Sunday, January 14, 2024

4316 - WEBB BROKE COSMOLOGY?

 

-    4316  -   WEBB  BROKE  COSMOLOGY?  -  After 2 years in space, the James Webb telescope has broken cosmology.   For decades, measurements of the universe's expansion have suggested a disparity known as the “Hubble tension”, which threatens to break cosmology as we know it.  A new finding by the James Webb Space Telescope has only entrenched the mystery.


--------------------------  4316  -   WEBB  BROKE  COSMOLOGY?

-    Nearly a century ago, the astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered the balloon-like inflation of the universe and the accelerating rush of all galaxies away from each other. Following that expansion backward in time led to our current best understanding of how everything began, the Big Bang.

-

-   But over the past decade depending on where astronomers look, the rate of the universe's expansion (the Hubble constant) varies significantly.   The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has cemented the discrepancy with precise new observations that threaten to upend the standard model of cosmology.

-

-    The new physics needed to modify or even replace the 40-year-old theory is now a topic of debate.  It's a disagreement that has to make us wonder if we really do understand the composition of the universe and the physics of the universe.

-

-    In an instant, the young cosmos was formed: an expanding, roiling plasma broth of matter and antimatter particles that popped into existence, only to annihilate each other upon contact.

-

-    The matter and antimatter inside this plasma should have consumed each other entirely. But scientists believe that some unknown imbalance enabled more matter than antimatter to be produced, saving the universe from immediate self-destruction.

-

-    Gravity compressed the plasma pockets, squeezing and heating the matter so that sound waves traveling just over half the speed of light, called “baryon acoustic oscillations”, rippled across their surface.

-

-    The high energy density of the early universe's crowded contents stretched space-time, pulling a small fraction of this matter safely from the fray.   As the universe inflated like a balloon ordinary matter interacting with light congealed around clumps of invisible dark matter to create the first galaxies, connected together by a vast cosmic web.

-

-    Initially as the universe's contents spread out, its energy density and therefore its expansion rate decreased. But then, roughly 5 billion years ago, galaxies began to recede once more at an ever-faster rate.   The cause was another invisible and mysterious entity known as “dark energy”.

-

-    The Big Bang is immediately followed by a rapid expansionary period called inflation. Then, as protons and electrons combine to form atoms, light can travel freely; leaving the cosmic microwave background imprinted upon the sky. The universe's expansion slowed around 10 billion years ago, and it began to fill with galaxies, stars and giant black holes. Around 5 billion years ago, dark energy caused this cosmic expansion to rapidly accelerate. It shows no signs of stopping.

-

-   The simplest and most popular explanation for dark energy is that it is a “cosmological constant”.  It is an inflationary energy that is the same everywhere and at every moment; woven into the stretching fabric of space-time. Einstein named it “lambda” in his theory of general relativity.

-

-   As our cosmos grew, its overall matter density dropped while the dark energy density remained the same, gradually making dark energy the biggest contributor to its overall expansion.

-

-    Added together the energy densities of ordinary matter, dark matter, dark energy and energy from light set the upper speed limit of the universe's expansion. They are also key ingredients in the “Lambda cold dark matter” (Lambda-CDM) model of cosmology, which maps the growth of the cosmos and predicts its end with matter eventually spread so thin it experiences a heat death called the “Big Freeze”.

-

-   Astronomers have no clue what dark matter or dark energy are.  Most people agree that the universe's present composition is 5% ordinary, atomic matter; 25% cold, dark matter; and 70% dark energy.

-

-   But an even greater threat to Lambda-CDM has materialized: Depending on what method astrophysicists use, the universe appears to be growing at different rates.  This is a disparity known as the “Hubble tension”. And methods that peer into the early universe show it expanding significantly faster than Lambda-CDM predicts.

-

-    The “cosmic microwave background” is the universe's 'baby picture' taken by the European Space Agency's Planck satellite.  The first method to measure the universe's expansion rate looks at the “cosmic microwave background” (CMB), a relic of the universe's first light produced just 380,000 years after the Big Bang.

-

-    The imprint can be seen across the entire sky, and it was mapped to find a “Hubble constant” with less than 1% uncertainty by the European Space Agency's (ESA) Planck satellite between 2009 and 2013.  In this cosmic "baby picture," the universe is almost entirely uniform, but hotter and colder patches where matter is more or less dense reveal where baryon acoustic oscillations made it clump.

