Thursday, August 10, 2023

4114 - MODIFIED GRAVITY - does MOND replace Dark Matter?

 

-    4114 -   MODIFIED  GRAVITY  -  does MOND replace Dark Matter?   There is a smoking-gun evidence for modified gravity at low acceleration from Gaia observations of wide binary stars.   Evidence for the breakdown of standard gravity equation in the low acceleration limit from a verifiable analysis of the orbital motions of long-period, widely separated, binary stars, usually referred to as wide binaries.


-----  4114  -    MODIFIED  GRAVITY  -  does MOND replace Dark Matter?

-    Up to 26,500 wide binaries within 650 light years were observed by European Space Agency's “Gaia space telescope”.   This study focused on calculating gravitational accelerations experienced by binary stars as a function of their separation or, equivalently the orbital period.

-

-    Gravity could be most directly and efficiently tested by calculating accelerations because gravitational field itself is an acceleration.  Galactic disks and wide binaries share some similarity in their orbits, though wide binaries follow highly elongated orbits while hydrogen gas particles in a galactic disk follow nearly circular orbits.

-

-   The studying when two stars orbit around with each other with accelerations lower than about one nanometer per second squared start to deviate from the prediction by Newton's universal law of gravitation and Einstein's general relativity.

-

-    For accelerations lower than about 0.1 nanometer per second squared, the observed acceleration is about 30 to 40% higher than the Newton-Einstein prediction. The significance is very high meeting the conventional criteria of 5 sigma for a scientific discovery.

-

-    In a sample of 20,000 wide binaries within a distance limit of 650 LY two independent acceleration bins respectively show deviations of over 5 sigma significance in the same direction.

-

-    Because the observed accelerations stronger than about 10 nanometer per second squared agree well with the Newton-Einstein prediction from the same analysis, the observed boost of accelerations at lower accelerations is a mystery.

-

-    This breakdown of the Newton-Einstein theory at accelerations weaker than about one nanometer per second squared was suggested 40 years ago by theoretical physicist in a new theoretical framework called modified Newtonian dynamics (MOND) or Milgromian dynamics in current usage.

-

-    The boost factor of about 1.4 is correctly predicted by a MOND-type Lagrangian theory of gravity called “AQUAL”.  What is remarkable is that the correct boost factor requires the external field effect from the Milky Way galaxy that is a unique prediction of MOND-type modified gravity.

-

-    Unlike galactic rotation curves in which the observed boosted accelerations can be attributed to dark matter in the Newton-Einstein standard gravity, wide binary dynamics cannot be affected by it even if it existed. The standard gravity simply breaks down in the weak acceleration limit in accordance with this MOND framework.

-

-    Anomalies in Mercury's orbits observed in the nineteenth century eventually led to Einstein's general relativity.   Now, anomalies in wide binaries require a new theory extending general relativity to the low acceleration MOND limit.

-

-    Despite all the successes of Newton's gravity, general relativity is needed for relativistic gravitational phenomena such as black holes and gravitational waves. Likewise, despite all the successes of general relativity, a new theory is needed for MOND phenomena in the weak acceleration limit. The weak-acceleration catastrophe of gravity may have some similarity to the ultraviolet catastrophe of classical electrodynamics that led to quantum physics.  Who knows?

-

-    Wide binary anomalies are a disaster to the standard gravity and cosmology that rely on dark matter and dark energy concepts. Because gravity follows MOND, a large amount of dark matter in galaxies (and even in the universe) are no longer needed.

-

-     If this anomaly is confirmed as a breakdown of Newtonian dynamics, and especially if it indeed agrees with the most straightforward predictions of MOND, it will have enormous implications for astrophysics, cosmology, and for fundamental physics at large.

-

-    The unprecedented accuracy of the “Gaia satellite” make his results sufficiently robust to qualify as a discovery.  With this test on wide binaries as well as our tests on open star clusters nearby the sun, the data now compellingly imply that gravitation is Milgromian rather than Newtonian. The implications for all of astrophysics are immense.

-

-    As these results show although dark matter is a central part of the standard cosmological model, it's not without its issues.  The idea of MoND was inspired by galactic rotation. Most of the visible matter in a galaxy is clustered in the middle, so you'd expect that stars closer to the center would have faster orbital speeds than stars farther away, similar to the planets of our solar system.

-

-     What we observe is that stars in a galaxy all rotate at about the same speed. The rotation curve is essentially flat rather than dropping off. The dark matter solution is that galaxies are surrounded by a halo of invisible matter argue that our gravitational model must be wrong.

-

-   At interstellar distances, the gravitational attraction between stars is essentially Newtonian. So rather than modifying general relativity they proposed modifying Newton's universal law of gravity.    Rather than the force of attraction as a pure inverse square relation, gravity has a small remnant pull regardless of distance. This remnant is only about 10 trillionths of a G, but it's enough to explain galactic rotation curves.

-

-   Just adding a small term to Newton's gravity means that you also have to modify Einstein's equations, as well. So MoND has been generalized in various ways, such as AQUAL, which stands for "a quadradic Lagrangian." Both AQUAL and the standard LCDM model can explain observed galactic rotation curves, but there are some subtle differences.

-

-   One difference between AQUAL and LCDM is in the rotation speeds of inner orbit stars vs. outer orbit stars. For LCDM, both should be governed by the distribution of matter, so the curve should be smooth. AQUAL predicts a tiny kink in the curve due to the dynamics of the theory. It's too small to measure in a single galaxy, but statistically, there should be a small shift between the inner and outer velocity distributions.

-

-    High-resolution velocity curves of 152 galaxies as observed in the “Spitzer Photometry and Accurate Rotation Curves” (SPARC) database found a shift in agreement with AQUAL. The data seems to support modified gravity over standard dark matter cosmology.

-

-    The result is exciting, but it doesn't conclusively overturn dark matter. The AQUAL model has its own issues, such as its disagreement with observed gravitational lensing by galaxies.

-

-    Astronomers have more work to do.  Stay in school!

-

August 9,  2023         MODIFIED  GRAVITY  - replace Dark Matter?                4114

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Thursday, August 10, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment