Monday, October 19, 2020

BIG BANG - what really happened?

 -  2865  -  BIG  BANG  -  what really happened?  For more than 50 years, we have had definitive scientific evidence that our Universe, as we know it, began with the hot Big Bang. The Universe is expanding, cooling, and full of clumps (like planets, stars, and galaxies) today because it was smaller, hotter, denser, and more uniform in the past. 


 

---------------------------  2865  - BIG  BANG  -  what really happened?

-  If you extrapolate all the way back to the earliest moments possible, everything we see today was once concentrated into a single point: a “singularity“, which marks the birth of space and time itself.

-

-  The Universe was born a finite amount of time ago, and started off with the Big Bang.  The Big Bang can no longer be described as the very beginning of the Universe that we know, and the hot Big Bang almost certainly doesn’t equate to the birth of space and time. If the Big Bang wasn’t truly the beginning, what was it? 

-

-  Our Universe almost certainly emerged from a hot, dense, almost-perfectly uniform state early on. In particular, there are four pieces of evidence that all point to this scenario:

-

-----------------------  The Hubble expansion of the Universe, which shows that the amount that light from a distant object is redshifted is proportional to the distance to that object,

-

-----------------------  The existence of a leftover glow, the “Cosmic Microwave Background” (CMB), in all directions, with the same temperature everywhere just a few degrees above absolute zero,

-

----------------------  Light elements: hydrogen, deuterium, helium-3, helium-4, and lithium-7, that exist in a particular ratio of abundances back before any stars were formed,

-

---------------------  A cosmic web of structure that gets denser and clumpier, with more space between larger and larger clumps, as time goes on.

-

-  These four facts: the Hubble expansion of the Universe, the existence and properties of the CMB, the abundance of the light elements from Big Bang nucleosynthesis, and the formation and growth of large-scale structure in the Universe, represent the four cornerstones of the Big Bang.

-

-  In the 1920s, Edwin Hubble, using the largest, most powerful telescope in the world at the time, was able to measure how individual stars varied in brightness over time, even in galaxies beyond our own. That enabled us to know how far away the galaxies that housed those stars were. 

-

-  By combining that information with data about how significantly the atomic spectral lines from those galaxies were shifted, we could determine what the relationship was between distance and a spectral shift.

-

-  The farther away a galaxy was, the more significantly its light was “redshifted“, or shifted systematically towards longer wavelengths. In the context of General Relativity, that corresponds to a Universe whose very fabric is expanding with time.

-

-   As time marches on, all points in the Universe that aren’t somehow bound together, either gravitationally or by some other force, will expand away from one another, causing any emitted light to be shifted towards longer wavelengths by time the observer receives it.

-

-  Although there are many possible explanations for the effect we observe as “Hubble’s Law“, the “Big Bang” is a unique idea among those possibilities. The idea is simple and straightforward in its simplicity, but also breathtaking in how powerful it is;

-

--------------------  The Universe is expanding and stretching light to longer wavelengths (and lower energies and temperatures) today,

-

--------------------  That means, if we extrapolate backwards, the Universe was denser and hotter earlier on.

-

---------------------  Because it’s been gravitating the whole time, the Universe gets clumpier and forms larger, more massive structures later on.

-

---------------------   If we go back to early enough times, we’ll see that galaxies were smaller, more numerous, and made of intrinsically younger, bluer stars.

-

--------------------  If we go back earlier still, we’ll find a time where no stars have had time to form.

-

--------------------  Even earlier, and we’ll find that it’s hot enough that light, at some early time, would have split even neutral atoms apart, creating an ionized plasma which “releases” the radiation at last when the Universe does become neutral. 

-

-------------------  And at even earlier times still, things were hot enough that even atomic nuclei would be blasted apart; transitioning to a cooler phase allows the first stable nuclear reactions, yielding the light elements, to proceed.

-

-  We’ve measured the clumpiness of the Universe, and found that it increases exactly as predicted as time goes on. We’ve measured how galaxies evolve with distance and cosmic time, and found that the earlier, more distant ones are overall younger, bluer, more numerous, and smaller in size. 

-

-  We’ve discovered and measured the CMB, and not only does it spectacularly match the Big Bang’s predictions, but we’ve observed how its temperature increases at earlier times.

-

-  And we’ve successfully measured the primordial abundances of the light elements, finding a spectacular agreement with the predictions of Big Bang nucleosynthesis.

-

-   We can imagine the Universe getting even denser, hotter, and more compact than it was when protons and neutrons were being blasted apart. If we stepped back even earlier, we’d see neutrinos and antineutrinos, which need about a light-year of solid lead to stop half of them, start to interact with electrons and other particles in the early Universe. 

-

-  That’s the earliest signal, thus far, we’ve ever detected from the hot Big Bang. But there’s nothing stopping us from running the clock back farther: all the way to the extremes. At some point:

-

-------------------------  It gets hot and dense enough that particle-antiparticle pairs get created out of pure energy, simply from quantum conservation laws and Einstein’s 

E = mc²,

-

-----------------------  The Universe gets denser than individual protons and neutrons, causing it to behave as a quark-gluon plasma rather than as individual nucleons,

-

---------------------  The Universe gets even hotter, causing the electroweak force to unify, the Higgs symmetry to be restored, and for fundamental particles to lose their rest mass,

-

--------------------  Then we go to energies that lie beyond the limits of known, tested physics, even from particle accelerators and cosmic rays. Some processes must occur under those conditions to reproduce the Universe we see.

-

-   Something must have created dark matter. Something must have created more matter than antimatter in our Universe. And something must have happened, at some point, for the Universe to exist at all.

-

-  If you go far enough back in time, you’ll come to a state that’s so hot and so dense that the laws of physics themselves break down.  At some point, you achieve energies, densities, and temperatures that are so large that the quantum uncertainty inherent to nature leads to consequences that make no sense.

-

-  Quantum fluctuations would routinely create black holes that encompass the entire Universe. Probabilities, if you try to compute them, give answers that are either negative or greater than 1: both physical impossibilities. We know that gravity and quantum physics don’t make sense at these extremes, and that’s what a singularity is: a place where the laws of physics are no longer useful. 

-

-  Under these extreme conditions, it’s possible that space and time themselves can emerge. This, originally, was the idea of the Big Bang: a birth to time and space themselves.

-

-  But all of that was based on the notion that we actually could extrapolate the Big Bang scenario as far back as we wanted: to arbitrarily high energies, temperatures, densities, and early times. As it turned out, that created a number of physical puzzles that defied explanation. 

-

--------------------  Why did causally disconnected regions of space, regions with insufficient time to exchange information, even at the speed of light, have identical temperatures to one another?

-

---------------------  Why was the initial expansion rate of the Universe in balance with the total amount of energy in the Universe so perfectly: to more than 50 decimal places, to deliver a “flat” Universe today?

-

---------------------  Why, if we achieved these ultra-high temperatures and densities early on, don’t we see any leftover relic remnants from those times in our Universe today?

-

-   Instead of extrapolating the Big Bang all the way back to a singularity, inflation basically says that there’s a cutoff: you can go back to a certain high temperature and density, but no further. According to the big idea of cosmic inflation, this hot, dense, uniform state was preceded by a state where:

-

-----------------------  The Universe wasn’t filled with matter and radiation,

-

----------------------  But instead possessed a large amount of energy intrinsic to the fabric of space itself,

-

---------------------  Which caused the Universe to expand exponentially (and at a constant, unchanging rate),

-

---------------------  Which drives the Universe to be flat, empty, and uniform (up to the scale of quantum fluctuations),

-

---------------------   Then inflation ends, converting that intrinsic-to-space energy into matter and radiation,

-

---------------------  That is where the hot Big Bang comes from. Not only did this solve the puzzles the Big Bang couldn’t explain, but it made multiple new predictions that have since been verified. 

-

-  There’s a lot we still don’t know about cosmic inflation, but the data that’s come in over the last 30 years overwhelmingly supports the existence of this inflationary state that preceded and set up the hot Big Bang.

-

-  All of this, taken together, is enough to tell us what the Big Bang is and what it isn’t. It is the notion that our Universe emerged from a hotter, denser, more uniform state in the distant past. It is not the idea that things got arbitrarily hot and dense until the laws of physics no longer applied.

-

-  It is the notion that, as the Universe expanded, cooled, and gravitated, we annihilated away our excess antimatter, formed protons and neutrons and light nuclei, atoms, and eventually, stars, galaxies, and the Universe we recognize today. It is no longer considered inevitable that space and time emerged from a singularity 13.8 billion years ago.

-

-  And it is a set of conditions that applies at very early times, but was preceded by a different set of conditions (inflation) that came before it. The Big Bang might not be the very beginning of the Universe itself, but it is the beginning of our Universe as we recognize it. 

-

- It’s not “the” beginning, but it is “our” beginning. It may not be the entire story on its own, but it’s a vital part of the universal cosmic story that connects us all.

-

-  October 17, 2020                                                                              2865                                                                                                                                              

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---- 

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----  

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews 

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, October 19, 2020  ---------------------------






No comments:

Post a Comment