleration goes for gravity.   Light emitted from the surface of the Earth will shift down into redder frequencies the farther upward it travels.

-

-   It took a few decades to conclusively demonstrate this prediction, because the effect is so tiny. But in 1959, Robert Pound and Glen Rebka proposed, designed, built and executed an experiment that enabled them to measure the redshift of light as it traveled a few stories up the Jefferson Laboratory at Harvard University.

-

-     Even with all that evidence, we continue to put general relativity to the test. Any sign of a crack in Einstein's magnificent work would spark the development of a new theory of gravity, perhaps paving the way to uncovering the full quantum nature of that force. That's something we currently don't understand at all.

-

-   But in all regards, General Relativity passes with flying colors; from sensitive satellites to gravitational lensing, from the orbits of stars around giant black holes to ripples of gravitational waves and the evolution of the universe itself, Einstein's legacy is likely to persist for quite some time.

-

-

May 25, 2024            EINSTEIN'S  -  theory of relativity?                     4481

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                        

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Saturday, May 25, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Thursday, May 23, 2024

4478 - LIGHT PHOTONS - how were they discovered?

 

-  4478   -   LIGHT  PHOTONS  -  how were they discovered?   Einstein’s discovery of photons would be just one result in the growing awareness of the microscopic, quantum world.    It was the first to claim that an entity in nature (in this case, the radiation of Maxwell discovered) was really made of quantum particles.  That is photons.


---------------  4478    -   LIGHT  PHOTONS  -  how were they discovered?

-   Light comes to our eyes in little bundles of energy, or are they very small particles?  Can we even discover the difference?   These questions all got started with a simple experiment that was all the rage in the early 20th century. And as is usually the case, simple experiments often go on to change the world, leading Einstein himself to open the revolutionary door to the quantum world.

-

-   Here’s the setup. You take a piece of metal. You shine a light on it. You wait for the electrons in the metal to get enough energy from the light that they pop off the surface and go flying out. You point some electron-detector at the metal to measure the number and energy of the electrons.

-

-    The bizarre thing about this experiment, measuring what’s known as the “photoelectric effect”, is that the electrons didn’t behave as they should. If light is made of waves of electricity and magnetism, as Maxwell taught us, then the electrons should be able to slowly accumulate energy until they get hot enough to go flying off, regardless of the frequency of light.

-

-     And brighter more intense light should lead to more energetic electrons, because there’s more energy available. But neither of those expected outcomes happen.  Instead, only light above a certain frequency could get electrons to fly off the surface.   Those electrons always left the metal with the same energy, no matter how intense the light was.

-

-    Einstein thought about this problem for a shockingly short amount of time before coming up with an elegant solution…that once again reshaped our understanding of the physical universe. He supposed that light itself was 'quantized”.

-

-    What we perceive as undulating waves of electricity and magnetism is really, at a deeper, more fundamental level, a flood of discrete, distinct, indivisible little bundles of photons of light. Each one of these bundles represents the smallest amount of light-stuff that you can possibly have. And because these bundles are uncuttable, you cannot have fractional proportions of light-stuff.

-

-    You can have one unit of light-stuff, two units of light-stuff, and so on, but never 2.56 units, or units. Somehow these bundles, when enough of them come together, conspire to behave as if they were waves of electricity and magnetism, but once you picked those waves apart you would reveal their particle-like nature.

-

-    This neatly solved the problem with the photoelectric effect. Electrons need a certain amount of energy to get away from a metal. And that energy isn’t determined by the brightness or intensity of the light, but in its “frequency”.

-

-    Higher frequencies correspond to more energetic “photons”. If the energy was too low, the electrons could simply never escape the metal. And when the photon strike the electrons, they deposit a specific, fixed amount of energy, no more, no less, explaining why the electrons always escaped in the exact same way.

-

-

May 22, 2024           LIGHT  PHOTONS  -  how were they discovered?                  4478

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, May 23, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4477 - BLACKHOLES - what have we learned?

 

-  4477   -  BLACKHOLES  -  what have we learned?  -    James Webb Telescope detects most distant black hole merger to date.   Astronomers find evidence for an ongoing merger of two galaxies and their massive black holes when the universe was only 740 million years old. This marks the most distant detection of a black hole merger ever obtained and the first time that this phenomenon has been detected so early in the universe.


