-
-
-------------------- 2566 - QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT - Is it for real?
-
- Life is full of choices and choices have consequences. We make them of our own free will. Or do we?
-
- Do the laws of nature sometimes allow for things to happen at “random“? A century-old series of physics experiments still hasn’t been able to settle the question, but a new experiment has tilted the odds toward the latter by performing a quantum experiment across billions of light-years.
-
- The laws of classical physics are “deterministic“. Newton’s mathematical cosmos is a clockwork universe, where each cause has a unique effect and we are governed not by our choices but by the rigid laws of nature.
-
- “Quantum physics“, on the other hand, has a property of “fuzzy randomness“, which some scientists feel could open the door to free will. Since quantum physics lies at the heart of reality, it would seem that randomness is what determines everything. REALLY?
-
- Some scientists have argued that quantum randomness isn’t truly random. If I roll a die the outcome seems random, but it isn’t really. All of its bumps and turns are caused by the forces of gravity and the table in a complex dance, but the result is deterministic.
-
- The moment the die leaves my hand, its fate is sealed, even though I don’t know the outcome until it happens. Perhaps quantum objects behave in the same way. They seem to act in random ways, but they are really governed by some deterministic hidden variables.
-
- Some aspects of “quantum gravity” is studying how Einstein’s deterministic theory of gravity can fit together with the randomness of quantum mechanics.
-
- The question fascinated Einstein and he came up with an experiment that could test the idea. Together with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen he presented a thought experiment now known as the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen experiment.
-
- You may have heard of Schrödinger’s cat, where a quantum cat is neither alive nor dead until observed in a definite state. Like classical cats, quantum cats like quantum boxes. In the quantum realm things can be in an indefinite state until you observe them. It is impossible to know what specific something , dead or alive, is until you open the box to observation.
-
- How we measure quantum objects determines what the outcome can be. It would be as if opening the box on the side forces it to be a live cat, while opening it from the top forces it to be a dead cat. How one box is opened affects another box miles away. In quantum theory, we say that our two boxes are entangled, so that observing the content of one box also tells us something about the other.
-
- We can’t do this experiment with cats but we can do it with light. Two entangled photons can be sent in opposite directions. The polarity orientation of one photon at random, you measure the other, and then we compare our results. There are lots of different orientations we would measure, so we can each choose the orientation we want.
-
- When this experiment is done in the lab, it actually works. If our measurements are random, there is no way for the photons to know ahead of time which orientation will be measured. So, there can’t be any hidden variable to determine the outcome. Whether we get the dead cart or the live cat the result is truly random.
-
- This is the heart of why Einstein referred to entanglement as “spooky action at a distance.” It’s spooky because entangled objects have a quantum connection, even if they are light-years apart, or just separated between here and on the Moon.
-
- A measurement on one object is a measurement on both through this spooky entanglement. But it’s only spooky if the measurement we make is random. If it’s not random, then no spooky connection is necessary to explain the results.
-
- This is known as the “freedom of choice” loophole. Experiments are done in a lab, and even though the choice of how to measure the photons seems random, if there’s no free will then the observation we make was determined by earlier conditions.
-
- Since it takes time to set up the experiment in a lab, it’s possible that there are small interactions that could let the quantum system know ahead of time what measurement will be done. Maybe the experiment, the scientists and the lab are all entangled in such a way that the outcome isn’t truly random, so the quantum objects can game the outcome.
-
- To get around the loophole, you have to deal with the speed of light. It’s often said that nothing can travel faster than the speed of light, but it’s really information that can’t travel faster than light. We can send each other text messages, but never faster than the time it takes for light to travel between us.
-
- In a small lab, light has plenty of time to travel back and forth across the room while the experiment is being set up, so perhaps small bits of information bias the “random” aspect of experiment before it’s even done. That doesn’t seem very likely, but a new experiment has overcome this problem. Rather than using a random number generator in the lab to decide which photon measurement to make, the experimenters used “quasars“.
-
- Quasars are brilliant beacons of light powered by supermassive black holes in the centers of distant galaxies. Random fluctuations in the light from quasars determine how the photons were measured. Since the light from a quasar has to travel for billions of years to reach us, the fluctuations in brightness happened billions of years before the experiment was done. This is billions of years before humans even walked the Earth. So, there is absolutely no way for it to be entangled with the experiment.
-
- The result was just what quantum theory predicts. It looks like there really are no deterministic hidden variables, and randomness is still possible throughout the cosmos.
-
- Of course, randomness isn’t the only thing necessary for free will. But it does mean that your fate is not necessarily sealed. Maybe, just maybe, the choice was yours after all.
-
- 2503 -To learn more of the math that is used in this experiment see Review 2503.
-.
- 2502 - how the universe entangled in property pairs defies all reason?
-
- 2501 - how quantum entanglement is faster than the speed of light? This Review gives the history of these discoveries.
-
- 2500 - we can not explain the quantum world?
-
- 2211 - macro - micro extremes.
-
- 2208 - quantum entanglement.
-
- 1957 - weird science.
-
- 1950 - new mysteries in science.
-
- 1838 - where is the missing link between quantum mechanics and general relativity?
-
- 1828 - is the entire universe a space-time interconnected fabric?
-
- 1801 - what are wormholes?
-
- 1949 - how quantum computers will change cryptography?
-
- 1818 - how quantum computing will change your life?
-
- 1733 - quantum dots and valleytronics?
-
- 1457 - quantum dots are a 10 nanometer window.
-
- December 26, 2019 2566
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----- Comments appreciated and Pass it on to whomever is interested. ----
--- Some reviews are at: -------------- http://jdetrick.blogspot.com -----
-- email feedback, corrections, request for copies or Index of all reviews
--- to: ------ jamesdetrick@comcast.net ------ “Jim Detrick” -----------
- https://plus.google.com/u/0/ -- www.facebook.com -- www.twitter.com
--------------------- Friday, December 27, 2019 --------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No comments:
Post a Comment