Saturday, February 29, 2020

THINKING - seeing with new eyes?

-  2643  -  THINKING  -   seeing with new eyes?  Objectivity is as important in communication as clarity is.  There is always more information than truth.  Only a broader perspective can lead to a greater intelligence.  Read more to learn and to consider more. Words express thoughts and connotative words express opinions. 
-
-
-
---------------------   2643  -  THINKING  -  seeing with new eyes?
-
-    You may think thinking is hard, but “seeing” is harder.  Visualization uses more than ½ your brain.    Your eyes take the pictures but your brain does the seeing. A lot of what we see is recognized because the image is already in memory.
-
-   Each sentence deserves thought as learning requires digesting these ideas.  It is brain building with new thoughts.
-
-   Objectivity is as important in communication as clarity is.  There is always more information than truth.  Only a broader perspective can lead to a greater intelligence.
-
-   Visualization uses more than half your brain.  While you are sitting down reading this review your brain is using 33% of the oxygen that you breath.  When you are sitting and reading you are burning 33% of the calories your body has consumed.  A total of 17% of what you eat gets used by your brain.  And, if you worry a lot the percentage  goes up.
-
-  Speech uses a tiny area on one side of your brain.  In other words, it does not take much of your brain to be talking.  “Somehow, I knew that already“.  Hearing uses 10% of the size of the brain that seeing uses. “ Listening” has got to require a lot more brain than that 10%.
-
-  The conclusion is certain that seeing areas in the brain are bigger than thinking areas of the brain.  Which goes on to say that you cannot learn a lot more with your eyes closed. Amen.
-
-  Even moving arms and legs uses a surprisingly small part of the brain.  Interviewing most boxers and football players will allow you to draw this conclusion as well.
-
-  Computers work differently than the brain works.  Computers can do a lot of things better than the brain can.  One thing computers have not yet learned to do better is to see.  A computer has a central processing unit to control all its programming. 
-
-  The brain has trillions of central processing units.  Each can be working on whatever you are doing.  So, you can walk, talk, listen, smell, and think all at the same time.  Computers are trying to do the same think using many CPU’s and parallel processing.  When it comes to seeing, computers have a long way to go to catch up.
-
-  Your eyes take the pictures but you brain does the seeing.  The brain first picks out patterns of light.  It looks at edges and sudden changes in patterns.  Your brain can act on this information before it has an image.
-
-    Later the image reaches the visual part of the brain.  The positions and angles of edges are picked out first.  Color and things moving are picked out next.  The brain sees the same way you create a cartoon.  Once the cartoon is created in the brain it starts working on recognizing and understanding the different features it sees.
-
-  Facial expressions are recognized in a special area of the brain called the inferior temporal cortex.  It is just above the bony lump behind your ear.  Women are especially developed in this area. Ha! Ha!
-
-  Scientists think that recognition and memory are coded as patterns in a large group of brain cells.  Each brain cell is effectively a CPU.  It is only when a bunch of brain cells work together that recognition happens.
-
-  You brain gets a 2 dimensional pictures from the back of your retina but it works out a           3-dimensional image from the clues it gets in the light patterns.  You see in 2-D but you think in 3-D.    It helps that each eye gets a little different picture of the same image.  The brain creates a single 3-D image from the two 2-D images it receives.  It is called “stereopsis“.
-
-   Your brain can judge depth with one eye closed by moving your head from side to side.  This is why pigeons nod their heads when they walk or want depth perception.  Pigeons have eyes on the sides of their heads and get no stereopsis.  They need to do the head moving to see in 3-D.
-
-  Astronomers us stereopsis to measure distances to the stars.  They usually have to wait 6 months for the Earth to move to the other side of the Sun.  In this way their eyes, (telescopes), are getting images 186,000,000 miles apart.  By doing this they can use stereopsis to measure distance to stars out to 300 million lightyears.
-
-  A lot of what we see is recognized because the image is already in memory.  Reading is taking patterns of light and dark and transferring them into ideas, thoughts, and memories.  No wonder the brain is using so many calories.
-
-  Sperm whales have brains 5 times bigger than ours.  But, they are not smarter.  Maybe a better indicator would be brain size as a percentage of weight.  In that case, the mouse would be 50% smarter.  In conclusion, it is not the size of the brain it is how we use it that makes us smart.  My hope is that you just learned something.  But, don't stop there:
-
-  If you want your brain to learn more, exercise it.    Specific body building exercises are designed for specific muscles.  Brain building works exactly the same way on your intelligence.  The key to any exercise is habit.  Habit is the constant repetition that makes learning second nature. 
-
-  Everything we do is time consuming.  Brain building is one of the few things that is time repaying.  Self awareness is the first step in brain building.  Become aware of how you are thinking.
-
-   Learning is what allows us to make sense of the confusing array of stimuli that reaches us from every part of our environments.  As a human we are developed not just by heredity but by circumstances in our environments and how we deal with them.
-
-  The human is endowed with the ability to overcome and alter the circumstances around him.  What we do and how we act is the single most important factor in dealing with our environment.  We are the operator of the brain that we own. 
-
-  Intelligence is what makes us question, Why?  Ours is the only species that asks questions.   If you let others direct your thinking eventually you stop thinking for yourself.   Attempts to impress someone arises out of a lack in confidence. 
-
-  Thinking mathematically helps you separate emotion from intellect.  Mathematical reasoning is merely logical reasoning that is quantifiable. A logical approach to thinking mathematically is to first become aware of the problem, recognizing you have a problem. 
-
-  Secondly, define the problem, analyze it, and establish its parameters.  Thirdly, approach the problem rationally, from different angles, considering different options, hypothesize different solutions.  Then, select a solution and verify its effectiveness. 
-
-  A problem is an unsettled question.  A symptom is something that indicates the existence of something else.  If there is sufficient data in your premise, your conclusion will be valid.  But, beware, you can always lie with statistics.
-
-  Making assumptions is one of the most likely places for getting into trouble.  Insight is genius, it is a cognitive leap.  Genius is also a combination of motivation, hard work, and perseverance.  The harder you work the smarter you will get. 
-
-  Sometimes negatives may be as useful as positives in forming insight.  Intuition is common sense and sensitivity rolled into luck.  Accept the result of any mistake as part of the learning process.  The smartest learning process is sometimes only making mistakes fast enough, faster than your competitor. 
-
-  Objectivity is as important in communication as clarity is.  There is always more information than truth.  Only a broader perspective can lead to a greater intelligence.  Read more to learn and to consider more. Words express thoughts and connotative words express opinions. 
-
-  A common error is making a judgment based on a certain set of circumstances then clinging to that judgment after the circumstances have changed.
-
-  Perspective itself is actually a subset of objectivity.  To regard anyone else except yourself as responsible for your own judgment is to become a slave to circumstances.
-
-  The brain is the most valuable thing you have.  Use it wisely.  Hopefully it grew a little with this review.  Once the brain expands it never returns to its previous size.
-
-   February 29, 2020                                            2091                      2643                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 
--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------
-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com
 ---------------------          Saturday, February 29, 2020    --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EQUATIONS - my favorites?

`-  2642  -  EQUATIONS - my favorites? No one knows how mathematics can so well describing the natural Universe.  Were these equations invented or discovered?  I think they were invented by great men and women.  Nature has symmetry and invariance that is a quality of math.  So the two work together well to make new discoveries: 
-
-
---------------------   2642  -   EQUATIONS - my favorites?
-
-  My 10 favorite equations and the physicists who invented them. 
-
-------  (1)  Pythagoras’ equation for hypotenuse of a right triangle, ......  a^2+b^2 = c^2
-
-------  (2)  Newton’s equation for motion, .............  F = m*a
-
-------  (3)  Newton’s equation for gravity,..........    F  = G*M*m/r^2
-
-------  (4)  Euler’s equations for natural logarithm, “e“, and imaginary numbers, “square root of -1“.
-
-------  (5)  Clausis’ equation for entropy
-
-------  (6)  Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism
-
-------  (7)  Einstein’s equation for energy,............   E = m*c^2
-
-------  (8)  Einstein’s equation for gravity.
-
-------  (9)  Schrodinger’s equation for wave mechanics.
-
-------  (10)  Heisenberg’s equation for uncertainty , ..........  dp*dx > h/2*pi
-
-  No one knows how mathematics can so well describing the natural Universe.  Were these equations invented or discovered?  I think they were invented by great men and women.  Nature has symmetry and invariance that is a quality of math.  So the two work together well to make new discoveries: 
-
 -------  (1)   a^2+b^2 = c^2
-
-------  (2)   F = m*a
-
-------  (3)    F  = G*M*m/r^2
-
-------  (4)   e^i*pi  + 1  =  0
-
-------  (5)   S1 - S2 > 0
-
-------  (6)  Integral E* dA  =  Q / Eo,   and Integral B*dA  =  0
-
-------  (7)   E = m*c^2
-
-------  (8)  G  =  K ( T -1/2 gT)
-
-------  (9)   d^2U/dr^2  +  2(a+1) / r* dU/dr  +  2*m*(E + e^2/r)*U/K^2  =  0
-
-------  (10)  dp*dx > h/2*pi
-
-  Here are the famous physicists that invented these equations.  Note all from Europe, none from Asia or the United States.
-
-------  (1)  Pythagoras  (560 B.C.  -  480 B.C.)  Age 80,  Greece
-
-------  (2)  Sir Isaac Newton  (1642 -  1727)  Age 85,  Lincolnshire, England.
-
-------  (3)   Sir Isaac Newton  (1642 -  1727)  Age 85,  Lincolnshire, England.
-
-------  (4)  Leonhard Euler  (1707 - 1783)  Age76, Basel, Switzerland
-
-------  (5)  Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausis  ( 1822 - 1888) Age 66, Poland
-
-------  (6)  James Clerk Maxwell (1831 - 1879)  Age 48, Edinburgh, Scotland
-
-------  (7)  Albert Einstein  (1879- 1955), Age 76, Ulm, Germany
-
-------  (8)    Albert Einstein  (1879- 1955), Age 76, Ulm, Germany
-
-------  (9)  Erwin Schrodinger (1867 - 1961) Age 85, Vienna, Austria
-
-------  (10)  Werner Karl Messenger (1901 - 1976)  Age 75, Wurzburg, Germany
-
-------  (1)  Pythagoras  -  the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides, ...................  a^2+b^2 = c^2.
-
-  Pythagoras founded a cult of secrecy, asceticism, and mysticism on a Greek island.  He moved to Italy at age 31.  In his study of sound he discovered that a string of twice the length would emit a sound an octave lower.  He showed that the square root of 2 could not be equal to any conceivable fraction.  He thus discovered “irrational numbers“.
-
-    He discovered that the Evening Star and the Morning Star were the same star, the planet Venus.  There are over 50 proofs for the Pythagorean Theorem.  Below is one of those proofs.  The general equation is a^2 + b^2 - 2*a*b* cosine theta  = c^2.  When the angle theta is 90 degrees the cosine is zero and the equation for a right triangle becomes the simpler:    .........................  a^2 + b^2  =  c^2.
-
-  Start with a large square with equal sides.  Put a smaller square inside at a diagonal creating 4 right triangles around the smaller square and inside the larger square.  Label the hypotenuse “c” and the longer side “a” and the shorter side ”b” for each triangle.  The area of the smaller square on the inside is c^2.  The area of each right triangle is 1/2 a*b.  The total area of the four triangle is 2*a*b.  The area of the larger outside square is (a+b)^2. 
-
- The area of the small square plus the area of the 4 triangles  =  the area of the large square, Therefore:
-
-------------  c^2 + 2*a*b  =  (a+b)^2
-
------------   c^2 + 2*a*b  =  a^2 + 2*a*b  + b^2
-
-------------  c^2  =  a^2  +  b^2
-
-------  (2)  Newton’s equation for motion, F = m*a,   Force  =  mass * acceleration,  was applying math to the theories of Galileo.  Sir Isaac Newton  (1642 -  1727)  was born in  Lincolnshire, England, as a premature baby.  His mother remarried and left him with his grandparents to raise him.  They lived on a farm. 
-
-  In school he was always building mechanical things, kites, sundials, water clocks.  In 1650 he left school at age 8 to work on the farm.  His uncle recognized his talent and sent him to Cambridge in 1660 at age 18.  In 1665 he graduated and invented the “Binominal Theorem“,   A simple version is:
-
----------------  (x+y)^2  =  x^2 + 2xy + y^2
-
---------------  but, it gets much more complicated with larger exponents of a binomial and he invented this when he was 18:
-
-----------  (x+y)^n  =  (n:0)x^n   +  (n:1)*x^(n-1)* y  +  (n:2)*x^(n-2)* y^2  +  (n:3)*x^(n-3)* y^3  +  .................   (n:k)*x^(n-k)*y^k   .......................(n:n)y^n
-
-----------  where  :  (n:k)  =  n !  / k! * (n-k)!
-
-----------  where :    For example:
-
-----------  The exponent is 6, n+6 and,  5!  =  5 factorial  =  5*4*3*2*1  =  120
-
------------ (6:5)  =  720   / 120 * (6-5)  =  6
-
-----------  (x+y)^6  =  (6:0)x^6  + (6:1)*x^(6-1)* y +  (6:2)*x^(6-2)* y^2  + (6:3)*x^(6-3)*y^3   + (6:4)*x^(6-4)*y^4   +  (6:5)*x^(6-5)*y^5   +   (6:6)y^6
-
-----------  (x+y)^6  =  x^6  + 6x^5 y +  15*x^4 y^2  + 20*x^3 y^3   + 15*x^2 y^4   +  6*x^6 y^5  +  y^6
-
-------  (3)  Newton’s equation for gravity,  F  = G*M*m/r^2
-
-  At age 27 Newton became a professor at Cambridge.  He developed the equations for Galileo’s laws of motion.   He recognized that the force of gravity fell off according to the square of the distance from the center of Earth.  He used this to determine the equation for the orbit of the Moon inventing Calculus in the process. 
-
-  He used prisms to prove that white light was a composition of colors of the rainbow.  In 1668 he invented the reflecting telescope using a parabolic mirror.  In 1687 he published “ Mathematical Principles of Natural Philosophy”, and was elected to Parliament that same year.  1727 he was buried in Westminster Abbey at the age of 85
-
- Centripetal force is not a force at all it is simply a body resisting its natural inertia to move at the same speed in a straight line.  It does not want to go in a circle.  To make it you need a force to constantly accelerate it into changing directions.  A change in motion is proportional to the force applied.  The force causes  a change in momentum which is mass * velocity. 
-
--------------------  Force  =  d ( m*v)  =  m*dv  =  m*a
-
--------------------  F = ma
-
---------------------  where:   “m” is mass and acceleration “a” is a change in velocity, “dv”.
-
-------------------  For any action there is an equal and opposite reaction.  Action is mass * (length)^2 / time.  Action is Energy * time.
-
-------------------  The force of gravity is proportional to the masses and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.  “G” is the constant of proportionality.
-
--------------------  F  =  G*m*M / r^2
-
-------  (4)  Euler’s equations for natural logarithm, “e“, and imaginary numbers, “square root of -1“.   Leonhard Euler  (1707 - 1783)  Age 76, Basel, Switzerland.  He got is masters degree at University of Basel at age 16.  He went to the University of St. Petersburg, Russia, and became a math professor in 1733 at age 26.
-
-   In 1735 he lost his right eye trying to look at the Sun and invent a new method for time determination.  He published over 800 papers as a prolific mathematician.
-
-  The natural logarithm, “e” was invented from this math called the Taylor series”
-
-----------  e  =  2.718 .....  =  1 + 1 / 1! + 1/2! + 1/3! + 1/4! +  ...........................
-
-  Where:  the natural logarithm, “e”,  raised to a power, an exponent “x”,  3! = 3*2*1 = 6:
-
-----------  e^x  =  1+x + x^2/2! + x^3/3! + x^4/4! + .........................
-
-----------  sin x  =  x - x3/3! + x^5/5! - x^7/7!  +  .........................
-
-----------  cos x  =  1 -  x^2/2! + x4/4! - x^6/6! + .........................
-
------------  e^ix  =  cos x + i sinx
-
------------  e^i*pi  =  1  + i*pi  +  (i*pi)^2 / 2!  +  (i*pi)^3 / 3!  +  (i*pi)^4 / 4!  + ............. 
-
------------  where “i”  =  the square root of -1 and “x”  = pi, cos pi  =0  sin pi = -1
-
------------  e^ i*pi  =  -1
-
-  “e^ i*pi  + 1 =  0”  is considered the most famous equation in all of mathematics.  It has a natural logarithm, “e“, pi, an angle of 180 degrees, the imaginary number “i”, the square root of -1  and +1 and a zero.  There is nothing intuitive about this equation.
-
-------  (5)  Clausis’ equation for entropy.   Rudolf Julius Emmanuel Clausis  ( 1822 - 1888) Age 66, Poland.  The energy in the Universe is a constant number.  It can never increase or decrease.  However, the entropy in the Universe constantly increasing, it can never decrease.  Entropy constantly strives toward a  maximum.
-
------------------  (Entropy)  -  (Entropy at a later time)    >    0
-
-  At absolute zero it is not to the energy that becomes zero, but, the property  entropy becomes zero.  Atoms are still moving in quantum’s at absolute zero, but, entropy stops.  The capacity of any closed system to do work is called energy.  That portion of energy that is lost in the system is called entropy, lost energy. 
-
-  There is always lost energy, because no system is perfectly efficient.  The higher the entropy the less energy available to do work.  Entropy is maximum when the Universe is in temperature equilibrium.  Entropy is maximum randomness, maximum disorder.
-
-------  (6)  Maxwell’s equations for electromagnetism.  James Clerk Maxwell (1831 - 1879)  Age 48, Edinburgh, Scotland.  James was nicknamed “Daffy” in school because of his unusual mathematical talent.  He attended Cambridge in 1850, became a professor at Aberdeen in 1856.
-
-   In 1857 he proved mathematically that the rings of Saturn were composed of small particles.  He teamed up with Boltzman and proved that temperature was the average kinetic energy of atoms and that P*V /T for gases was a constant, pressure times volume / temperature was a constant, 8.314 per mole.
-
-    From his equations he worked out Avogadro’s number 6.023*10^23 molecules in every mole of material.    In 1864 he applied his math talent to Faraday’s magnetic lines of force and invented 4 equations that completely defined electromagnetic theory.
-
------------  Integral E* dA  =  Q / Eo,           and,                Integral B*dA  =  0
-
-------------  The 1st equation is Gauss’ Law for an electric field.  Calculus applied to an electric flux though a closed surface with an electric charge inside.  The 2nd equation is the same thing only applied to a magnetic monopole.  This equation proved that a monopole cannot exist.
-
-    The 3rd equation applied Amperes law relating a magnetic field to the current that creates it.  The 4th equation applied Faraday’s law relating an induced electric field generated by changing magnetic field.  Together these equations coupled electric and magnetic field that produced traveling waves of electromagnetic energy.
-
-    Only accelerating charges can produce propagating electromagnetic fields.  A changing electric field always produces a magnetic field which in turn induces another electric field.  The fields traveled at right angles to each other at the speed of light.  He proved light was actually electromagnetic energy.
-
-------  (7)  Einstein’s equation for energy, E = m*c^2.  Albert Einstein  (1879- 1955), Age 76, Ulm, Germany.  Einstein was the son of a chemical engineer.  He went to college in Switzerland , but failed to get a job as a professor upon graduation.  So, at age 22 he became a clerk in the patent office in Berne. 
-
-  In 1905 at age 26 he produced 5 papers that would turn physics on its head .  He did this with no money , no laboratory, using only his mind and pencil & paper.  The Special Theory of Relativity had his famous E=mc^2. 
-
-   Nothing in the Universe could be viewed at absolute rest.  No motion could be viewed as absolute motion, all motion is Relative. The speed of light was constant regardless of motion.
-
-   His paper on the photoelectric effect showed that light was “quanta” of energy and a function of wavelength.  The shorter the wavelength the more the energy.  He showed statistically that Brownian Motion was atoms in vibration using Maxwell and Boltzmans’ kinetic energy of molecules.
-
-  At age 34 he finally became a professor in Berlin in 1913.  In 1915 he came to Princeton, New Jersey, because the Nazi’s were coming to power and he was a Jew.   The same year he published his theory for gravity in General Relativity.   In 1921 he won the Nobel Prize for his photoelectric paper.  In 1940 he became a U.S. citizen.
-
-------  (8)  Einstein’s equation for gravity.  Time and energy could not be measured simultaneously.  In 1895  George Francis Fitzgerald ( 1851 - 1901) proposed that distance would contract with the velocity of motion enough to keep the speed of light constant.  The contraction of length with motion.
-
-    In 1902 Hendrik Antoon Lorentz (1853 - 1928) proposed that mass increases with velocity.  In 1905 Einstein pulled it all together.  He proposed that physics was the same everywhere regardless of Relative motion.   There was symmetry in the Universe whereby the laws of space-time were invariant. 
-
-  If force = mass * acceleration.  Then, acceleration = force / mass.  If the force was constant and the mass was constant then acceleration was constant.  According to Newton’s equations then acceleration would increase forever.
-
-   Einstein  proposed that acceleration which was the rate of change of velocity was limited because velocity could not exceed the speed of light.  A force causes motion and faster motion is a gain in Kinetic Energy and both mass and velocity must increase.
-
-  Einstein used Euler’s Binominal Theorem on Lorentz factor for this increase in mass with relativity.
-
--------------  mass at rest =  mass in motion * Lorentz Factor.
-
 Lorentz Factor  =  1 / square root ( 1 - v^2/c^2).  This could be written as:
( 1 - v^2/c^2)-.5.    And, this as the binomial form of :
-
-----------  (x+y)^n  =  (n:0)x^n  + (n:1)*x^(n-1)* y +  (n:2)*x^(n-2)* y^2  + (n:k)*x^(n-k)*y^k   ................................    (n:n)y^n
-
----------  Therefore:  ( 1 - v^2/c^2)-.5  =  1 + v^2 / 2c^2 + 3v^4 /8c^4 + .................
-
------------  m  =  m*( 1 - v^2/c^2)-.5
-
------------ where:   E = mc^2 ,       mass at rest  = E/c^2
-
-----------  where E/c^2  =  m *   (1 + v^2 / 2c^2 + 3v^4 /8c^4 + .................)
-
-----------  where  E/c^2  =  m   + m*v^2 / 2c^2 + 3m*v^4 /8c^4 + m*.................
-
-----------  where  E =  m c^2  + mv^2 / 2+ 3m*v^4 /8c^2  +   mc^2*.................
-
-----------  where:  Kinetic Energy = 1/2 mv^2
-
-----------  therefore:  E =  m c^2  + Kinetic Energy +   smaller terms that are usually ignored  .................)
-
To get total Energy you must add Energy with mass at rest according to mc^2 plus the kinetic energy due to relative motion.  Einstein’s equation for General Relativity  G = k(R - 1/2 g R)  where R is the geometry of space.  k(R -1/2 gR) is the distribution of energy and momentum.  Space is telling mass how to move and mass is telling space-time how to curve.
-
-------  (9)  Schrodinger’s equation for wave mechanics.  Erwin Schrodinger (1867 - 1961) Age 85, Vienna, Austria.  Here is his equation to define the structure of an atom in particle-waves.
-
-------------------  d^2U/dr^2  +  2(a+1) / r* dU/dr  +  2*m*(E + e^2/r)*U/K^2  =  0
-
 His picture of the atom has the electron orbiting around the nucleus is a standing wave that extends an exact number of electron wavelengths.  As long as the electron was a standing wave it did not accelerated in its orbit and did not emit electromagnetic radiation.  A charged particle under acceleration always emits electromagnetic energy.  A standing wave is not accelerating.
-
-  Schrodinger fled Germany under Hitler for England in 1940.  He became a professor in Dublin, Ireland and did not return to Vienna until 1956.  He died in 1961 at the age of 94.
-
-------  (10)  Heisenberg’s equation for uncertainty , dp*dx > h/2*pi.  Werner Karl Messenger (1901 - 1976)  Age 75, Wurzburg, Germany.    Heisenberg got his Phd form the University of Munich in 1923 at the age of 22.  He worked for Bohr, Sommerfeld, De Broglie and Schrodinger in trying to picture the atom.
-
-   He began using Schrodinger’s wave mechanics to explain the wavelengths of spectral lines.  Then Heisenberg invented matrix mechanics, the forerunner to Quantum Mechanics to get the math he wanted. 
-
-  In 1927 at the age of 26 he proposed that it was impossible to simultaneously determine both position and momentum of any body.  This law at the time completely destroyed the deterministic philosophy of the physics community.  He suggested the proton-neutron model for the atomic nucleus. With the number of neutrons being the Atomic Weight - the Atomic Number.
-
-    During World War II Heisenberg was in charge of the Nazi program to develop the atomic bomb  After the war he became director of the Max Planck Institute in Gottingen.  He got the Nobel Prize in 1932. 
-
------------------  dp*dx > h/2*pi
-
------------------  where:  h/2*pi is a constant  =  6.58*10^-16 electron volt * seconds.
-
------------------  The probability of momentum * probability of position  is always greater than Planck’s Constant.
-
-----------------  dp * dx > 10^-16 eV*seconds.

-  And, that is all I know about equations.  All stolen from these great minds that preceded me.
-
-  February 29, 2020                                    1076                              2642                                                                               
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 
--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------
-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com
 ---------------------          Saturday, February 29, 2020    --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FORCES - Control Everything?

-  2641  -  FORCES  -   Control Everything?    A force is a push or a pull.  So, a force is something that moves something.  Not really, no force is needed if something is moving at a constant velocity in a straight line.  But, a force is needed to accelerate something, to “change” its velocity, or, to change it from moving in a straight line
-
-
---------------------   2641  -  FORCES  -   Control Everything?
-
-  ENERGY is a force acting over a distance. (E = F*d)  So, to move something through space takes energy.  The force of gravity has potential energy that can quickly change into kinetic energy if you step off a cliff. 
-
-  The electric force is between electric charges.  The magnetic force is between magnetic poles.  But, combine these two and you get electromagnetic radiation which is light.  Then you have the next two nuclear forces holding atoms and molecules together.
-
- There are only four forces, or maybe three, or maybe more if new ones like Dark Energy get discovered to be a force..  Forces like energy are not continuous.  They seem like it, but, at the smallest level they occur in quantums, i.e. discrete steps. 
-
-  The force carrier for electromagnetic energy is the quantum called the “photon“.  The photon carries radio, microwave, infrared, light, ultraviolet, X-rays, and Gamma Rays.  The photon carries the force between electrons and protons that hold atoms together.
-
-   The photon is massless and can only exist when moving at 186,000 miles per second.  Gravity is thought to have a quantum called the graviton, but it is yet to be discovered beyond theory.  The graviton is also massless and travels at the speed of light.
-
-  The other two forces occur inside the nucleus of the atom.  The Strong Nuclear force holds protons and neutrons together in an area of 10^-15 meters.  Protons have positive charges and they should be repelling each other, but, the strength of the Strong force is 137 times stronger than the electric force so the nucleus holds together.
-
-   But, not always.  There is the Weak Nuclear force that is 1/100,000th the strength of the Strong Nuclear Force which is enough to randomly cause radioactive decay inside the nucleus changing neutrons into protons.
-
-  The force carriers for the Strong force are quantums called “Gluons“.  But, unlike photons that have unlimited range, the Gluons have a range of only 10^-15 meters, which is the diameter of the nucleus.
-
-    In the case of the Weak Nuclear force the range is even smaller, 10^-17 meters, or 0.1% the diameter of a proton.  The force carriers for the Weak force are quantums called “W and Z Bosons“.  Both the photon and graviton are massless.  The Gluons and W and Z Bosons are very massive and that is what limits their range.
-
-  The difference between the photon and the graviton is the photon has a “spin” of 1 and the graviton has a spin of 2.  “spin” is the angular momentum of the particle which also only occurs at quantum increments.  The biggest difference is the graviton is extremely weak.  The strength of the photon compared to the Strong force is 1 / 137. 
-
-  The strength of the graviton compared to the Strong force is 1/ 6*10^39,  that is 1 / 6 followed be 39 zeros.  You can compare how weak the force of gravity is by picking up a paper clip with a refrigerator magnet, defying gravity of the entire Earth pulling against it.
-
-  The Gluon is the exchange particle that mediates the forces between the Quarks that make up the protons and neutrons inside the nucleus.  There are 3 Quarks in each proton and in each neutron.  The Gluon is massive, it weighs 100,000 electron volts. ( mass as weight = energy / c^2, expressed in electron volts / c^2).     The range of the Gluon as a force carrier is only 10^-15 meters.
-
-  The electromagnetic force carried by the photon travels at the speed of light and has the range to reach the edges of the Universe.  However, the strength falls off as the square of the distance it travels.
-
-   For example, the force between two electric, or magnetic, charges , Q1 and Q2 is proportional to the strength of the charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them.
-
--------------------  Force  =  Constant * Q1 * Q2 / r^2
-
-  The Weak Nuclear force uses W and Z Bosons as the force carriers.  These Bosons are exceedingly massive, 80,000,000 electron volts.    Their strength is 1/100,000 the strength of the Gluons and the Strong force.  Their range is even smaller, only 10^-17 meters. 
-
-  You would not expect the Weak force to have much effect in the outside world.  But, you would be surprised.  This little force can change a proton into a neutron and vise versa.  It is the force that cause radioactive decay in the heavy elements.  This is called Beta Decay and it occurs when a neutron changes into a proton, or, actually, at the more fundamental level, when a heavier Down Quark changes into a lighter Up Quark.
-
-   This effect alone is responsible for the plate tectonics and volcano activity on our planet.  The volcanic activity on the planet is caused by the radioactive decay of uranium and thorium deep inside the Earth.
-
-   The Sun too is powered by this Weak interaction that can transmute a proton into a neutron to form deuterium to create fusion inside the Sun.  The Weak force becomes necessary to create all the heavier elements in the Periodic Table.  “There is power in Weakness!”.
-
-  The masses of all these particles and force carriers are considered “Fundamental Constants” because they never change and are the same everywhere in the Universe ( as far as we know).
-
------------  6 constants are the masses for the 6 Quarks
-
------------  6 more constants for a total of 12 are the masses of the 6 Leptons.  Leptons are the electron, the muon, the tau, and the 3 neutrinos.
-
-  These masses are expressed in kilograms, or in electron volts per the speed of light squared.  The speed of light is in meters / second.  All of these units are simply arbitrary and man-made. 
-
-  Science does not like this idea of expressing Fundamental Constants in arbitrary units.  Max Planck realized that since they were arbitrary he could select any units he wanted.  So, he selected units that made the Fundamental Constants equal to one.
-
-----------   Gravity  =   speed of light  =  Planck’s constant  =  Boltzman’s constant  =  1
-
-----------  G = c  =  h  =  k  =  1

----------   By choosing the right values for the units of mass, length, and time, instead of kilograms, meters, and seconds, you get Planck mass, Planck length, and Planck time.  And the Gravitational Constant (G), the Constant speed of light (c), the Planck’s Constant of Action (h), and the Boltzman’s Constant (k) all equal to 1.  Here are the Planck units that result:
-
------------  mass  =  2*10^-8 kilograms
-
------------  length  =  2*10^-35 meters
-
------------  time  =  5*10^-44 seconds.
-
-  Besides the 12 masses of the particles there are the 4 Coupling Constants of the forces.
-
-------------  Strong  =  1
-
-------------  Electromagnetic  =  1 /137
-
-------------  Weak  =  10^-6
-
------------  Gravity  =  10^-39
-
-  These Fundamental Constants are completely dependent on experiments and the units used in the measurements.  They are unlike the Mathematical Constants, like pi, the natural logarithm “e”, and the Golden Ratio.  These math constants can be derived. 

-  The force that controls the structure of the atom and molecules is 1 / 137 and is called the Fine Structure Constant.  It is measured to be 1 / 137.03599...  That is the number, but, nobody knows how to derive it.  It just is.
-
------------  Fine Structure Constant  =  2*pi*e^2 / h * c
-
-----------    Fine Structure Constant  =  the electron charge squared divided by the product of Planck’s Constant of Action per wavelength and the Constant speed of light.
-
--------------  Find Structure Constant  =  1 / 137.03599... 
-
-  The Electromagnetic Coupling Constant, the Strong Force Coupling Constant and the Gravitational Constant bring the total from 12 to 15 Fundamental Constants.  The Weak Force Coupling Constant can be calculated from the other two so it is not included as “Fundamental”.
-
-  But the interaction of the W and Z Bosons with the quarks creates 4 more numbers that are Fundamental Constants.  Called Cabibbo-Kobayash-Maskawa matrix math.  This is math analogous to a specifying of a vector in 3 dimensions plus a spin of either clockwise or counter clockwise to get 4 numbers to specify the behavior. 
-
-  This brings the total to 19 Constants.  The neutrinos get their mass for interaction with the Higgs Boson so we get 4 more Constant numbers from the Maki-Nakagawa-Sakata matrix math.  This brings the total to 23.
-
-  The mass of the Higgs Boson and the Constant Coupling Factor of the Higgs field get us to 25 Fundamental Constants.   Science discover the Higg’s Boson in the Large Hadron Collider, the particle accelerator that just turned on in CERN, Switzerland.
-
-  Then, number 26 is Einstein’s Cosmological Constant that was developed in the General Theory of Relativity.  This could be the Constant that is causing the expansion of the Universe, also called Dark Energy, yet to be discovered.
-
-  In conclusion we have 4 forces that control everything.  With these we have 12 particles of matter and particles of force carriers.  And, we have Constant Coupling factors between these fundamental force carriers. 
-
-  We theorize it all started with the Big Bang which was a Constant * Temperature , (k*T), which was equal to 10^29 electron volts, which was equal to Planck’s Constant of Action / Planck’s time, (h/t).
-
--------------  k * T  =  h / t  =  10^29
-
-  “t”  is Planck’s time which is the time it takes for light to travel across a Planck Length.
G is the Gravitational Constant.  “h” is Planck’s Constant of Action per wavelength, (h/2*pi).  “c” is the Constant Speed of light.
-
--------  (Planck Time)^2  =  G * h / c^5                  =  5.4*10^-34 seconds
-
----------( Planck Length)^2  =  G*h/c^3                  =  1.6*10^-35 meters
-
---------  (Planck Time)^2 *c^2 =  G * h / c^3           =  1.6*10^-35 meters
-
---------- Planck Area  =  2.6*10^-70 meters^2
-
----------  (Planck Mass)^2  =   h*c / 8^pi*G                =  1.1 * 10^-8 kilograms
-
-   Science has got everything down to 4 forces and 26 constants but that is still not simple enough.  We need more discoveries.  There has got to be less to it.  The theory of everything still escapes us.  The more we know the more mysteries are before us.

-  February 29, 2020                               1108    1109                       2641                                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 
--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------
-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com
 ---------------------          Saturday, February 29, 2020    --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

3D PRINTING - how rockets are to be built?-

-  2640  -   3D PRINTING  -  how rockets are to be built?  The real secret to Relativity’s rockets is the artificial intelligence that tells the printer what to do. Before a print, Relativity runs a simulation of what the print should look like. As the arms deposit metal, a suite of sensors captures visual, environmental, and even audio data. Relativity’s software then compares the two to improve the printing process. We have a rocket ready to launch in 60 days.
-

-
---------------------   2640 -  3D PRINTING  -  how rockets are to be built?-

-  It amazes me how the printer attached to my computer can print a page in seconds.  That is just two dimensional printing I can produce a complete library  Imagine printing in 3 dimensions.  Now imagine printing an entire rocket with a 3D printer.  What else could a 3D printer produce?
-
- Relativity Space, a startup company that wants to combine 3D printing and artificial intelligence to do for the rocket what Henry Ford did for the automobile.
-
-  This company claims it can make rockets anywhere.  Even on the Moon!  Relativity wants to not just build rockets, but to build them on Mars. How exactly?
-
-   Relativity’s Los Angeles headquarters has four of the largest metal 3D printers in the world, churning out rocket parts day and night. The latest model of the company’s proprietary printer, dubbed “Stargate“, stands 30 feet tall and has two massive robotic arms that protrude like tentacles from the machine.
-
-  The Stargate printers will manufacture about 95 percent, by mass, of Relativity’s first rocket, named “Terran-1“. The only parts that won’t be printed are the electronics, cables, and a handful of moving parts and rubber gaskets.
-
-  To make a rocket 3D-printable it will have 100 times fewer parts than a comparable rocket. Its Aeon engine consists of just 100 parts, whereas a typical liquid-fueled rocket would have thousands.
-
-   By consolidating parts and optimizing them for 3D printing,  Relativity will be able to go from raw materials to the launch pad in just 60 days. However, Relativity hasn’t yet assembled a full Terran-1 and doesn’t expect the rocket to fly until 2021 at the earliest.
-
-  A full-scale test will be the biggest milestone for Relativity to prove this new technology.  Fully assembled, Terran-1 will stand about 100 feet tall, and be capable of delivering satellites weighing up to 2,800 pounds to low Earth orbit.
-
-  That puts it above small satellite launchers like Rocket Lab’s “Electron” but well under the payload capacity of massive rockets like SpaceX’s “Falcon 9“.  It will be particularly well-suited to carrying medium-sized satellites.
-
-  Relativity isn’t the only rocket company using 3D printing, SpaceX, Blue Origin, Rocket Lab, and others also use it to print select parts.   3D-printed rockets are the key to transporting critical infrastructure to and from the surface of Mars. These rockets could  be used to loft science experiments into orbit around Mars or return samples to Earth.
-
-  At the heart of Relativity’s robotic rocket factory is Stargate, the largest metal 3D printer in the world. The first version of Stargate is about 15 feet tall and consists of three robotic arms. The arms are used to weld metal, monitor the printer’s progress, and correct for defects.
-
-  To print a large component, such as a fuel tank or rocket body, the printer feeds miles of a thin, custom-made aluminum alloy wire along the length of an arm to its tip, where a plasma arc melts the metal.
-
-  The arm then deposits the molten metal in thin layers, orchestrating its movements according to patterns programmed in the machine’s software. Meanwhile, the printer head at the tip of the arm blows out a non-oxidizing gas to create a sort of “clean room” at the deposition site.
-
-  Every new iteration of the Stargate printer has been significantly bigger than the last, allowing it to churn out very large rocket parts in one piece.  Relativity now has a new version of Stargate that can, in a single go, print even bigger components, like the rocket’s fairing or fuel chambers.
-
-  The Stargate printers work well when you need to print large parts quickly, but for parts that require more precision, such as the rocket’s engine, Relativity uses the same commercially available metal 3D printers that other aerospace companies use. These printers use a different printing technique, in which a laser welds together layers of ultra-fine stainless steel dust.
-
- The real secret to Relativity’s rockets is the artificial intelligence that tells the printer what to do. Before a print, Relativity runs a simulation of what the print should look like. As the arms deposit metal, a suite of sensors captures visual, environmental, and even audio data. Relativity’s software then compares the two to improve the printing process.
-
-  With every new part, the machine learning algorithm gets better, until it will eventually be able to correct 3D prints on its own. In the future, the 3D printer will recognize its own mistakes, cutting and adding metal until it produces  flawless parts.
-
-  Relativity has already inked deals worth several hundred million dollars with several major satellite operators.  Once they have a complete rocket, it will be ready to ship it to Launch Complex-16 at Kennedy Space Center, in Florida, where Relativity holds a long-term launchpad lease, alongside SpaceX, Blue Origin, and the United Launch Alliance.
-
-  The first flight of an entirely 3D printed rocket will be a major moment in space exploration, but for Relativity it will be just the start of its long journey to Mars.
-
-  What next for 3D printing technology?  Almost anything you can imagine!

-  February 29, 2020                                                                          2640                                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 
--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------
-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com
 ---------------------          Saturday, February 29, 2020    --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FUSION REACTORS - for our electricity?

-  2639  -  FUSION  REACTORS  -  for our electricity?  See Review 2638 about the history of fusion reactors.  When I was in high school I learned in physics class that fusion was going to replace fission and our electricity would no longer depend o fossil fuels.  Electricity would essentially be free.  Well 60 years later and we are still saying that  “recent developments” in the world of fusion power are giving scientists newfound optimism for the elusive ‘holy grail’ of energy technologies. 
-
-
-
---------------------   2639 -  FUSION  REACTORS  -  for our electricity?
-
-  The first of recent developments is a discovery by the Department of Energy’s Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory  which uses radio frequency technology to greatly reduce so-called ‘plasma disruption’, the leading challenge to achieving a sustained, net energy gain fusion reaction. This is a key element to long awaited making fusion a feasible source of electricity.
-
-  The second development is a report by a panel of distinguished scientists from the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine to the DOE which concluded that a $200 million annual investment in the technology for the next several decades could lead to a commercially viable reactor before 2050. This timeline includes demonstrating energy-gain fusion, a reaction which produces more energy than it takes in, by the mid-2020s and a concept reactor by the 2030s.  The future is not always what it is made out to be.
-
-  Nuclear fusion is a technology that is easy to get excited about. The power emitted from sustained thermonuclear fusion is safe, carbon-free, and abundant. The primary fuel, hydrogen isotopes, can be found in regular sea water, and just a few grams are enough to kick-start a reaction.
-
-  General Atomics, a manufacturer of the powerful magnets necessary for fusion plasma containment, estimates that a working reactor would only need 11 pounds of hydrogen to generate the energy equivalent of 18,750 tons of coal, 56,000 barrels of oil or 755 acres of solar panels, an amazing feat of science and technology, if it ever happens?
-
-  The implications are near limitless. Aside from the obvious benefits for combating climate change, ending energy scarcity, and growing the global economy, fusion could also have applications for space travel and U.S. national security (provided we develop the technology first).
-
-  It’s no wonder, then, that a number of private entities are aggressively pursuing the technology. Lockheed Martin  announced last year its plan to develop a prototype compact fusion reactor within the next decade. If it works, the truck-sized device would be capable of providing enough electricity to meet the demand of a small city of 100,000 people.
-
-   Lockheed is joined by TAE Technologies, The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Plasma Fusion Center , and Canadian-backed General Fusion Inc., in a group of contenders promising to bring fusion commercialization before 2030.  Even Amazon’s  Jeff Bezos and Microsoft’s Bill Gates have thrown their hats into the fusion power ring.
-
-  This tricky technology has eluded scientists for more than 60 years.
-
-  The Fusion process is the same one that powers our Sun.  A star as one gigantic fusion reactor:  hydrogen atoms forced together under immense heat and pressure break their atomic bonds, fusing into a new heavier element, helium. Some mass is lost in the process, however, and great amounts of energy are released as a result.
-
-  This is what Einstein's famous formula E = m * c² describes: the tiny bit of lost mass (m), multiplied by the square of the speed of light (c²), results in a very large figure (E), which is the amount of energy created by a fusion reaction.
-
-  The catch is that these reactions generate very hot and very unstable globs of plasma in excess of 500 million degrees Fahrenheit.   This requires tremendous amounts of energy to maintain. To date, the longest recorded sustained plasma operation is just over one minute long.
-
-  Scientists believe that magnetic fields offer the best method for containing the super-heated plasma, a key principle of the Soviet-designed Tokamak reactors, which most of today’s leading prototypes are modeled after.
-
-   The International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor  project under construction in Cadarache, France is the most celebrated Tokamak-style reactor in existence. The multi-billion dollar, 35-nation effort including the United States, Russia, China, India, the European Union, Japan and South Korea and is now on pace for a 2050 commercial debut after a number of cost overruns and delays.
-
-  The United States has already contributed $1.13 billion since 2016, roughly 9 percent of the total cost. For the international project to meet its current timeline, the National Academy of scientists estimates that the U.S. will need to contribute at least another $2.2 billion over the next decade.
-
-  However,  post-World War Two tech developments from hydraulic fraction to Apple smart phones to TESLA  electric cars suggest that it is the private sector, profit-driven companies and entrepreneurs, that are most effective in the commercialization of basic science.
-
-  While fusion technology certainly seems to be gaining momentum in academic, policymaking, and venture capital circles, the promise of reliable fusion power has always been ‘just a decade or two away.’
-
-  If history is any guide, we should not hold our breath just yet.

-  February 29, 2020                                                                          2639                                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 
--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------
-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com
 ---------------------          Saturday, February 29, 2020    --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FUSION - from stars to electricity ?

-  2638 -  FUSION  -  from stars to electricity ?How does fusion work in the stars?  See the end of this review to learn how fusion works on the planet Earth.  If we can get Earth’s nuclear fusion reactors working above a breakeven point they could supply all the electrical energy needs of the planet with no pollution.
-
---------------------------------------------  This is fission not fusion
-
---------------------   2638 -  FUSION  -  from stars to electricity ?
-
-  The fusion in the core of stars can be analyzed as simple hydrogen nuclei, which are protons, fusing together to create heavier elements.  Each fusion process up to the element Iron releases some amount of energy.
-
-   Knowing how much energy our Sun puts out we can estimate the lifetime of our star, how long it will take to “burn up” all of this proton fuel.
-
-  How does fusion work in the stars?  The end of this review to learn how fusion works on the planet Earth. 
-
-   You look into the night sky and every shining star is a fusion reactor.  It is so common, it can’t be that complicated.  Well we have been seriously trying for 30 years and the breakeven point is still another 30 years away, maybe 50 to 100 years away.  Fusion is simple, it is just not easy.   
-
-  Here is how stars make fusion.  Our Sun is a star that is a big ball of hydrogen.  It originally collects as a ball of gas out of a cloud of hydrogen gas.  Gravity constantly pulls matter into the densest center of gravity.  Eventually it all condenses into a sphere of gas.
-
-   As the mass and gravity of the sphere grows the center of the sphere gets hotter and denser until the hydrogen gas ionizes into a plasma.  Essentially this “plasma” is the nucleus of the hydrogen atoms separated from the negatively charged electrons.  The electrons become free electrons and the nuclei remaining are positively charged protons. 
-
-  The protons are heavier and get pulled into the center of gravity with immense density and temperature.  Protons are like positive charges that repeal each other with the electromagnetic force.  When the mass reaches 10% of the mass of our Sun the force of gravity can begin to overcome this electromagnetic force separating the protons.  Nuclear fusion can begin.
-
-  The Sun is fusing these protons into Helium nuclei with its core temperature at 15,000,000 Centigrade.  (The “surface temperature” of the Sun is 6,000 Centigrade).  This same process occurs in all the stars.
-
-   However, if the mass of the stars is larger then fusion can continue beyond 2 Hydrogen , H-1, nuclei fusing into  Helium nuclei,(He-2).  When 3 protons fuse together they form Lithium, (Li-3).  When 4 protons fuse together they form Beryllium, 5 -  forms Boron,  6 - Carbon, 7 - Nitrogen, and this continues right up each of the heavier elements in the Periodic Table to 28 protons fuse to form Iron, Fe-28).
-
-   At the element 28 - Iron the fusion process does not release excess energy.  Up until iron each element is slightly lighter than the sum of its parts( i.e.: protons).  The excess mass is converted to energy according to E = mc^2.  Elements heavier than Iron require the addition of energy in order to fuse rather the having an excess of energy.
-
-  When the core of the star becomes Iron no more excess energy is produced.  The star collapses and rebounds into a massive explosion called a supernova.  It is in this explosion that higher energies are reached and elements heavier than iron are produced.
-
-  The natural elements all the way up to 92 protons fusing to form Uranium, (U-92).  2 protons fuse into Helium, or, said in another way, 2 Hydrogen nuclei fuse into one Helium-2 nucleus. Or, to be more accurate to where we are heading, 4 protons fuse into a heavy isotope of Helium-4 which contains 2 protons and 2 neutrons with energy left over for 26.8 electron volts of sun power heading toward the surface of the Sun. 
-
-  This sun power eventually leaves the surface with a total output power of 3.9 *10^26 watts. (That is 3.9 followed by 25 zeros).   8 minutes later it reaches the surface of Earth providing 1,300 watts of sun power on every square meter area. 
-
-  Let’s go back to the core of the Sun and see step by step how this fusion actually happens:
-
-  (1)  One proton fuses with a proton electron pair which is a neutron forming a Hydrogen isotope nucleus, called Deuterium.  The Deuterium nucleus is one proton and one neutron.  In addition to the H-2 Deuterium nucleus an anti-electron, an electron- neutrino, and 0.4 million electron volts of energy are produced.  The anti-electron is also called a positron.  The energy produced is  abbreviated 0.4 MeV.
-
-  (2)  This process is repeated with  2 other protons.  The total reaction now contains: 2 H2. Deuterium nuclei  +  2 anti electrons  +  2 neutrinos and a total of 0.8 MeV.
-
-  (3)  Both of these processes fuse with other neutrons creating a Hydrogen-3 isotope with one proton and 2 neutrons, plus Gamma Rays, and plus energy of 5.5MeV.  For a total of 6.3 MeV, for the first fusion  and 6.3 MeV again for the second fusion.  Now the grand total of particles and energy in the fusion reaction is 2 protons and 4 neutrons in the 2 H-3 nuclei, 2 Gamma Rays and 11.8 MeV.
-
-  (4)  When the above two processes fuse together the grand total of particles and energy released becomes 2 protons and 2 neutrons fuse to form Helium-4 and the 2 free neutrons decay to form 2 protons, and  + 7 Gamma Rays, and  + 2 neutrinos, and +  releasing an additional 13.0 MeV of energy.  This brings the total energy released to 24.8 MeV.
-
-  (5)  The last step involves the 2 anti electrons that were produced which collide with 2 free electrons and annihilate each other into 4 Gamma Rays and 2.0 MeV of energy.
The total energy released from this 5 step process becomes 26.8 MeV. 
-
-  Note that 4 protons were consumed for 26.8  / 4, or 6.7 MeV per proton.  And, 2 protons were left over to repeat the process starting with step (1)  again.  This is referred to as a “chain reaction” that will continue over and over again until all the protons are consumed.
-
-  There are other fusion processes occurring in the dynamic plasma at the core of the Sun, but this is one of the fundamental fusion processes going on.  If we used purely this process and assumed the Sun was a giant ball of protons how long would it shine before it ran out of protons to fuse?
-
-  The total mass of the Sun is 2.0 * 10^30 kilograms.
-
-  The mass of a single proton is 1.67 *10^-27 kilograms.
-
-  Their simple division tells us that there are 1.2*10^57 protons in the Sun.  Of course, only the protons at the core of the Sun are at the pressures and temperatures necessary to cause a nuclear fusion reaction.  Approximately 10% of the Sun’s mass can be considered the core.  So, the core would contain 1.2 * 10^56 protons.
-
-  We know that the total energy output the these core protons are producing is 3.9 * 10^26 Watts.  A Watt is a Joule of energy per second.  There are 1.6022*10^19 electron-volts in one Joule of Energy. Therefore the Sun’s total output power in electron-volts per second is:
-
----------------    3.9 * 10^26  /  1. 6022 *10^-19  =  2.434*10^45 eV / second
-
----------------  Sun’s energy  =  2.434 * 10^39 MeV / second
-
-  We have calculated the energy contribution per proton to be 6.7 MeV.  Again simple division tells us how many protons are being consumed each second in the core of the Sun.
-
--------------  2.434 * 10^39 MeV / second    /    6.7 MeV  =  3.6 * 10^38 protons / second
-
-  The Sun’s core has 1.2 * 10^56 protons and it is burning 3.6 * 10^38 protons each second, how many seconds can this last?
-
---------------  1.2 * 10^56 protons  /   3.6 * 10^38 protons/ second  =  3.3 * 10^17 seconds.  There are 31,560,000 seconds in a year.  So, that means that the Sun’s core can burn protons for about 10 billion years.  This has been going on for about 5 billion years so the Sun has burned through about half of its supply of protons.  We have another 5 billion years to go.
-
-  More massive stars than our Sun actually have shorter lives because they burn hotter and faster and go through their supply of protons  with a shorter lifetime.
-
------  25 Solar Mass Star  ---------  80,000 Luminosity of Sun  ----- 3 million years
-
------  3 Solar Mass Star  ---------------  60 Luminosity of Sun  ----- 500 million years
-
------  1 Solar Mass Star  ----------------  1 Luminosity of Sun  ----- 10,000 million years
-
------  1/2 Solar Mass Star  -----------  3 % Luminosity of Sun  ----- 200,000 million years
-
-  Why Do We Not Have Fusion Reactors to Make Electricity?
-
-  Nearly all the electrical energy on Earth originates from the Sun.  Wind, Oil, Gas, Hydro all get their energy coming from the bath of radiation we get from our nearest star.  Because of the Conservation of Energy, all energy is conserved.  We always have the same amount it is simply being converted from one form of energy to another.
-
-  So, why not solve our society’s energy problems by going directly to the source and creating our energy the same way the Sun does?  How does the Sun get its energy?  From Nuclear Fusion.  Simply combining lighter elements into heavier elements.
-
-  In the Sun’s case combining 2 Hydrogen atom nuclei into one Helium atom nuclei.  To state this even simpler, the Sun combines two single protons into one nucleus with two protons. 
-
-  When fusion of two protons comes together to form Helium the combination is not quite as heavy, massive, as the individual protons that come from the Hydrogen nucleus. Remember, protons have a positive charge and like-charges repel each other. 
-
-  The Strong Nuclear Force is needed to hold two protons together in the nucleus.  When this nuclear reaction occurs a small amount of mass left over is converted directly to energy.  The energy is in the form of Gamma Ray radiation, according to E = mc^2.
-
-  This Gamma Ray radiation occurs at the center of the Sun at a temperature of 28,000,000 F.  Gamma Ray photons are high energy photons that have to bounce their way through layers of the Sun’s gas until finally reaching the surface at 10,000 degrees F.  On average, it takes a single photon over 1 million years to make this journey to the surface.
-
-  To solve all our energy problems why can’t we duplicate this fusion process here on Earth?  The process is simple, it is just not easy.  Science can do it, but, it takes more energy to create and contain the 28,000,000 degree temperatures than we can retrieve from the nuclear fusion reaction it produces.
-
-  Science has been trying to economically produce energy using nuclear fusion for decades.  Up until now the process to create fusion consumes more energy than the fusion produces.  We have yet to reach a breakeven point, and, to be economical the process needs to be 20 to 30 times more efficient than just a breakeven.
-
-  To get nuclear fusion working for us many nations are spending research dollars building fusion reactors.  The U.S. is spending $210 billion per year generating electric power.  Some of that needs to go to research in building fusion reactors:
-
-  France is spending $20 billion in their fusion experiment that is scheduled to be completed by 2018.
-
-  Livermore, California is spending $3.5 billion to begin a fusion experiment by 2012.  (See Review  1070).
-
-  Kirtland Air Force Base, part of Los Alamos National Labs, is investing $4 million dollars to create a breakeven fusion reactor.  The Shiva Star facility at Kirtland does not have much money but it thinks it has a better idea.  All three facilities are trying different approaches to producing nuclear fusion.
-
-  Overcoming the electromagnetic force with enough temperature and pressure forcing the nuclei to merge, or fuse, which creates a heavier element releasing nuclear energy requires immense gravity.
-
-    The Sun merges hundreds of millions of tons of Hydrogen into Helium every second at its core.  And, it has been doing this for some 5 billion years.  Every star in the night sky is doing the same thing in various degrees.  Bigger stars have more gravity and fuse heavier elements.  All star-energy comes from gravity compressing and heating lighter elements into heavier elements.
-
-  For nuclear fusion reactors on the planet the primary fuel used is Deuterium, which is a heavy isotope of Hydrogen, one proton and one neutron in the nucleus.  Deuterium is abundant in seawater and easily available.  Unlike fission reactors the dangerous radiation of the process’ by-products decays rapidly, within decades.  Fission by-products carrying dangerous radiation can remain for centuries.
-
-  Fusion is definitely the way to go for producing energy.  So, why is it so hard?  Well, to start with it has to be hot, 27,000,000 degrees F, minimum.  And, it also has to be under high pressure.
-
-   The center of the Sun is 200,000,000,000 atmospheres pressure.  The melted plasma of ionized hydrogen, a soup of protons and free electrons, is so hot it would vaporize any material that we used to contain it.  It takes tremendous force to overcome the electromagnetic force that is repelling 2  simple protons from fusing together. 
-
-  We can not duplicate the mass and gravity of the Sun.  What we really need is fusion in a beer can.  They are trying to do that at Kirtland AFB using a technique called magnetized target fusion.  The target is a 30 by 10 centimeter aluminum cylinder with 1 millimeter thick walls ( a beer can ). 
-
-  A strong  magnetic field is created to control the hot plasma of ionized Deuterium gas inside the can.  The target-can is hit with 12 million amperes of electric current that will crush the can in 24 microseconds. The Deuterium nuclei fuse releasing nuclear energy that produce heat, to produce steam, to turn turbines and produce electricity.
-
-  The experimental machine to produce this enormous shot of electric current was originally designed as a weapon to shoot down incoming ballistic missiles by firing a burst of high energy plasma at the missile.  It never succeeded as a weapon but it did destroy many experiments.  It produces 5,000,000 joules of energy.
-
-   In this last decade they decided to alter the design to produce controlled fusion that would generate electricity instead of shoot down missiles.  Current experiments are to get the machine to produce a fusion reaction that has a breakeven in “energy produced” versus “energy consumed“.  It has not happened yet.
-
-  To become economically viable as an electric power plant in a community a fusion reactor must produce 30 times more energy out than what it consumes.
-
-  The experiment in France uses a machine that constructs its magnetic structure in the shape of a doughnut.  It is called a “ Tokomak” and it is designed to produce 500,000,000 watts output with 50,000,000 watts input.  This is a 10 times efficiency over breakeven.
-
-  Tokomak creates a doughnut shaped magnetic field that confines the ionized plasma into the center of the ring.  The heating is “omic” heating, no different than the filament in an incandescent light bulb.  The maximum temperature obtained to date is 20 to 30 million degrees.
-
-  Lawrence Livermore Lab has a machine using 192 lasers focused on a capsule of Deuterium and Tritium.  The lasers focus 500,000,000,000 watts on a pellet the size of an aspirin.  (See Review 1170  “Laser Ignition Fusion” for a detailed discussion of this process.)
-
-  The history of fusion started with the atomic bomb which eventually developed into the Hydrogen bomb in 1952.
-
------------  In 1958 the reactor in Los Alamos first bottled Hydrogen Plasma in a magnetic field.
-
------------  In 1968  a Soviet Tokomak produced a plasma raised to 1,000,000 degrees temperature.
-
-----------  In 1989 there were false claims within the science community that they had created cold fusion.
-
----------  In 1997 the Tokomak in France generated 16 megawatts out with 24 megawatts input. 
-
-----------  In 2002 there were false claims in the science community about bubble fusion being created using sound waves.
-
-----------  In 2009 Lawrence Livermore Labs first fusion ignition is scheduled to occur in 2012.  (See Review 1070)  The facility is called NIF, the National Ignition Facility, and it has achieved temperatures up to 10,600,000 F.  Still not hot enough for fusion of the target Deuterium and Tritium into Helium.  The temperature is measured by measuring the X-rays emitted by the exploding gold capsule that contains the target.
-
---------  In 2011  the Energy Matter Conversion Corporation in Canada , EMC2, uses a proton-boron fuel which requires a higher temperature than Deuterium but converts directly to electricity without using boiling water to drive a generator.
-
-   It uses a electrostatic field to contain the positively charged ions.  Its electromagnetic coils are arranged in a polyhedron of tubes.  The configuration traps electrons in the middle.  Ions are introduced to accelerate in a  confined space until they create fusion power.
-
-  The polyhedron is essentially a large vacuum tube with spherical grids .  The ions accelerate into the grid.  Often the ions pass through the grid without a collision with other ions.  Occasionally they collide.  Hopefully fusion occurs.
-
---------  In 2011  NIF has come up with another idea using their lasers.  They will use a hybrid fusion-fission process.  Lasers create fusion at the center of the reactor chamber.  Neutrons emitted penetrate a blanket of Uranium that lines the chamber walls.  Energy from the fission reactions in the Uranium multiple the chambers power by a factor of 4. 
-
-  This process has the advantages of being able to use depleted uranium, or the spent fuel from the nuclear fission reactors now being used.  Today’s fission reactors require Plutonium or Enriched Uranium which is used in nuclear weapons and dangerously radioactive.
-
-   These fission reactors consume only a few percent of the fissionable atoms in the Enriched Uranium.  The hybrid fusion-fission reactor consumes 90% of the fissionable fuel.  Less fuel is needed and less spent fuel is left behind.
-
---------  In 2011 many technical problems remain to actually have a fusion electrical power plant in operation.  We are still projecting a breakeven fusion reaction will happen soon.  It will solve the World’s energy problems.  When?  God only knows.
-
--------  2013  -  General Fusion in British Columbia is using a liquid metal lining with Tritium to create a fusion reaction.  They are projecting a breakeven in 2013.

-  The lucky  ol’ Sun  nothing to do but just roam round heaven all day.
-
-  February 28, 2020                          1249    1250                             2638                                                                                 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 
--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------
-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com
 ---------------------          Saturday, February 29, 2020    --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Friday, February 28, 2020

FOURIER - Math Discovers Exoplanets

-  2637  -  FOURIER -  Math Discovers Exoplanets.  If technology continues to improve and astronomers can capture some reflected light from the exoplanet its spectroscopy can detect the elements that are in the planet’s atmosphere.   Detecting the slightest sinusoidal wobble in the light spectrum and performing the Fourier transform on the data so the period of the orbiting object will pop out of the data,  astronomers will detect Earth-size terrestrial planets orbiting other stars.
-
-
-
---------------------   2625   -  FOURIER  -  Math Discovers Exoplanets
-
-  Jean Baptista Joseph Baron Fourier, a French mathematician,  born 1768, died 1830, became famous for his mathematical treatment of heat flow.  Heat flow depends on the temperature difference between two points, the heat conducting properties of the material, the shape of the material, and more.
-
-  The result of model is a complex set of differential equations that characterize the heat flow from one place to another.  Fourier solved these equations using an infinite series of trigonometric functions.
-
-  His mathematical theorem founded in 1807 is now known as the “Fourier Series“, or “Fourier Analysis“.  The series expands a periodic function as an infinite sum of sine waves of varies frequencies and amplitudes.   His theorem applies to any periodic wave and has very wide science and engineering application.  “Any wave can be approximated by super positioning sinusoidal waves with different frequencies“.
-
-  The human ear performs a Fourier analysis as sound waves of different frequencies enter the ear and vibrate tiny hairs at those specific frequencies.  The listener can then discern the different pitches and harmonics in the sound they hear.
-
-  The Fourier Theorem: 
-
-    The function of a wave in relation to time = Amplitude* sin(n*2pi* frequency * time).
-
-  “n” is integer multiples of the fundamental frequency.  These frequencies are called harmonics.
-
-  ( Fourier got a little over obsessed with heat.  When he was sick he overheated his house expecting a cure.  Wrapped in a blanket, he tripped and fell down the stairs and died.)
-
-  Our Sun wobbles.  Our Sun orbits its spot in the sky in small circles caused by the gravity pull of Jupiter.  They are not perfect circles because the Sun is also affected by the lesser amount of gravity pull from Saturn. 
-
-  We know this because if we measure the wobble it has a primary period of 12 years and another wobble super imposed on the primary of 30 years.  The orbit of Jupiter about the Sun is 11.862 years.  The orbit of Saturn about the Sun is 29.458 years.
-
-  When the Sun’s wobble is moving towards us it is traveling 20 meters/second faster than when it is moving away from us (+ or- 10 meters/second).  If you walk  slowly across the room you are traveling 1 meter/second. (2.2 miles per hour). So you can see this is a very small change in velocity that has to be detected.
-
-  How can astronomers measure such a small change in velocity to detect this slight wobble of a star caused by its orbiting planets?
-
-  The answer comes from the light spectrum.  When light from the Sun, or a star, is passed through a prism it spreads the light into a spectrum, a rainbow of colors from red to blue.  A careful study of this rainbow of colors finds fine, dark absorption lines that occur because the light passes through elements that absorb that particular frequency.
-
-   The particular frequency corresponds to a particular electron orbit, where the electron absorbs the photon and jumps into a higher orbit.  Each element has unique electron orbits and therefore unique absorption lines.  By measuring absorption lines in a spectrum you can identify each element in the periodic table, 100 different elements such as sodium, carbon, silicon, etc.
-
-  An even closer look at these absorption lines in the spectrum can identify a shift in their frequency over time.  When the wobble is moving towards us the lines shift toward the blue end of the spectrum (higher frequency).  When the wobble is moving away from us the lines shift towards the red end of the spectrum (lower frequency). 
-
-  Ok, what does Fourier Analysis have to do with this?
-
-  This change in frequency in the spectroscopy spectrum is also known as the “Doppler Shift“.  It is no different from the Doppler Shift of sound waves that occur when a speeding race car approaches ,then , whizzes past you. 
-
-  Current technology with today’s telescopes and spectrometers can measure Doppler Shifts of +or- 10 meters per second.  This has already allowed astronomers to discover over 4,000 planets orbiting other stars in our Milky Way.  There are over 400,000,000,000 stars in our galaxy so there are many more out there to be discovered.
-
-  However, +or-10 meters/second can only detect Jupiter size planets which are  317 times Earth size.  In order to measure Earth size, terrestrial planets, orbiting stars we must be able to measure +or- 0.1 meters/second Doppler Shifts.  This is measuring wobble velocities equal to the speed of a turtle scampering across the floor.
-
-  Believe it or not astronomers are figuring out how to do just that in their quest to find life on Earth-like planets like our own.  Direct observations are nearly impossible because the brightness of the star totally overwhelms any light reflected off the surface of a nearby planet.  It would be like seeing a firefly in the face of a circus search light.  However, the Doppler technique may work to allow us to find these small terrestrial planets.
-
-  If we find enough planets circling stars we are likely to find one orbiting edge-on to the star.  In other words, the planet just happens to pass directly in front of the star and directly behind the star. 
-
-  If this happens astronomers can measure in addition to the mass of the planet, the size of the planet because of the stars brightness changes as the planet passes in front and blocks some of the light.  Now they can calculate the size and density of the planet.
-
-  If technology continues to improve and astronomers can capture some reflected light from the planet its spectroscopy can detect the elements that are in the planet’s atmosphere.  Knowing this will allow astronomer to predict if life is likely to exist on that planet.  They will be able to predict if an iron core and a consequential magnetic field exists to protect life from the star’s cosmic rays and ultraviolet radiation.
-
-  The breakthrough in this improved technology comes from computing power.  First we need to measure the starlight 365 days out of the year for 5 years, i.e. we need a  dedicated telescope.  And, we must take 175 observations each night,  (365 * 5 * 175)  = 300,000 observations. 
-
-  With this enormous amount of data and the computing power to detect the slightest sinusoidal wobble in the light spectrum and performing the Fourier transform on the data so the period of the orbiting object will pop out of the data,  astronomers will detect Earth-size terrestrial planets orbiting other stars.
-
-   Fourier would fall down the stairs if he knew what astronomers are doing with his mathematics.
-
-  February 28, 2020                                      710    2051      2119     2673                                                                               
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 
--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------
-  https://plus.google.com/u/0/  -- www.facebook.com  -- www.twitter.com
 ---------------------          Friday, February 28, 2020    --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------