-

-----------------------------------  4477    -   BLACKHOLES  -  what have we learned?

-   Astronomers have found supermassive black holes with masses of millions to billions times that of the sun in most massive galaxies in the local universe, including in our Milky Way galaxy. These black holes have likely had a major impact on the evolution of the galaxies they reside in. Scientists still don't fully understand how these objects grew to become so massive.

-

-    The finding of gargantuan black holes already in place in the first billion years after the Big Bang indicates that such growth must have happened very rapidly, and very early.   These observations have provided evidence for an ongoing merger of two galaxies and their massive black holes when the universe was just 740 million years old. The system is known as “ZS7”.

-

-   Massive black holes that are actively accreting matter have distinctive spectrographic features that allow astronomers to identify them. They found evidence for very dense gas with fast motions in the vicinity of the black hole, as well as hot and highly ionized gas illuminated by the energetic radiation typically produced by black holes in their accretion episodes.  Webb also allowed astronomers to spatially separate the two black holes.

-

-  They found that one of the two black holes has a mass that is 50 million times the mass of the sun.  The mass of the other black hole is likely similar, although it is much harder to measure because this second black hole is buried in dense gas.

-

-    These findings suggest that merging is an important route through which black holes can rapidly grow, even at cosmic dawn.   Active, massive black holes in the distant universe show that massive black holes have been shaping the evolution of galaxies from the very beginning.

-

-    Once the two black holes merge, they will also generate gravitational waves. Events like this will be detectable with the next generation of gravitational wave observatories, the upcoming Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) mission, which was recently approved by the European Space Agency and will be the first space-based observatory dedicated to studying gravitational waves.

-

-    Physicists consider black holes one of the most mysterious objects that exist. Ironically, they're also considered one of the simplest. For years, physicists have been looking to prove that black holes are more complex than they seem. And, LISA will help us with this hunt.

-

-    Research from the 1970s suggests that you can comprehensively describe a black hole using only three physical attributes—their mass, charge and spin. All the other properties of these massive dying stars, like their detailed composition, density and temperature profiles, disappear as they transform into a black hole.

-

-   The idea that black holes have only three attributes is called the "no-hair" theorem, implying that they don't have any "hairy" details that make them complicated.   For decades, researchers in the astrophysics community have exploited loopholes or work-arounds within the no-hair theorem's assumptions to come up with potential hairy black hole scenarios. A hairy black hole has a physical property that scientists can measure that's beyond its mass, charge or spin. This property has to be a permanent part of its structure.

-

-    A black hole containing the maximum charge it could hold—called an “extremal charged black hole”—would develop "hair" at its horizon. A black hole's horizon is the boundary where anything that crosses it, even light, can't escape.

-

-     Since astrophysical objects such as stars and planets are known to spin, scientists expect that black holes would spin as well, based on how they form. Astronomical evidence has shown that black holes do have spin, though researchers don't know what the typical spin value is for an astrophysical black hole.

-

-    A gravitational wave is a tiny disturbance in space-time typically caused by violent astrophysical events in the universe. The collisions of compact astrophysical objects such as black holes and neutron stars emit strong gravitational waves.

-

-    They can measure these hairy attributes from gravitational wave data for fast-spinning black holes. Looking at the gravitational wave data offers an opportunity for a signature of sorts that could indicate whether the black hole has this type of hair.

-

-      LISA will look for gravitational waves, and the data from the mission could help with the  hairy black hole questions.   LISA consists of three spacecrafts configured in a perfect equilateral triangle that will trail behind the Earth around the sun. The spacecrafts will each be 1.6 million miles apart, and they will exchange laser beams to measure the distance between each other down to about a billionth of an inch.

-

-    LISA will detect gravitational waves from supermassive black holes that are millions or even billions of times more massive than our sun.   It will build a map of the space-time around rotating black holes, which will help physicists understand how gravity works in the close vicinity of black holes to an unprecedented level of accuracy.

-

-    With LIGO making new observations every day and LISA to offer a glimpse into the space-time around black holes, now is one of the most exciting times to be a black hole physicist.

Is there anything stranger in the universe than black holes?

-

-    Black holes might have hair.    In the 1960s, physicist John Wheeler suggested that black holes "have no hair," meaning that each particular cosmic object could only be distinguished from its brethren by its spin, angular momentum and mass. Any other differentiating information about a black hole is considered "hair," and is thought to disappear behind a black hole's impenetrable event horizon, a boundary around the black hole beyond which nothing, including light, can escape.

-

-    In 2016, when famed physicist Stephen Hawking proposed that black holes actually sport a hairdo made of ghostly, zero-energy particles, and that this contains information about material the black hole has consumed. This hypothesis has not been proven, but could help solve a longstanding paradox about what happens to gas and dust that has fallen into a black hole's maw.

-

-    Nothing is supposed to be able to escape a black hole's powerful gravitational grip. But that only applies to material that has gotten extremely close to the hole's edge. Many black holes are, in fact, surrounded by streams of gas and dust, which circle around the hole, like water going down a drain.

-

-     Friction in this material generates heat, which creates churning, storm-like structures in the gas and dust. Recent observations suggest that this motion also produces arching rings that surround inner columns of matter, which shoots straight into the air, strongly resembling fountains.

-

-    Quantum mechanics provides another way for particles to escape a black hole. According to theory, pairs of subatomic particles are constantly blinking in and out of existence around a black hole's event horizon. Every so often, the configuration is aligned in just the right way to cause one of the partners to fall into the black hole. The particle's identical associate is then propelled away at extremely high speed, robbing the black hole of a tiny bit of energy.

-

-    This produces what's known as “Hawking radiation”, after Stephen Hawking, who discovered the phenomenon. Because energy equals mass, this process actually can cause a black hole to shrink and eventually evaporate away over very long periods of time.

-

-    One of the problems with Hawking radiation is that it causes conundrums for physicists. The subatomic particles produced by this radiation are entangled, meaning that what happens to one is immediately felt by the other. So what does the partner that didn't fall into the black hole feel as its associate gets crushed into an infinitely dense point? Nobody knows.

-   

-     One theory holds that the black hole severs the particles' entanglement, an outcome that — according to the laws of quantum mechanics – would produce an insane amount of energy. That, in turn, would mean that all black holes are surrounded by roiling walls of fire.

-

-     It's hard to square black holes' crushing mass with the laws of quantum mechanics, which hold that information about particles can never be destroyed. But material that slips beyond a black hole's edge should become forever lost to the universe. This conundrum is known as the “black hole information paradox”.

- 

-     Recent research suggests that information that gets scrambled within a black hole could be passed to the outgoing particle partners in Hawking radiation; however, no definitive answer to this paradox has been found, to date.

-

-    Shortly after the Big Bang, the universe should have produced a multitude of tiny black holes. Because these features would be massive objects that give off no light, some physicists have conjectured that these “primordial black holes” could account for dark matter, that mysterious material that the vast majority of matter in the cosmos is made of.

-

-     But the idea is controversial, given that data from the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) has ruled out a universe filled with many minuscule black holes. Perhaps medium-size black holes might still be lurking out there, though observations suggest they would only make up, at most, 1% to 10% of dark matter.

-

-    Black holes run into the problem of 'infinity”.  A black hole's mass is crushed to an infinitely dense point that's infinitely small in size. Physically, this doesn't make any sense, so researchers have searched for alternative frameworks to get a handle on black holes.

-

-       One proposal is known as “quantum loop gravity”, suggests that the fabric of space-time is curved very strongly near the center of the black hole. This would result in part of the hole extending into the future, meaning that matter getting sucked into it would time travel forward.

-

-     One highly-controversial observation suggests that our universe is a latecomer. Earlier universes might have existed before ours, and would have contained black holes. Prominent Oxford University mathematical physicist Roger Penrose has argued that cosmic background radiation contains imprints of these black holes from before time.

-

-    Physicists are set to release the first-ever image of a black hole. This supermassive beast lurks at the heart of our Milky Way galaxy; capturing a photo of it has been the aim of the Event Horizon Telescope. This instrument is actually a global network of radio telescopes all over the Earth, which have combined their powers to zoom in closer to the galactic center than ever before. The telescope should be able to spot the black hole's shadow across its material surrounding, and images are expected in 2024.

-

-    Black hole singularities continue to defy physics.  New research presents a bold solution to this puzzle: Black holes may actually be a theoretical type of star called a 'gravastar,' filled with universe-expanding dark energy.

-

-   “Gravastars” are hypothetical astronomical objects that were introduced in 2001 as alternatives to black holes.   They can be interpreted as stars made of vacuum energy or dark energy: the same type of energy that propels the accelerated expansion of the universe.