-

-   As the universe exploded outward, this soap-bubble structure ballooned into the cosmic web, a network of crisscrossing strands along whose intersections galaxies would be born.

-

-    By studying these ripples with the Planck satellite, cosmologists inferred the amounts of regular matter and dark matter and a value for the cosmological constant, or dark energy. Plugging these into the Lambda-CDM model out came a Hubble constant of roughly 46,200 mph per million light-years, or roughly 67 kilometers per second per megaparsec. (A megaparsec is 3.26 million light-years.)

-

-   If a galaxy is at a distance of one megaparsec away from us, that means it will retreat from us (and us from it) at 67 kilometers per second. At twenty megaparsecs this recession grows to 1,340 kilometers per second, and continues to grow exponentially there onward. If a galaxy is any further than 4,475 megaparsecs away, it will recede from us faster than the speed of light.

-

-    A second method to find this expansion rate uses pulsating stars called “Cepheid variables”   These are dying stars with helium-gas outer layers that grow and shrink as they absorb and release the star's radiation, making them periodically flicker like distant signal lamps.

-

-   In 1912, astronomer Henrietta Swan Leavitt found that the brighter a Cepheid was, the slower it would flicker, enabling astronomers to measure a star's absolute brightness, and therefore gauge its distance.

-

-   t was a landmark discovery that transformed Cepheids into abundant "standard candles" to measure the universe's immense scale. By stringing observations of pulsating Cepheids together, astronomers can construct cosmic distance ladders, with each rung taking them a step back into the past.

-

-   To build a distance ladder, astronomers construct the first rung by choosing nearby Cepheids and cross-checking their distance based on pulsating light to that found by geometry. The next rungs are added using Cepheid readings alone.

-

-    Then, astronomers look at the distances of the stars and supernovas on each rung and compare how much their light has been redshifted (stretched out to longer, redder wavelengths) as the universe expands.

-

-   This gives a precise measurement of the Hubble constant.   The result high expansion rate of 74 km/s/Mpc.

-

-    When JWST launched in December 2021, it was poised to either resolve the discrepancy or cement it. At 21.3 feet  wide, JWST's mirror is almost three times the size of Hubble's, which is just 7.9 feet wide. Not only can JWST detect objects 100 times fainter than Hubble can, but it is also far more sensitive in the infrared spectrum, enabling it to see in a broader range of wavelengths.

-

-    By comparing Cepheids measured by JWST in the galaxy NGC 4258 with bright Type Ia supernovas (another standard candle because they all burst at the same absolute luminosity) in remote galaxies the result arrived at a nearly identical result: 73 km/s/Mpc.

-

-   Other measurements on the rapid brightening of the most luminous "tip of the branch" red giant stars, and another with light bent by the gravity of massive galaxies came back with respective results of 69.6 and 66.6 km/s/Mpc. A separate result using the bending of light also gave a value of 73 km/s/Mpc.

-

-    The CMB temperature is measured at the level of 1% precision, and the Cepheid distance ladder measurement is getting close to 1%.  So a difference of 7 kilometers per second, even though it's not very much, is very, very unlikely to be a random chance. There is something definite to explain.

-

-    How things can be fixed is unclear. A tweak to the Lambda-CDM model that assumes dark energy (the lambda) isn't constant but instead evolves across the life of the cosmos according to unknown physics.

-

-   What should replace it?  A theory called Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND).

-

-   The theory proposes that for gravitational pulls ten trillion times smaller than those felt on Earth's surface (such as the tugs felt between distant galaxies) Newton's laws break down and must be replaced by other equations.

 

The presence near the center of the 2-billion-light-year wide underdensity of galaxies is skewing our measurements of the Hubble constant.

-

-     Cosmologists are looking for answers in a number of places. Upcoming CMB experiments, such as the CMB-S4 project at the South Pole and the Simons Observatory in Chile, are searching for clues in ultraprecise measurements of the early universe's radiation. Others will look to the dark matter maps produced by ESA's Euclid space telescope or to the future dark energy survey conducted by the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument.

-

-  Stay tunes we have more to learn.  So do you.

-

-

January 14, 2023         WEBB  BROKE  COSMOLOGY?         4316

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------                                                                                                                       

--------  Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ---

---   Some reviews are at:  --------------     http://jdetrick.blogspot.com ----- 

--  email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews

---  to:  ------    jamesdetrick@comcast.net  ------  “Jim Detrick”  -----------

--------------------- ---  Sunday, January 14, 2024  ---------------------------------

 

 

 

 

 

           

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment