Wednesday, November 29, 2023

4246 - MILKY WAY GALAXY - new discoveries?

 

-   4246   -   MILKY WAY  GALAXY  -   new discoveries?     The supermassive black hole at the heart of our galaxy isn't just spinning, it's doing so at almost maximum speed, dragging anything near it along for the ride.\


-----------  4246 -   MILKY WAY  GALAXY  -   new discoveries?

-   Physicists calculated the rotational speed of the Milky Way's supermassive black hole, called Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), by using NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory to view the X-rays and radio waves emanating from outflows of material.

-

-   The spin speed of a black hole is defined as "a" and given a value from 0 to 1, with 1 being the maximum rotational speed to a particular black hole, which is a significant fraction of the speed of light.   The rotational speed of Sgr A* is between 0.84 and 0.96.  This is close to the top limit defined by a black hole's width.

-

-    Discovering that Sgr A* is rotating at its maximum speed has far-reaching implications for our understanding of black hole formation.   A black hole's spin is different from those of other cosmic objects. Whereas planets, stars and asteroids are solid bodies with physical surfaces, black holes are actually regions of space-time bounded by an outer nonphysical surface called the “event horizon”, beyond which no light can escape.

-

-   While the rotation of a planet or star is governed by the distribution of its mass, the rotation of a black hole is described by its angular momentum.  Due to the extreme gravitational forces near a black hole, the rotation causes spacetime to become highly curved and twisted, forming what is known as the “ergosphere”. This effect is unique to black holes and does not occur with solid bodies like planets or stars.

-

-   That means that when they spin, black holes literally twist up the very fabric of space-time and drag anything within the ergosphere along.  This phenomenon, called "frame dragging" or the "Lensing-Thirring effect," means that  to understand the way space around a black hole behaves, researchers need to know its spin. This frame dragging also gives rise to weird visual effects around black holes.

-

-    As light travels close to a rotating black hole, the rotation of spacetime causes the light's path to be curved or twisted.   This results in a phenomenon called “gravitational lensing”, where the light's trajectory is bent due to the gravitational influence of the rotating black hole.

-

-   The frame-dragging effect can lead to the formation of light rings and even the creation of the black hole's shadow. These are manifestations of the gravitational influence of black holes on light. The theoretical top speed of a black hole is determined by how it feeds on matter and thus how it grows.

-

-    As matter falls into a black hole, it increases the black hole's spin, but there's a limit to how much angular momentum it can possess.   Another factor is the mass of the black hole. More massive black holes have a higher gravitational pull, making it more challenging to increase their spin.   Additionally, the interaction between the black hole and its surroundings, such as accretion disks, can transfer angular momentum and affect the black hole's spin.

-

-    This could explain why Sgr A*, with its mass equivalent to around 4.5 million suns, has a spin speed between 0.84 and 0.96 but the rapidly feeding supermassive black hole at the heart of galaxy M87 is spinning at between 0.89 and 0.91, despite having the mass of 6.5 billion suns.

-

-    The latest image from the James Webb Space Telescope shows a portion of the dense center of our galaxy in unprecedented detail, including never-before-seen features astronomers have yet to explain. The star-forming region, Sagittarius C (Sgr C), is about 300 light-years from the Milky Way's central supermassive black hole, Sagittarius A*.

-

-   There's never been any infrared data on this region with the level of resolution and sensitivity we get with Webb, so we are seeing lots of features here for the first time. Webb reveals an incredible amount of detail, allowing us to study star formation in this sort of environment in a way that wasn't possible previously.

-

-   The cloud the protostars at the center of our galaxy are emerging from so dense a region that the light from stars behind it cannot reach Webb, making it appear less crowded when it is one of the most densely packed areas of the image.

-

-    Webb's NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) instrument captured large-scale emission from ionized hydrogen surrounding the lower side of the dark cloud, shown cyan-colored in the image. This is the result of energetic photons being emitted by young massive stars, but the vast extent of the region shown by Webb is something of a surprise that bears further investigation.

-

-    The galactic center is a crowded, tumultuous place. There are turbulent, magnetized gas clouds that are forming stars, which then impact the surrounding gas with their outflowing winds, jets, and radiation.

-

-    Around 25,000 light-years from Earth, the galactic center is close enough to study individual stars with the Webb telescope, allowing astronomers to gather unprecedented information on how stars form and how this process may depend on the cosmic environment, especially compared to other regions of the galaxy. Are more massive stars formed in the center of the Milky Way, as opposed to the edges of its spiral arms?

-

-    Massive stars are factories that produce heavy elements in their nuclear cores, so understanding them better is like learning the origin story of much of the universe.  The Milky Way's Black Hole is spinning as fast as it can.

-

-    Pick any object in the Universe, and it is probably spinning. Asteroids tumble end over end, planets and moons rotate on their axes, and even black holes spin. And for everything that spins, there is a maximum rate at which it can rotate. The black hole in our galaxy is spinning at nearly that maximum rate.

-

-    For objects such as the Earth, the maximum rate of rotation is defined by its surface gravity. The weight we feel while standing on the Earth isn’t just due to the gravitational pull of the Earth. Gravity pulls us toward the center of our world, but the Earth’s rotation also tends to fling us outward away from the Earth.

-

-    This “centrifugal” force is tiny, but it does mean that your weight at the equator is just slightly less than it is at the north or south pole.  With our 24-hour day, the weight difference between the equator and pole is just 0.3%. But Saturn’s 10-hour day means that the difference is 19%.

-   

-    So much centrifugal force that that Saturn bows outward a bit at its equator. Now imagine a planet spinning so fast that the difference was 100%. At that point, the gravitational pull of the planet and its centrifugal force at the equator would cancel out. If the world were to spin any faster. it would fly apart. It would likely fly apart at an even slower spin rate, but this is clearly the maximum rate of rotation.

-

-   For black holes, things are a bit different. Black holes aren’t objects with a physical surface. They aren’t made of material that could fly apart. But they still have a maximum rate of rotation. Black holes are defined by their tremendous gravity, which distorts space and time around them. The event horizon of the black hole marks the point of no return for nearby objects, but it isn’t a physical surface.

-

-    The rotation of a black hole also isn’t defined by the spin of physical mass, but rather by the twisting of spacetime around the black hole. When objects such as the Earth spin, they twist space around themselves very slightly. It’s an effect known as frame dragging.

-

-    The spin of a black hole is defined by this frame-dragging effect. Black holes spin without the physical rotation of matter, just a twisted spacetime structure. This means there is an upper limit to this spin due to the inherent properties of space and time.

-

-     In Einstein’s equations of general relativity, the spin of a black hole is measured by a quantity known as “a”, where a has to be between zero and one. If a black hole has no spin, then a = 0, and if it is at its maximal rotation, then a = 1.

-

-    This brings us to a new study on the rotation of the supermassive black hole in our galaxy. The team looked at radio and X-ray observations of the black hole to estimate its spin. Due to the frame-dragging of spacetime near the black hole, the spectra of light from material near it is distorted. By observing the intensity of light at various wavelengths, the team was able to estimate the amount of spin.

-  

-   What they found was that the a value for our black hole is between 0.84 and 0.96, which means it’s rotating incredibly fast. At the upper range of the estimated rotation, it would be rotating at nearly the maximal rate. This is even higher than the spin parameter of the black hole in M87, where a is estimated to be between 0.89 and 0.91.

-

-    A galactic archaeology project has revealed the Milky Way’s neighboring galaxy, Andromeda, has looked at the chemical compositions of stars in Andromeda, which is the closest large galaxy to our own. The goal was to reconstruct its past.

-

-    After examining the abundance of elements in Andromeda and considering the fact this galaxy possesses both planetary nebulas ,  gas and dust blown away from dying low-mass stars and red giant stars, the researchers concluded that  it experienced dramatic and forceful formation.

-

-    The creation of the Andromeda galaxy was more turbulent than the origins of the Milky Way. The astronomers theorize that Andromeda initially experienced a burst of intense star formation that created the galaxy's foundation, with a secondary period of star birth happening between 2 billion and 4.5 billion years ago.

-

-    Although in many ways Andromeda is similar to our own Milky Way , it's a similarly-sized, spiral disc galaxy,  new research confirms that its history is far more intense and dramatic, with bursts of activity forming stars in abundance, and two distinct eras of star formation.

-

-   The idea is the second starburst period was triggered when the gas-rich Andromeda collided and merged with another galaxy, also replete with gas, in an event that astronomers call a "wet merger." The influx of gas in such a merger acts as the fuel to kick-start yet more bouts of star formation.