-

-    A black hole is predicted to be a point of infinitely high density, called a “singularity”, where all the mass of the black hole is concentrated, but fundamental physics teaches us that infinities do not exist, and their appearance in any theory signals its inaccuracy or incompleteness.

-

-    The main advantage of gravastars is that they do not have singularities.   “Dark energy” is the strange phenomenon thought to be responsible for the accelerating expansion of the universe, but could it also be holding black holes together, as gravatar theory suggests?

-

-    Like ordinary black holes, gravastars should arise at the final stage of the evolution of massive stars, when the energy released during thermonuclear combustion of the matter inside them is no longer enough to overcome the force of gravity, and the star collapses into a much denser object.

-

-     But in contrast to black holes, gravastars are not expected to have any singularities and are thought to be thin spheres of matter whose stability is maintained by the dark energy contained within them.   Using Einstein's theory,  the huge masses of hot matter that surround supermassive black holes would appear if these black holes were actually gravastars. They also scrutinized the properties of "hot spots", gigantic gas bubbles orbiting black holes at near-light speeds.

-

-   Their findings revealed striking similarities between the matter emissions of gravastars and black holes, suggesting that gravastars don't contradict scientists' experimental observations of the universe. They discovered that a gravastar itself should appear almost like a singular black hole, creating a visible shadow.

-

-    This shadow is not caused by the trapping of light in the event horizon, but by a slightly different phenomenon called the 'gravitational redshift,' causing light to lose energy when it moves through a region with a strong gravitational field.  When the light emitted from regions close to these alternative objects reaches our telescopes, most of its energy would have been lost to the gravitational field, causing the appearance of this shadow.

-

-    The Event Horizon Telescope traceing the lines of powerful magnetic fields spiraling out from the edge of the supermassive black hole at the center of our Milky Way galaxy suggests that strong magnetism may be common to all supermassive black holes.

-

-    Sagittarius A* wasn’t the first black hole whose shadow was imaged by the EHT. Back in 2019, astronomers showed off a similar picture of the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy M87, which is more than a thousand times bigger and farther away than the Milky Way’s black hole.

-

-    In 2021, the EHT team charted the magnetic field lines around M87’s black hole by taking a close look at the black hole in polarized light, which reflects the patterns of particles whirling around magnetic field lines. Researchers used the same technique to determine the magnetic signature of Sagittarius A*, or Sgr A* .

-

-    Getting the image wasn’t easy, largely due to the fact that Sgr A* was harder to pin down than M87. The EHT team had to combine multiple views to produce a composite image.  What we’re seeing now is that there are strong, twisted and organized magnetic fields near the black hole at the center of the Milky Way galaxy.

-

-   Along with Sgr A* having a strikingly similar polarization structure to that seen in the much larger and more powerful M87* black hole, we’ve learned that strong and ordered magnetic fields are critical to how black holes interact with the gas and matter around them.

-

-    The structure of the magnetic fields around Sgr A* suggests that the black hole is launching a jet of material into the surrounding environment. Previous research has shown that to be the case for M87’s black hole.

-

-    The fact that the magnetic field structure of M87* is so similar to that of Sgr A* is significant because it suggests that the physical processes that govern how a black hole feeds and launches a jet might be universal among supermassive black holes, despite differences in mass, size and surrounding environment.

-

-    In the seven years since the EHT began gathering observations, the collaboration has been adding to its array of radio telescopes, which is resulting in the production of higher-quality imagery. The researchers aim to produce high-fidelity movies of Sgr A* that may reveal a hidden jet. They’ll also look for evidence of similar polarization features around other supermassive black holes.

-

-

May 22, 2024            BLACKHOLES  -  what have we learned?                  4477

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, May 22, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Monday, May 20, 2024

4476 - DARK MATTER - experiments to learn what is it?

 

-  4476   -  DARK  MATTER  -   experiments to learn what is it?      Dark matter makes up over 80% of all matter in the universe, but scientists have never seen it.  We only assume it exists because, without it, the behavior of stars, planets and galaxies simply wouldn't make sense according to laws of gravity


---------------  4476    -   DARK  MATTER  -   experiments to learn what is it?

-

-  (  See Review 4475  about the discovery of light photons)

-

-   We have not discovered what dark matter is yet?   Dark matter is the mysterious stuff that fills the universe but no one has ever seen.  We only see its effects of gravity.

-

-    If dark matter is 'invisible,' how do we know it exists?    Dark matter is completely invisible. It emits no light or energy and thus cannot be detected by conventional sensors and detectors. The key to its elusive nature must lie in its composition.

-

-   Visible matter, also called “baryonic matter”, consists of baryons which is an overarching name for subatomic particles such as protons, neutrons and electrons. Scientists only speculate what dark matter is made of. It could be composed of baryons but it could also be non-baryonic, that means consisting of different types of particles.

-

-   Most scientists think that dark matter is composed of non-baryonic matter. The lead candidate, WIMPS (weakly interacting massive particles), are believed to have ten to a hundred times the mass of a proton, but their weak interactions with "normal" matter make them difficult to detect.

-

-    Neutralinos, massive hypothetical particles heavier and slower than neutrinos, are the foremost candidate, though they have yet to be spotted.

-

-   Sterile neutrinos are another candidate. Neutrinos are particles that don't make up regular matter. A river of neutrinos streams from the sun, but because they rarely interact with normal matter, they pass through Earth and all its inhabitants.

-

-   There are three known types of neutrinos; a fourth, the “sterile neutrino”, is proposed as a dark matter candidate. The sterile neutrino would only interact with regular matter through gravity.

-

-   One of the outstanding questions is whether there is a pattern to the fractions that go into each neutrino species.  The smaller “neutral axion” and the “uncharged photinos,” both theoretical particles, are also potential placeholders for dark matter.

-

-    There is also such a thing as “antimatter”, which is not the same as dark matter. Antimatter consists of particles that are essentially the same as visible matter particles but with opposite electrical charges. These particles are called antiprotons and positrons (or antielectrons).

-

-    When antiparticles meet particles, an explosion ensues that leads to the two types of matter canceling each other out. Because we live in a universe made of matter, it is obvious that there is not that much antimatter around, otherwise, there would be nothing left. Unlike dark matter, physicists can actually manufacture anti-matter in their laboratories.

-

-    What we do know is that if we look at a typical galaxy, take account of all the matter that we see (stars, gas, dust) and use Newton's Laws of Gravity and motion (or, more correctly, Einstein's General Relativity), to try to describe the motions of that material, then we get the wrong answer.

-

-   The objects in galaxies (nearly all of them) are moving too fast. There should not be enough gravity to keep them from flying out of the galaxy that their in. The same thing is true about galaxies moving around in clusters.

-

-    There are two possible explanations:

-

--------------  1. There is more stuff (matter) that we don't see with our telescopes. We call this dark matter.

-

-------------    2. Newton's laws and even General Relativity are wrong on the scale of galaxies and everything bigger. This idea is usually called modified gravity (because we need to modify GR) or Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND).

-

-    Mostly, cosmologists believe that the answer is that the behavior of galaxies is explained by dark matter. Why? Partly because it has been very hard to write down a successful theory of MOND or modified gravity. And partly because it turned out that when we turned our microwave telescopes to look at cosmic background radiation (CMB), the light from the early universe, it turned out that, according to GR, the same amount and type of dark matter was also required to explain the behavior of the sound waves that traveled in the universe when it was less than 500,000 years old, and whose imprints we are able to see.

-

-    “Modified gravity” struggles to provide a unified explanation across all these systems, galaxies, clusters of galaxies, the universe.

-

-   If dark matter exists, it must have mass. Massless dark matter would not behave in ways that solve the problems that dark matter addresses.  The two things we know for sure about dark matter (assuming it exists), is that it exerts gravity (has mass) and that it moves slowly (compared to the speed of light). 

-

-    Since we don't know what dark matter is for every possible candidate for the dark matter there is a different strategy to search for it. People build giant detectors deep underground (to get away from all the other particles streaming through the environment around us) and look for signals of the dark matter hitting their detector after passing through the Earth overhead.

-

-   How do we know dark matter exists? The answer is gravity, the force exerted by objects made of matter that is proportional to their mass. Since the 1920s, astronomers have hypothesized that the universe must contain more matter than we can see because the gravitational forces that seem to be at play in the universe simply appear stronger than the visible matter alone would account for.

-

-    Motions of the stars tell you how much matter there is.  Astronomers examining spiral galaxies in the 1970s expected to see material in the center moving faster than at the outer edges. Instead, they found the stars in both locations traveled at the same velocity, indicating the galaxies contained more mass than could be seen.

-

-   Studies of gas within elliptical galaxies also indicated a need for more mass than found in visible objects. Clusters of galaxies would fly apart if the only mass they contained was the mass visible to conventional astronomical measurements.

-

-    Different galaxies seem to contain different amounts of dark matter. In 2016, a team found a galaxy called Dragonfly 44, which seems to be composed almost entirely of dark matter. On the other hand, since 2018 astronomers have found several galaxies that seem to lack dark matter altogether.

-

-    The force of gravity doesn't only affect the orbits of stars in galaxies but also the trajectory of light.  Albert Einstein showed in the early 20th century that massive objects in the universe bend and distort light due to the force of their gravity. The phenomenon is called “gravitational lensing”. By studying how light is distorted by galaxy clusters, astronomers have been able to create a map of dark matter in the universe.

-

-   A vast majority of the astronomical community today accepts that dark matter exists.  Several astronomical measurements have corroborated the existence of dark matter, leading to a world-wide effort to observe directly dark matter particle interactions with ordinary matter in extremely sensitive detectors, which would confirm its existence and shed light on its properties, However, these interactions are so feeble that they have escaped direct detection up to this point, forcing scientists to build detectors that are more and more sensitive.

-

-    Despite all the evidence pointing towards the existence of dark matter, there is also the possibility that no such thing exists after all and that the laws of gravity describing the motion of objects within the solar system require revision.

-

-   Dark matter appears to be spread across the cosmos in a net-like pattern, with galaxy clusters forming at the nodes where fibers intersect. By verifying that gravity acts the same both inside and outside our solar system, researchers provide additional evidence for the existence of dark matter. (Things are even more complicated as in addition to dark matter there also appears to be dark energy, an invisible force responsible for the expansion of the universe that acts against gravity.)

-

-   But where does dark matter come from? The obvious answer is that we don't know. But there are a few theories.   Dark matter might be concentrated in black holes, the powerful gates to nothing that due to the extreme force of their gravity devour everything in their vicinity. As such, dark matter would have been created in the Big Bang together with all other constituting elements of the universe as we see it today.

-

-    Stellar remnants such as white dwarfs and neutron stars are also thought to contain high amounts of dark matter, and so are the so-called brown dwarfs, failed stars that didn't accumulate enough material to kick-start nuclear fusion in their cores.

-

-    Since we can't see dark matter, can we actually study it? There are two approaches to learning more about this mysterious stuff. Astronomers study the distribution of dark matter in the universe by looking at the clustering of material and the motion of objects in the universe. Particle physicists, on the other hand, are on a quest to detect the “fundamental particles” making up dark matter.

-

-    An experiment mounted on the International Space Station called the “Alpha Magnetic Spectrometer” (AMS) detects antimatter in cosmic rays. Since 2011, it has been hit by more than 100 billion cosmic rays, providing fascinating insights into the composition of particles traversing the universe.

-

-    We have measured an excess of “positrons” [the antimatter counterpart to an electron], and this excess can come from dark matter.   But at this moment, we still need more data to make sure it is from dark matter and not from some strange astrophysics sources. That will require us to run a few more years.

-

-   Back on Earth, beneath a mountain in Italy, the “LNGS's XENON1T” is hunting for signs of interactions after WIMPs collide with xenon atoms.   A new phase in the race to detect dark matter with ultra-low background massive detectors on Earth has just begun with XENON1T.

-

-    The Large Underground Xenon dark-matter experiment (LUX), seated in a gold mine in South Dakota, has also been hunting for signs of WIMP and xenon interactions. But so far, the instrument hasn't revealed the mysterious matter.

-

-    The IceCube Neutrino Observatory, an experiment buried under the frozen surface of Antarctica, is hunting for the hypothetical “sterile neutrinos”. Sterile neutrinos only interact with regular matter through gravity, making it a strong candidate for dark matter.

-

-    Experiments aiming to detect elusive dark matter particles are also conducted in the powerful particle colliders at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Switzerland.

-

-    Several telescopes orbiting Earth are hunting for the effects of dark matter. The European Space Agency's Planck spacecraft, retired in 2013, spent four years in the Lagrangian Point 2 (a point in the orbit around the sun, where a spacecraft maintains a stable position with respect to Earth), mapping the distribution of the cosmic microwave background, a relic from the Big Bang, in the universe. Irregularities in the distribution of this microwave background revealed clues about the distribution of dark matter.

-

-    In 2014, NASA's “Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope” made maps of the heart of our galaxy, the Milky Way, in gamma-ray light, revealing an excess of gamma-ray emissions extending from its core.

The signal found cannot be explained by currently proposed alternatives and is in close agreement with the predictions of very simple dark matter models.

-

-    The excess can be explained by annihilations of dark matter particles with a mass between 31 and 40 billion electron volts. The result by itself isn't enough to be considered a smoking gun for dark matter. Additional data from other observing projects or direct-detection experiments would be required to validate the interpretation.

-

-    The James Webb Space Telescope, launched after 30 years of development on December 25, 2021, is also expected to contribute to the hunt for the elusive substance. With its infrared eyes able to see to the beginning of time, the telescope of the century won't be able to see dark matter directly, but through observing the evolution of galaxies since the earliest stages of the universe, it is expected to provide insights that have not been possible before. 

-

-    ESA's Euclid mission launched on July 1, 2023, and is currently on the hunt for dark matter and dark energy. The mission aims to map the geometry of matter in the universe, specifically the distribution of galaxies to learn more about the elusive dark matter

-

-

May 20, 2024          DARK  MATTER  -   experiments to learn what is it?           4472

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, May 20, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

               

 

 

4475 - PHOTON - what Einstein discovered?

 

-  4475   -   PHOTON  -  what Einstein discovered.  -    Creating the Photon started with a simple experiment that was all the rage in the early 20th century. And as is usually the case, simple experiments often go on to change the world, leading Einstein himself to open the revolutionary door to the quantum world.


-----------------------------------  4475    -   PHOTON  -  what Einstein discovered?

-   You take a piece of metal for the experiment.  You shine a light on it. You wait for the electrons in the metal to get enough energy from the light that they pop off the surface and go flying out. You point some electron-detector at the metal to measure the number and energy of the electrons.

-

-    The bizarre thing about this experiment, measuring what’s known as the “photoelectric effect”, is that the electrons didn’t behave as they should. If light is made of waves of electricity and magnetism, as Maxwell taught us, then the electrons should be able to slowly accumulate energy until they get hot enough to go flying off, regardless of the frequency of light.

-

-   And brighter more intense light should lead to more energetic electrons, because there’s more energy available. But neither of those expected outcomes happen.  Instead, only light above a certain frequency could get electrons to dance, and those electrons always left the metal with the same energy, no matter how intense the light was.

-

-   Einstein thought about this problem for a shockingly short amount of time before coming up with an elegant solution.  He reshaped our understanding of the physical universe.   He supposed that light itself was quantized. In other words, what we perceive as sloshing, undulating waves of electricity and magnetism is really, at a deeper, more fundamental level, a flood of discrete, distinct, indivisible little bundles of light-stuff.

-

-    Each one of these bundles represents the smallest amount of light-stuff that you can possibly have. And because these bundles are uncuttable, you cannot have fractional proportions of light-stuff. You can have one unit of light-stuff, two units of light-stuff, and so on, but never 2.56 units, or 23,347,12.223 units.

-

-    Somehow these bundles, when enough of them come together, conspire to behave as if they were waves of electricity and magnetism, but once you picked those waves apart you would reveal their particle-like nature.

-

-    This neatly solved the problem with the photoelectric effect. Electrons need a certain amount of energy to get away from a metal. And that energy isn’t determined by the brightness or intensity of the light, but in its frequency.

-

-    Higher frequencies correspond to more energetic photons.  If the energy was too low, the electrons could simply never escape the metal. And when the photon strike the electrons, they deposit a specific, fixed amount of energy, no more, no less, explaining why the electrons always escaped in the exact same way.

-

-   Einstein’s discovery of photons would be just one result in the growing awareness of the microscopic, quantum world. But it would be an important one – and the one result for which he would ultimately receive the Nobel prize – because it was the first to claim that an entity in nature was really made of quantum particles.

-

-

May 20, 2024               PHOTON  -  what Einstein discovered                              4472

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, May 20, 2024  ---------------------------------