-

-    Andromeda isn’t finished clashing with other galaxies   Scientists have long thought that Andromeda experienced collisions and mergers with other galaxies in its past, thanks to the positions and motions of its individual stars,  the stars started out in another galaxy.

-

-    By looking at the chemical compositions of these stars, the team found two distinct signatures in the disc components of Andromeda. One family of stars appeared to have ten times more oxygen than iron, while the other group appeared to have similar amounts of both elements. This adds a new dimension to the understanding of this galaxy’s past, revealing more about the nature of the suggested collision and its effect on Andromeda’s stellar population.

-

-    By analyzing the chemical abundance in different ages of stars in Andromeda, we can bring to life its history and better understand its origins.   Andromeda likely has a history of violence  and  its future looks to be equally turbulent, with our own galaxy set to become part of its neighbor’s chaotic existence.

-  

-    This is because the Milky Way and Andromeda are currently on a collision course, set to slam into each other in around 4.5 billion years. This titanic collision will give both galaxies a severe makeover, wiping out the distinctive arms of both spiral galaxies.

-

-    The stellar population of the Milky Way and Andromeda, which is currently about 2.5 billion light years away from us, will not slam into each other but will survive to be thrown into new orbits around a new galactic center. Our own star, the sun, and the entire solar system are likely to be pushed away from the new galactic core, moving toward the outskirts of the resultant new galaxy.

-

-   Oxygen is one of the so-called alpha-elements produced by massive stars. The others are neon, magnesium, silicon, sulfur, argon, and calcium.   Oxygen and argon have been measured with planetary nebulae, but Andromeda is so far away that the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) is required to measure other elements, including iron.

-

-

November 29, 2023        MILKY WAY  GALAXY  -   new discoveries?          4246

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, November 29, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4245 - SPACE GRAVITY - how fast is?

 

-    4245   - SPACE GRAVITY  -  how fast is?     How can the universe expand faster than light travels?   It seems like it should be illegal.   The supreme iron law of the universe is that nothing can go faster than the speed of light.  Nothing further needs to be said about the issue, but here is more!

-


--------------------------  4245  -   SPACE GRAVITY  -  how fast is?

-

-   Some galaxies are moving away from us faster than the speed of light. What gives?

-

-    We live in an expanding universe. Every day the galaxies get farther apart from each other, on average. There are slight motions on top of that general expansion, leading to instances such as the Andromeda Galaxy heading on a collision course for the Milky Way. But in general, in the biggest of pictures, the galaxies are getting farther away from each other.

-

-   The objects  close to you would appear to move away with some speed, but the farther objects would appear to move faster.   The apparent stretch of space changes with distance.

-

-     Edwin Hubble was the first to measure the expansion rate. The number he got was way wrong.  The more modern value is 68 kilometers per second per megaparsec.   One megaparsec is 1 million parsec, which is 3.26 million light-years.

-

-    It means that if you look at a galaxy 1 megaparsec away, it will appear to be receding away from us at 68 km/s. If you look at a galaxy 2 megaparsec away, it recedes at 136 km/s. Three megaparsec away?  204 km/s. And on and on: for every megaparsec, you can add 68 km/s to the velocity of the far-away galaxy.

-

-    So it's easy enough to compute: At some point, at some obscene distance, the speed tips over the scales and exceeds the speed of light, all from the natural, regular expansion of space.

-

-   The movement of that galaxy can be interpreted as a "speed": you can measure the distance to it, wait awhile and measure it again. Distance moved divided by time equals speed.  The speed you measure can be faster than light.

-

-    The notion of the absolute speed limit comes from “special relativity”, but who ever said that special relativity should apply to things on the other side of the universe? That's the domain of a more general theory,  “general relativity”.

-

-   In special relativity, nothing can move faster than light. But special relativity is a local law of physics. In other words, it's a law of local physics. That means that you will never, ever watch a rocket ship blast faster than the speed of light. Local motion, local laws.

-

-   But a galaxy on the far side of the universe? That's the domain of general relativity, and general relativity says that galaxy can have any speed it wants, as long as it stays way far away.

-

-     Concepts like a well-defined "velocity" make sense only in local regions of space. You can only measure something's velocity and actually call it a "velocity" when it's nearby and when the rules of special relativity apply. Stuff  far away, like the galaxies doesn't count as a “velocity” in the way that special relativity cares about.

-

- Another misintrepretation is that antimatter falls down, not up.  Physicists have shown that, like everything else experiencing gravity, antimatter falls downwards when dropped.

-

-    This outcome is not surprising.  A difference in the gravitational behavior of matter and antimatter would have huge implications for physics.  Because gravity is much weaker than other ubiquitous forces such as electrostatic attraction or magnetism, separating it from other effects in the laboratory is a delicate affair. 

-

-   Gravity is just so weak, you really have to be careful to get a good measurement.

Experiments aim to test whether gravity acts with the same strength on antimatter as it does on matter. Any tiny discrepancies could help to solve one of the biggest problems in physics. How the Universe came to be made almost exclusively of matter, even though equal amounts of matter and antimatter should have arisen from the Big Bang.

-

-    In the world of antimatter, atomic nuclei are made of negatively charged antiprotons, orbited by positively charged antielectrons, or positrons. According to the standard model of particle physics, however, the opposite charges should be pretty much the only difference: particles and antiparticles should have nearly all the same properties.

-

-    Experiments have confirmed that positrons and antiprotons have the same masses as their matter counterparts, within the limits of experimental errors.

-

-    According to Einstein’s general theory of relativity, all objects of the same mass should weigh the same.  They should experience exactly the same gravitational acceleration.

-

-    What would happen when the neutral atom antihydrogen was dropped.   It’s almost impossible to do an experiment with a charged particle, so antihydrogen is the perfect candidate.

-

-    Antimatter particles are routinely created in laboratories.  Most particles produced by high-energy particle collisions are made in pairs, one particle of matter and its antiparticle. But it is hard to get antiparticles to combine into antiatoms because antimatter particles are typically very short-lived.

-

-     When an antiparticle meets a particle, they both cease to exist and turn back into energy, in a process called annihilation. In a world made primarily of matter, this makes it hard for antimatter particles to find each other.

-

-    CERN is currently the only place in the world where antihydrogen can be made. It has an accelerator that makes antiprotons from high-speed proton collisions, and a ‘decelerator’ called “ELENA” that slows them down enough to be held for further manipulation.

-

-     Several different experiments feed off ELENA in CERN’s antimatter research hall. “ALPHA-g” is one of them, and it combines antiprotons with positrons it collects from a radioactive source.

-

-    After making a thin gas of thousands of antihydrogen atoms, researchers pushed it up a 3-meter-tall vertical shaft surrounded by superconducting electromagnetic coils. These can create a magnetic ‘tin can’ to keep the antimatter from coming into contact with matter and annihilating.

-

-    Next, the researchers let some of the hotter antiatoms escape, so that the gas in the can got colder, down to just 0.5 °C above absolute zero and the remaining antiatoms were moving slowly.

-

-   The researchers then gradually weakened the magnetic fields at the top and bottom of their trap and detected the antiatoms using two sensors as they escaped and annihilated. When opening any gas container, the contents tend to expand in all directions, but in this case the antiatoms’ low velocities meant that gravity had an observable effect: most of them came out of the bottom opening, and only one-quarter out of the top.

-

-    To make sure that this asymmetry was due to gravity, the researchers had to control the strength of the magnetic fields to a precision of at least one part in 10,000.

-

-    The results were consistent with the antiatoms experiencing the same force of gravity as hydrogen atoms would. The error margins are still large, but the experiment can at least conclusively rule out the possibility that antihydrogen falls upwards.

-

-   In 2010 scientists succeed at trapping antihydrogen for an extended time, and starting in 2016 they were able to measure how the antiatoms absorb light. But the gravity experiment required a new level of sophistication.

-

-   No one would have expected antimatter to fall up because antiprotons are made of antiquarks, but these only constitute less than 1% of an antiproton’s mass: the rest is the energy that keeps them together.   Any violation, if it exists, cannot be over 1%.  Going beyond that would subvert not only the theory of gravitation, but also the standard model of particle physics.

-

-    A third CERN experiment, called “AEgIS”, will attempt to measure the gravitational force on a beam of antihydrogen atoms in the absence of any magnetic fields. They will aim to reach 1% precision by first making positive antihydrogen ions (antihydrogen with an extra positron), which will help to cool the gas down to a fraction of a degree above absolute zero.

-

-    Other efforts aim to measure gravity acting on positronium, a short-lived particle made of one electron and one positron orbiting each other. ALPHA-g itself plans to aim for 1% precision by letting antihydrogen atoms bump up and down and form a quantum superposition with themselves.

-

-    The science goes on to understand the world we live in.  How does it work?

-

-

November 27, 2023                  4242

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Wednesday, November 29, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Tuesday, November 28, 2023

4244 - MOON - what is a Beaver Moon?

 

-    4244  -  MOON  -  what is a Beaver Moon?  -   The full moon of 2023 will shine on Monday, November, 27, in the form of the “Beaver Moon”.    At the exact moment of the full moon, the moon will be 180 degrees away from the sun as viewed from the center of Earth, shining brightly in the constellation of Taurus, the Bull.


-------------------------  4244  -   MOON  -  what is a Beaver Moon?

-    Following the Beaver Moon, the illuminated face of the moon will start to recede, which astronomers call “waning”. This progression of darkness across the lunar face will continue until the completely dark new moon on December 12.

-

-    This final new moon of 2023 will also signal the beginning of this year's final lunar cycle leading up to the last full moon of 2023, December's Cold Moon, which rises on December 26.

-

-   According to Farmer's Almanac, the name for November's full moon, the Beaver Moon, arises from the fact these animals have gathered sufficient food stores and begin to take shelter in their lodges at this time of year. When the food trade was active in North America, the name also referred to this being the time to trap beavers and recover their thick winter pelts.

-

-    Alternative names for November's full moon in Native American and Colonial American tradition refer to the activity of animal life at this time of year. Colorful examples are Tlingit's name, the Digging Moon, which refers to the foraging of animals for fallen nuts and bears digging their dens.

-

-     The Deer Rutting Moon, in the Dakota and Lakota tradition, refers to the time deer seek mates, and the Algonquin people's Whitefish Moon moniker describes the spawning of fish at this time.

-

-   Cree and Assiniboine peoples call the November full moon the Frost Moon, while the Anishinaabe tradition refers to it as the Freezing Moon.

-

-    The chilly names for the full moon continue into December, with the final full moon of the year referred to as Cold Moon most commonly, arising from native North American tribes and even in Celtic culture.

-

-      December's full moon is also called the Winter Moon by the Shoshone tribe, the Dead of Winter Moon by the Alaskan Inupiat people, and the Snow Moon by the Cherokee and Haida tribes, indicating the first fall of snow.

- 

-

November 28, 2023           MOON  -  what is a Beaver Moon?        4244

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, November 28, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4243 - MOON - how old is the moon?

 

-    4243   -  MOON  -   how old is the moon?     An object the size of Mars crashed into the Earth over 4 billion years ago, creating a cloud of debris that formed the Moon. When the Apollo astronauts landed on the lunar surface, they found and brought back Moon rocks that helped pinpoint when this event happened.


-------------------------  4243  -  MOON  -   how old is the moon?

-    See Review 4242 for discoveries of the oldest galaxies.  This Review is about the age of the Moon.  And, the  Moon is 40 million years older than we thought.

-

-    A new study of crystals in the lunar samples pushed that event back even further , about 40,000,000 years earlier than previous estimates, setting the Moon’s formation to about 4.46 billion years old.  This is not long after the Earth formed.

-

-    Scientists used an “atom-probe tomography” facility to study Moon rocks and dust collected during the Apollo 17 mission in 1972. This facility allowed them to perform an improved form of radiometric dating.

-

-    Radiometric dating calculates an age in years for geologic materials by measuring the presence of a short-life radioactive element, such as carbon-14, or a long-life radioactive element plus its decay time. 

-

-    The facility, which includes a sensitive high-resolution ion microprobe, allowed the researchers to look at every atom in the zircon crystals and count how many of the atoms have undergone radioactive decay. When an atom undergoes decay, it sheds protons and neutrons to transform into different elements.

-

-    Uranium decays into lead, and zircon contains the radioactive element uranium. Uranium has been called “the clock within zircon” because it converts to the element lead at a specific rate over a long span of time.

-

-    This study is a testament to immense technological progress we have made since 1972 when the last crewed Moon mission returned to Earth.   These samples were brought to Earth half-a-century ago, but only today do we have the necessary tools to perform microanalysis at the requisite level, including “atom-probe tomography.”

-

-   When the Mars-size object hit the Earth and formed the Moon, the energy of the impact melted the rock that eventually became the Moon’s surface.  When the surface was molten like that, zircon crystals couldn’t form and survive.  So, any crystals on the Moon’s surface must have formed after this lunar magma ocean cooled. Otherwise, they would have been melted and their chemical signatures would be erased.

-

-    Apollo 17 was the sixth and final Apollo mission to land people on the Moon and was the only Apollo mission to have a trained geologist among its crew. Lunar module pilot and geologist Harrison Schmitt joined Commander Gene Cernan and Command Module Pilot Ron Evans. The astronauts landed on the southeastern rim of the Serenitatis Basin, known as Taurus-Littrow. Schmitt and Cernan collected about 243 pounds of soil and rock samples that were brought back to Earth for further study. Previous studies concluded that the samples from Apollo 17 came from the oldest known impact craters on the Moon.

-

-    For the new experiment on these samples, a small portion of the lunar sample was sharpened into a very sharp tip, using a focused ion beam microscope.  UV lasers evaporate atoms from the surface of that tip. The atoms travel through a mass spectrometer, and how fast they move provides evidence of how heavy they are, which in turn tells the scientists what the atoms are made of.

-

-   These crystals are the oldest known solids that formed after the giant impact.   Because we know how old these crystals are, they serve as an anchor for the lunar chronology.

-

-   Radiometric dating works somewhat like an hourglass.   In an hourglass, sand flows from one glass bulb to another, with the passage of time indicated by the accumulation of sand in the lower bulb.    Radiometric dating works similarly by counting the number of parent atoms and the number of daughter atoms they have transformed to. The passage of time can then be calculated because the transformation rate is known.

-

-   A previous study suggested this older age of the lunar surface.  They used the atom probe tomography facility at Northwestern to get a nano-scale look at the lunar samples, which confirmed the age of this oldest known lunar crystal

-

-    This is an anchor point for so many questions about the Earth. When you know how old something is, you can better understand what has happened to it in its history.  It stabilizes the Earth’s rotational axis, it’s the reason there are 24 hours in a day, it’s the reason we have tides.

-

-    Without the Moon, life on Earth would look different. It’s a part of our natural system that we want to better understand, and this study provides a tiny puzzle piece in that whole picture.  Maybe we can find out how old Duane is.  Get a sample from his coffee cup.

-

-

November 27, 2023         MOON  -   how old is the moon?             4242

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Tuesday, November 28, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Monday, November 27, 2023

4242 - GALAXIES - oldest ever seen?

 

-    4242   -  GALAXIES  -  oldest ever seen?     James Webb Space Telescope has discovered a cosmic 'peanut' and 'fluff ball' that happen to be two of the four oldest galaxies in the known universe.  The second- and fourth-most distant galaxies ever seen (UNCOVER z-13 and UNCOVER z-12) have been confirmed using the James Webb Space Telescope’s Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam).


--------------------------  4242  -   GALAXIES  -  oldest ever seen?

-    They are shown as near-infrared wavelengths of light that have been translated to visible-light colors.    These are two of the oldest and most distant galaxies in the known universe, dating to just 330 million years after the Big Bang.

-

-    These ancient objects, estimated to be the second and fourth most distant galaxies ever detected, just shy of the earliest known galaxy, named JADES-GS-z13-0, which was previously spotted by JWST at around 300 million years after the dawn of time. The light from all three of these immensely old galaxies traveled for more than 13 billion years to reach JWST's lens.

-

-    The light from these galaxies is ancient, about three times older than the Earth.   It is only by their light that we can begin to understand the exotic physics that governed the galaxies near the cosmic dawn.  This proves that photons do not decay with time.

-

-    The early universe was crammed with stars 10,000 times the size of our sun.  The newfound galaxies are in a region of space called Pandora's Cluster, or Abell 2744 — an immense cluster of galaxies containing the equivalent mass of 4 trillion suns.

-

-   Galaxy clusters are the most massive structures in the universe bound by gravity. However, the two newfound ancient galaxies weren't discovered within the cluster itself.

-

-     They were discovered behind it, thanks to a natural magnifying effect called gravitational lensing. First predicted to exist by Albert Einstein, gravitational lensing occurs when an ultra-massive object curves the space around it, bending and magnifying light that passes nearby.

-

-   The Pandora Cluster's mass created a gravitational lens powerful enough to magnify the light of the two galaxies, despite their being located many billions of light-years behind Pandora.

-

-    The two ancient galaxies appear to be significantly bigger than other galaxies observed at the same point in cosmic history. The galaxies were big enough that the researchers could make out distinct shapes.

-

-    Previously discovered galaxies at these distances are point sources, they appear as a dot in our images.    But, one of ours appears elongated, almost like a peanut, and the other looks like a fluffy ball.

-

-    It is unclear if the difference in size is due to how the stars formed or what happened to them after they formed, but the diversity in the galaxy properties is really interesting.

-

-    The new galaxies join a growing list of extremely ancient objects detected by JWST. Recently, the telescope revealed the oldest active supermassive black hole in the known universe, dating to about 450 million years after the Big Bang, as well as the oldest evidence of organic molecules, which was located in a cloud roughly 12.3 billion light-years from Earth.

-

-

November 27, 2023         GALAXIES  -  oldest ever seen?         4242

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, November 27, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

4241 - UNIVERSE - on a single graph!

 

-    4241   -  UNIVERSE  -  on a single graph!   Everything in the known Universe fits in this one graph. Even the impossible stuff.  The Universe has physical constants, such as the force of gravity that define everything. If these constants were any different, our Universe would look quite different.


---------------------  4241  -   UNIVERSE  -  on a single graph!

 When you consider the types of objects that exist in our Universe, from quarks and bacteria to fleas and superclusters, different forces dominate their existence.

-

-    A fascinating new graph plots everything in the known Universe and shows us what’s possible. It also shows what types of objects are prohibited by the laws of physics as we understand them.

-

-   The graph's thought experiment will get people to think about all the unanswered questions we have about the Universe.  The graph provides an overview of the thermal history of the Universe and the sequence of objects ( protons, planets, and galaxies) that condensed out of the background as the Universe expanded and cooled.

-

-    The Universe followed a general process that has happened multiple times as the hot dense universe cooled down as it expanded and condensed into various objects.   As the hot dense plasma of quarks and gluons cooled, it condensed into protons and neutrons. And as the hot dense plasma of protons and electrons cooled down it condensed into atoms, known as “recombination”.

-

-    This general process of “condensation,” is underappreciated as a simple way to understand what happened as the universe cooled: the hot dense big bang condensed into objects.

-

-    The middle strip in the middle section marked “BBN” or Big Bang Nucleosynthesis has atoms and elements, with the atomic densities of things like bacteria, fleas, humans, whales, the Earth, Sun and stars.

-

-   Enlarged section of the graph is showing the astronomical objects in the Universe.

In it, we see main sequence stars, which when they run out of fuel, become white dwarfs, which eventually collapse into neutron stars, which eventually collapse into black holes. On this plot, black holes exist on the dark black line.

-

-    Returning to the main graph we see that the Hubble radius, which is the entire observable Universe, in on that line.   Does that mean the whole universe is a black hole? This graph seems to imply this might be true!

-

-  Is it plausible that what we see from inside our Universe is simply the result of being inside a black hole that formed from some parent Universe?

-

-    Contrary to common knowledge, black holes are not the densest things in the universe.   The bigger the black hole, the less dense it is.   That is why the whole universe could be a huge low-density black hole.

-

-    Another interesting fact is when you trace the evolution of the whole universe back along this black hole line, all the way back to the beginning of the universe,  the plot suggests that the initial condition of the universe was an “instanton”,  the smallest possible black hole, an object that instantaneously evaporates (through Hawking radiation) and explodes at the highest possible temperature (the Planck temperature: 10^32 K).

-

-   The area of the graph that might be most intriguing are two triangular regions that are ‘forbidden.’   This is where objects cannot be denser than black holes, or are so small, quantum mechanics blurs the very nature of what it really means to be a singular object.

-

-   The boundaries of the plots and what lies beyond them are also a major mystery, as the triangular regions forbidden by general relativity and quantum uncertainty and help navigate the relationship between gravity and quantum mechanics.

-

-    The plot is an explicit and highly conventional extrapolation into very speculative territory.   This graph should help both students and experts articulate some very profound questions that we don’t know the answers to.  Keep studying you kids! 

-

-

November 26, 2023           UNIVERSE  -  on a single graph?             4241

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Monday, November 27, 2023  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

Sunday, November 26, 2023

4239 - EINSTEIN'S SPACETIME

 

-    4239   -  EINSTEIN'S  SPACETIME  -    In Einstein’s famous theory of relativity the concepts of immutable space and time aren’t just put aside, they’re rejected. Space and time are now woven into a coexisting fabric.  We live in a four-dimensional universe. Space and time alone cease to exist; only the union of those dimensions remains, “spacetime”.


------------------------------  4239  -   EINSTEIN'S  SPACETIME

-   This is what physicists give as a single word: “spacetime”. Take four pens from your desk at work. Start with two and make a cross on your desk, so that they are sitting perpendicular two each other. Now add a third pen and position it so that it’s perpendicular to both of the first two. To do this you can no longer let the pencils sit on the desk, which is a two-dimensional surface. You have to hold our contraption in the air, which is a part of the three-dimensional world that we’re used to.

-

-   But we don’t live in a merely three-dimensional world. Take your fourth pen and pierce it through the other three pens so that it’s perfectly perpendicular to all of them. And no angles less than 90 will do.

-

-   You can’t. There are only three spatial dimensions. And beyond that, you can’t even think of a fourth spatial dimension, because our brains evolved in a three-dimensional world.

-

-   But while you can’t hold in your mind the concept of a fourth dimension, you can experience it. The flow of time from past to future sits as its own dimension. You, holding your odd arrangement of pens, spans the dimension of time from the moment you first put it together until it all falls apart. For that duration, you created a four-dimensional piece of sculpture.

-

-   Physicists bind the three spatial dimensions and singular temporal dimension into the unified framework of “spacetime”. In the physics of Newton, that spacetime is the stage, and we the objects and contents of the universe are the actors. We hit our marks and say our lines, and the stage provides the background on which we perform our interactions. We know where the other actors are based on that same stage.  They are on their marks saying their lines at the appointed cues.

-

-   But in general relativity, the stage itself becomes the starring actor. To make a theory of gravity compatible with the relativity of space and time (now spacetime), Einstein realized that gravity is not a force at all, at least not of the kind envisioned by Newton.

-

-   Spacetime is not a fixed stage, but a flexible membrane that suffuses the entirety of existence. It is a thing, an object and entity in its own right, a dynamical actor in the cast of characters in the universe. The universe consists of the usual assortment of particles and radiation and all their wonderful interactions, and those interactions don’t happen on top of spacetime but along with spacetime.

-

-   Mass and energy (which do not need to be strictly separated, as they are now regarded as equivalent thanks to Einstein’s special theory) change the shape of spacetime in their vicinity. You, reading this very text, are an entity in the universe, a thriving bundle of matter. You have mass and you have energy. The spacetime within you, throughout you, and near you is now distorted thanks to that mass and energy. Space and time are changed thanks to your existence.

-

-   And the rest of the universe responds. If we imagine an infinitely tiny particle traveling on a trajectory near you, we can ask how that particle responds to your presence. In the language of Newton we would say that your body exerts a gravitational field, an invisible influence, and that the particle responds to that invisible influence by way of the sensation of a gravitational force, which changes its direction.

-

-    But in the language of Einstein there are no forces, no invisible strings. There is only spacetime and spacetime alone. In Einstein’s radical reevaluation of gravity, all objects travel in straight lines, always and forever. But the spacetime that those objects must traverse bends beneath them.

-

-   A hiker making their way from one waypoint to another may travel in a straight line according to a map and according to their feet, which are always placed directly in front of one another with every step, but must follow the bends and curves (not to mention the gnarled tree roots) along the trail, lest they get lost in the wilderness.

-

-   And so objects, test masses, planets, beams of light, always travel in straight paths, but “straight” only in the sense that every step forward is always placed directly in front of the previous. The spacetime underneath and around those objects bends, and so too does the path the object takes.

-

-    This is gravity, according to Einstein. Mass and energy bend the shape of spacetime, and the bending of spacetime becomes an actor, affecting the paths and motions of everything else. With this awakening of gravitational insight, Einstein was able to successfully marry his concept of special relativity, that there are no fixed, universal standards of reference, with the gravitational force.

-

-     Not even spacetime itself is immune from the relativistic effects of differing viewpoints, and that mutation of spacetime gives rise to our experience of gravity.

-

-

November 25, 2023             EINSTEIN'S  SPACETIME                 4239

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Sunday, November 26, 2023  ---------------------------------